There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

startrek

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

aeronmelon , in Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Thanks for reminding me the X-33s never got built in our timeline.

ambitious_bones ,

Just have some faith of the heart

Bishma ,
@Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

My eye was drawn right to it. But the Dream Chaser is near.

jawa21 , in Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning
@jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

This would make an amazing wallpaper.

setsneedtofeed , in Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

It’s been a long time.

negativenull OP , in Star Trek’s Ronny Cox Shares How Captain Jellico Memes Encouraged Him To Reprise The Next Generation Role For Prodigy
@negativenull@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, that’s sort of right in my wheelhouse of humor anyway. I said to somebody else earlier that I like PUNishing people.

  • Ronny Cox
FlyingSquid , in Star Trek’s Ronny Cox Shares How Captain Jellico Memes Encouraged Him To Reprise The Next Generation Role For Prodigy
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

You’re welcome, Ronny.

paddirn , in Star Trek’s Ronny Cox Shares How Captain Jellico Memes Encouraged Him To Reprise The Next Generation Role For Prodigy

He’ll always be Dick Jones to me.

MajorHavoc , in Star Trek’s Ronny Cox Shares How Captain Jellico Memes Encouraged Him To Reprise The Next Generation Role For Prodigy

We accomplished something!

Etterra , in Star Trek’s Ronny Cox Shares How Captain Jellico Memes Encouraged Him To Reprise The Next Generation Role For Prodigy

My favorite scene with jellico is in the alternate universe comic when evil Picard voids the shuttle bay containing him and all of his loyalists lol

themeatbridge , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Did he lie? Or did he give a vague statement that is necessarily true?

teft ,
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

Data is an Aes Sedai confirmed.

Draegur ,

WoT references! a rare treasure from a long lost age (which may hopefully come again…)

teft ,
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

The only community I truly miss from reddit is wetlander humor.

HuntressHimbo ,

There is a wetlander humor but it is very low activity

teft ,
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

Sorry, should have said an active wetlander humor community. I’m actually a subscriber on that community.

HuntressHimbo ,

The question is what Ajah he would end up in. The Whites, Grays, and Browns would all want him, hut he might be a Blue at heart

Bishma ,
@Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

O’Brien deactivated the weapon, so something did happen during transport.

themeatbridge ,

Yes. Perhaps it did.

pizza_the_hutt , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Contrary to popular belief, there is nothing in Data’s programing that would prevent him from doing “bad” things like lying or killing. He has free will just as much as any other Starfleet officer.

Data is much more human than you might guess at first. He is more akin to a human on the autism spectrum than a robot with hard-coded programming.

ummthatguy OP ,
@ummthatguy@lemmy.world avatar

Absolutely. Rewatching the series in full as an adult made it more apparent that Data was always closer to his goal than he could comprehend. Just had trouble adjusting to social “norms” more than others.

CptEnder ,

Yup exactly. He just lacked emotional subroutines (at first) and the hardware to process that. But he doesn’t need emotions to kill. He is in fact capable of using lethal force (First Contact), he just has an ethical subroutine that prevents killing (Descent I, II) unless in defense of others, himself, or The Federation. Which would fall under his logical subroutines.

Similar in a way to Chief Engineer Hemmer who will not use violence (Memento Mori) unless in an act of preserving life. The means to defend is part of the training of a Starfleet officer.

Swedneck , (edited )
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

This is honestly something that kind of annoys me about the show, data is pretty obviously human enough from the get-go, his journey is just about generally figuring things out and forming a proper personality.

Like the episode where they have to put his personhood to trial isn’t that amazing, humans now overwhelmingly at least somewhat care about the well-being of actual cattle, how the fuck would a clearly human-looking android that’s clearly capable of reasoning not be considered a person just like any other humanoid alien species?

It would have made sense if it took place in humanity’s capitalist past, but the largely enlightened federation? come oooooooon

i like that The Orville has their obligatory digital lifeform be from a whole-ass race that considers themselves obviously superior to everyone else, and no one questions their personhood because how the fuck do you question the personhood of someone who is actively choosing not to pulverize you?

1stTime4MeInMCU , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Why did Fajo believe data couldn’t kill? We see data blasting baddies all the time

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar
1stTime4MeInMCU ,

Omg literally perfect

_stranger_ , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Data’s the science officer. He could probably build a phaser from scrap blindfolded. Him saying maybe “something” happened during transport is clearly a deflection. I bet he thought about this moment when he discovered Lore and all Lore had done.

Cagi , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Anyone who thinks he didn’t fire with the intention to kill Fajo needs to go back to English class and learn how to read some basic literature. It’s like the end of the Sopranos. People’s wishes for happy endings and perfect Hollywood stories blind then to the work the writers went through to tell you (rather obviously, there isn’t much room for debate among people who know how to interpret stories) that yes, Data can kill an unarmed man in the right circumstances, or yes, Tony Soprano’s brains are splattered all over his family. It’s not a happier story but it’s a better one with actual meaning and has a more lasting impact.

ummthatguy OP ,
@ummthatguy@lemmy.world avatar

I believe that Data has it in him to make that decision, I’m mostly calling out the ambiguity of the scene as it played out. And yeah, Tony met a gruesome but earned end.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

It’s like the end of the Sopranos.

They ran out of film?

Bishma , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?
@Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

We know he’s figured out bloodlust by Generations.

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dstfp.gif

grue , in [DISCUSSION] In TNG's "The Most Toys" (s3e22), did Data lie about firing the disruptor?

Data: “Perhaps something occurred during transport, Commander”

Riker: “Like what?”

Data: “Like I tried to shoot the motherfucker but you beamed me away too quick.”

RizzRustbolt ,

O’brien: “Bitches be crazy…”

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

“Deactivating it” meant he stored it in another pattern buffer for future use. Could always add it to a troublesome person’s transporter beam…

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines