Gentrifying a place is investment of capital into formerly-poor areas in cities, and formerly-poor areas in cities were poor because they were ghettos, generally as a result of redlining, white flight, or both.
We should be gentrifying every inner city, subsidizing current-occupant rent as it climbs, and lifting people out of the ghettos we built.
No I think when you shove a bunch of “undesirables” into an area by literally not letting them get loans or see houses outside of that area, you create ghettos.
You may wanna give “redlining” a Google, and then search up the history of places you want to “protect” from gentrification. You’ll find the two are nearly always connected.
We owe it to the people who live there to financially apologize for the atrocities we committed upon them and their families in the past.
We should financially apologize for the atrocities and lift people up like you suggest, but that’s not what gentrification means. The other commenter was right. Gentrification means upgrading an area and displacing those who live there.
gentrification jĕn″trə-fĭ-kā′shən noun
The restoration and upgrading of deteriorated urban property by middle-class or affluent people, often resulting in displacement of lower-income people.
The process of renewal and rebuilding accompanying the influx of middle class or affluent people into deteriorating areas that often displaces earlier usually poorer residents.
The restoration of run-down urban areas by the middle class (resulting in the displacement of low-income residents).
Depends on your definition of gentrification. Most Americans do not associate renovation/upkeep/modernization but undue rent increase with minor changes to the space, I feel.
In the Oneshot she wouldn’t often just sit quietly while panicking and glaring but would say weird or odd things trying to get a point across or ramble for the entire page.
IIRC she still stood still internally while internally freaking out when speaking. But it was more like she had two modes, rambling and oversharing random stuff or barely saying a word and being kind of dumb.
Is that GPT-3.5 (ie the free version) or GPT-4? I tried with the former today and the screenshot of this thread is from that try. I just tried again right now with GPT-3.5 and it still yields the same answer:
I asked if Kenya was in Africa after and it apologized for the mistake. I then asked the original question and it corrected itself to the wrong answer again.
Yeah I think these screenshots probably exclude all the fuckery they pump into ChatGPT before getting the wrong answer. Pretending ChatGPT isn’t the biggest development in the history of commerce isn’t going to change the impact it has, it’s just going to leave people surprised and unprepared when it changes everything.
Pretending ChatGPT isn’t the biggest development in the history of commerce
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. Is it neat? Yes. Is it a useful tool? Yes (when they haven’t put a million restrictions and performance limitations on it).
Is it the biggest development in the history of commerce? Almost certainly not. LLMs are a highly-sophisticated game of mad libs, they work even better than many would expect (as Google learned when they bet against them) but they are not general AI or world-changing. It’ll have to be combined with a lot of other tech before it reaches the level we can say “biggest development in the history of commerce”
A properly trained AI can produce an accurate analysis report that takes professionals 90 days to compile, in about half a second. I don’t remember the name of the business, but one business managed to get it to do 8 YEARS worth of one employee’s work in 5 minutes. My boss was telling us about a product that integrates into the code repository and knows how all of the code works. He got a demo and he described a bug to it, it found the problem, fixed it, created a feature branch, pushed it to GitHub, created a pull request, and emailed the admin letting them know a pull request was waiting for them. It has increased my productivity at work by probably 600%. It is a game changer. It may not be the biggest change to commerce ever, but it certainly is in our lifetime. Experts are saying that it will dramatically impact 80% of all jobs on the planet within the next ten years. That’s some fancy mad libs indeed.
I think these screenshots probably exclude all the fuckery
Before you make that accusation go and ask it that question, it’s not hard, there’s no hidden “fuckery”. You must live a sad life if you feel obligated to get emotional and make silly accusations just because an internet stranger made fun of ChatGPT.
lemmyshitpost
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.