There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

news

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

LordCrom , in State Farm seeking 30% rate hike for California homeowners

Been dealing with this in Florida too. Many times you can’t even find an insurance policy, regardless of price.

fuzzzerd ,

What are folks doing in those cases? Where I live you can’t get a mortgage if you don’t have proof of insurance and until your loan to value in hits a certain amount the bank basically manages the policy.

LordCrom ,

Oh, if you can’t get insurance, most all mortgages have a clause that says the bank can pick a policy (usually a really expensive one) and you are forced into it. Wonderful, isnt it?

fuzzzerd ,

Yeah. I understand this, my question was about what happens when no insurance company wants to insure the property?

LordCrom ,

No no, the bank doesn’t pick a 3rd part company, they will place insurance on the house, usually with a bank subsidiary or other kind of bank entity. Usually is only for replacement value of the house, not theft or anything. It’s placed to protect the bank only, and you pay.

They don’t get a state farm policy… The bank gets a “this bank insurance company” policy.

someguy3 , in Ye Employees Sue, Allege Black Employees Called ‘Slaves,’ Denied Pay

Previous discussions have informed me that at a certain point of wealth, you no longer consider yourself part of the “black class” and you instead consider yourself part of the “wealthy class”.

Nomad ,

Yeah Kanye was always Batshit crazy, but he was making money fore enough people to be enabled and managed. How do you think Donald Trump happened?

DmMacniel , in White Nebraska man shoots and wounds 7 Guatemalan immigrant neighbors
@DmMacniel@feddit.org avatar

What a sorry man. What may have lead to such behaviour?

Delusional ,

Fox “news”

They’re responsible for a lot of heinous shit that people do and allowing them to continue to spew out misinformation, hate, and lies will only lead to more of this happening.

Arbiter ,

Yeah, this is the result of living in an alternate world of propaganda and hate.

I’m sure his actions felt perfectly reasonable to /him/.

bartolomeo ,
@bartolomeo@suppo.fi avatar

Imagined persecution can have real results, often playing into the hands of the rich & powerful.

https://suppo.fi/pictrs/image/b6bc82fa-4d7d-404a-ab65-9e0a303eceb0.webp

fubarx , in US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts

And going forward, who decides what’s an official vs. unofficial Presidential act?

azimir ,

Why that’s easy. It’s the top elected official, of course.

Zaktor ,

It’s actually the Court, which is a convenient aspect since it means only Republicans get immunity.

Evilcoleslaw ,

The courts

LordCrom ,

Which means every case about presidential actions is appealed up to the supreme Court from now on

irotsoma ,
@irotsoma@lemmy.world avatar

Pretty much everything the president does while in office is official. So the more important question is what is within the president’s powers.

The problem with immunity rather than changing the law is that all he has to do is prove that in some circumstance he has that power and that he believes that circumstance existed at the time and he used that authority to do it.

For example, he has the power to order the military to assassinate, so the specifics of whether it was legal to assassinate a certain person can’t be questioned in court, only whether he has the power to issue that type of order. Because once it’s established that it is within his power and he states that he used his authority as president to issue the order, he is immune to any further prosecution. Also, it doesn’t matter if he ordered the CIA to do it and they don’t have that legal authority to act inside the US. In that case the president is breaking the law, he just can’t be prosecuted for it, only the CIA agents involved could be. It’s not presidential authority that is being violated in that case so it’s off the table for prosecution regardless of how illegal it is.

nul42 , in Conspiracy Theorists Think Biden Was Hit With Directed-Energy Weapons During Debate

Trump was protected by his blue suit.

IndustryStandard , in Top Biden allies say he's still the best bet to win against Trump in November

Biden isn’t the guy to run if they truly fear the end of Democracy.

nondescripthandle ,

If he had what it takes to root out fascism he’d already be in motion using the Supreme Court ruling saying hes immune from anything he does in an official capacity. Dems in general are too tepid to even try. I really hope I’m wrong but leaving options on the table unused is the democratic way.

Ultraviolet ,

The more they pull this shit, the harder it is to not believe they’re just the fascists’ controlled opposition.

systemglitch , in Instances of anti-LGBTQ vandalism reported in nearly two dozen states during Pride Month

So everyone is pretty chill overall.

FlyingSquid , (edited ) in US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

I posted this in another thread.

I am really confused about this ruling.

“But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts.”

He’s not being prosecuted for exercising core constitutional powers or official acts. He’s being prosecuted for election fraud, inciting an insurrectionist mob and mishandling classified documents. None of those are core constitutional powers and they clearly can’t be official acts.

Edit: I just love this part-

Without immunity, Trump’s lawyer said, sitting presidents would face “blackmail and extortion” by political rivals due to the threat of future prosecution.

Trump just faces blackmail and extortion from his political allies. Like Vladimir Putin.

FireTower ,
@FireTower@lemmy.world avatar

They sent it back down to the lower courts because they need to determine if he was acting officially. If he was acting outside of an official constitutional capacity he is criminally responsible. If he was doing his official duties with in the constitution he’s alright.

It’ll probably end up with him hit with some charges and avoiding others.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Why does this need to be determined? He wasn’t. He just wasn’t. Nothing he is being charged with is constitutional, which is the point.

catloaf ,

In your opinion. It needs to be determined by a court.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

It already was determined by a court. Now they’re sending it back to that court to re-determine it.

FireTower ,
@FireTower@lemmy.world avatar

That’s just due process of law. The lower court can’t just wax seal issues of constitutionality with out looking at them. Doing so would be a fantastic grounds for appeal.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

They already looked at them before he appealed to SCOTUS. And SCOTUS didn’t rule that they were wrong as far as I can tell.

SnotFlickerman ,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Devil’s Advocate: It’s been needing to be determined since fucking Nixon left office, and our entire government has been waffling about it for 70 years, because it’s a question they don’t actually want answered. It’s only convenient to them now as a reason to give Trump a legal time-out so he can make it to the election without more indictments.

The District Court in question has already defined official versus unofficial acts, which is part of why the SC released this so late on fucking purpose. Because even though the DC is ready to go with their findings, they’ll have to wait until October to kick it back up the chain to the Supreme Court when Trump inevitably appeals.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

It won’t be answered if Trump gets in. I guess that’s the hope.

SnotFlickerman ,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

That’s the . I think it goes a little farther than “hope” with these guys. They think they can manifest reality.

We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do’.

-Karl Rove

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

They see 1984 as a manual without recognizing the warnings in Animal Farm.

SnotFlickerman ,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

In some ways, you can almost see why trying to “erase” bad ideas is intoxicating, since humans seem endlessly drawn to them.

It’s like in tech circles, the joke goes that some Sci-Fi writer creates a horrible invention and includes a warning “DO NOT BUILD THE TORMENT NEXUS” and that warning, repeatedly, goes ignored. People are like “but we could make good profit from the Torment Nexus!”

AI is a good example. “If we don’t make the terrible AI, someone else will, so we have to make the Torment Nexus, errr, I mean AI.”

But trying to stop all these bad ideas is just Fahrenheit 451 with extra steps.

prole ,

AI is a good example. “If we don’t make the terrible AI, someone else will, so we have to make the Torment Nexus, errr, I mean AI.”

That mode of thought is a byproduct of capitalism.

SnotFlickerman ,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I think the Soviets and the space race with the USA would prove that the “We have to build it faster, first!” isn’t just a capitalist thing.

Capitalism incentivizes it, absolutely. To be clear, I’m not making some “it’s human nature” argument, culture plays a huge role. Capitalist culture influences it greatly, but I think humans “racing” to achieve something before another does is outside the scope of just capitalism.

pdxfed ,

They don’t mind being the pigs, their only driver is to jot be the other animals who suffered with someone else in power.

dhork ,

Some of the evidence that Jack Smith has put together involve some form of Trump’s official capacity. for instance, the Times notes that one of the points of the prosecution was that Trump tried to get Jeffrey Clark installed as acting AG in the days before Jan 6, presumably because he would go along with the coup. One of the findings of the Court is that appointments like that are within the President’s direct duties, and can’t be used as evidence against him, even if it can be proven that the appointment was made to directly piss on the Constitution Trump swore to protect.

The Times also notes that Trump’s pressure campaign on Pence is similarly protected now.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

The Times also notes that Trump’s pressure campaign on Pence is similarly protected now.

How can that be constitutional?

dhork ,

Because presiding over the counting of the votes is one of the very few duties the Constitution allocates to the VP, so is covered under this new doctrine. He has the absolute right to conduct that how he sees fit, without regard to whether he is upholding his oath to the Constitution or not, and any conversations he had with the President are part of that duty, and similarly protected. If it turns out he is not upholding that oath, the only remedy is impeachment. (And finding 67 Senators to agree to convict.)

Absolute power, just as the Founders intended.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Which, I guess, includes blackmailing the VP if necessary. To protect the president from blackmail.

Fades ,

because they need to determine if he was acting officially.

this was already ruled on, reelection campaign is NOT an official capacity thing PERIOD. This move is nothing but another delay to ensure this shit falls on a date post-election

EmptySlime ,

Delaying until after the election was the main point yeah. He did get a couple other goodies from it though to my understanding. Presumption of immunity and not being able to admit testimony or communications of the president and his staff being the big ones from what I’m reading.

But absolutely Remand is the big prize for Trump here. Having the case remanded back to the lower courts all but guarantees that it won’t be concluded before the election. Hopefully it doesn’t entirely gut the other prosecutions as well but I don’t have a lot of faith that it isn’t going to basically kill the other cases.

agamemnonymous ,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

As for a President’s unofficial acts, there is no immunity. Although Presidential immunity is required for official actions to ensure that the President’s decisionmaking is not distorted by the threat of future litigation stemming from those actions, that concern does not support immunity for unofficial conduct. Clinton, 520 U. S., at 694, and n. 19. The separation of powers does not bar a prosecution predicated on the President’s unofficial acts.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Right, and why do the questions “can a president officially commit election fraud” and “can a president officially incite a violent mob” and “can a president officially mishandle classified documents?” need to be determined? The answers have already been determined. They are all no.

Zaktor ,

Constitutionally defined roles have absolute immunity (e.g., pardons). Other “official acts” are presumed to have immunity, but what acts are official is not well defined and as written can be very expansive. Since the Court gets to decide each one on a case by case basis, it will presumably apply more expansively to fascist allies and more narrowly to opponents. All Trump needs to do is present a flimsy excuse for how he was “protecting the election” or “making a political speech as president”. The liberal judges are correctly ringing alarm bells. “Official acts” isn’t a guardrail.

Track_Shovel , in Conspiracy Theorists Think Biden Was Hit With Directed-Energy Weapons During Debate

https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/18b1265e-d7a4-4e2a-9ce0-0e9d49e1fd97.jpeg

Not that I wanted the debate to go the way it did

remotelove , in A teen tech whiz nicknamed 'God's influencer' will become the first millennial saint

I was teaching people how to download porn years before that kid showed up. That should have made me at least a cardinal or something and I ain’t even catholic.

Chozo , in Two missing Georgia firefighters are found dead in a car in Tennessee

Kuhbander’s mom, Jane, posted on social media days after her son was last seen. She claimed that Kuhbander was ‘coerced’ by Anderson and that she was a danger to herself. She also claimed that Kuhbander did not go with her willingly.

Family had said the two were romantically involved but had broken up before they went missing.

For as few details as this article has, they certainly do let you paint a pretty disturbing picture of what happened.

Ltcpanic , in 16-year-old Quincy Wilson now the youngest-ever male US track Olympian

Boy, oh boy. Wow

TheDeepState , in New York City promised to build a shelter for trans people. Activists are demanding it follow through

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • remotelove , in Conspiracy Theorists Think Biden Was Hit With Directed-Energy Weapons During Debate

    I don’t buy it in this particular case, but “directed energy” can do some funky things: youtu.be/J-SH18dtBlY?si=40dOJbu4O9ZWWCsZ

    (No, it’s not a conspiracy theory video or any of that crap. Benn Jordan is a musician that likes all kinds of funky sound things.)

    ToucheGoodSir , in Sudan: paramilitaries loot the village of Jebal Moya | Africanews

    Sounds like some peace keepers need to come in and get these looters in order. I doubt they’re going to be as economically productive as the people whose stuff they stole and drove away.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines