I wonder if there would be a way to draw that up. A healthcare system paid for by the states that participate and distributed federally. Treatment only for those from states that participate. Thus still pitting the government against the pharmaceutical companies in terms of fair prices and pushes states to ideally make their own choices which would slowly move towards more and more states choosing to support their people. We would have to be dicks and deny medical attention to people coming from other states. I’m sure there are a million holes to work out, but no one should have any reason to argue with it outside “I don’t want others to get help if I can’t.”
I would argue that we provide medical care for out of state people but all the facilities have posters providing the truth and sources of why it works well in this state. Maybe that way they’ll look a little deeper into why they have to travel to another state to get help.
Omg there’s this toy my kid had (we gave it away) that we called the “Euro Crab” and it would play European Rave/EDM type music and frantically zipped side to side around your living room. My dog was traumatized.
Nope. No other animals except humans can be "gay." They often can be homosexual, however. Horses mount other male horses quite often and mules do also, and monkeys, chimps, dogs, ducks, geese, cats, etc all engage in homosexual behavior. It's as natural as breathing is.
But the term "gay" denotes a whole lifestyle built around a homosexual preference, and only humans make their lives exclusively about their sexual preferences. And I am not saying that all humans do that either, some do but many don't.
Some gay people make their whole lives about their homosexuality, and being "gay," but not every homosexual person does. For some of us, it's really just a sex preference, not a whole lifestyle, and that's also fine - to each his own. I'm just pointing out that other animals don't really have what can accurately be called "gay" lifestyles.
No - well, maybe. I'm definitely an "overthinker" about everything. I did work with a human sexuality researcher for about eight years and found some interesting data and I did see a lot of research about gay vs. straight personalities. I guess I over think because, it's just who I am. So maybe yes. I've spend a long time considering what defines "gay" and what doesn't.....probably too much.
Tell me, what exactly defines a “gay lifestyle”? Just having homosexual romantic and sexual preferences? Bc that’s not a lifestyle, that’s just how some people feel, same way you probably have heterosexual preferences. Lifestyle is a choice, attraction isn’t. There’s really nothing more to it than that, gay is a state of being, not choices you make. Never seen anyone try to define gay like you do, let alone gay people
Edit just saw some of your other comments on the matter, you’re definitely not a homophobe. I removed a more confrontational part of my comment
Right exactly - to me, having sexual preference (as a male) for other males, is just a "preference," not a lifestyle as you say. I mean I did have hetero sex up until my mid-20s, and then it all changed. So it's not like I don't find females attractive or have desires for them, but they aren't my primary "preference."
And I like your definition of Lifestyle being a choice, while attraction isn't. I agree with that totally. But I think there is always some element of choice involved in deciding to live a certain way, as flamoyantly out of the closet, or in your face about being gay, or being closeted, or just being neutral...and much of the choice comes from how you honestly feel about yourself.
I'm not a homophobe at all, I'm glad you could see that. I mean I'm gay but it's always been to me, a huge blessing and I've always tried to encourage others to see it that way. However - I am very open about discussing issues about gayness, and sometimes that comes across as being somehow anti-gay or not fully accepting. And I hope that is not how I come across.
You’re not wrong about being out or closeted both being a lifestyle choice, I hadn’t really thought of it that way. I initially thought you were conflating being gay with engaging with gay culture, which wasn’t what was going on. Sorry if I came across as aggressive earlier, there’s def nothing wrong with talking about gay stuff :3
Actually to me I don't really see why people conflate being gay with gay culture - although I guess it's obvious that they would, it just doesn't always apply to most people. For me, anyway, being homo attracted means just that - it's just what my sexuality is, not what I do with my free time (I mean I don't seek out movies or books or beaches or bars that are gay, but that's just me).
I have friends whose whole lives are built around their same-sex attraction, who dress flamboyantly and do the whole rainbow decor thing and always want to go do a gay-oriented thing when we go out. I'm fine with that, but it seems like those of us who just want to lead a very boring "not in your face" life don't get the same kind of respect.
Anyway thanks for the feedback and responses. I think we're really on the same wavelength, maybe I could have worded my initial statement more clearly.
I think the actual story that Alex “I don’t get enough oxygen when I sleep” Jones fudged that conspiracy theory from is way more interesting than turning frogs gay.
And yes, Alex Jones recently said that he suffers from oxygen deficiency when he sleeps because of his “freakishly big neck” (or whatever words he used) which gives him visions from god.
Real talk though, that’s honestly quite fascinating, isn’t it. Yiddish is a Germanic language while Hebrew is Semitic. Those are two entirely different language families, yet both languages use the same letters.
Also, Finnish and Hungarian belong to a common family even though they read and sound entirely different and have little cultural and no geographic overlap.
lemmy.today
Newest