It seems pretty clear to me that this is a parody of conservative memes. I suppose many of the downvotes are from people who take it literally or who aren’t sure.
I don’t know why, but it seems many in this community default to downvoting what they don’t understand instead of ignoring. This isn’t even just for political memes, same thing happened when I posted a bad apple joke.
Not a debate, a fact. A millennium is 1,000 years. 1,000 years was completed at the end of the year 1000. The second 1,000 years was completed at the end of the year 2000.
The first time I can remember feeling old was when I was walking home behind a couple of kids and one said to the other in a cautionary tone that there was a “big ol’ guy” (or words to that effect) behind them. I guess I seemed menacing in some way? I was in my early twenties, which means those kids are older now than I was then.
Strangely, this reminds me of this manga set in a megalopolis, and when the MC reaches what is assumed to be the roof of the super structure, he meets someone who explains that they aren’t looking at a night sky, but rather at a ceiling that’s far enough away to be difficult for human eyes to discern, how far away is that, coincidentally this gap between the “roof” and the “sky” is about the width of the planet Jupiter.
Guy literally has to use a telescope to be able to track stuff happening on the other side.
In particular, note the nonsensical reflection in the mirror (which is inexplicably placed on the floor?), weird toilet paper roll, and half-unicorn horn half-third ear thing sticking out from the head.
And if you check out that Pinterest account, it’s full of AI-generated crap too.
Which mostly just demonstrates how good the AI has become, to the point where if you scale down the image somewhat, it fools humans and AI detectors alike.
lmao no wonder something looked so off to me, the HD verision makes it even clearer that it’s AI-generated, even more so considering the website it came from.
Interestingly enough even the larger image on the original website fooled most of the AI image detectors, with only one of them (isitai.com) just barely saying that the image is probably AI-generated, while all the others said with >90% confidence that it wasn’t.
I can only speculate that all of these detectors are outdated and were trained with older AI-generated images that were easier to detect.
Which came first? The AI image could be a bad render of the original picture with low quality.
There’s issues with models pushing back source material with minor modifications, which suggest they were trained on some copyrighted material. It seems like it could be the case here. Or, as you suggest, it’s a lowering of the AI quality to add a more realistic appearance.
lemmyshitpost
Hot
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.