There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

AstroGnomeical ,

How do you boycott a company you already weren’t buying anything from?

LostXOR ,

Go there every day and ask for a water. It's free, but you're costing them a tiny amount each time.

Quill7513 ,

Oh I was gonna recommend arson. Maybe your plan is better

nolefan33 ,

Your plan is certainly quicker, which is an upside.

SpaceNoodle ,

Well you gotta use up all their water first

surewhynotlem ,

Free water, arson, bricks, and bullhorns. With these four powers combined, I am… Captain Protest!

Imgonnatrythis ,

Use the bathroom and flush four times!

Kalkaline ,
@Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

Also grab something on the way out and don’t pay for it.

Know_not_Scotty_does ,

Take their coffee grounds for compost?

Dadifer ,

You mean pickett?

null ,

Shoplift?

ArmoredThirteen ,

Bricks are cheap

DragonTypeWyvern ,

Molotovs.

wabafee ,
@wabafee@lemmy.world avatar

Cockroaches + Starbucks product + video

lemmus ,
@lemmus@lemmy.world avatar

The sooner we destroy all private jets the better.

zcd ,

*private jet owners

T00l_shed ,

Both?

Arcanum ,

…To shreds you say?

abfarid ,
@abfarid@startrek.website avatar

I’m sure that private (meaning small) jets can have valid use cases, it’s the abuse by the rich that is the problem.

dexa_scantron ,
@dexa_scantron@lemmy.world avatar

“Private” doesn’t mean “small”. It means “privately owned”, which means by a rich person.

abfarid ,
@abfarid@startrek.website avatar

Even if we are talking about specifically jets that are owned privately, they could have legit use cases. It’s the abuse that is the issue. I agree with the whole “eat the rich” sentiment, but that’s a separate issue. In the system where rich people exist, the problem is abuse.

barsquid ,

I vote for we start destroying the private jets without reservation and if we encounter a legitimate use case we’ll deal with it at that time.

abfarid ,
@abfarid@startrek.website avatar

But that won’t solve anything. That’s like treating diabetes by drinking diet soda.

Mouselemming ,

Many could be refitted for worthy uses like fighting wildfires and transporting patients

brbposting ,

Legit use cases… Make A Wish comes to mind, but maybe that’d be a corporate jet or not a traditionally-private jet.

Any exemptions for sports teams or anything? VIPs whose lives are at risk through no real fault of their own…

Lost_My_Mind ,

So, you’re going to continue to increase climate change, rather than just using a zoom call. GOD DAMN CEOS!!! Why the hell is return to office so important to you assholes??? Just do a god damned video call!

CaptDust ,

Have you considered the culture ?? Hmmm???

Milksteaks ,

Yeah the cubicle farm that smells like farts and microwaved fish is integral to a good days work!

topherp ,

Cubicles? You mean open plan office space for better collaboration!

Karyoplasma ,

Self-preservation. If they stay at home for too long, they’ll get sued for domestic violence.

ashok36 ,

A zoom call has the possibility of being recorded. I’m 90% sure at this point all these execs insist on in person meetings is so they can plan and discuss illegal and unethical shit without worry.

I’m only in middle management and I know I feel the difference in the way I talk about things on zoom calls VS in person.

Blackout ,

Next time Starbucks does a greenwashing campaign just think of this asshole drinking champagne while commuting on a private jet.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Real “Meetings that could have been Emails” energy on this executive level decision.

Honestly, doing the big Star Wars Emperor hologram head would have made this guy look less evil.

painfulasterisk1 ,

I’m sorry, if you aren’t willing to relocate, you are not a good fit for the company.

I heard this in a job interview and the position was disclosed as remote.

bacon_saber ,
mavu ,

Calling it “supercommute” is such a stupid thing. It should be called “stupidcommute” or maybe “commoronute”.

Mr_Blott ,

Cuntycommuting

There ya go

subignition ,
@subignition@fedia.io avatar

The fucker should fly business class with everybody else

SpaceNoodle ,

Economy.

Death_Equity ,

Steerage

asexualchangeling ,

Wing

inb4_FoundTheVegan ,
@inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world avatar

Niccol can live in his home in Newport Beach, California and commute to Starbucks’ head office 1,000 miles away on a corporate jet

Replace all the Taylor Swift memes with this fucking guy.

DampSquid ,

We can do both, let’s not forget that Taylor Swift is a garbage person too!

hydroptic ,

Taylor Swift is the liberals’ emotional support billionaire

AshMan85 ,

Eat the rich

midnight_puker ,
@midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works avatar

I keep my cutlery sharp in preparation.

kfchan ,

Bro should one way supercommute into the sun

demizerone ,

I have to dry my clothes between 12am and 3pm and this m’fer gets to fly a jet to work. Private jets along with luxury yachts are things humanity shouldn’t have.

tacticalsugar ,

Remember kids, climate change is your fault specifically, and only you can make things better by making your own life harder!

lolola ,
@lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Gosh. Thinking about all the time I wasted on the damn bus today made this sting more than usual.

Imgonnatrythis ,

I stopped using plastic straws at Starbucks. If enough of you join me we can compensate for an entire weeks worth of the carbon footprint of this very important man.

NeptuneOrbit ,

Don’t worry, he probably has some arrangement to only go like once. A month.

lilbirddog ,

Try once a week! He will have to be in Seattle three days a week to conform to Starbucks’ remote/hybrid work policy.

subignition ,
@subignition@fedia.io avatar

Per the article, he's required to be onsite 3 days a week

In the offer letter, Starbucks also notes that it will set up a remote office for Niccol in Newport Beach along with an assistant of his choosing.
When he is not traveling for work, however, Niccol will still be expected to work from the Seattle office at least three days a week in alignment with Starbucks’ hybrid work policies, a company spokesperson tells CNBC Make It.

jonne ,

That’s some ridiculous micro management of a CEO. Didn’t expect to see that in a contract for someone at that level.

subignition ,
@subignition@fedia.io avatar

It seems more like he isn't an exception to the hybrid work policy that applies to everyone else. Although it notes "when not traveling for work", so chances are he'll be flying all over the place anyway for unnecessary meetings and schmoozing sessions. Or whatever else a CEO can't do remotely

Riven ,
@Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Also what are the odds they’re gonna be paying for all the flights.

SpaceNoodle ,

A “remote office” in his backyard, no doubt.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines