A thought experiment: you operate a security camera on behalf of a property owner. The camera records a serious crime taking place. The police want to see the video, but they can’t force you to give it to them. The property owner doesn’t want the police to see the video, but he can’t force you not to give it to them. (However, he can stop being a customer, which will cost you money.) What would you do?
I think I’d give the police the video as long as I thought the crime was serious. And I’d do that even if it cost me money, because IMO it’s the right thing to do. I’m not saying Amazon was in that position, but I would have to know the specific circumstances before I could judge.
Initially I thought about a chick being a WW2 pilot, an avian with metal wings making those doubting her amphibians, but chics from the Chicken Run movie arguing about enjoying food from KFC topped that without any challenge.
Didn’t know that. But since birth is that stressful and demanding, it makes sense to avoid any waste and bring it back into the system. Yet, imagining a woman snatching that umbical cord like it’s bacon is… uhm… something. Sometimes double standards are okay.
If this was controlled by your Google home, it would need a battery, which would need to be recharged. Imagine saying “hey Google, turn my balls off” and getting “I can’t reach that device” because you forgot to recharge your ball switch last night…
Exactly this. I’ll have all open source everything or I’m not using it. And I’m perfectly happy with everything in my home being dumb and manual like it’s 1990.
Indeed, this really is my old hairbrush. Initially I never would have expected the bristles to fade like that, but it still works just fine, minus a few missing bristles.
But it looks like a gray haired old man now…
It’s almost a buyitforlife sorta post, but it’s showing it’s age, just like me.
lemmyshitpost
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.