There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world cover
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

setsneedtofeed

@[email protected]

I mod a worryingly growing list of communities. Ask away if you have any questions or issues with any of the communities.

I also run the hobby and nerd interest website scratch-that.org.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

setsneedtofeed , (edited )
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I’m both posting as high output as I feasibly can of OC, and aggregating links from blogs and creators I follow to !tabletopminis, as a way to minimize reddit content.

!wargaming is also full of links to articles and blog content relevant to the hobby that isn’t ripped from reddit.

!warhammer40k has a small but regular community.

So many people complain about dead niche communities or niche communities only recycling reddit content. If that same energy was put in service to making new content, the communities would be improved. There is a bystander problem where loads of people complain, but if you check the profiler of the complainer, you often find few to no posts.

setsneedtofeed OP ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Because none of the characters in the picture know what they are doing.

setsneedtofeed OP ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

His review of Homeworld Cataclysm (“Emergence”) made me buy the game just based on how he talked about the plot and tone.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Hey wait a minute, that isn’t PLA07 Desert pattern. This shit post is a phony.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

This is a bad situation for her. I am genuinely curious under what standing she is suing. Thinking it through, this seems like a situation where the laws might not have caught up to what is happening. I hope she gets some changes out of this, but I am really curious on the legal mechanics of how that might happen.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I presume at that point the store would just have security walk out the person wearing the hat.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

A tangent to explore. I though am curious how the current case under the current laws is expecting to go forward.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

If the AI is flagging faces and immediately alerting employees, it is likely also going to throw up a flag for abnormal interference like that. Or if it doesn’t do it now, it is a feature that could be added if such hats become a common enough.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I am waiting to follow the case for updates, because while I hope that the outcome pushes back on AI system like this, I am skeptical of current laws to perceive what is happening as protected class discrimination. I presume in the UK the burden for proving fault in the AI lays on the plaintiff, which is at the heart of if the reason is legitimate in the eyes of the law.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

And this is why I’m asking, because I know little about UK law, and am trying to figure out how this is going to move forward. She can sue, now I wonder about the theory that leads to a win. Protected categories is a start, but it feels vague, and I’m curious what the precise angle and evidence brought in will be.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

For the last 30 years, monopolies could only be broken up if the corporation bought other companies "without the intention of of forming a “monopoly.”

With the intention of forming a monopoly?

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Often times news upsells what’s happening in their title or with vague language in the article. I’ve become instinctively skeptical of outrageous headlines.

I went and checked the text of the bill itself. Wow. It’s exactly what it says on the tin of the news article. Not even an attempt to vague it up in the bill’s language. There’s no wishy washy way to think it means anything but the biblical Ten Commandments, in straight forward language. The bill wants them posted in every classroom.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/850dc2c3-96c5-403d-8cf5-0ec87705a6ea.jpeg

This obviously violates the Louisiana state constitution and the U.S. Constitution.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Weird that I had to wait so long for it to be clam free.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

That’s why it is important to do sociological testing on earth first. Putting groups of humans in, let’s call them vaults, to test reactions to isolation and lack of surface contact.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I strongly suspect the original post was attempting to use the word “chattel”, but couldn’t get it right.

Chattel, as in chattel slavery. Which means the idea being spun appears to be a driver’s license registers one on the books of the Department Of Transportation as a chattel slave, a good to be bought and sold.

Which begs the question who is trading with the DOT, but I’m sure the answer would be 36 pages of unpunctuated explanation.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

It would still have a cost, just paid for from a different source. I was curious how much a pier of this kind is supposed to actually cost, but I misunderstood, and see you were making an entirely different point unrelated to that.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Is that normally how long piers of this type and size take for the military?

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

The bridge was usable after 4 weeks then?

setsneedtofeed , (edited )
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

It says built in 13 hours but usable for traffic in 4 weeks, and I am trying to parse that.

There was a temporary pontoon bridge then, and then a more permanent bridge for traffic built? I ask because pictures I initially saw were quite larger than the initial bridge, which made me question the within a day time.

I suppose it depends if the Gaza pier is closer to the first than the second. While the Gaza pier is described as temporary, it seems built to handle high and continuous cargo traffic. I imagine constructing such a platform which is also seaworthy enough to be towed requires more tasks than a single lane pontoon bridge. I also wonder how much of the Gaza pier had to be adapted and customized compared to pre-fabricated bridge segments.

Given the difference in type of work, and prefabricated material I wonder if 4 weeks is reasonable or not still. An example of similar maritime construction would be useful I suppose.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I’m aware of the implication. I’m trying to find out if it’s reasonable. Two military projects completed at different speeds is partially compelling, but then I find it less compelling looking at the differences.

I honestly don’t know if a month to build this project is reasonable or not. I’m poking at reactions to find out.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve heard Homeworld Emergence (formerly Homeworld Cataclysm) is quite good. It started as an expansion pack for the first game but kept expanding until it was a standalone game.

www.gog.com/en/game/homeworld_emergence

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines