Recently I borrowed my partner’s copy of Links Awakening for the Nintendo Switch. I understand that many people did not enjoy the remake due to the graphics but I am one of the weirdos who somewhat enjoys the cutesy round graphics with the intense depth of field / forced perspective look. From a pure graphical standpoint I...
DATE:
June 07, 2024 at 08:00AM
.
TITLE:
Smartphone in sight? No impact on cognitive performance, study finds
.
URL: https://www.psypost.org/smartphone-in-sight-no-impact-on-cognitive-performance-study-finds/
<p>A recent study published in the journal <em><a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/tmb0000123" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Technology, Mind, and Behavior</a></em> revealed that simply having a smartphone nearby does not significantly affect cognitive performance. Researchers found no meaningful difference in cognitive outcomes whether a smartphone was present or not. This challenges the widely held belief that merely having a smartphone in sight could be a distraction.</p>
<p>Smartphones have become an integral part of our daily lives. Beyond making calls, they serve as tools for navigation, financial transactions, work-related correspondence, and even health tracking during the COVID-19 pandemic. This extensive use has led to a sense of dependency on these devices, with many people checking their phones at least once an hour and feeling they cannot live without them. Given their omnipresence, researchers have been keen to understand their impact on cognitive functions, especially amid concerns about their potential to distract and disrupt productivity.</p>
<p>Previous studies have suggested that smartphone alerts and notifications can interrupt tasks requiring deep focus, even when these notifications are ignored. The idea is that the mere presence of a smartphone, due to its association with rewarding experiences and habitual use, might reduce available cognitive resources for other tasks. However, the results from different studies have been mixed, leading to a need for a comprehensive analysis to clarify these effects.</p>
<p>“Our interest in this topic stemmed from the widespread integration of smartphones into daily life and the growing public concern about their potential cognitive impacts,” explained study author <a href="https://faculty.smu.edu.sg/profile/andree-hartanto-2051" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Andree Hartanto</a>, an assistant professor of psychology at Singapore Management University.</p>
<p>“Many people question whether complete isolation from smartphones can improve academic and work productivity. Given the mixed findings in existing literature, we aimed to clarify whether the mere presence of smartphones significantly affects cognitive functions through a comprehensive meta-analysis.”</p>
<p>To address these mixed findings, researchers performed a meta-analysis, combining results from multiple studies to derive a more accurate overall effect. This approach allows for greater precision by aggregating data and considering variances in sample sizes across studies.</p>
<p>The study included data from 33 studies with 53 samples, encompassing a total of 5,866 participants from 12 countries. The participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 27 years, and about 64% of them were female. The studies varied in how they manipulated smartphone presence, including whether the phones were face up or down, whether they were kept by participants or researchers, and whether they were on silent or active modes. Cognitive tasks measured included executive functions, intelligence, sustained attention, and decision-making abilities.</p>
<p>The meta-analysis revealed that the presence of a smartphone had no significant effect on cognitive performance. The effect size was almost zero, indicating negligible impact. Furthermore, the effect was not moderated by factors such as demographics, smartphone dependency, or the specific methods used to manipulate smartphone presence and assess cognitive outcomes. This suggests that simply having a smartphone nearby does not interfere with cognitive tasks like decision-making or memory.</p>
<p>“The key takeaway from our study is that the mere presence of a smartphone does not significantly impair cognitive performance,” Hartanto told PsyPost. “This suggests that while smartphones are often perceived as distractions, their simple presence without active use is unlikely to impact productivity or cognitive functions in a meaningful way.”</p>
<p>Additionally, the study found that even among participants with high smartphone dependency, the mere presence of their phone did not significantly impact cognitive performance.</p>
<p>The study’s findings contradict earlier research that indicated significant negative impacts from smartphone presence. For example, some previous studies had shown that even the sound of a smartphone notification could impair academic performance. However, this new analysis suggests these effects might not be as robust as previously thought.</p>
<p>“It was surprising to find that the mere presence of smartphones had no significant effect on cognitive outcomes,” Hartanto said. “This contradicts several prior studies that suggested otherwise and indicates that the impact of smartphone presence might have been overstated in earlier research.”</p>
<p>Despite the comprehensive nature of the meta-analysis, the study had limitations. The included studies varied widely in their methods, sample characteristics, and types of cognitive tasks used, which could influence the results. For instance, some studies required participants to place their smartphones face up, while others required them to be face down. Similarly, the definition of smartphone absence varied, with some studies allowing phones to be in the same room but not within reach, and others requiring phones to be kept in a different room.</p>
<p>These variations make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the specific conditions under which smartphone presence might affect cognitive performance. Future research should aim for greater standardization in study designs to allow for more accurate comparisons.</p>
<p>“One major caveat is the methodological variability across studies included in our meta-analysis, such as differences in smartphone placement and task types,” Hartanto noted. “However, our moderation analyses showed that there was an absence of moderating effects from methodological variances, cognitive task demand, and sample characteristics.”</p>
<p>“Our long-term goals include exploring the nuanced ways in which smartphone use and dependency might affect cognitive, behavioral, and emotional outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of the results, we also aim to investigate potential moderators and individual differences that might explain why some people are more affected by smartphone presence than others.”</p>
<p>These findings have important implications for understanding the role of smartphones in our daily lives and their potential impact on productivity. They suggest that simply having a smartphone nearby may not be as distracting as previously thought, which could influence policies and recommendations around smartphone use in educational and work settings.</p>
<p>However, “it’s important to note that while our study found no significant cognitive detriment from the mere presence of smartphones, this does not rule out potential negative impacts from active smartphone use, especially in contexts requiring sustained attention and deep focus such as driving,” Hartanto added.</p>
<p>The study, “<a href="https://tmb.apaopen.org/pub/7np97zr5/release/1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Effect of Mere Presence of Smartphone on Cognitive Functions: A Four-Level Meta-Analysis</a>,” was authored by by Andree Hartanto, Verity Y. Q. Lua, K. T. A. Sandeeshwara Kasturiratna, Paye Shin Koh, Germaine Y. Q. Tng, Manmeet Kaur, Frosch Y. X. Quek, Jonathan L. Chia, and Nadyanna M. Majeed.</p>
There was a beautiful time back when I was young where we tried to change to metric and schools taught us nothing but. Now I’m ~50 years old and don’t even know how many pints are in a gallon. Or feet in a mile. Always forget whether it’s 12 or 16 that’s inches in a foot / ounce to pound. Always have to look that shit up. Because they didn’t teach us that garbage. Ever.
Guess what I NEVER have to look up? The measurements that tell you in their fucking prefixes how many X are in Y. What a concept.
Accept that sometimes you can’t make every food perfect.
Sometimes the rice is overdone or too sticky or the pasta is too salty.
Try out simple dishes and continue from there. (Potatoes + sour cream -> Baked potatoes (wedges) with rosemary in oil -> Hasselback potatoes -> etc.)
Keep track of what you liked that your parents prepared for you.
Interrogate them if it’s necessary. Until they stop with the “Do as much as you like” and instead instruct you with “Put about a cup of X and about a quarter of Y by volume”. If you got this you are nore prepared for the measure by eye and feel.
Until they stop with the “Do as much as you like” and instead instruct you with “Put about a cup of X and about a quarter of Y by volume”.
My parents are the worst about this. It’s all based on vibes. My dad acts like Amadeus in the kitchen, furiously experimenting and being creative. I’ve asked him to explain wtf he’s doing and he never does. Like he’ll tell me what he’s literally doing, but with no explanation of why.
Edit: Particularly with cooking meat, which I never seem to do right. My parents both describe the temperature and time they choose purely in terms of vibes and I have no idea how to copy that when I go from trying to learn with them where I’m typically trying to cook for 3-4 people to trying to figure out how to cook for just myself.
Interrogate them if it’s necessary. Until they stop with the “Do as much as you like” and instead instruct you with “Put about a cup of X and about a quarter of Y by volume”. If you got this you are nore prepared for the measure by eye and feel.
I get around this by asking them to make the specifics dish, gathering all the ingredients for them, then weighing everything before and after to get exact numbers.
It really is a matter of “do as much as you like”, but without an intuition on how different ingredients taste and affect the dish at varying quantities, you’re not going to know how much you like. So getting that starting point to experiment with is very important.
I often take painkillers (acetaminophen aka paracetamol), but I’ve noticed that it’s much more effective if I take them TOGETHER with my ADHD medication (ritalin aka methylphenidate) + my morning coffee. If I don’t take them AT the same time, the painkiller is far less effective....
This thread sounds like a stackoverflow stereotype “How do I do X?.. You shouldn’t do X, you should do Y” except that the people in this thread are actually giving good advice (to find the root cause).
I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.
At some point there’s proprietary stuff in our bodies, be it a driver, a BIOS or the code that runs on the various microcontrollers that run low level functions from the USB ports to simple power management.
The most “security paranoid” organizations in the world usually run a lot of stuff on children and babies are full of opaque and proprietary code and they consider it “safe enough”.
People are replacing lost/damaged organs and limbs with computer-controlled hardware. The same problems that occur in computers that exist outside of humans will occur in computers inside of humans. Do you trust non-open drivers from Corporation X or Government Y in your eyes telling your brain what you do or don’t see?
That’s the extreme, of course, but it isn’t any less scary than computers you trust with your credit card, bank account, etc information.
Open source drivers means when corporation X goes under, your hardware still can work and isn’t automatically abandoned. It keeps more hardware out of landfills longer, with the ability to drastically reduce e-waste.
Do you trust non-open drivers from Corporation X or Government Y in your eyes telling your brain what you do or don’t see?
I agree with your point, but I find it very unlikely to have cutting edge medical technology using open-source software - after all those pacemaker / brain implant companies want to protect their research (and profits) - and I’m not even sure if a FOSS solution for that would ever get approved by any legal body.
That’s the extreme, of course, but it isn’t any less scary than computers you trust with your credit card, bank account, etc information.
All those systems that process your financial transitions run on tons of proprietary software and the banks and credit card companies believe that software is secure enough.
Open source drivers means when corporation X goes under, your hardware still can work and isn’t automatically abandoned. It keeps more hardware out of landfills longer, with the ability to drastically reduce e-waste.
This is probably the most reasonable thing about having open-source drivers… however hardware is diverse and complex and so are drivers. The community might not be able to maintain such the driver for specific-version-x-hardware I have because it might not have access to all the design documentation of the hardware nor the time to reverse engineer it. It might not be worth keeping a driver around if it only serves a few people because everyone is mostly on a different revision of the hardware or some other detail like that.
To be fair Linux removed support for 386, 486, floppy drives, “Carillo Ranch”, and a bunch of other older hardware recently… at some point the few users that still have a piece of tech won’t care about it because they can just replace it by a new and better alternative for cheap.
Despite not subscribing to political communities and having a large number of content filters based on keywords, my feed here is still for a large part all negative articles and ragebait. Elon Musk this and Israel that. Microsoft ruining windows, AI ruining internet, right wingers and capitalism ruining the world, police being...
You don’t like ‘owe’ me an explanation of your personal ect ect I can empathize. We all literally have shit going on in our lives myself included so I get that shit is just fucking really tough sometimes. Life is not always the way we want it and we face challenges everyday.
But that is just the very reality though for the entire human race. No one is exempt from that. Challenges go hand in hand with life in general.
Don’t make excuses. Take ownership.
You don’t need to ‘gather’ a group of people to do x y and z. You don’t and can’t force/entice/convince/ whatever anyone to what you think needs to be done.
That’s up to you and you only. You start by setting an example not making excuses.
If they were interested in my location they could request location data. What are the odds they are doing this to directly market products to people based on health data?...
You know, I almost thought for a minute there was going to be a chance there was something cool behind it, like, “it can guide you to the exact location of a product that you’re looking for with x,y,z precision such as how AirTags work” or, “they look at data to optimize placement of items in the store to make it easier for people to find things efficiently” but it’s actually just another degree of shittyness. That stinks.
Bold of you to assume the data in save files is packed binary and not something like JSON where { “x”: 13872, “y”: -17312, “z”: -20170 } requires 40 bytes of storage.
I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy’s massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It’s been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let’s say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they’re what’s colloquially referred to...
The problem i have, every time this conversation happens, is that cutting them out doesn’t solve anything, and that I don’t want to be coddled.
The 2 main issues we have, as lemmy at large, is that there are some wildly uneven standards enforced across instances and that we have no say about that. There was that hugbox instance that would ban people for being rude and yeeted itself into the void, there was hexbear that got de-federated for its mods actively encouraging being subversive (despite its users receiving intolerable psychic damage after 5 minutes in any lib space where people are free to call them names, or was that lemmygrad?) and now we’re talking about removing lemmy.ml for the fact that its mods are somehow sentient pieces of actual shit.
And while I agree to all of those reasons, I don’t think defederating is the answer.
Every time we fragment the fediverse we make it overall worse.
Average users don’t even understand what they’re looking at when it comes to decentralized networks, let alone can they understand that there’s politicking between instances and such. If I were told “you can make an account on instance x or y, but they don’t talk to eachother so if you want to see stuff on instance y you can’t make an account on instance x” as a rando, I would go back to reddit, the only reason I didn’t is that i really hate the app and I am tech/net savvy enough to handle this.
I am a tad more radical when it comes to speech than most, and I accept that, but I do believe that these people have no power so long as they can’t abuse moderation, so the answer to the question “how do we handle open propagandists”, to me, is to create perhaps a “moderation neutrality charter” and making it very clear which instances subscribe to it, having each instance’s moderation team maybe be required to weigh in on appeals to bans from other instances to ensure a certain amount of balance.
That would take care of that real quick. They can subscribe to the charter and start abiding by neutral moderation standards agreed to across the board by some democratic standard, or they can defederate themselves.
That’s actually something twitter does right with the idea of community notes, that for the note to be published it needs to be agreed on by multiple parties that don’t usually agree in those votes, to ensure there is a bipartisan agreement.
I know this is perhaps too lofty for a ragtag group of essentially microblogging self-hosters, but a man can dream.
This is a good answer and probably the right solution (still not 100% convinced defederating isn’t, ultimately, going to be the answer though).
But your Jane/Joe Average User doesn’t look to see which instance that pr0n cute picture of a cat holding a teddy bear is on. They probably don’t even understand the concept of different instances showing content from others. Hell I’ve been online since 1992 and it took me a couple of days to get my head around it when I joined.
So I think we need some kind of step by step “If you see X, then do Y” sticked to the instances that care about this for the people who (like me) do care about this issue.
still not 100% convinced defederating isn’t, ultimately, going to be the answer though
It may be, but only as a last resort.
So I think we need some kind of step by step “If you see X, then do Y” sticked to the instances that care about this for the people who (like me) do care about this issue.
Yes, the map of thr Fediverse needs “here be dragons” sprinkled around.
I’m going to say this in all Caps because I’m sick of this question:
THERE IS NO PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LINUX DISTRIBUTIONS. ITS ALL THE SAME PIECES ASIDE FROM HOW THE OS IS MANAGED AT THE PACKAGE LEVEL. DISTRO X WILL NEVER BE MORE PERFORMANT THAN Y IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY.
I feel like I need to start a voice channel for people to just be told “no” at this point. There is literally no difference.
Title. Basically, a lower panel that shows the latest news, etc (fetched from a rss link or a sequence of rss links) while scrolling left (ala CNN). Why? I’m trying to make a “smart clock” of sorts that shows a live stream, a real time clock and -also- the latest news – all crumbled together in a single screen....
I see, I didn’t know ffplay could do some ffmpeg stuff by itself but it makes sense (ffplay is bundled with ffmpeg). I tried a very small example, you have to tweak it:
-vf drawtext=“fontsize=20:fontcolor=white:text=example line of text:y=h-line_h:x=mod(w+text_w-50*t,w)”
It makes the text scroll right to left, looping back to the start when it goes off screen. I adapted it slightly from the examples section of the manual: ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#Examples-71
But what actually happens is you do something you read in a paper, then you fail, get super frustrated, publish a paper titled “Doing X doesn’t lead to Y”, and several people suddenly start telling you they all knew that but never bothered to tell anyone.
the current narrative is dangerous and risks leading to escalation beyond Ukraine and has already caused a lot of suffering
I would say it's all the shelling and rocket attacks and bombings, not so much the narrative.
In general I think trying to talk and understand the world is not a hostile act. If you're trying to deliberately distort honest conversation to justify something, then that's a bad thing, but just saying that some sincere narrative right or wrong can be a dangerous thing all on its own, I don't agree with.
To me it’s hard to imagine that after Russia put their army on the border and explicitly said, Ukraine stays neutral or war, that the US wasn’t aware of the consequences.
Bro
What if I put a couple of my friends on the border of your house, and explicitly said, hey if you try to do X Y or Z then I might have to kill you. What's your reaction? What's fair in that scenario? If you ask for some allies to come over because you plan on doing X Y and Z anyway and fuck the border-standers, does it all of a sudden become the allies' fault that any of that happened? What you're saying is just a very weird allocation of blame to me.
Like I say, what Mearsheimer says on this issue actually makes a good deal of sense to me, but what you're saying here is very different from what he says about it, as far as I know. I think one of the critical issues is whether the whole thing was a "ploy" by the West -- he definitely doesn't think that, that I'm aware of. Where did you get that idea? It definitely doesn't seem to me that fighting between Russia and various former-USSR states needed any additional help in order to develop, although I'm sure the US is happy it's happening and happy to help it go badly for Russia.
Clearly Ukrainian lives were not on the forefront of their decision making process at that point.
I think it's relevant what the Ukrainians think. Are you saying that rejecting Russia's orders for what they were and were not allowed to do, knowing that Russia might attack them as a result, was not their decision but someone else's? What do you think they think about it?
Here's a little excerpt, somewhat related, from "Sky Above Kharkiv" by Serhiy Zhadan:
"And I'd like to make another point. I was rather skeptical of the current government. I was struck by one particular thing. The elections of 2019 brought a lot of young people to power -- not my peers (I'm a far cry from being young) but a bunch of political youngsters who didn't belong to dozens of parties or hadn't worked for all kinds of shady cabinets of ministers. 'But why do these young people,' I thought, 'act like old functionaries from the Kuchma era? Where did their childish urge to make a quick buck and flaunt it come from? Why aren't they trying to be different?' Thing is, I personally had the chance to do what I still consider rather constructive, useful things with a lot of them -- everyone from ministers to mayors and governors. Nonetheless, I'd look toward the Parliament building and ask myself, 'Why aren't you trying to be different?'
"Now [in wartime] with the naked eye you can see them trying to be different. Advisers, speakers, ministers, negotiators, officers, mayors, and commanders -- these forty-year-old boys and girls whose generation has been dealt the cruel lot of having to stand up for their country. And this applies no less (and possibly even more) to the millions of soliders, volunteer fighters, and just regular people pitching in, people shedding the swampy legacy of the twentieth century, like mud falling off new, yet well-chosen combat boots. Young Ukrainian men and women -- that's who this war of annihilation is being waged against. And then, in contrast, are the heads of Russia, Belarus, America, and Germany. The first two are old delusional geezers from the past century who look a lot like old Russian armored vehicles, but they're old. And they're Russian, which, in itself, does little to recommend a vehicle. Then there are the latter two -- they're cautious office clerks, retired capitulators who aren't brave enough to admit that they, too, are involved in what's going on."
What do you think started, and kept WWI going, narrative. Every party believed or was sold that they could win this thing if they just kept climbing the escalation ladder. With the result that an entire generation of boys and men was gone for basically nothing.
What if I put a couple of my friends on the border of your house, and explicitly said, hey if you try to do X Y or Z then I might have to kill you.
For a start I would not do X, Y and Z, this is the whole idea of realism, accept the world as is. Threats work, I’m sorry. If your response is to call the police, there is no police in the world of international politics, you have to play the hand you’re dealt.
And in the case of Ukraine this was sadly a very bad hand, that is why I don’t blame Ukraine for much. You could of course blame Ukraine for being lured by the power of the US, and that they could thus safely ignore dire warnings from Russia. But as they say, with great power comes great responsibility, so I choose to put the blame at the hands of Russia and the US.
Increased industrialization meaning that nations could field an army undergoing massive attrition for years and years without suffering a crippling lack of production at home, and
Lack of understanding on the part of political leaders of how the face of war had changed
narrative. Every party believed or was sold that they could win this thing if they just kept climbing the escalation ladder.
I mean… not really. Surely, at the time, the “dangerous” narrative was anything against the war. To me, allowing a freer flow of ideas would have helped to resolve the war sooner, and deciding that certain narratives were dangerous and should be stayed away from (leading to difficulty in understanding what was happening) was a factor that made things worse, not better. No?
For a start I would not do X, Y and Z, this is the whole idea of realism, accept the world as is. Threats work, I'm sorry.
I am glad that you are not involved in the foreign policy of either Ukraine or any country I care about. There is realism, sure; the world is not always a comic book where being righteous is enough. Then, also, there is cowardice, and then beyond that there is saying that someone else who is rejecting cowardice is to be blamed (along with anyone who gives them assistance in standing up) for danger they find themselves in as a result.
Ukraine seems likely to be able to hold on to a significant chunk of their territory and self determination, after deciding to pay a heavy heavy price for it, in homes and cities and money and lives and anything else. You can take your condescending stuff about realism and whose decision that was, and what kind of lives under Russian rule they should be resigning themselves to instead, and shove it up your ass.
They mention using L and R for mouse clicks, but I wonder how the rest of the controls are? Stick and maybe Dpad for cursor seems obvious. But what are the B, Y, X and A buttons doing?
Looks like Select enables Fullscreen… that just confuses the heck out of me. Why wouldn’t it be Fullscreen?
Disappointment with Links Awakening Remake (NSW); what could have been a great game hampered by lacklustre controls.
Recently I borrowed my partner’s copy of Links Awakening for the Nintendo Switch. I understand that many people did not enjoy the remake due to the graphics but I am one of the weirdos who somewhat enjoys the cutesy round graphics with the intense depth of field / forced perspective look. From a pure graphical standpoint I...
Everyday, as an American (midwest.social)
Change to Adobe terms & conditions outrages many professionals - 9to5Mac (9to5mac.com)
What's the most basic thing you can't do?
Am I ruining my liver?
I often take painkillers (acetaminophen aka paracetamol), but I’ve noticed that it’s much more effective if I take them TOGETHER with my ADHD medication (ritalin aka methylphenidate) + my morning coffee. If I don’t take them AT the same time, the painkiller is far less effective....
GNU Nano gains optional modern keybindings – OSnews (www.osnews.com)
I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.
Wait... why does Linux-libre (and #Freedo) exist?
Is Linux not free software itself? I thought propietary stuff was added downstream....
Don't you all get tired of the constant negativity?
Despite not subscribing to political communities and having a large number of content filters based on keywords, my feed here is still for a large part all negative articles and ragebait. Elon Musk this and Israel that. Microsoft ruining windows, AI ruining internet, right wingers and capitalism ruining the world, police being...
My grocery store wants to know my BMI (lemmy.world)
If they were interested in my location they could request location data. What are the odds they are doing this to directly market products to people based on health data?...
GOG will delete cloud saves more than 200MB per game after August 31st (support.gog.com)
Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem
I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy’s massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It’s been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let’s say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they’re what’s colloquially referred to...
deleted_by_moderator
Gaming vs Regular Distros
TL;DR: Is there really a performance benefit to a gaming distro over a regular distro? Or is it more of a “this is the least work” to get setup?...
Is it possible to parse a rss reader through ffplay?
Title. Basically, a lower panel that shows the latest news, etc (fetched from a rss link or a sequence of rss links) while scrolling left (ala CNN). Why? I’m trying to make a “smart clock” of sorts that shows a live stream, a real time clock and -also- the latest news – all crumbled together in a single screen....
Academic Olympics (mander.xyz)
I am genuinely confused by hexbear's opinion on the Ukraine war (lemmygrad.ml)
What I have learned:...
Here's the original Fallout on a Nintendo 3DS (www.eurogamer.net)