There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive ads

  • Google is transitioning Chrome’s extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the V3.
  • This means users won’t be able to use uBlock Origin to block ads on Google Chrome.
  • However, there’s a new iteration of the app — uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.
spaghettiwestern ,

Susceptible to intrusive ads and viruses.

My Windows computer was infected more than once by virus spreading ads on legitimate websites. The site owners denied any responsibility for the viruses saying it was the fault and responsibility of the ad companies. Never again.

Telorand ,

The site owners are correct. And if the ad companies can’t be bothered to vet their ads, I can’t be bothered to look at them.

systemglitch ,

13 years ago I got a virus from a justin.tv ad. That was the last time you ever allowed an ad on my machine.

ElectricAirship ,
@ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Not trying to troll or anything, but what can Chrome do that Firefox cannot?

I’ve always felt like Firefox has more useful features like screenshotting, etc.

RubberElectrons ,
@RubberElectrons@lemmy.world avatar

Even if it didn’t have superior functionality, I’d still support & use firefox over chrome just because I don’t care how fast the sports car is: if it’s not going where I tell it to, I ain’t gettin’ in.

PassingThrough ,

I only break out Chrome(or Edge) for two reasons:

One is access to serial ports to flash ESP devices, or update the firmware on my XR glasses. Firefox can’t do that.

The other is to automate Twitch drop collection. The addon I found to reload broken streams and collect drops while I’m at work only has a Chrome version.

CameronDev ,

I really hope ff gets WebSerial support.

billiam0202 ,

The addon I found to reload broken streams and collect drops while I’m at work only has a Chrome version.

The question is, is it gonna have a Manifest V3 version?

PassingThrough ,

Looking at it, seems not. Google store page says it doesn’t follow best practices and may soon no longer be supported. AFAIK it’s a single dev hobby project so this might be the end of it. Ah well. I’ll just no longer have as many free skins for games.

billiam0202 ,

I’ll just no longer have as many free skins for games.

Yeah, that FOMO is a bitch. I had to break myself of obsessively clicking for drops for games I don’t own or haven’t been playing.

bokherif ,

Some websites intentionally break Firefox for some reason. I’ve had numerous issues on Firefox which were resolved by switching to Chrome. These could potentially be fixed by a User-Agent string change, but instead of dealing with it I switched to a Chromium based browser.

Scrollone ,

What if we stop using User-Agent altogether? It would increase privacy and prevent browser discrimination. Too bad for the Analytics services, but after all… who cares?

_____ ,

Ding ding. This header is bullshit and only exists to exploit users.

greenskye ,

Last time I checked: tab groups. Yes there are extensions for it, but all the ones I tried were either really over complicated or buggy. Chrome tab groups are pretty simple and seamless to use.

But I’m going to have to figure something out because I’d rather lose tab groups than ad blocking, so I’ll have to switch to something.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Didn’t know about those in Chrome. Sounds good, though I’ve always just grouped my Firefox tabs by having a browser window of tabs per logical group

jh34 ,
@jh34@lemmy.world avatar

Waterfox has a native sidebar/vertical tab feature along with container tabs that might fill your tab group needs (I stopped using chrome before they added tab groups so I watched a 4m video on them and seems like you could get all the features and more out of the sidebar).

amorpheus ,

To be honest, the Lite version is working well enough for me right now that I don’t feel like I need to switch.

ahal ,

Firefox native tab groups are coming soon!

OfficerBribe ,

Another thing that comes in mind is native PWA support. Currently you need an extension.

TwoBeeSan ,

My work has edge and chrome. Everything else locked.

Will be seeing ads at work now. Cool.

mindlight ,

If you want to avoid ads it might be a good idea to not use products from a company which primary goal is to make money on ads…

But hey, what do I know…

fine_sandy_bottom ,

This is as good a place as any to challenge firefox users: what are you doing to support the project?

Using their software doesn’t support them, unless you search with Google and I doubt many users reading this do.

Mozilla may be deserving of criticism, but criticism alone does not support them.

I fear that one day we will lose firefox.

ikidd ,
@ikidd@lemmy.world avatar

What’s even worse is every time someone mentions Firefox, some chucklefuck has to go hardcore negative on everything Mozilla does that is 1/10th as shitty as Google. Just shut your piehole if you don’t like the only somewhat private open source browser.

Chozo ,

Let's be honest, Mozilla is only 1/10 as shitty as Google because they're 1/100 the size. If they had the resources, they'd be just as awful. They've already shown us how awful they can be at their current size, I can't imagine how bad they'd be if they were at Google's scale. Firing your employees and giving your execs bonuses is 100% a Google-like move, and the only reason they stopped at a few hundred employees was because they didn't have more to give.

Just because they make a good open source product doesn't make them immune from criticism.

2xsaiko ,
@2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

You severely underestimate how shitty Google is. I highly doubt Mozilla would try to pull shit like Web Integrity or making their sites work worse on competitor browsers on purpose even if they were as large as Google. (Though, maybe to become as large as Google they would have to start doing this kind of shit so you might be right in some way.)

riquisimo ,

Soooo you’re saying I should donate to the Mozilla foundation?

BakedCatboy ,

I pay for Mozilla VPN and relay throwaway email addresses. And I seldom use either it’s basically just a donation.

tibi ,

My biggest worry about Mozilla is that most of their revenue comes from Google. What’s stopping Google from demanding that Mozilla does certain things to Firefox, like forcing them to reduce the ad blocking capabilities, just like Chrome?

fine_sandy_bottom ,

I think that specific concern is unfounded, but it’s obviously problematic that their revenue fines from Google.

That said, everyone has been trying to find an alternative for the last decade, yet here we are.

Omgboom ,

Susceptible to malware even

megabat ,

I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that even the United States FBI recommended using ad blocking extensions to protect yourself online.

www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221

BobGnarley , (edited )

I always wondered about this and how all the ad blocking apps have complete access to every webpage you visit.

Also to add to this, its made a little weirder considering ad blocking makes you more susceptible to fingerprinting.

Hexbatch ,

Yea, that is what gets me too, when I look at the blockers to use; Ad blockers have access to all keystrokes, forms and pages. They have access to my banking and other codes when I use them .

While I am sure the more popular blockers do not abuse this, and the code most likely checked line by line. It’s still possible for a handful of mistakes to allow supply chain attacks or a dozen other things to happen.

It worries me, so I don’t use them as extension and use security elsewhere

Kethal ,

I used Firefox when it first came out. Google and Mozzila got into a hot race to make the best browser and they both did well. Somehow I ended up using Chrome a lot more even though I thought that by the time the race ended they were pretty even. Both were very fast and had great plugin libraries. Chrome looked nicer out of the box, but Firefox is highly customizable. Since the end of that race, Chrome has gotten worse and Firefox is about the same. I’ve switched back fully to Firefox, and the only thing I miss is the “Piss off publisher frames” plugin, that I haven’t found a replacement for. It’s a nice browser.

fine_sandy_bottom ,

I switched to chrome for several years. Back then I was using Gmail and google docs et cetera. I naively thought Google were the good guys.

At that time the chrome ui was better. As an example, Firefox still had a separate search bar and address bar, although you could search in the address bar if you wished.

More recently I think the “nice ui” thing has tipped back towards Firefox. Chrome seems to have evolved some extra buttons.

Kethal ,

Yeah, it’s ironic that one of Google’s selling points was that Chrome didn’t have a lot of clutter. It’s even where the name comes from. Now it looks messy. It’s no Microsoft product yet, but it’s definitely one of the ways it used to be better.

billiam0202 ,

As an example, Firefox still had a separate search bar and address bar, although you could search in the address bar if you wished.

The advantages of that was you could set the URL bar and search bar to different search engines. I would do a Google search with the URL bar while keeping the search bar set to Wikipedia. Eventually this feature was removed, and then the search bar itself (since there was no reason to search from the URL bar and a dedicated search bar.) It’s a feature I missed for a while, but I got over it.

feannag ,

You know you can set up custom strings to use different searches, right? E.g. typing w: and then your search string to search Wikipedia.

billiam0202 ,

I’m aware there are probably a hundred different ways to do what I want in Firefox, and that 99 of them are probably easier than the way I do them already. Now I just keep a Wiki tab open for when I want to search something.

zueski ,

I have never understood the desire to combine the search and the address fields. I occasional search a url when I forget the rules for what it thinks is keyword. It just seems like a scheme to collect more data by bouncing your intended site to google and increase your reliance on them rather than being a real UI feature.

jay ,
@jay@mbin.zerojay.com avatar

I would be on Firefox myself except that I need Webassembly that functions at a decent speed and It's about 30-100 times slower on Firefox than it is on Chrome and hasn't changed in yeeeeears.

echo ,

uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.

Then what is the purpose/value of it?

Quill7513 ,

Its able to block some ads. However, from a security perspective this basically means google chrome is no longer a web browser that should be used in a professional setting, let alone for your private and personal work

echo ,

I’ll let corporate worry about corporate… I don’t want the ads at home.

Quill7513 ,

100% don’t use it at home. I’m saying if you wouldn’t even use it at work (and you seriously shouldn’t anymore, its a total liability) you for sure shouldn’t use it at home

amorpheus ,

It’s not as comprehensive, but it still blocks ads. Personally, I’ve not noticed a difference. If you are a power user with custom rules and third party lists then your experience will vary.

echo ,

I went ahead and switched to Firefox which I can also use on my phone and now block ads there, too.

TransplantedSconie ,

Firefox is the bomb.

perviouslyiner ,

It is… revolutionary.

2001aCentenaryofFederation ,

see also: librewolf

parpol ,

deleted_by_author

    •
    DaddleDew ,

    Fennec is a pace in the right direction for that

    dukatos ,

    Mull is better…

    JetpackJackson ,

    Mull is the closest

    Mwa ,
    @Mwa@thelemmy.club avatar

    iceraven is nice to

    JetpackJackson ,

    Never used it, I thought it was unmaintained but I guess I was wrong

    fine_sandy_bottom ,

    Mull:

    f-droid.org/packages/us.spotco.fennec_dos/

    circuscritic , (edited )

    I’m not saying to never use Firefox Android forks, but the reality is that Chromium forks are significantly more secure on Android, such as Mulch (same dev as Mull) and Chromite (Bromite fork).

    Again, I am talking security, not privacy, and specifically for Android.

    Here is a good write up on the topic from the developer of the Mull and Mulch browsers:

    divestos.org/pages/browsers

    For desktop there are a lot of good Firefox forks, such as Mullvad’s Browser, Librewolf, & Waterfox. If a website needs Chrome to work, I just use Vivaldi or Ungoogled Chromium.

    Edit: I’ve made this point a few times, and always with lots of downvotes, just kind of funny. Especially when I provided a technical write-up from the developer of a security focused distro (DivestOS) as well as two popular security focused Android browsers (Mull and Mulch), but hey, maybe you all know better than he does.

    JohnDClay ,

    YouTube isn’t playing on Firefox with Ublock for me either. I’ll need to go through and reinstall my extensions, but I couldn’t find the root cause so far, I’d just been using chrome with ublock for YouTube and Firefox for everything else.

    parpol ,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    JohnDClay ,

    But that wouldn’t have comments or updating recommendations, right?

    JohnDClay ,

    As for grey jay, I haven’t had time to compile it yet. ReVanced is working well for me.

    Zier ,
    @Zier@fedia.io avatar

    Try NewPipe or a fork of that for YouTube on Android.

    JohnDClay ,

    It doesn’t have recommendations or ability to comment does it? And ReVanced is still working for me on Android.

    Mog_fanatic ,

    Saaaaame for me on PC. Such a bummer.

    Frellwit ,

    Make sure jnn-pa.googleapis.com isn’t blocked anywhere in your network. It may perhaps be blocked in a filter list you have activated in uBO, DNS, VPN, Firewall, anti-virus, Firefox enhanced tracking protection, etc.

    Sir_Kevin ,
    @Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    FreeTube is available for Windows and Android. It has SponsorBlock built in as well.

    ogmios ,
    @ogmios@sh.itjust.works avatar

    Yea, I’m just waiting for the bomb to go off when Mozilla inevitably ends up following Google’s example.

    Lemminary ,

    Yep, I’m watching intently with the shit they’ve been doing.

    sheogorath ,

    Thankfully, Firefox is open-source, so we can just use one of the forks, or perhaps Ladybird will be ready for general release by that time.

    ngwoo ,

    Firefox already adopted manifest V3 but specifically kept the features needed for adblockers

    friend_of_satan ,

    I’d just like to reassure everybody that you can quit using Google Chrome. I switched to Firefox a year ago. You can switch to something else too. Give it a try.

    Wait, I don’t need to nudge anybody. After all the ads start invading their browsing experience I doubt anybody will need much prodding.

    echo ,

    Yep… when ublock quits working for me on Chrome then I will migrate.

    Maestro ,

    Why wait? Migrate now. There's even Firefox for mobile with ublock

    chazwhiz ,
    @chazwhiz@lemmy.world avatar

    There is?

    arin ,

    Yes my main mobile browser

    TachyonTele ,

    Same here. Haven’t seen an ad in I don’t know how long.

    chazwhiz ,
    @chazwhiz@lemmy.world avatar

    That doesn’t really answer my question. How does one get ublock origin on mobile?

    RampageDon ,

    You use Firefox as your mobile browser

    ArgentRaven ,

    And to add to that, set all your programs and links to open in Firefox by default, instead of the YouTube app, etc. then you’re blocking ads just like a desktop on every site you visit.

    Sir_Kevin ,
    @Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Why stop there? uninstall the youtube app. It’s garbage. FreeTube has an Android fork now too.

    catloaf ,

    Same as on desktop. You go to the Mozilla extension site or the author’s site and click add.

    JohnSwanFromTheLough ,

    There’s an extensions menu in the firefox app, uBlock is listed as one of the recommend ones, all you have to do is click the plus sign to add it.

    Hobbes ,

    Not in mobile

    pipe01 ,

    Yes in mobile

    Makhno ,

    Yes there is lol

    ripcord ,
    @ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

    Everyone is leaving out that this is Android only.

    TachyonTele ,

    That’s what you get for using an apple product.

    ripcord ,
    @ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

    It’s definitely one of the reasons I left.

    On the other hand, Google fucking SUCKS and I expect Apple to be doing way less questionable-to-evil stuff with my data.

    CommanderCloon ,

    That’s because “firefox” (or “chrome” too) on apple products is just a reskin of Safari. Apple does not allow 3rd party browser engines in its app store.

    That’s because 3rd party browser engines might not suck ass, which would allow OWA apps in your browser whcih would circumvent Apple’s 30% cut on everything. So they kneecap their own browser and don’t allow any other browser on their devices.

    oddsys ,

    Yes, in mobile Firefox.

    veloxization ,
    @veloxization@yiffit.net avatar

    This is Fennec, a fork of Firefox for mobile, though mobile Firefox has this same menu. c: Extensions are very much supported on mobile and it’s great.

    Though I should add: I’m not an iOS user, so the story is likely to be different there, Apple being Apple and whatnot.

    A screenshot from an Android phone, showing Fennec, a Firefox fork, listing extensions, including uBlock Origin.

    Maestro ,

    Yes. You can install extensions on firefox mobile just like you can on the desktop version. IIRC it's the only mobile browser that does this.

    pennomi ,

    Only on Firefox Android.

    As far as I know, Safari is the only browser with Adblock on iOS.

    harsh3466 ,

    This is true, however, Firefox focus has a built in blocker that’s pretty good, and the Orion browser for iOS actually supports Firefox extensions (even though it’s built on top of safari), and is also pretty good. I run bothe Firefox focus and Orion with ublock on my iOS devices.

    Eggyhead ,

    I just installed Orion thanks to this post and I'm really impressed. I usually stick to safari, but I'm going to sit on this for a week and see how I feel about it.

    2 quick questions; Do you know if it's possible to get YouTube videos to run in PiP on iOS/iPadOS? And is there a dark mode for the app's interface?

    harsh3466 , (edited )

    Yes, you can do pip, you need to first expand the video to full screen, then tap the screen to bring up the on screen controls, and you should see a pip button in the upper left of the video.

    Orion doesn’t have a dark mode that I’m aware of, though it mostly respects iOS dark mode (with annoying exceptions). Though with firefox extensions, you can install dark reader, or you can install the dark reader iOS app, to get dark mode on all websites.

    Edit: I’m not certain that dark reader iOS app will work with orion. I don’t use the app, I use the firefox extension with orion.

    H4mi ,

    I use Firefox Focus on iOS. It blocks quite a bit without addons.

    skuzz ,

    Also third party browsers on iOS are forced to use a janky slow WebKit WebView instead of the accelerated WebKit on Safari.

    In the EU, things are different and third-party rendering engines have been forced upon Apple, so people there may have more options.

    mp3 ,
    @mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

    On Android, Firefox for iOS doesn’t have addons because Apple.

    maccentric ,

    The Orion browser has rudimentary support for Firefox extensions. UBlock origin seems to work for me. Best I’ve found for iOS

    webghost0101 ,

    For real the votes here have so much “well it works on my machine so you must be wrong”-energy

    SorryQuick ,

    It it because apple doesn’t want addons, or because firefox is forced to use webkit?

    mp3 ,
    @mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

    From what I understand, it’s mostly because they’re forced to use WebKit, and building a compatibility layer to make the existing addons to work within iOS constraints on top of WebKit would need a significant amount of work.

    My guess is that Mozilla is waiting on the engine restrictions to be lifted, but so far that will only happen in the European market with their alt stores.

    ShepherdPie ,

    Firefox mobile allows you to install extensions just like a PC version of the browser.

    strawberry ,

    low key that's why I switched. ads on mobile are so incredibly intrusive

    Orbituary ,
    @Orbituary@lemmy.world avatar

    Mull is a Firefox fork with even more privacy features. There are others that I’m sure people will chime in with.

    UltraMagnus0001 ,

    Blocks ads in YouTube too, and if you add sponsorblock you it’ll skip in video ads too

    Mog_fanatic ,

    I tried but for some reason certain websites can’t play any videos on Firefox without buffering every like 5 or 10 seconds for a few seconds. It happens on 100% of videos on YouTube and like 50% of videos on any other website. It’s super annoying, so back to chrome I went and I guess I’ll stay until ublock bites the dust and I have to move.

    militaryintelligence ,

    Google owns YouTube so there’s probably some shenanigans there

    Kallioapina ,

    Thats Googles fault. Firefox has an user agent switcher -addon. Flip it there to appear as Chrome, and suddenly Youtube bufferring problems drastically lessen.

    Also if you are in EU, consider making a complaint about this assholish and anti-competetive behaviour to your country’s competition/trade authority. Also EU’s, if you feel like being an extra responsible EU citizen. These assholes at Google need to be fined to extinction.

    echo ,

    Mostly inertia and other priorities…

    aeharding ,
    @aeharding@vger.social avatar

    It’s ez

    echo ,

    yeah, I went ahead and set it up…

    Any recommendation for an alternative to Hangouts?

    ipkpjersi ,

    Hopefully it will break badly enough to move people past their inertia so then there can be a more serious competitor to Chrome, or maybe even multiple competitors to Chrome.

    Zahille7 ,

    I personally enjoy Ecosia. They’re the ones who plant trees whenever you use their search engine, and while not the best, at least their mobile app has a built in ad-blocker that imo seems pretty decent.

    Resonosity ,

    You can use FireFox and set your default search engine to Ecosia’s. Best of both world’s.

    There is also a FF extension called Search For Trees that defaults to Google’s search engine instead of Ecosia/Bing where you don’t have to pre-load each search with #g, unlike Ecosia. The Google search in this extension is a little wacky though so not perfect. Search For Trees donates to Trees For the Future btw.

    westyvw ,

    Or better still firefox focus. Ad blocking built in and it drops all the cookies as soon as you close it.

    I keep firefox on mobile for when I need to go to a trusted site, firefox focus for everything else.

    PopShark ,

    I just wanted to drop in to say I do the same!! Especially on iOS where regular Firefox is kinda so-so (but better than Safari) Firefox Focus meanwhile is King

    Steve ,

    Yup

    _bcron ,

    Firefox with NoScript is better than any adblocker I used. It blocks the ‘disable adblocker’ popups alongside ads and most sketchy shit in general

    superkret ,

    It also blocks everything else on the website.

    Makeitstop ,

    It’s definitely more of a hassle than most people will want to deal with. But I still prefer to have it and selectively enable things as needed, because quite frankly I’d rather deal with predictable hassles of my own making than be bombarded with new bullshit every day due to ever worsening trends in enshittification.

    webghost0101 ,

    Tip: its not better if you know its to much hassle for most people. But dont let that stop you from posting your ideas. The more power to those that such is not a hassle.

    Makeitstop ,

    People have different tolerances for these kinds of things. Some people never bother to even get an ad blocker. Some won’t touch settings no matter how simple. And some want to tweak and modify endlessly.

    Makeitstop ,

    Why not both?

    ShepherdPie ,

    Because it can ruin your browsing experience all together. It’d be like installing multiple anti-virus programs on your Windows PC

    icosahedron ,

    iirc some hardened firefox configs, including arkenfox, recommend using ublock ONLY. other privacy extensions like noscript aren’t worth using because ublock replicates all of their features plus more

    prole ,

    You can basically use uBlock Origin as NoScript (or I think ScriptSafe? or did they change back?) if you put it into “hard mode.”

    I personally like “medium mode”. I guess I get why they hide it behind several obscure steps, but I feel like they should advertise it more. It’s a nice middle ground. Still breaks every website the first time you go there but meh. Small price to pay.

    Kalkaline ,
    @Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

    Firefox reader mode is the champ, especially when combined with uBlock

    fine_sandy_bottom ,

    I don’t understand the inertia if I’m honest.

    shalafi ,

    Easy to understand. People don’t like change.

    Despite 25 years in IT, and knowing better, I only recently switched back to Firefox. I expected a fair bit of hassle, and I won’t say the transition was seamless, but I was astounded.

    Those of us in the know aren’t doing any good circle jerking ourselves over our superior browser. We need to get our friends, coworkers and relatives engaged. And that should be easy if we contrast our ad-free experience with theirs.

    Sir_Kevin ,
    @Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    On that note: Anyone wanting the same look and feel of Chrome without ads should try Brave. No add-ons or plugins necessary.

    Jimmycakes ,

    Nobody that cares about seeing ads is still on chrome. I bet they don’t lose more than 8-10% market share in a year even that is probably super high

    grue ,

    I’ve always used Firefox on every other device I own, but now I need to do something about my Chromebook.

    Scrollone ,

    Rocking Firefox even from my Android phone. It works great!

    vinayagg ,

    Do you know if brave browser is better than firefox? they claim to prioritize user privacy more than firefox

    linearchaos ,
    @linearchaos@lemmy.world avatar

    I’d use Firefox over brave. The company behind brave will still sell your data.

    They’re selling the tor feature of brave. You can install tor in FF.

    I like brave because it’s staffed with developers full-time to block YouTube. I don’t love their crypto, but I don’t use it, and it does pay their devs.

    hswolf ,
    @hswolf@lemmy.world avatar

    brave is based on chromium, so it’s not 100% safe from google

    Cheems ,
    @Cheems@lemmy.world avatar

    You can even keep all your bookmarks

    MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

    The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

    BlameThePeacock ,

    Switching back to Firefox in the next few weeks. Fuck you google

    NateNate60 ,

    What did the fact checker bot ever do to you?

    Estebiu ,
    @Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Shh, we dont talk about that here…

    fine_sandy_bottom ,

    Fact checker bot is BS. It should be banned.

    samus12345 ,
    @samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

    Just block it and you won’t have to see it any more.

    catloaf ,

    That doesn’t fix the problem. MBFC is firmly biased, and presenting it as unbiased is positively harmful.

    fine_sandy_bottom ,

    Sure because if I don’t see it the problem is solved.

    NateNate60 ,

    I wonder why you hate the fact-checkers.

    fine_sandy_bottom ,

    I don’t hate fact checkers.

    I dislike this bot.

    leftzero ,

    Spread disinformation.

    Label anything short of outright fascism as “left leaning” in an attempt to shift the overton window even further right than it already is in the US.

    Spam.

    It’s malware, it’s harmful, and it should be banned.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •