You’re not contextualizing reasonably here. The bourgeoisie in his context meaning, the capitalist class. It is just a comment about how it has tilted to fashionable to support LGBT. That is a reasonable statement. Participation in events is a controversial subject for many. Personally I believe gendered sports should be entirely eliminated in favor of singular combined competition of humans, but I’m a giant dude that loves cycling, where a little woman could have a real advantage over someone like me. I find sports that lack such diverse nuance somewhat outdated.
Many might not see the two party system of the USA as what it presents itself as internally. It is not hard to say, this is a one party system that wears two masks and be entirely uninterested in which clown color mask faces forward at the moment.
I see indifference. I see neutrality. I don’t see two sides of a conversation with transparency that qualifies the accusation friend. Feel free to post with transparency though.
Maybe you need the context of all the transphobic shit that’s happened lately, like the Olympics boxing stuff? Idk, it still seems transphobic without context. No clue who this guy is though
Because a specific group of populists ‘lost’, but populism still works and will continue to work wherever there is people in dire situations.
The more dire your situation is, the more you need a solution. And then someone telling you “it’s the fault of those other people”, that just offers up a real straightforward supposed solution.
Even if it’s pretty clear that it cannot possibly actually solve the real problem, the prospect of a mild improvement will have many going along and ignoring morals.
This is what is tho... There people who are directly at fault. The issue who is who fascist blame and how they won't ever name their daddies is part of the problem... When in reality owner class pushing this shit are the ones causing the dire circumstances for the working class to begin with.
It is a clever tactic and has proven very effective at manipulating men with fragile egos.
Funny enough, fake news will never call out anything that would endanger economic interests of the owner class. Why would anyone take these clowns seriously?
It’s a website from the early 2000’s that had absurdist flash animations centered around weird cartoon characters in a fiction small town. It was kind of like a weird interactive TV show for a while.
I’ve had to explain it to my younger friends from college that all these flash animations the old farts reference and nostalgiagasm over were simply the best media available on the internet at the time, because online video just wasn’t really a thing yet outside of flash animations
Probably Wayne Gretzky? I don’t even know anything about ice hockey and I know he’s supposed to be the most dominant player of any sport. Like he and his brother have the record for highest combined goals of any pair of brothers: 2,857 by Wayne, 4 by Brent. If you take away all his goals, he’d be the highest scoring player of all time on assists alone. There have been 13 times when a player has scored over 100 goals in a season in NHL history: Lemieux (once), Orr (once), and Gretzy (eleven times in a row). He retired last century and still holds 57 records. I’m not gonna keep picking out examples but there’s a bunch more facts like this that sound like the old “chuck norris facts” meme but are actually true.
“If you don’t know anything about ice hockey why do you have all these facts on hand?” - I remembered seeing this kind of list before so I did a quick Google.
Edit: I’m seeing some different exact figures for some of these, but the general principle stands and I’m not invested enough in hockey facts to nail down which numbers are exactly right.
If outlier status as a sportsman makes the GOATest GOAT, sorry Gretzky, but you’re second to the Don. Sir Donald Bradman averaged 99.94 in a 20 year career as a test cricket batsman. This is in a sport where only 4 other people even pass 60, and no other passes 62. Bradman even averaged 56 in a series where the opponents create a now-banned strategy specifically to thwart his dominance.
At more than 50% above number 2, the Don is the GOATest GOAT.
It’s what was known as “bodyline”, or “fast leg theory”. In essence, bowling in a way that the ball is bowled at speeds potentially in excess of 140 km/h aimed at the batsman’s upper body or head. It makes it very hard to hit the ball, and if you do hit it, it drastically reduces the types of shots you can play and increases the chance that you only get an edge on the ball. So setting a field with a large number of fielders on the leg side (the left side for a right-handed batsman), particularly leg slips (behind and slightly to the leg side, basically forming an arc away from the wicket keeper), to greatly increase the chance of getting them out caught. It also posed a safety risk, especially at the time because safety equipment like helmets were not worn at the time.
There’s a 1984 miniseries starring Hugo Weaving as the English captain, if you’re interested. I haven’t seen it myself, and tbh I’m not sure where if anywhere it’s available online, but its reviews seem very good.
The rules were eventually changed to limit the number of bouncers that could be bowled in one over, and to limit the number of fielders behind the batsman on the leg side.
If you take away all his goals, he’d be the highest scoring player of all time on assists alone.
This is true, but every other time you’ve used the word “goals” in this post it should be “points”, points = goals + assists. Every goal has at most two assists, but typically the ratio is around ~1.5 assists for every goal. As you say, Gretzky has the record for goals and then also has more assists than any other player has points, which is ludicrously dominant.
One of the most wild things to me is how boring Gretzky highlights are. If you look at highlight footage of the other generational hockey players - Lemieux, Ovechkin, Crosby, McDavid - these guys are insane athletes who are capable of outmuscling and embarrassing the opposition. Gretzky was not a freak athlete, he just had intuition for where to be on a better level than anyone else ever has. I remember reading that when he was eight he got an exception to play in a league for ten-year-olds and completely tore it up, like five points per game, in spite of being the tiniest kid on the ice every night.
It’s not even well documented what he was doing because the NHL typically had only one camera per game in the eighties, the one following the puck, and his dominance came from where he was going when he didn’t have the puck.
If you watch hockey, every so often there will be a game where a guy doesn’t particularly stand out, but then you look on the scoresheet at the end and realize he got four points. You think I guess that he had a good game tonight. I imagine watching Gretzky was this exact feeling, except then you realize you’re fifty games into the season and this is like the thirtieth time this has happened.
Ovechkin is actually in striking distance of breaking the goals record, but 50 goals (42? I don’t remember where he ended the season.) is a large number for anyone to hit past 38. It’s pretty rare for a player to be good enough to still have a roster spot by that point, let alone score 50 in the remainder of their career. Has anyone besides Howe (in the 1970s) scored over 40 goals after 38?
In any case, I’m hoping he can break it. Ten years ago literally no one thought a major Gretzky record could be even remotely in jeopardy. It was not something anyone would give serious consideration.
Did it ever get better? Or stay the same? Cause I think sometimes about the heart as I heard it from a heartbroken guy on Rumblestrip Vermont. He said when it gets broken it's like you put it in a bag and smash it. And it's like china, you can only put it together so many times before it becomes dust. But personally, I've found I am miserable if I put myself there. And instead remind myself that there is no cap on love, and that it's a wellspring that we can all draw from.
Call me crazy, but I loved mine (near the end). No crease, could still multitask fine. The fact it folded shut kept me from opening and doom scrolling as much. Could throw a video on one screen and “tent” the phone easily.
But yeah, the software took awhile to get even “okay” out the gate and that really hurt the user experience. I felt I was always wrestling with mine over something for the first 6mos even.
Sounds interesting. Like some sort of underground secret sporting thing that the French are doing? I wonder if this will catch on in other countries too? Are there nude pillow fighting videos and stuff like that?
Not me. In fact if it isn’t blocked and I can’t easily get rid of it, I’ll bail on the site altogether.
Honestly don’t understand what the benefit to anybody is. If I want to watch it, I will, if I don’t, I won’t. They’re just making the overall experience worse.
I assume it’s some bonehead manager that thinks it looks cool or will increase engagement though.
Look boss we have ‘engagement’ up 700% now! Everyone looks at the video!! Well, at least 5 to 15 seconds it seems but not more hmm gotta fix that too now…
Exactly. If a site tries to shove things down my throat so much that it prevents me from accessing the part that I want to access, fuck em. I close the tab.
kbin.life
Hot