There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

nkat2112 ,
@nkat2112@sh.itjust.works avatar

Stone: The lights are on, but no one’s home.

jordanlund ,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

I’m not going to advocate violence for this guy, but can we bring back the pillory or something? Him and Steve Bannon both.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillory

Zahille7 ,

I wouldn’t call locking them in a kneeled position while people throw rotten food at them “violent,” necessarily.

But I’d love to see it happen anyway.

jaybone ,

Once they are already in the position it wouldn’t be too hard to move them to the guillotine.

prole ,

Unfortunately, Roger Stone would probably get off on it.

TransplantedSconie ,

How would he know? Trump isn’t supposed to talk with felons.

PunnyName ,

Get those mirrors out of his living spaces.

Viking_Hippie , (edited )

That’s only if he gets away with probation. Due to him talking with felons all day every day and the fact that he’s publicly shown ALL of the contempt (in both the colloquial and legal sense of the word) of the court and continues to do so, that’s unlikely in spite of the kid gloves he’s being treated with.

My guess is he gets community service and I hope it involves picking up thrash while wearing a jumpsuit that matches his skin.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

I can’t wait for Fox News. “PRESIDENT TRUMP is picking up trash! He has to bend down and PICK UP TRASH! He is being treated more unfairly than ANY AMERICAN has EVER BEEN TREATED in the HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY!”

Censored ,

I hate to burst your bubble, but Trump’s not going to be picking up trash. He will either get house arrest, or community service. Community service will likely consist of recording public service announcements. This is how celebrities are typically treated.

His security is actually a valid concern for the court, which must be considered. It’s impossible to guarantee his security while picking up trash on the side of the highway - since anyone could stop and shoot. Likewise, it is impossible to guarantee his security in prison without solitary confinement.

Of course, it is possible that one day he may get to run his own prison like Pablo Escobar, but I think house arrest is more likely. He’ll love it. Sitting on his ass in Mar a Lago, doing virtual campaign events, watching the news and shitposting all day.

WhatYouNeed ,

Solidarity confinement sounds good.

No access to a mobile phone or another person forced to listen to him moan, would drive him absolutely bonkers.

0110010001100010 ,
@0110010001100010@lemmy.world avatar

Of course the orange turd is going to challenge it, this shouldn’t surprise anyone. He wasn’t even given a slap on the wrist for inciting a mob to try to overthrow the government. Why wouldn’t he try again?

Stone is just a useful idiot which also shouldn’t surprise anyone.

D1G17AL ,

I don't know if anyone else has pointed this out, in this photo especially, Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

Viking_Hippie ,

Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

Who is himself a caricature of an old and evil rich man. If the shoe fits…

Btw, remember when he showed up to the inauguration looking like a literal Batman villain?

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7ae57ae3-4045-42d3-b6f4-8dd1e36c6078.jpeg

havocpants ,

wow, posh spice let herself go

ImADifferentBird ,
@ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

IIRC, Mr. Burns was meant to be a caricature of specifically Rupert Murdoch.

octopus_ink ,

I say if Ebeneezer Scrooge were a real person and alive today, that is exactly what he would look like.

Xaphanos ,

I get fundraising texts occasionally. I don’t know why. But the one that came on the heels of the conviction had a section of fine print declaring what the money was for. It included a “recount challenge fund”. This is in the open.

242 ,

Well, given how broke the Republican Party is they’re probably still paying off the lawyers from their failed challenges from 2020. But they’re also planning on doing it again.

SwingingTheLamp , (edited )

Why aren’t these guys in jail? Seriously. I mean, I know the theory of the rule of law and all, but even our widely-acclaimed greatest president suspended habeas corpus when insurgent seditionists tried to overthrow the Union.

RestrictedAccount ,

I suspect that this is extremely dry humor, but for others that read this, Trump pardoned both Bannon and Stone

CraigeryTheKid ,

it’s still unfathomable that trump was “allowed” (I know it was “legal”, don’t point that out) to pardon his literal partners-in-crime. He basically has already self-pardoned himself by proxy by allowing these traitors to walk free.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Ford pardoned Nixon.

Bush Jr pardoned Scooter Libby.

Governor Abbott pardoned a pedophile for shooting a black girl’s white boyfriend

Why is this even remotely surprising?

ASeriesOfPoorChoices ,

the difference being that ford wasn’t involved in Nixon’s taping. etc. etc.

this is direct involvement, which makes it stink more.

disguy_ovahea ,

The only restrictions on presidential pardons are on convicted impeachment and the requirement that it must be a federal crime. Yes, Trump can even pardon himself from the federal documents, insurrection, and election fraud cases if he takes office again.

constitution.congress.gov/…/ALDE_00013316/

takeda ,

We should never have allowed a pardon before a conviction. What Ford did for Nixon created all kinds of paradoxes.

disguy_ovahea ,

Carter did it with draft dodgers too, but I agree.

frunch ,

Well that balances the damage lol

takeda ,

We messed up when we allowed Ford’s pardon of Nixon before he was convicted. We should only allow pardons after the person was convicted. That created all kinds of paradoxes:

  • creating a blanket pardon "from any crime that we don’t know yet about"
  • possible pocket pardon, where a president could pardon themselves secretly
  • hiring thugs on president benefit and giving pardon right before leaving office. They know they can do anything and will receive a blanket pardon. If president had to wait for conviction then there was no guarantee he would be there to pardon them. So it would make whole escapade more risky
  • total immunity which trump is arguing about would be even less likely if there was no blanket and pocket pardon and he had to wait until being convicted before being able to be pardoned
SwingingTheLamp ,

I’m not sure if I’m joking. In any case, the writ of habeas corpus is the legal tool that a court can theoretically use to compel the appearance of a prisoner before it. It is the legal doctrine that underlies the right to trial, and I say “theoretically” because courts rarely need to issue one; it’s just standard procedure to bring people to court to face charges.

By suspending it, Abraham Lincoln could detain those people he deemed dangerous seditionists indefinitely, because the detainees would have to go to court to challenge their detention, and there was no way to get to court. The effect of suspending it again is that it wouldn’t matter that Baboon (autocorrect and I’m leaving it) and Stone were pardoned, or that there were even criminal charges.

Lincoln did it, George W. Bush did it. Barack Obama did it. The Constitution contains a clause which allows it to be suspended due to rebellion or threats to public safety. It’s a dangerous thing to allow a president to do, but the MAGA danger might be greater.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Worth noting that, historically speaking, if a state official wanted to punish someone without going through the court system he could always just turn the prisoner over to a lynch mob.

So while suspending habeaus corpus is a danger to democracy, it is not a singular method by which mayors, governors, or Presidents have disposed of political opponents.

Tryptaminev ,

In other words the US is neither a state of law nor is it a democracy as separation of power can be overturned whenever the president feels like it.

Censored ,

Emergency powers are in most constitutions because people generally understand that during war things have to operate a little differently. You can’t allow the enemy, who is attacking you physically, to go and publish propaganda that attacks you rhetorically and turns the populace’s loyalty towards the other side. The problem we have now is the constant use of emergency powers. That needs to be shut down. Emergency powers should be limited to a certain timeframe, and reviewed by congress after that. Not these multi decade states of emergency.

Serinus ,

I have to say, “you’ve been unpardoned” would be a great line.

evatronic ,

Because Trump pardoned him.

npr.org/…/trump-pardons-roger-stone-paul-manafort…

SwingingTheLamp ,

As in my other reply, the Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus in cases of rebellion or threats to public safety, and without that writ, charges and sentences are irrelevant.

rsuri ,

The Supreme Court has held that the Constitution contains a right to habeas corpus in Boumedine v. Bush. The Lincoln thing was never fully litigated and was probably unconstitutional.

hglman ,

The Constitution doesn’t empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.

rsuri ,

Well that’s an even older decision:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States. Decided in 1803, Marbury is regarded as the single most important decision in American constitutional law.

hglman ,

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

Burn_The_Right ,

Throughout human history, laws have never stopped conservatism. Jails have never stopped conservatism. Pacifism has never stopped conservatism. Only force has ever stopped conservatism. Only force.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Careful or you’ll get called a tankie

Pips ,

Tankies are literal authoritarians. People say they’re “authoritarian communists,” which ignores they’re mostly Maoists or Stalinists, both of whom were closer to fascism than the left. It sort of ignores the basic premise of communism or even socialism to have a single authoritarian ruler. Kind of like how the Nazis called themselves socialists. I guess they were a workers’ party to start, but I don’t think you can reasonably conflate their ideology with the tenets of socialism.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

That’s certainly a take

Tryptaminev ,

The Nazis only used the label socialists to deceive the working class. They said so plenty of times when meeting with the industrialists whose bidding they were doing. They never were a workers party and they knew that it was only in name to be more palatable. This deception now has been replaced with “owning the libs” and whatever the local version of neoliberal, conservative or fascist ideology you have around the world.

novibe ,

What’s Stalinism 🤔

explodicle ,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism

novibe ,

I was being pedantic. There is no such thing as Stalinism, that article is a joke. Stalin was just a Marxist Leninist.

nyctre ,

No, you don’t understand. The problem is that those people haven’t had enough time to bring upon real communism. Real communism hasn’t been reached yet. They want to let the Maos and Stalins of the world have enough time to reach communism. Things will surely be different with the next guy.

Dkarma ,

Trump is just Stalin and mai with less power.

There is no difference between authoritarianism at either end of the spectrum.

The issue with authoritarianism isn’t “communism or fascism” it’s a symptom of shitty PEOPLE NOT TYPE OF GOVERNMENT.

STalin wasn’t a shithead BECAUSE he was commumist, but in spite of it.

barsquid ,

People get called that when they’re pretending to be far left while urging everyone to take the exact actions the Repubs want them to take.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Is this code for “people who aren’t voting for Joe Biden”?

barsquid ,

It’s code for “antifascist” “leftists” who are urging people to do the exact same things that the Republican party wants them to do.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

urging people to do the exact same things

Specifically, which things?

barsquid ,

If you’re upset about being called a tankie, you could cross-reference what you are urging people to do with what the Republican party wants people to do. And then stop that.

In general I would recommend being antifascist in a way that isn’t the exact same actions as overt fascism with the only difference being the rhetoric justifying the actions.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

What am I urging people to do?

barsquid ,

Fuck if I know. You’re whining about being called a tankie. I can explain why that happens in general. You’ll have to figure the rest out on your own. Maybe if you do some reading and educate yourself you can get there.

Censored ,

Tankie is the pro-authoritarian left. The Stalinists essentially. The ones who think it’s appropriate to send in the tanks to quell a socialist or communist uprising because it has a tint of democracy in it, which may cause their strong leader to lose dictatorial power.

beetlejuice0001 ,

Funny thing is, in all my life I’ve never met anyone on the left that was pro authoritarian. Seems like a made up faux news boogeyman

dogslayeggs ,

It depends on whether you consider PRC and Stalin “left.” There are plenty of their supporters out on the internet.

beetlejuice0001 ,

My point stands

pyre ,

that would be people who are essentially voting for trump, so yeah, why not.

RememberTheApollo_ ,

Tankies these days are conservatives wrapped in an authoritarian shell. Instead of just being supportive of their own authoritarian government they try to destabilize other governments for their gain.

Censored ,

That’s not what being a tankie is lol

Censored ,

Roger Stone’s been to jail a number of times. He really doesn’t care because he knows he’ll get pardoned. Also he’s basically a mafia don, so I imagine he gets a lot of respect in prison from republicans.

beetlejuice0001 , (edited )

In what capacity does he resemble the mafia? He’s a snake. These guys want to desperately be associated with the mafia but they’re just con men. The Mafia were intelligent criminals.

Everyone needs to remember this guy shaking hands with world leaders during his years in office. In every single picture he is smiling like a pig in shit. It is only after the indictment photo he is attempting to rebrand himself as some sort of tough guy criminal instead of a slimy, smug con artist.

takeda ,

He was going to face a trial and likely prison, but trump pardoned him and the rest.

Prandom_returns ,

Huh? Why would anyone with power go to jail in an oligarchy? Unless you upset the more powerful oligarch.

RagingSnarkasm ,

Also caught on tape: “Pardon me.”

BigMacHole ,

I’m a Republican that does their own Research and even though the election hasn’t happened yet I ALREADY KNOW TRUMP LOST UNFAIRLY because of Sleepy Joe Biden being UNFAIR!

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

This is exactly how I feel so your comment is one hundred percent correct.

Dkarma ,

What’s the name of your face book research group?

JoeBigelow ,
@JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca avatar

My emotions validate my worldview!

ALoafOfBread ,

That thumbnail is terrifying. Genuinely thought it was a dude wearing a roger stone mask wtf

some_guy ,

“That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have a more honest election.”

Fixed it: “That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have the appearance of a more honest election.”

Stone noted during the conversation that the Trump campaign is attempting to change state voting laws and plans to immediately file a number of lawsuits seeking to change the results should the former president lose again, as Trump allies did in Michigan and several other states in 2020.

This is looking grim. We might have to actually fight on this one. Sigh…

Gradually_Adjusting , (edited )
@Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world avatar

It’s the newest ARG, a Get Out / The Purge crossover where half the population pretends laws don’t exist and the other half has to try to keep their democratic institutions! Hijinks will ensue in this surreal tragicomedy Asshole Reality Game, brought to you by Koch Brothers ©!

hglman ,

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

brbposting ,

https://files.catbox.moe/w5oxwo.gif

Yeah it was bad (full video also out there)

MeekerThanBeaker ,

If there were a cartoon definition of slimeball, this would be included.

barsquid ,

Like a cocaine-themed Batman villain.

Zahille7 ,

Jesus fuck and I thought don jr. had a coke problem… This dude’s whole body is bouncing all over the place with every word he says.

tgxn ,
@tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net avatar

This was 4 years ago?

Varyk ,

I wonder if they’re actually dumb enough to try the false electors scheme twice in a row?

They got caught are being convicted right now for doing it in 2020, and everybody is expecting it now.

Maggoty ,

If it works then you get to convict the other side for being fake.

Varyk ,

Sure. But there are less idiotic and more effective ways to try to seize power.

Literally forging documents and sending them in two institutions that verify documents is pretty dumb.

Resulting in legal consequences already.

Maggoty ,

You’re still assuming those bodies operate in good faith. Democrats must win the house and senate to ensure that.

Varyk ,

Nope, I’m not assuming these bodies operate in good faith.

I’m taking what happened before into account and the outrage and legal culpability for a large scale, lazy conspiracy, and making a prediction based on that.

m13 ,

Whatever the result they’re going to keep trying again. Why wouldn’t they when there are virtually no consequences? Fascists don’t give a damn about what election results say, they’re always going to try to gain power by any means necessary.

Varyk ,

Well that’s what I mean.

There are so far very severe consequences. Lawyers have been disbarred, dozens of people have been charged, the trials are ongoing right now and more charges are occurring from more agencies. there are a whole lot of legal consequences which is why i am wondering if they’re going to do it again.

They don’t care about election results, but they do care about legal consequences.

Censored ,

They only care about the legal consequences that affect THEM. There’s always another idiot lawyer ready to get disbarred.

Varyk ,

Right, that’s the nice part about legal consequences for them. They care about those legal consequences.

eestileib ,

The trials are being sandbagged by republican judges, nobody is actually getting punished for trying to steal the election. They’re gonna do it again.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Uh… If you don’t want your election stolen, you, uh, you gotta vote. Vote so hard they can’t steal it. Make your friends vote. Make your friends’ friends vote.

Because if we don’t win this year, we don’t get to have any more elections. No more voting. We’re getting rid of it because your don’t vote good.

joostjakob ,

I’m pretty sure they’ll do increasingly farcical votes for some time after.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

That’s basically Texas and Florida right now

shottymcb ,

You sound like a MAGA moron. Also encouraging people not to vote, and encouraging people to not vote for Biden elsewhere in the thread. Sus.

eestileib ,

I, uh, have voted in every election I’ve been eligible to vote in.

Varyk ,

That’s happening more with The classified documents case, not with the fake electors.

Good news, The fake elector charges and trials are actually going through without a hitch, have a lot of defendants informing on co-defendants. Several defendants have already pled guilty, participants are being arrested, more charges are coming, there’s actually a lot going on with this case.

Censored ,

But who is the defendant in the fake electors trial? This isn’t one where Trump himself is on the docket, right?

Varyk ,

It would be strange if he wasn’t eventually charged since he was definitely part of the plot.

This is a case that goes across eight states with dozens of defendants, some have already pled guilty, many are working with the prosecutors to provide testimony against peer and higher co-defendants.

Trump hasn’t been charged yet, but people are still getting charged for the fake electors scheme every month, and since he was on the phone with these people convincing them to forge and mail in the documents, I can’t see why he wouldn’t be charged.

It’s being investigated right now as to how to charge Trump, since he was personally involved in this scheme.

He’ll probably be one of the last people charged.

Especially now that he was already convicted once and it isn’t taboo or anything to charge him with felonies.

There are so many defendants, this was such a huge conspiracy that most of the trial still haven’t started, and several defendants haven’t been arraigned.

But it’s going forward!

eestileib ,

What about the one in DC run by Judge Chutkan that’s on indefinite hold thanks to the Supreme Court?

What about the one in Georgia that is on indefinite hold thanks to the Georgia Supreme Court?

Those seem pretty hitched to me.

Varyk ,

As far as I’m aware, the supreme Court we’re not indefinite.

The supreme Court is a piece of s*** don’t get me wrong, but I’m pretty sure that trial is still going on.

And Trump’s lawyer admitted that “private acts of a sitting president are not entitled to immunity”.

Yeah, so that’s going well.

Georgia, that one is currently on hold, but it doesn’t negate all of the other ongoing cases against him and none of the charges are going away.

Scotty_Trees ,
@Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world avatar

They will. And they’ll take it to the Supreme Court, where <checks notes> they’ll just install Trump as the winner of the election. Mark my words.

Varyk ,

Humbug. I take cynicism lightly.

They didn’t get past mailing in the forged documents last time, and they have a worse chance this time.

They’d have to do something different, like state legislatures passing laws that say they don’t have to listen to appointed electors.

That’s already failed, but that’s the tack I think they’ll try to refine, since they’re approaching it so poorly right now and direct forgeries don’t work

Asafum ,

I would think that failure just exposes points of improvement. They failed before, but now they know how to succeed. :(

Varyk ,

I think that’s just distant fatalism.

It’s not like they can forge the documents better this time.

They’ll have to try completely different, like changing State legislatures to somehow ignore election results or claim that the state can use their own electors.

Most of the people who forged the documents or participated in the conspiracy the last time are going to be pretty busy in trial or testifying in trials.

Dozens of people, anyone significantly involved in the fake electors scheme is facing charges or will be facing charges soon, many of them have already pled guilty.

Asafum ,

I hope you’re right!

HubertManne ,

yeah. I doubt they would do that unless there was a precedence set for a court to determine a presidential election.

stringere ,

There is. Bush v Gore

Censored ,

That was technically a procedure to allow or disallow a recount of a specific vote in a specific district in Florida. And yes, the Supreme Court will be ruling on those again.

Natanael ,

Gore vs Bush…

HubertManne ,

them? double down?! surely not.

Censored ,

Who is being convicted? It sounds like nobody’s been convicted yet, so they’re wiling to try it again. Also who cares if some false elector goes to jail? Not Trump. Not the dirty ratfucker.

Varyk ,

Well, as a personal conspirator in this game, dumps is certainly liable.

He’s been indicted in Georgia. And by the doj, so dumps will have to fight those charges of conspiracy.

This is such a huge case investigated by so many agencies that everyone isn’t even charged yet 4 years later.

So the convictions will take time, but at least eight people, including chesebro and other planning-level agents, have actively been working with every investigation testify to the involvement of the others.

The trials and convictions are still ongoing, but a few trials have finished.

I only know about the ones that have pled guilty and are informing on others. But none of this is halted or not happening, it’s just that the trials and sentencing are still going on.

rayyy ,

They are dumb enough to try a bunch of other stuff, including violence, again though.

chiliedogg ,

No. Instead they’re gonna have state legislature throw out the results of the election. Which they can probably do, Constitutionally-speaking.

The State legislature pick the electors. Just because they all use a popular vote to do it doesn’t mean they can’t change the law in between the voting in November and the actual election in December.

Varyk ,

Ha, I’ve answered that two or three times to other people here!

I agree that changing or interpreting the law to pick stricty conservative electors is their next strategy， but I don’t think it’s going to be as simple or successful as they imagine.

Sort of like how they didn’t realize sending in forged documents was very likely to fail.

chiliedogg ,

Forged documents are illegal. Changing laws regarding how electors are selected isn’t.

Heck - way back in 2000 the Supreme Court hinted at the tactic in the majority opinion in Bush v Gore, saying that the Florida legislature probably could have just selected electors directly after the vote.

Varyk ,

Actually, a lot of the fake electors tried to use the defense that there’s no specific law against fake elector documents.

Colorado just signed a law that says fake electors are illegal.

Landscape’s a lot turnier then it looks

alarratt ,

I am shocked… SHOCKED I tell you!

PsyDoctah9Jah ,
@PsyDoctah9Jah@lemmy.world avatar

The “person” doesn’t look human at all…

funkless_eck ,

haunted vent dummy

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •