The US government in 1962 regarded the project as a major threat due to the ātremendous increments in economic productivityā which could disrupt the world market. Arthur Schlesinger Jr, historian and special assistant to President Kennedy, described āan all out Soviet commitment to cyberneticsā as providing the Soviet Union a ātremendous advantageā in respect to production technology, complex of industries, feedback control and self-teaching computers.
A government of autists would come up with optimized solutions to many problems. The issue is that most people are resistant to actually fixing things, so everyone would just get mad.
optimised solutions often create negative secondary effects in other systems - itās not (always) that people are resistant to fixing things, itās that when people get attached to an āoptimised solutionā and it comes into contact with the real world, itās often difficult for them to take valid criticisms that arenāt about the system
Itās almost always for a selfish reason though. For instance, health insurance in the U.S. could easily go away if the government combined all of the funding for public healthcare systems. It wonāt happen because of the for profit healthcare industry.
It largely depends on what lense you parse your logic through, if its the lense of accumulating wealth and power you will almost always reach the same conclusion, the same if you use dialectical Materialism you will almost always reach yhe same conclusion. In the first instance you wont be able to understand how others canāt see the truths that are burning into your retinas, while in the latter truth you will understand exactly why they avoid the rubric of logic which brings makes their lifestyle unable to accept they are everythig wrong with the world and dragging us int a greenhouse heat death in the pursuit of profit.
the same if you use dialectical Materialism you will almost always reach yhe same conclusion
Material and historical conditions vary widely. Dialectical Materialism exists to synthesize solutions to a variety of contradictions. Stalin, Mao, and Tito reached some very different conclusions, despite growing up during the same international conflagration. Subsequent leftist revolutionaries - from Che to Chavez, had their own takes on the best path forward. A lot of leftist infighting can be attributed to these differences in baseline material condition.
A relatively wealthy leftist living in the imperial core is going to have this sense of living in a post-scarcity world with a relatively liberal social order, while a Philippian labor organizer is going to be struggling just to survive while the stateās brutal police forces actively hunt them. Chinese communists and Vietnamese communists have a very acrimonious history together and are easily pitted against one another by European industrialists. And coalition building between northern Indian communist farmers and the Kashmiri neighbors who they are in economic competition with is extremely difficult.
While you can always talk about the straight hyper-moral correct positions, they donāt always lend themselves to the physical labor involved in building local movements or the historical biases native to your region.
One big take away of dialectical materialism is that outcomes arenāt clear and conclusions arenāt certain. You always need to try things, anticipate failure, and move forward from there. You canāt trap yourself in rigid ideology or youāll find that ideology used against you as soon as capitalist leadership can adopt that rhetoric.
Or if theyāre like a few people I knowā¦whose critical thinking skills are āparrot opinions from someone who I think is almost as smart as me (according to me) because I exclusively listen to themā
Getting harder every day. People think Amazon if full of fakes. As if Walmart, target, Best buy, [big shop here] doesnāt also get shitty merch from the lowest bidder.
This, among many other reasons, is why you have switches per-plug rather than having to either risk electrocution or knock all your sockets offline while you unplug this
This is the Overton Window, the window of acceptable topics for public discourse, and itās unrelated to testosterone (I know, surprising /s).
A misaligned Overton Window (like a slow response to an impending disaster) is hard to counteract because the experts dealing with the topic may lose their credibility by trying to push against the window.
But I have heard the theory that the evolutionary reason for autism may be to counteract this effect. A small amount of genuine vocal concern could encourage others to speak out and break the tension surrounding the topic.
This vocal concern is not however gonna come from the evershifting lies of the X and 4chan echo chambers.
Neurotypical means literally none of those things, itās the exact opposite. I think you mean neurodivergent or neuroatypical. Aneurotypical is basically a misspelling of the latter.
Every kid is different, so maybe youāll get lucky by that age. Definitely invest the time to do sleep training, which should be around the corner for you guys. Weāve been dealing with night terrors lately, so a lot of sudden wake ups in the middle of the night and confusion/freaking out. Takes a bit longer to get her back down after that type of episode.
The amount of people parroting just whatever is currently in without critically questioning it (or even being open to question it) (looking at you, fascists (maga) and tankies (pro-putin /pro-hamas)) is too high
I donāt know what makes a person lose interest in politics and just parrot whatever the others parrot, but Iām highly suspicious that T is it. I think that part is just a lie in Elonās interest to spread.
I thought critically about the issue and came to the conclusion that genocide and apartheid are bad and that fascism is wrong. Not my fault if enough other people reach the same conclusion for it to be trendy.
Itās kind of impressive how many wrong things you just said.
First, it is valid to disregard someoneās opinions based on their other political views. If you had a swastika in your username, should I ignore that and listen earnestly to everything you say? Of course not.
Second, this is about fascism because the quoted text in OP is fascist propaganda. What theyāre describing is the idea of the ubermensch, of certain people being inherently superior and genetically predisposed to rule over others.
Third, youāre not a mind reader. Youāre incorrectly assuming that you know my thought process. I did not think, āThis person has an Israeli flag, therefore they must be wrong,ā I thought, āThis person is telling people to look for a point in what is very clearly fascist propaganda, hey, look at that, they also have a fascist flag in their username, I guess it makes sense that theyād do that.ā
So no, I didnāt write off your opinion because of your support of a fascist regime, though if I had it wouldāve been valid. I simply thought critically about two different behaviors you did and noticed that they both display sympathy towards fascism, which I found interesting.
lemmyshitpost
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.