This is Google’s way of throwing a fit. They’ve been thwarted at every attempt to replace cookies with something WAY MORE creepy and WORSE by privacy advocates.
They’re quickly realizing that people will not give advertisers free reign anymore.
If there was a Christian performance at the ceremony, but a Satanic performance was not allowed, I would be upset. But, there are no performances related to religion or culture and this is not about Native American discrimination.
This isn’t strictly about religion. It has deeper cultural meaning that whites demanding attention from their sky daddy. This is closer to disallowing a turban over a “no head covering” policy. Similar to another case where a Maori kid wasn’t allowed a Haka at their graduation. I think that one happened in LA and it’s still at the complaints-before-the-lawsuit stage.
But what if cloud daddy gets mad because your kid showed their hair to the sky?? Or what if someone finds out you didn’t ritually mutilate the genitals of your male children??? It could be embarrassing.
On the flip side, culture is something children are specifically in school to learn. I remember one year of high school we had a month where absolutely no bread was allowed on campus because someone bullied a Jewish kid, so we ALL had to be punished. Yknow. Like the nazis punished the jews. We kinda made laws about that, but since kids don’t have rights at school, fuck the rest of us I guess.
Why would you come with a campaign tweaked against a specific opponent and not with a program that is the best for the majority of the citizen? Politics is really stupid especially in 2024!
The tricky thing here (as far as I understand it) is that the appeal to the Supreme Court is not about whether it was a good idea for the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals not to vacate the conviction. It’s about whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals did something contrary to the law when it chose not to vacate. Does that court have a legal obligation according to the Constitution to defer to the Attorney General, not just in this case but in all similar cases?
I think that it is in fact true that “Nothing in the Constitution compels a state court to provide a particular measure of deference to a state official’s confession of error.” Maybe there ought to be something like that in there but that’s not the Supreme Court’s job to decide (despite their trend of making such decisions anyway). The people of Oklahoma should have elected judges more concerned with not executing people who might be innocent.
I think that it is in fact true that “Nothing in the Constitution compels a state court to provide a particular measure of deference to a state official’s confession of error.”
Back in my day, the Internet was a testament to human ingenuity, determination and spirit, as noteworthy as the Manhatten project or the pyramids, not just synonym for one of Google’s crappy products that will inevitably end up in the Google graveyard.
Denying him the photo op by refusing to go to his public event but having a private meeting with him to tell him he’s a shithead war criminal who needs to stop interfering in our election (hopefully)
Given where we are now, it seems obvious that you would let the delegates pick the candidate, but it’s sort of strange that The People don’t actually get any say in who the candidate is. Kamala will get the nomination from the ruling class alone. It’s an option that could be used to circumvent the democratic process. Something to keep an eye on.
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.