There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

news

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Redx , in The IRS plans to crack down on 1,600 millionaires to collect millions of dollars in back taxes

Another pointless article to distract from the bigger issue. Spending is out of control and collecting this won’t help to pay that down. It’ll only contribute to more spending. Neither side are helping to do anything about it other than lining their own pockets.

tryptaminev ,

The term “spending” is bullshit for most governmental expenses. Maintaining infrastructure, education, healthcare and social assistance are investments. Educated healthy people, that can recover, if they are affected by a job loss or other major struggle are a much better workforce than sick, indebted and uneducated people.

Redx ,

Call it whatever you want. The unlimited piggy bank just needs to stop. They all need to be held accountable for every dollar spent as a start. End the corporate lobbying bullshit and have the government public servants actually serve the public. Not your comment but the one above about centrist shit, I don’t care about the petty squabble of which side does what. They are both bad. I’m not into picking the lesser of two evils.

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

I love centrists.

Always complaining without a solution.

Naura ,

That’s exactly what a centrist would say 🤷🏻‍♀️

forrgott ,

Oh shut up. One side spends like crazy, then uses that as an excuse to try to gut the other sides programs. F off with you centrist bull

utopianfiat ,

The only problem with spending is that too much of it is to prop up dying and damaging industries like oil, and not enough of it is being spent to actually invest in the future of America. We should spend more, on things like free healthcare, free education, free public transportation, and universal basic income.

gregorum ,

How about we stop spending billions on subsidies for oil companies?

foggy , in Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis Wrote Letters in Support of Danny Masterson Ahead of Rape Sentencing; Kutcher Called Him a ‘Role Model’

They also added that their exclusive NFTs were on sale for all of Labor Day Weekend!

Companion1666 , (edited ) in Nancy Pelosi: Democrat and ex-Speaker, 83, to seek re-election

US politics really romanticizing elderly abuse.

downpunxx , in Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis Wrote Letters in Support of Danny Masterson Ahead of Rape Sentencing; Kutcher Called Him a ‘Role Model’
@downpunxx@kbin.social avatar

simple explanation, which in no way absolves these two from the choice they made in coming to the defense and support of a convicted rapist: family is family

Silverseren ,

Which is an explanation and that explanation, where you'd defend "family" even when they did do something wrong, if not horrific, rather than say they should face the consequences of their choices.

And that sort of defense is one where the person making it is just as evil as the person they're defending.

downpunxx ,
@downpunxx@kbin.social avatar

yes dipshit, obviously

HellAwaits ,

the audacity of this absolute piece of dogshit calling anyone else a dipshit

hypelightfly ,

Fuck that. When I found out a family member had raped someone they were no longer family.

neuropean ,

When did you “find out”? Before or after the trial?

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

You know that people can judge other people as guilty regardless of what a court finds them.

Or do you think OJ Simpson didn’t murder his ex-wife?

Fredselfish ,
@Fredselfish@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly no exception you cut them out completely.

GONADS125 ,

A comment I made elsewhere is even more relevant here:

My family beat and outcast a member who turned out to be a predator. Fuck him, he’s dead now. Didn’t shed a tear.

Blood is irrelevant and the family you choose is stronger.

charonn0 , in North Korea launches new tactical nuclear attack submarine
@charonn0@startrek.website avatar

Are there any pictures of it actually touching water?

Zaktor , (edited ) in Thousands of migrant children test NYC schools system

New York City has a population of 8.8 million and from March 2020 to June 2021 they had an estimated 130k leave the city. 110k migrants isn’t nothing, but it’s not a city destroying burden and, if anything, might help reverse COVID-related losses. Mayor Cop Liar is playing to his centrist roots and scapegoating immigrants for pre-existing problems.

holdenrichards , in X is no longer labeling ads for some users
@holdenrichards@kbin.social avatar

"springtime for hitler"

bradorsomething , in Americans Are Less Motivated to Work This Year Compared to Last, New Data Shows

I’d like to add that I am less motived to work then a minute ago.

I waited a minute, and I have a new, lower data point…

Pulptastic ,
_haha_oh_wow_ , in In U.S.-China AI contest, the race is on to deploy killer robots
@_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works avatar

Can we not please?

bobman ,

If we don’t, then they will.

Same reason we use oil.

Yepthatsme , in Fulton County special grand jury recommended charges against Lindsey Graham and 2 Georgia US senators | CNN Politics

We always knew Lindsay was going to get his and here’s to him getting served 🍻

zcd , in Elon Musk ‘committed evil’ with Starlink order, says Ukrainian official

100% chance there’s a musk piss-tape

SpaceCowboy ,
@SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca avatar

I agree, there’s probably a tape, but I think there’s more than pissing going on in it.

At this point if there’s a tape of a prostitute peeing on Musk in a Moscow hotel room, it wouldn’t be anything shocking or damage his reputation all that much beyond what he’s done to himself already. I think if there is a tape, it’s gotta be something really fucked up.

realcaseyrollins , in Jimmy Fallon apologises to Tonight Show staff after toxic workplace allegations - reports

An apology is not exactly what I was expecting.

Blamemeta , in Thousands of migrant children test NYC schools system

So now migrants are a problem?

Glad we’re finally on the sane page!

Jah348 ,

I think the issue is republican leaders intentionally causing harm to migrant children for their own joy and political gain. They moved them to areas like new york with the goal of overburdening and breaking the system.

It’s be the equivalent of me buying 100,000 AR-15 and air dropping them onto a bus full of children; have a republican say wow these guns are a problem and respond, “oh so noooooow guns are a problem CHECKMATE”

Regardless, decades of actively fucking the people, land, and economies of south American countries have indeed caused a humanitarian crisis leading to migrants fleeing for safety and hope. Neither party seems to have much interest in proactively sorting it out. Reap what you sow.

Blamemeta ,

So it’s fine when it’s a small border town, it’s not fine when it’s NYC, because we bussed them to NYC, to a place with more resources?

And accepting migrants isn’t a long term solution, it’s not a solution at all. What we need to do is fix their countries, and having their best flee isn’t helping their countries at all.

Jah348 ,

Randomly relocating migrants to other cities with zero communication or planning with pure intention of causing harm to the migrants as well as the people of the arrival city for political gain is indeed a bad thing to do. I must remind people that cruelty and harm is the point of Republican policies. There was no thought that New York has resources so clearly this is a good choice of the health of either the city or the migrant to send buses there; else it would be planned and communicated ahead of time.

Let’s use Texas for example. There are big cities in Texas if you weren’t aware: Dallas, Houston, Austin - odd that there was no thought of sending migrants to those cities with all their city resources. There are also large other cities between Texas and New York: Oklahoma City, Kansas City, Indianapolis, Charleston, Pittsburgh, etc - it’s almost like right wing propoganda incessantly targets New York as a city of Democrats and we must punish them. Cruelty is the point. There is no functional purpose of sending migrants to New York other than cruelty and chaos for political gain.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

Ah yes, the cruelty and harm strawman again. This isn’t about hurting anyone, it’s about showing just how big of a problem dealing with them crossing illegally is. Apparently they can trek all the way up from wherever the fuck but the second you transport them to where democrats actually have to deal with the problem suddenly their movement is a problem.

Veraticus ,
@Veraticus@lib.lgbt avatar

How is it a strawman when it really is cruel and harmful?

It is about hurting both the migrants and Democrats. As is typical for Republicans, the cruelty is the point.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

How are the migrants worse off than they were at the town that didn’t want them?

If democrats want open borders they’re welcome to have them, so long as they take in the crossers.

Veraticus ,
@Veraticus@lib.lgbt avatar

Because their own choices matter — they went to that destination to be with their families and friends or to fill job opportunities they found. They are actual people with real feelings and ignoring their decisions to move them thousands of miles against their will as a political stunt is definitional cruelty.

If you don’t want immigrants in your town, you should move. Spoiler alert though, there are immigrants going to every town in the US. So you might have to leave the country and immigrate somewhere else.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

They don’t get choices, what part of illegal do you not understand? They should get sent straight back, but if liberals want them they can have them in their cities.

Veraticus ,
@Veraticus@lib.lgbt avatar

So you actually do acknowledge it’s cruel and harmful, you simply don’t care because you believe they deserve it?

You are an awful person.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

Being intentionally obtuse doesn’t help anything, but at least from your above comment we agree that New York and other Democrat cities can and should take them.

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

Texas could reduce immigration demand unilaterally by prosecuting people who hire undocumented workers.

They don’t, because they want a permanent underclass to exploit.

This is a stunt for the base to make it look like the GOP hates the status quo, but this is the system that they’ve intended all along: it provides cheap labor for their donors and red meat for the people who hate immigrants and cities. They’re playing both sides of their coalition.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

And I’d be all for that. I’m gleeful over the coyote felony law being implemented in Florida.

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

But they don’t do it.

Which is my point.

Because it’s about creating a permanent underclass.

So you’re being used.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

So let’s hold hands and sing in front of some candles while some signs are being shown saying make any hiring or helping or even any conversing with illegal aliens a felony. Where will we hold this vigil?

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

You seem like a very serious person who has thought deeply about this issue.

My favorite part is how I explained twice how Republican politicians are not interested in fixing this and you refuse to engage with it either time.

That’s the conservative calling card: pretend like you’ve got everything figured out, and when the obvious flaws are pointed out to you just pretend like we’re talking about something else.

Yes, I’m sure you’re a very serious and intellectually honest person who just needs to switch topics for very good reasons other than having no rebuttal.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

You said your point was something wasn’t being done, I said let’s do something to get it done. I’m sorry if you don’t actually want that thing done, my mistake for assuming you meant what you said.

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

And here I thought your philosophy was

Being intentionally obtuse doesn’t help anything

But Republicans always think they get a special exception, so that tracks after all.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

But they don’t do it.

Which is my point.

So to be clear, you do or don’t want it to be illegal to hire illegals?

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

I think we’re done here.

I have no interest in “debating” with a meme machine.

JustAManOnAToilet ,

No just a yes or no, you either can or can’t answer the question. You said that was your point, that they don’t do it, so don’t back down now, unless you want to rethink your position.

Zombiepirate ,
@Zombiepirate@lemmy.world avatar

I think we’re done here.

I have no interest in “debating” with a meme machine.

esadatari ,

i legitimately laughed at this comment rofl

nail on the head

Jah348 ,

I don’t think you know what the term strawman means, but I’ll leave that aside.

Physically harming others and intentional causing chaos to prove a point isn’t something a functional governing body should do. We return to cruelty is the point. This isn’t about solving any sort of issue or assisting the fabricated issue of boarder towns in chaos (citation needed). The singular goal is cause harm onto others and feel vindicated by causing that harm.

Democrats currently have continued most if not all of the previous standards at the boarder. Please cite a single open US boarder. Where is this open boarder that people can walk accross without any sort of harm or law breaking? I suppose Canada is relatively loosey goosey but no one is worried of that. They can bring maple syrup and affordable Healthcare all theyd like.

Blamemeta ,

Well yeah, its the only way to make illegal immigration an issue to the democrats.

And its only cruel to the dnc.

theluckyone ,

Are those small border towns housing migrants in emergency shelters and enrolling the kids in school?

Blamemeta ,

Schools, yes. Shelters, many don’t have the resources.

artisanrox ,
@artisanrox@kbin.social avatar

they would if y'all would stop killing your own State's kids and guarding bathroom doors for a minute.

archiotterpup ,

What we need to do is stop interfering in their home counties and stop destabilizing them.

ChicoSuave ,

If you love next to an airport, expect noise. If you live next to a border, expect immigrants. It’s the idiots in a small town complaining about their choices that are causing this. If they don’t like it, move and then the people who want to be there live there

Eggyhead ,
@Eggyhead@artemis.camp avatar

I think the issue is Republican leaders intentionally causing harm to migrant children…

Funny how this implies immigrant children are actually better off In conservative states.

dhork , (edited )

There’s a critical difference, though, between the complaints of the NY City and State politicians, and the complaints of the Governors of Southern states that are doing the busing.

Folks like Abbott are complaining about these people coming over the border, while simultaneously spending money to make then Someone Else’s problem.

The politicians in NYC are upset at folks like Abbott for sending so many migrants there, but acknowledge that they are humans that need help, and their beef with the Federal Government is simply to send more money. They are also explicitly asking for expedited work permits for these people. These migrants want to work, but have no legal way to do that right now.

Between the young people everywhere in the country who can’t afford to have children, the regressive laws that are driving out young people who can afford to start a family, and all these migrant humans that the South does not want, I would not be surprised if there is a major demographic shift in the next census, where the liberal states which have been seeing a net outflow of residents reverse that trend. After all, these migrants are supposed to be enumerated in the census, and count in apportionment, even if they can’t vote. Well see whether Texas manages to ship a Congressional seat or two away to NYC on these buses.

bobman ,

More like they introduce additional obstacles that we need to work together to overcome.

They are a net-benefit to society as a whole, even if it isn’t immediate or without challenges.

Blamemeta ,

False. Immigrants are not a net benefit, except as cheap, abusable labor.

bobman ,

False. Immigrants are a net benefit. On average, every additional person contributing to a society is beneficial.

You’re coming at this from the obvious, white male perspective of “They took our jobs.” Admit it.

Blamemeta ,

Oh absolutely. No American will work as cheap or be as abusable as a h1b1. I would post the pewresearch study, says that for every 10% increase in immigrants, wages go down 2%, but google is not being helpful.

bobman , (edited )

So the government should step in to block immigration, but not the abuse of workers?

Gonna block you now. I can tell you have nothing ‘beneficial’ to add to this conversation.

Sorry you’re so racist and unskilled that you need to blame immigrants for your problems. Maybe you should become more competitive in this capitalist system your kind are so fond of.

Blamemeta ,

When has the government ever been pro-worker? The only lever we can actually pull is immigration.

FinnFooted ,

There was a study. I dont think it was pew. Here’s a good response to why this papers results doesnt match up with most other literature and why, while the model was good, he data selected seems biased: www.cato.org/…/does-immigration-reduce-wages#test…

FinnFooted ,

They commit crimes at a lower rate and improve the economy. Also, don’t we have a labor shortage everyone keeps going on about? And if they’re legal, they don’t get abused. Which is why we should make an easier path to getting them work papers.

So I mean. The whole labor thing boosting the economy is a big deal.

Tatters , in Wrong-way driver calls police on himself by mistake

I guess the drunk driver has done a lot of driving in a country where they drive on the other side of the road, which would explain why they got confused when drunk.

TheRealKuni ,

Now if only we could find an explanation for why he thought it appropriate to drive in his condition…

dogslayeggs ,

It’s actually a very easy explanation: alcohol.

Willer , in California moves to decriminalize use of magic mushrooms and other natural psychedelics

Its natural so it must be good for u right, right… XD

BudgetBandit ,

Arsenic is natural, so…

treefrog ,

And arsenic is legal and all of the drugs in reference are non-toxic.

So thanks for proving that the drug laws are about political violence, and not about keeping us safe.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

I think the point is that it isn’t bad for you, or at least not any more so than alcohol.

As far as I’m concerned, we should either make drugs legal or alcohol illegal. The double-standard makes no sense.

treefrog ,

I agree with most of what you’re saying aside from the part about making all drugs illegal.

The drug war is more about political violence than it is about keeping America safe, for one. A Nixon aide is on record describing how the drug war was about disinfranchising people who may stop his reelection.

For, two. Bodily autonomy is a right. Remember, the bill of rights is not meant to be all inclusive. And it’s not our job to prove our rights but the governments job to justify its power.

In this case, the government has utterly failed to justify this power. We’ve criminalized medicine that can cure addiction and consumerism. And put people in prison, destroying families. Both hippies just trying to grow some shrooms to share with friends, and suffering addicts who need medical help.

And for three, prohibition doesn’t work. We’ve seen this proved again and again in multiple countries and now over a full century.

It’s time to end this civil war that destroys families, and robs people of their political power. A war started so the second most corrupt president in history could angle for a second term.

This issue isn’t about safety. But control.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

I think they should all be legal, but I also think laws should be consistent. If we’re going to make drugs illegal, include alcohol, cigarettes and caffeine or legalize the rest.

treefrog ,

They should be consistent for sure.

But drugs is a word man made up. Kids get high on sugar and social media can be as addictive as meth.

So, we should make it all legal. And regulate it so people stop dying of fentanyl.

Full stop.

Because trying to police dopamine rewards that come from things outside ourselves is a very slippery slope.

Syrc ,

Depends on the drug. Stuff like Marijuana or those Psychedelics, sure. Cocaine and Heroin on the other hand… aren’t really comparable to stuff you can “”safely”” take for decades.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

So continue throwing people in prison for using them?

Syrc ,

Prison is a different issue. I think they should seize the drugs and direct them to a rehabilitation center (or force them if it’s repeat offenders). Prison is for dealers.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

But what constitutes a dealer? Because we throw people in prison now who are intending to sell a single vial of meth for $20 (or whatever Meth costs). They might be addicts who are so desperate for money that they’re selling their own supply. Don’t those people also need help? This is the problem with the drug war- it’s too vague. And there’s no real way to not make it vague.

Syrc ,

Even if it was someone desperate for money, they still tried to sell a very dangerous drug to another human. That’s not ok, in my opinion.

That’s where I draw the line: if you’re only harming yourself you need help. If you’re trying to fuel others’ addiction, it’s jail. At most if it’s clear that the person has a huge drug issue you could force the rehabilitation center in that case as well (but again, the first time. If you still sell meth after that you’re asking for it).

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Considering I had a friend with cancer sell me some of his weed so he could pay his medical bills that month, I can’t say I’d agree.

Syrc ,

That’s weed. Weed is far less dangerous than the stuff we were talking about.

Also my view might be skewed due to living in Europe, so “selling to pay cancer bills” wasn’t really what I thought of.

treefrog , (edited )

Psilocybin mushrooms have been used medicinally on this continent to treat mental health since before colonialism by white people.

And the LD 50 on it would require you to eat about fifty pounds of mushrooms before you might die (of course, your stomach would burst before this happened).

Do people freak out when psilocybin is taken unskillfully? Absolutely. Psilocybin is a powerful tool. And like a surgeon’s scalpel, it can hurt when used poorly. And heal when used skillfully.

So no, it’s not good because it’s natural. It’s good because it’s good. And when applied mindfully, it has the potential help heal a lot of people.

Willer ,

ahahah very funny

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines