This is 100% a China and US problem - nowhere else in the world would these Wankpanzers be a status symbol. What’s required is a re-education of the Nouveau Riche to make a better choice.
Between these two episodes (i think these are the relevant entries, may be more) the realities, contrast to this politician’s disinformation, are explored in depth:
Hey. me too! I started tests using rocks. I figure, if a rock attached with a string can reach the bottom, then I should be able to go inside a larger rock and reach the bottom too!
Of course not. It was only three times where the problem was asking for consent to kiss, not only three times for consent period. My consent rejection list is considerably longer than 3.
Didn’t I see you in those threads about the women choosing bears over men supporting the idea of men listening when women tell men they need to change their behaviour? Why are you now attacking me for doing it?
Humans lie, constantly. Especially in a situation like that. People will almost always say what ever they think will get them out of the situation with least conflict.
There is always going to be"that" person that has weird issues. But I would find it difficult to believe if they wanted to kiss you, asking would be a “show stopper” in most cases.
You dodged three bullets, bro. If a woman gets turned off by asking then she's either not into you or she wants you to chase her, and both should be deal-breakers.
It’s not disinformation, but it is partial information. They’re revealing enough information about their defense plans to make it clear that any invasion attempt on Poland will be costly. Russia does not have limitless resources. If they think they have enough resources to fight a war on two fronts, then it is in Poland’s best interest to both bolster their defenses, and let the enemy know they’ve bolstered those defenses in hopes that it changes the war cost equation enough for Russia to realize it is not favorable decision anymore.
It’s the geopolitical equivalent of finding out there’s been multiple breaking and enterings in your neighborhood recently, so you go out and buy a gun and place a “this house defended by Smith & Wesson” sign out front. You don’t tell them where in the house the gun is. You just give enough information for them to rethink their choice. The goal isn’t to defeat the burglar. The goal is to not get broken into.
It’s not like they are advertising specific mine placement. They showed pictures about trenches, anti-vehicles barriers, gates, etc. This stuff isn’t hidden, a guy with a camera at the border could spot everything, let alone aerial or satellite imagery. It’s about hardening the border and slowing down invaders. Then you layer it with more complex defense systems to support the static defense.
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.