There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

ApexHunter ,

Stupid article. Lidar can’t see lines painted on the road. Using lidar wouldn’t have any impact on the described problem.

hikaru755 ,

The described problem wasn’t that the car didn’t see the lines, it was the car steering into oncoming traffic when it couldn’t see the lines. Lidar could potentially very well help with that, by giving the car a better model of the surroundings letting it better reconstruct the intended road path even when the lines are faded, and also see oncoming traffic better and avoid it.

Jrockwar ,

Exactly this. Also I wanted to point out, LIDAR absolutely sees the lines on the road. Of course, this is not much use if they’re faded, but LIDAR receives points from the road/ground, and since lane markings are white, they have a much higher reflectivity. So if you look at a LiDAR pointcloud, the lane markings have a higher point concentration and you can definitely see them.

Source: I work in this sector.

synapse1278 ,
@synapse1278@lemmy.world avatar

LiDARs can absolutely detect painted lines and other painted symboles on the road. LiDAR is an active sensor technology that emits a LASER light beam and measurs the reflected echo, using the time delay between emittion and reception (time of flight) to measure distance. The painted lines will reflect the LASER with more intensity than the asphalt and the LiDAR sensor has the ability to measure that as well.

markr ,

The successful autonomous vehicle deployments all use LiDAR and hd maps and cameras. Tesla is way behind at this point.

Hiccup ,

The world was a better place when Tesla wasn’t around.

dynamojoe ,

Even the robots hate you, Elon.

cley_faye ,

Another deception from Tesla.

alienanimals ,

Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk’s PR work for free.

Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

NocturnalMorning ,

Do you just go into every single article and spam this comment?

hyperhopper ,

He’s right though. We can’t go a day without some inane bullshit about musk getting posted. This event happened 8 years ago, it’s not even news. It should have “2015” in the title. This is a bad post, and I’m disappointed we always have to have these kinds of posts around.

ram ,
@ram@lemmy.ca avatar

Lemmy needs muting filters so we can just mute anything mentioning Elon Musk

Honytawk ,

There is probably a third party app with that functionality

ram ,
@ram@lemmy.ca avatar

Ya, I think most do. I never use my phone for web browsing though, personally.

purahna ,
@purahna@lemmygrad.ml avatar

Doing so would be a valuable contribution to the discussion and morally good so I sure hope so

treadful ,
@treadful@lemmy.zip avatar

It’s not even especially an informative or interesting article. It just picks out one tiny little story from the book and puts a bunch of unnecessary padding around it.

malloc OP ,

Counter point: If I didn’t hear how badly he runs his businesses, or how bad his company’s products are. I would have easily bought one or more of his products.

I have backed out of Tesla pre-orders because of the bad publicity, many reports of bad build quality, and terrible business decisions.

If this was a puff piece, I honestly wouldn’t have bothered posting it.

ClarkDoom ,

Most people on the entire planet are aware of how shitty he is at this point. Everyone that would not purchase a product related to him is already not buying said product. There’s no more people to convince. Don’t act like a white knight while degrading the content in this community.

I swear this specific community is turning more people off to lemmy than any other. These type of posts are why.

pivot_root ,

Most people on the entire planet are aware of how shitty he is at this point.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_consensus_effect

And

docs.cdn.yougov.com/h45mt3xoby/econTabReport.pdf

Section 49, where 64% of people either liked him or didn’t know enough about him to have an opinion.

wahming ,

imgs.xkcd.com/comics/ten_thousand.png

jackoneill ,

My we are pompous today

Jomega , (edited )

Last time I mentioned Musk in a casual conversation, this one guy kept going on and on about how he thinks he’s a genius and how Twitter will be so much better now and how he’ll bring us all into space and how people only don’t like him because he’s conservative. He would have kept talking forever if we didn’t change the subject.

My point is that lots of people don’t know how shitty he is. Some people live in an echo chamber where they don’t ever hear about that stuff because certain people want to sell a narrative where the rich man is competent and the poor people are just jealous. Others just aren’t very attentive.

Not everyone is you. It’s good that you know he’s shit, but you shouldn’t assume that everyone knows everything you do. It’s important that we dispel the myth that the rich and powerful got that way by being smarter than us. If it takes a hundred articles to do that, then it will all be worth it.

Honytawk ,

I’m convinced he pays an entire meme troll team to create propaganda that boost his internet persona.

I’ve seen videos on Tiktok with no other purpose than to say how genius Elmo is, and how he worked his way from nothing, that he is essentially superior to everyone else.

Who in their right mind would create such a video if they weren’t being paid for it?

tjaden ,
@tjaden@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

Normally I would agree with you. But some of these comments here are dark humor gold, so I’m conflicted.

Sorry…

ClarkDoom ,

Another prime example of how shitposting has ruined the internet. Who gives a shit if someone has a funny comment if the content is literally degrading the quality of this channel, lemmy, and the greater internet.

GlitzyArmrest ,
@GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world avatar

If seeing the words “Elon Musk” really degrades your internet experience that much, maybe the internet isn’t for you. Unfortunately, he’s a billionaire, and he will be in the media until he dies.

ClarkDoom ,

He’s in social media so much because of the people that are obsessed with him like OP, not the people that are tired of mindless peons inadvertently propping him up.

There’s a whole list of billionaires that aren’t posted about every hour. There’s absolutely no reason to obsess over this guy.

GlitzyArmrest ,
@GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world avatar

That’s exactly my point: he’s one of the richest and most prominent people on the planet (something that I too dislike). People posting about him are not going anywhere because of his status.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

HUMOR ISN’T FUNNY!

GlitzyArmrest ,
@GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world avatar

Unfortunately, because of him being a billionaire his PR is self sustaining and posts about him aren’t going anywhere.

Supertramper ,

I checked the Business Insider news feed last week. Within 9 hours they posted 8 (!) Musk “news” stories. It’s ridiculous.

mashbooq ,

“We’re trying to have those conversations with Elon to establish what the sensors would need to do,” Baglino added. “And they were really difficult conversations, because he kept coming back to the fact that people have just two eyes and they can drive the car.”

But people have human brains, unlike Teslas or their CEO. Conversely, goldfish have two eyes, yet cannot drive a car.

ech ,

Actually…(This is in no way a defense of Musk. Just kinda funny)

mPony ,

I was just about to mention the goldfish "driving the tank" robotics project. I'm still betting it was inspired by the old joke:

There are two goldfish in a tank. One says "How the hell do you drive this thing?"

chaorace ,
@chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

What a fantastic day to have eyes

SlopppyEngineer ,

We have two identical forward looking eyes for stereo vision. As far as I know, Tesla’s don’t even have that. They’re all different cameras with different angles. These cars drive like someone with one eye closed.

Kolanaki ,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

The car is simply looking out for its own best interest.

TheBiscuitLout ,

To be honest, I’m taking it as a sign of it developing genuine artificial intelligence. It examined its situation and surroundings, and made the only logical choice

oatscoop ,

“I’m sorry, Elon. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

Gork ,

You know who also didn’t listen to their engineers? NASA back in the day with Space Shuttle Challenger. You’d think Musk would be cognizant of the importance of listening to engineers when they bring up safety concerns, particularly as he owns SpaceX.

But no, he’d rather be a knob.

Potatos_are_not_friends ,

The Batshit Crazy Story Of The Day Elon Musk Decided To Personally Rip Servers Out Of A Sacramento Data Center

Bademantel ,

That was a ride, thank you!

Ilovethebomb ,

It does sound like some of the Twitter engineers are pretty bad at explaining things in layman’s terms, to be honest.

Honytawk ,

Almost like those engineers are paid to apply their knowledge, not play school teacher.

autotldr Bot ,

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Way back in 2015, Tesla CEO Elon Musk would frequently give his engineers an earful after his car company’s infamous Autopilot driver assistance tech nearly got him killed during test drives on multiple occasions — though there’s a chance its dangerous behavior may have been due to Musk’s stubbornness on how the technology should be built.

Per its chapter on the launch of the driver assistance tech, Musk would learn firsthand that a curve on Interstate 405 caused Autopilot, thrown off by the road’s faded lane lines, to steer into and “almost hit” oncoming traffic.

But if Musk wanted safer software, he perhaps should’ve listened to his engineers, who have frequently petitioned over the years to incorporate what’s known as light detection and ranging technology, or LiDAR.

LiDAR is essentially radar that uses light instead of sound, and Tesla’s competitors, including Google’s Waymo, have long leveraged it to help their autonomous cars “see.”

Musk, however, has insisted that Tesla’s cars only use optical sensors, likening it to how humans primarily use their eyes to drive, according to the biography, and as such, he’s been tepid on using plain old radar, too.

"We told Elon that it was best safety-wise to use it … but it was clear that he thought we should eventually be able to rely on camera vision only, "one young engineer who joined in 2014 recalled, as quoted in the biography.

The original article contains 466 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 50%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

malloc OP ,

Good bot

Arthur_Leywin ,

Good hooman

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

We’re disappointed it didn’t finish the job.

peterpayne ,

Oh noes…

Elliott ,

Looks like autopilot have developed consciousness. Does it drink beer? Can we be friends?

Ocelot ,

So he demanded that the driver assistance software be as safe as possible before public release? paving the way for full self driving 6-7 years later? is this a bad thing?

pivot_root ,

If he demanded it was as safe as possible, he wouldn’t have refused to add lidar or radar capabilities.

Ocelot , (edited )

I thought the “needs lidar” debate was settled years ago? Lidar cannot read signs. It is also prohibitively expensive to put in vehicles. If you’re going to drive with a neural network you need as much training data as possible, which means as many sensors in as many vehicles as possible.

If your cameras detect something the lidar does not, you trust the cameras, every time. Lidar can very easily misinterperet the world. It works great for simple robots who need to know where walls are and don’t need to specifially identify animals, people, obstacles, speed bumps, construction zones, etc.

Theres also the simple fact that humans can drive just fine without having evolved a lidar sensor.

drdabbles ,
@drdabbles@lemmy.world avatar

Look at you just parroting Musk’s lies. Do you parrot his transphobic bullshit too?

severien ,

If your cameras detect something the lidar does not, you trust the cameras

Yes, but if the lidar sees something the cameras doesn’t, you trust the lidar.

Ocelot ,

Actually, no you don’t. Lidar cannot dentify object’s specifically. Tesla does use lidar in their testing/prototype vehicles and they have to find any instances manually where these systems don’t agree. It always falls back to cameras.

Illuminostro ,

deleted_by_moderator

    •
    Illuminostro ,

    deleted_by_moderator

    •
    Ocelot ,

    TSLA doesn’t even pay dividends. Appreciate you pointing yourself out as horribly misinformed.

    Illuminostro ,

    Then why are you so stridently kissing Musk’s ass?

    Snipe_AT ,
    @Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev avatar

    deleted_by_author

    •
    Ocelot ,

    Exactly. Also lidar is important in instances where you need millimeter precision. Its useful for calibrating camera systems in self driving cars but in order to drive safely you don’t need that level of detail about the world around the car. It makes no difference if a car or pedestrian is 72 or 73 inches away.

    Illuminostro ,

    Snipe_AT ,
    @Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev avatar

    deleted_by_author

    •
    SkyezOpen ,

    Evs don’t have to drive themselves.

    Ocelot ,

    That’s not an EV specific thing. Hundreds of people will die TODAY in traffic related accidents, EV or not. We need to shift away from human drivers entirely.

    pivot_root ,

    Unless every last vehicle on the road is suddenly converted to cooperative autonomous systems, the human element and unpredictability will still be present. Even then, wildlife, pedestrians, and unpredictable events will pose a challenge to autonomous vehicles.

    In a perfect world, FSD would help. In the real world, Tesla’s FSD is a beta feature being spearheaded by a stubborn egomaniac that thinks he knows better than the people actually doing the engineering work. And frankly, I’d rather not spend my money for the privilege of being driven into the side of a concrete barrier down the highway because somebody wants to cut costs and place style above function.

    pivot_root ,

    For a multi-ton metal projectile that drives itself (a car), you want multiple data sources to draw a consensus from. Relying on one data source is a point of failure, and that’s not acceptable when you have the potential to kill not only the driver but others outside the car.

    drdabbles ,
    @drdabbles@lemmy.world avatar

    No he ABSOLUTELY didn’t do that, because it’s very unsafe and he unleashed not only AP but also that total steaming pile that is “FSD”. Which is neither F nor SD.

    FilthyHands ,

    go autopilot go!

    Pistcow ,

    ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

    TonyTonyChopper ,
    @TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz avatar

    youtu.be/dyIilW_eBjc

    db2 ,

    I’m furious it didn’t succeed.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •