There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

HerrVorragend , in Aaaand now she is being sued.
@HerrVorragend@lemmy.world avatar

Planets are not allowed to have higher gravity than the star!

Rooty , (edited ) in Home sweet home

I was once like that, until I started working, now I can shit just about everywhere.

DrMango , in just ignore it

Why is this cropped so poorly?

NickwithaC ,
@NickwithaC@lemmy.world avatar

To avoid giving the original artist credit and also to avoid repost detection on Reddit.

thorbot OP ,

I didn’t crop it. I just stole it from elsewhere

WilliamTheWicked , in Sky daddy

This is actually light-years further along than most of the garbage posted in the atheist memes community. I honestly was starting to think they didn’t have it in them.

1984 , in Scrubs is pretty good
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Very cute girls on that show, and funny. Really liked scrubs.

DmMacniel , in Scrubs is pretty good

And then… Brendan Fraser.

1984 ,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Just an amazing human being and actor. If you haven’t seen The Whale, it’s highly recommended.

It made me cry though. It’s really sad.

DmMacniel , (edited )

Of course he is an amazing being and actor.

Have you seen the scrubs episodes where he played Cox’s brother Cox’s best friend Ben?

1984 ,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Yeah I’ve seen them all many times. They are sad and funny at the same time, its brilliant directing and acting.

KiofKi ,
@KiofKi@feddit.de avatar

*Jordan’s Brother

DmMacniel ,

Oh… my apologies.

TrismegistusMx ,
@TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world avatar

I can’t watch that movie because I work in a field that lets me smell it.

kofe ,

I just watched the other night and was unreasonably angry at the end crying uncontrollably. Idk how to mark spoilers on here but the end just pissed me off. Phenomenal otherwise

1984 ,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Yeah… Because it shows how cruel people can be to eachother. Thats why you got angry? Without spoiling…

kofe ,

No, I can’t explain without spoiling.

ElmarsonTheThird ,

Where do you think we are?

Jonny ,
@Jonny@kbin.social avatar

Too soon! ;-;

feedum_sneedson ,

They kind of gloss over the fact that’s a complete psychotic break.

hitmyspot ,

I think that’s one of the strengths of the show. They don’t try and ram home every emotion or problem. It’s a hospital. They deal with the worst of times.

feedum_sneedson ,

blurst

HERRAX ,

Fuck me man, you pretty much made me tear up with that single line. Favorite/most memorable scene in the show for me!

Aderyna ,

Damn I had forgotten about that! Huge memory unlocked

jeltebr ,

I’m in tears at the thought

mathemachristian , in Scrubs is pretty good

Its one of those shows that’s better remembered than rewatched though

Rezenate ,
@Rezenate@lemmy.world avatar

Not true at all. I’m rewatching now and it’s as good as ever!

CaptainBlagbird ,
@CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, the best unique humour of any show (that I have seen), and it still works today.

n3m37h ,

You need to watch Allo Allo

joolez ,
@joolez@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

This only happens if you slip into Season 9 in my mind.

mathemachristian ,

Well a lot of the humour is really transphobic or sexist and I definitely remember at least one racist joke. There is definitely a lot of good jokes and it’s a funny show, but then something like that comes out of left field and it just kills the mood for me.

n3m37h ,

I don’t think we watched the same show. No transphobic crap in that show, and the rest of it is JOKES, grow up.

stillwater ,

There are instances of some gay panic moments, especially in the earliest seasons when that was the norm for early 2000s western culture, but to suggest “a lot” of the humour is of this nature is just plain false.

mathemachristian ,

that was the norm for early 2000s western culture,

Which is why I think it’s better remembered than rewatched.

joolez , (edited )
@joolez@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

The problem is when you take something out of its time and see every portrayed character as stereotype - you will kill all humor in the end. Imaginge some todays series in 10 years. There will always be some further developed people who adapted their own human being to whats morally acceptable in given time.

Ask people who are “affected” by the humor and if they are offended. Or make jokes about growing grass.

BruceTwarzen ,

I never fully understood the appeal, but i have some good memories watching it with a group. I rewatched some the other day and it was really gucking bad. I guess if you find bad slapstick funny or seeing people run in these fast forward sequences, then it's pretty good.

CaptainBlagbird , (edited )
@CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world avatar

What has two thumbs and doesn’t give a crap what you think?

https://i.imgur.com/sQGb9qp.gif

RagingToad ,

Lol, link gives an error right now but I have the image in my head so it’s okay :)

Laticauda ,

I watched it for the first time recently and it was good but… Nowhere near as amazing as the internet led me to believe it would be. JD and Elliot’s relationship in particular was infuriating and I hated any episodes that were about it. They turned each other into horrible people.

stappern ,

Maybe that’s the message ? :)

Laticauda ,

To me they felt more like the generic will-they-or-won’t-they pairing that a lot of sitcoms felt the need to include and constantly inject with drama, rather than an intentional exploration of a toxic relationship. I honestly preferred them a lot more as friends and felt like their characters had a lot more chemistry together when their relationship was platonic. I was hoping during the stretch of time when they finally broke up for real after being on and off again for a while, and JD didn’t have feelings for her anymore supposedly, that things would stay that way. But no, they get back together again eventually. Maybe I’m biased because I’m not generally interested in romance, but I didn’t mind the relationship between Dr. Cox and Jordan, or Turk and Carla. It was just JD and Elliot that I disliked. It was honestly my least favourite part of the show.

Sharkwellington ,

I’m in complete agreement, the relationship between JD and Elliot was awful. It felt like JD was in a permanent state of puppy love while ignoring a mountain of red flags. The writing always seemed to demand a winner for their disagreements too. There was never any compromise, just one of them deciding to take blame and say sorry while the other accepts the apology. Elliot always seemed to be the winner, even when she was objectively way in the wrong. The worst example I can think of is when

spoilerElliot cheated on her boyfriend with JD. I think she believed their relationship was over but it wasn’t? JD wants to tell so they will break up. Elliot doesn’t want him to so they can keep dating. They never bother to think about the boyfriend’s feelings. JD “does the nice thing” and doesn’t tell so Elliot can continue her relationship built on a lie. Whole episode felt sleazy.

Funny enough, Elliot sort of became a heel character for me, I enjoyed it when she got knocked down a peg. From what I understand she’s a lot of people’s least favorite.

Laticauda ,

Idk how to spoiler tag so, uh, scrubs spoiler warning:

Oh that boyfriend thing was INFURIATING. It honestly lowered my opinion of her character by a lot. And iirc I think that was the boyfriend that was such a good match for her, like he understood her neurotic hangups and was good at reading her and communicating with her, I think it was that guy at least, but I could be getting them mixed up. I remember thinking she should have stayed with that guy who was so understanding of her issues. It’s been a few months since I watched so my memory is a bit spotty on whether that was the same guy or not. But yeah, I honestly almost dropped the show after that episode it pissed me off so much. And it bothered me how when JD was obsessed with her he would lose all his empathy that he would display in other episodes that weren’t focused on their relationship and just become a sex obsessed idiot who was desperate to get into her pants.

Oh and don’t even get me started on when he finally got together with her and then realized right after that he didn’t actually love her, he just wanted something he couldn’t have, so once he had it he didn’t want it any more. My God did that piss me off. If the writers were so dead set on fucking up Elliot’s relationship to get her back with JD the least they could do was fucking commit to it! That really soured my opinion of his character as well. They both came across as just, the worst people ever. It honestly made later episodes when JD was suddenly a good empathetic guy again a bit harder to accept for a while. I mean Elliot was always a bit self absorbed so while it made me like her less, it didn’t necessarily go against her character or ruin the believability of what the writers were going for with her (part of her character development was her growing out of her sheltered suppressed sheltered rich girl personality and becoming a more well rounded person. The writing didn’t always succeed at writing those types of stories for her but the intent at least still came across, so her being a bad person sometimes wasn’t necessarily out of character, even if I had hoped she was at least better than that), but JD’s entire shtick from the start was being lovable goofball with hidden depths who may make mistakes but ultimately wants to do the right thing. So if he would do something as awful as trying to sabotage the relationship of someone who was supposedly his friend, and then decide he doesn’t even want to be with her after all that, then it becomes a bit harder to believe that he actually cares about his patients, who are basically strangers, when he would act like such a sociopath towards someone he actually knows and supposedly should care about.

Idk, that whole thing just really poisoned a significant portion of the show for a while for me. Any episodes that were focused on romantic relationships or drama between the characters without actually being related to hospital life were probably my least favourite, even the more tolerable ones. The show was at its best when it was actually about the premise of them being in a hospital and how the characters engaged with it rather than devolving into generic interpersonal conflict that you could find in any other sitcom. There were a few exceptions, I know I usually enjoyed the episodes centering on JD and Cox’s relationship even if it was outside of the context of the hospital, but those were rare compared to the Romance drama related ones. I could not care less about JD’s dating life with or without Elliot, it was always insufferable whenever that was the focus.

To be clear, I DO like Scrubs and think it’s a good show overall, but I don’t think it’s the perfect show the internet treats it as. It has lots of flaws. There was lots of good stuff in it, but some bad stuff too, and when it was at its worst it felt like that dragged it down quite a bit for me. It could have been a lot better, if they’d focused more on that good stuff.

It didn’t help that when I watched it with my roommate it was our sitcom replacement for Schitt’s Creek which we’d just finished watching, and Schitt’s Creek was so good from start to finish and avoided so many of those annoying pitfalls that other sitcoms tend to have, or deconstructed them in an interesting way. Couples actually, gasp, communicated! Imagine that. Even the one technically on again off again relationship in that show (if it can be called that) was done well and in a way that worked really well for the characters’ development and didn’t feel like it was just drama for the sake of drama, when they split up it made sense why and felt like an important step for the main character in the relationship, and when they got back together again it felt natural because they’d developed so much as characters by that point and were different people than they had been the first time. So coming from that to scrubs which had a lot of my least favourite romance tropes, particularly with JD and Elliot was a bit jarring lol. Turk and Carla were done well, but they couldn’t make up for the other two and their dumpster fire.

This turned into a bit of a rant unintentionally lol, I guess I’m still a bit salty over that part of the show. I swear I do still like the show, I just wish it had lived up to the hype.

kameecoding ,

I rewatch it like every 2 years or so and it holds up and is really good.

It’s my ToP 3 show of all time with Community and IASIP.

FinalRemix ,

What version? Because I’m worried on a rewatch that the problems with the soundtrack are gonna really detract from the experience.

kameecoding ,

THe high seas aren’t affected by the licensing squabbles of scrubs

FinalRemix ,

So… that means there’s a version out there with the original broadcast soundtrack intact?

kameecoding ,

yep, sure is. at least I hope so because I deleted my old version ,

yep just checked it, it’s still up, but it’s a private tracker so not the easiest access.

Dasnap , in I'm looking at you, Mrs Incredible.
@Dasnap@lemmy.world avatar

For my own sanity:

https://i.imgur.com/mVozGYP.png

comedy ,
@comedy@kbin.social avatar

Thank you

quindraco ,

o7

Ubermeisters ,

It’s okay folks he removed nobody

snowe ,
@snowe@programming.dev avatar

thank you so much.

Graphine , (edited ) in What do you choose?

RadioShack.

I remember going as a kid, once. I was 5 I think. It was…unique. A shit ton of red I remember. And cheap cell phone cords. Wish I could’ve experienced it more. Especially during the 90s. But that’s before my time.

Dumeinst ,

I remember going to RadioShack as a kid too and they had a Tandy computer setup. It was magical for 8 year old me. I think they even did repairs back then because that electrical soldering smell is seared in my memory.

Graphine ,

That sounds amazing. Always wanted a Tandy.

DarthBueller ,

The clone PC junior for the masses!

xX_fnord_Xx ,

My family’s fist computer was a Tandy 1000 around 92. I was so stoked to make video games on the fly like Clarissa Explains It All did.

Little did I know game development takes a little more elbow grease than cutting and pasting pictures of your friends into an existing game format.

I learned a lot about getting around in DOS because the desktop OS it shipped with was garbage, at least.

Wootz ,

There is a single one-off store in my city (Copenhagen, Denmark) that is almost exactly like a mid 90s radioshack. Cheap cables, electronics projects, bargain bin full of random components, shoddy soldering irons, etc.

Somehow it’s still around. I’m deathly afraid that it’ll close some day, so I try to shop there whenever possible.

DarthBueller ,

If you think 90s Radio Shack was great, trust me when I say that 80s Radio shack was even better. They had Heathkit project kits, robots, various TRS and Tandys, plus PARTS. It was so good.

protosevn , in Choose your loadout

D because I love dogs

Roundcat , in I'm looking at you, Mrs Incredible.
@Roundcat@kbin.social avatar

I still remember when reddit got thirsty for Hiro's mom from Big Hero 6.

this_1_is_mine ,

*aunt

Voli ,

*stepmom

crashoverride , in *Impotent rage*

Why can’t the software have an option to hold your phone vertically but shoot horizontally? How is this not fixed yet?

IndefiniteBen ,
@IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl avatar

Because the sensors are landscape 4:3 and you would lose resolution when doing so.

AFAIK there’s no other reason other than that and giving people the option might confuse people.

miss_brainfart , (edited )
@miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

Many camera sensors in phones are so high resolution nowadays, you could fit 4K video in any orientation

IndefiniteBen ,
@IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl avatar

I agree! I wonder if there’s already camera apps that do this?

In any case, unless it’s in the default camera app and a default option, it will likely do nothing to reduce the plague of vertical video. I would guess that most people filming something that would be better in landscape didn’t even think about it, so won’t think about turning an option on.

Lev_Astov ,
@Lev_Astov@lemmy.world avatar

There is and has been for a while: horizon.camera

Spambox ,

Love this app, used it for years. I’d love to see them get picked up as a standard camera app on a big brand manufacturer so all the others would create their own version.

wischi ,

Many sensor are 3:2 or non trivial ratios because of how the color filter pattern is aligned. Why do you think the sensors are 4:3?

IndefiniteBen ,
@IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl avatar

I realise sensors come in other aspect ratios, but I didn’t want to spend the time researching and listing them all. Some sensors are 4:3 (like the IMX363).

But that’s irrelevant to my point that the sensor is not square which means you lose more resolution cropping to 16:9 in one orientation (usually portrait) than the other.

areyouevenreal , (edited )

I used to have a phone with a special camera that took 16:9 landscape video while the phone was in portrait mode. Good times.

So it’s definitely possible for the phone manufacturers to implement they just choose not to.

wheeldawg ,

They’d figure it out real quick if manufacturers could ask agree to build sensors turned 90 degrees and disable recording in portrait. Obviously keep the possibility to take photos, but disable video recording.

Then I sit back and watch to see what happens next. I see a few possibilities.

1- Highly unlikely, but newer phone sales go in the toilet, while the second market goes crazy with people trying to get phones that still have the portrait camera. People will be confused at first, but most people tend to pick it up quick and just incorporate it as the new normal. It would have to be coordinated as a big launch at once, to force quick adoption.

2- People just kind of shrug and move on with it, like they did with changes like headphone jack removal, or charger non-inclusion. Except this time, it’s a good thing.

3- TikTok dies a horrible death, and YouTube shorts jumps on the market, finally becoming an actual thing that’s not just a backup copy of TikTok content. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a short that was made for YouTube, not for TikTok.

IndefiniteBen ,
@IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl avatar

I think someone will make an app that overrides the IMU measurements so the phone thinks it’s in landscape when it’s portrait, then use another app to rotate the video to be vertical.

QuazarOmega ,

If you did that, then your video feed would always be using less pixels than it could have otherwise if the orientation of the camera and display matched though, the result could be seen at better resolution after shooting, but that would be pretty tedious

Bianca_0089 , in *Impotent rage*

youteub wul begin playn four videos at once, justa save bandwidth!

(cant find video link yet) ah here it is

Zink ,

This is pretty good, but damn it’s almost 11 years old! I guess 2012 was well into smart phone adoption, but it seems like it’s only gotten worse thanks to apps like Snapchat and tiktok

Steveanonymous , in Scrubs is pretty good
@Steveanonymous@lemmy.world avatar

Ricks daughter is Barbie?

n3m37h ,

You mean Beth?

MrVilliam ,

Second Becky

dabster291 , in And make it pink and blue.
@dabster291@lemmy.zip avatar

why did i think this was an oppenheimer reference

Chariotwheel ,

Barbie: "what you want?"

Him: "become death, destroyer of worlds"

Barbie: "say no more"

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines