There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Captain_Baka , in Nuclear isn't perfect, but it is the best we have right now.

“Safe”. Yeah. Let’s talk about Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and Fukushima. All that was kinda not so safe, don’t you think?

BachenBenno ,

Impossible with modern reactors, technologyimproved a lot since then.

Captain_Baka ,

You mean the modern reactors who are still not in a commercial productive state? But even if these would be NOW ready to actually be available it’s still so that there are a vast overwhelming majority of the old reactors which are not as safe as the meme was insinuating.

elfahor ,

All of those were caused by human mistake. But this does not mean that they must be discarded. Because human mistake happens. If it is with a solar panel, it’s inconsequential. Not with a nuclear reactor. So yes, it is an issue to consider, but in truth all it means is that we have to be VERY careful

RippleEffect ,

I work with people Human mistakes are inevitable

Captain_Baka ,

If it is so that a human mistake can cause a big number of casualties and massive environmental damage it is far from safe, even if you are very careful.

Godnroc ,

Comparatively speaking, it’s safer than coal mining. Wikipedia Nuclear Accidents by Death Toll

Mining Accidents

Diplomjodler3 ,

This is just so fucking dumb. Yeah coal sucks. We should get rid of coal as quickly as possible. But saying nuclear is safer than coal while ignoring all other forms of energy that are orders of magnitude safer is as disingenuous as it gets.

winterayars ,

Nuclear power is actually safer than almost everything, period. Even with the major accidents. Yes, even renewables and other “green” energy.

See this comment’s chart, for example: lemmy.ml/comment/11910773

Captain_Baka ,

200 years vs. 70 years. IDK if this is comparable. Also it is so that with nuclear accidents theres a lot of additional environmental damage, not just the human casualties.

Not defending coal mining here, coal is no good energy source by all means.

EldritchFeminity ,

Coal is often radioactive when it comes out of the ground, and thanks to poor regulations, is often radioactive when it goes into the powerplant, leading to radioactive particles coming out of the smokestacks and landing anywhere downwind of the plants.

More people have died from radiation poisoning from coal than from all of the nuclear accidents combined. But, as you said, 200 years vs. 70 years. But, also, nuclear is much more heavily regulated than coal in this regard due to the severity of those accidents. The risk of a dangerous nuclear power plant is nowhere near as large as commonly believed. It doesn’t take long to find longlasting environmental disasters due to fossil fuels, from oil spills to powerplant disasters. They’re used so heavily that it’s just so much more likely to occur and occur more often.

All this to say that fossil fuels suck all around and we should be looking at all forms of replacement for them, nuclear being just one option we should be pursuing alongside all the others.

grue ,

Still less radiation than coal plants release in normal operation.

Thorry84 , (edited )

Nuclear is by far the safest form of energy production. Even with the big accidents, the impact hasn’t been that big.

Chernobyl was by far the biggest, but that was 40 years ago, in a poorly designed plant, with bad procedures and a chain of human errors. We’ve learned so much from that accident and that type of accident couldn’t even have happened in the plants we had at the time in the west. Actually if the engineers that saw the issue could contact the control room right away, there would not have been any issue. In 1984 that was a problem, in 2024 not so much, we have more communication tools than ever. The impact of Chernobyl was also terrible, but not as bad as feared back in the time. In contrast to the TV series, not a lot of people died in the accident. With 30 deaths directly and another 30 over time. Total impact on health is hard to say and we’ve obviously have had to do a lot to prevent a bigger impact, but the number is in the thousands for total people with health effects. Even the firefighters sent in to fix stuff didn’t die, with most of them living full lives with no health effects. And what people might not know, the Chernobyl plant has had a lot of people working there and producing power for decades after the disaster. It’s far from the nuclear wasteland people imagine.

Fukushima was pretty bad, but the impact on human life and health has been pretty much nonexistent. The circumstances leading up to the disaster were also very unique. A huge earthquake followed by a big tsunami, combined with a design flaw in the backup power system, combined with human error. I still to this day don’t understand how this lead to facilities being closed in Germany, where big earthquakes don’t happen and there is hardly any coast let alone tsunamis. It’s a knee jerk reaction that makes no sense. Studies have indicated the forced relocation of the people living near there has been a bigger impact on people’s health than anything the power plant did.

Compare this to things we consider to be totally normal. Like driving a car, which kills more people in a week than ever had any negative impacts from nuclear power.

Or say solar is a far more safe form of power, even though yearly hundreds of people die because of accidents related to solar installations. Or for example hydroplants, where accidents can also cause a huge death toll and more accidents happen.

And this is even with the non valid comparison to the current forms of energy where we know it’s a big issue. But because the alternative isn’t perfect, we don’t change over.

CaptKoala , in It's like the Bacon game, but funnier

Yeah baby, yeah you piece of shit.

groet , in It's like the Bacon game, but funnier

I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe… Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion… I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain… Time to die you piece of shit!

Minarble , in It's like the Bacon game, but funnier

Got to get to da choppa, it’s the only way out, you piece of shit.

AgentGrimstone , in This pisses me off so much

Characters pretending to play video games on a controller

Allero ,

aggressively randomly clicking everything at once

Louisoix ,

Well that’s me with Messmer yesterday…

tfw_no_toiletpaper ,

I love this fight. Very punishing, but this one and Midas were very hard and still1 fun to learn, also reliable to dodge. Rennala though… took me at least 60 tries and I only got through with parry & bleed dagger (My build is FTH / DEX with colossal 💀). And then the endboss - honestly no idea how to do it…

Kiosade ,

Rellana was fun! I was using backblades at the time, and so with my mimic and the summonable NPC, it was like a freaking anime battle. Just constant dodging and sword slashes from all sides. Much more fun than the lion.

MonkeMischief ,

And the story is set in modern times but it sounds like an 80’s arcade cabinet. Bwoop-bwoop pew pew!

Granted some people are so focused while gaming that they look like drowned salmon, but streamers have proven you can still be emotive and act whilst gaming lol.

Annoyed_Crabby ,

Bwoop-bwoop pew pew but they button mash like hack and slash

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

I remember hearing Atari 2600 Pac-Man sounds on more than one occasion.

yokonzo , (edited ) in This pisses me off so much

Whelp. I’m never gonna under Unsee this.

rndll ,

Getting over it is overrated anyways.

cyberpunk007 , in This pisses me off so much

Most of the time when someone talks on a cell phone the screen stays on. Like wtf is the purpose of that?

Matriks404 , in This pisses me off so much

Drivers also tend to keep attention on the road a lot less in the movies.

Ookami38 ,

I dunno, have you seen the drivers out there? Pretty sure some of them are watching movies.

RememberTheApollo_ ,

They are. I’ve seen phones being on magnet mounts or held on the steering wheel with videos playing.

uhN0id ,

And I always anticipate an “unexpected” crash that almost never happens. Even in shows where it would never happen.

ElderWendigo ,

That view of the driver, looking out from the front passenger side out the driver’s window always makes me anxious for this reason. It’s like Chekhov’s gun. Why would they pick that angle unless the characters were about to get T-boned?

Sprokes , in This pisses me off so much

For it is :

  • Preparing a huge breakfast and then they take a bit and they say I need to go
  • People drinking coffee or other drinks but you see clearly that they don’t, why film that ?
  • Turing the wheel of the car like crazy when they on a straight road.
  • Wearing shoes inside the house even when they are about to go to sleep.
ChairmanMeow ,
@ChairmanMeow@programming.dev avatar

Turing the wheel of the car like crazy when they on a straight road.

Just drive like Nicholas Cage drives.

Annoyed_Crabby ,

Wearing shoes inside the house even when they are about to go to sleep.

As an asian that will be scolded if i ever do that, it weird me out and it does left an impression that westerner wear their shoes inside their house.

Slovene ,

I think it’s a USA thing. We don’t wear shoes inside the house in Europe.

BCsven ,

Could be, when I came to Canada and aome Canadians wore shoes in the house I was stunned. Like, it is just not right; Nevermind all the nasty shit you stepped in all day.

margaritox ,

I agree. Wearing shoes inside is really gross.

johannesvanderwhales , (edited )

A lot do, but also a lot don’t. It’s household by household.

I’ll also mention that you can probably expect people who grew up in no-shoe households to have strong feelings about it.

dditty ,

My boomer parents have dedicated inside shoes for this purpose. When you get old and have hardwood floors you need the extra arch support and traction. Podiatrists recommend wearing shoes inside.

Katana314 ,

Eating and drinking on set is notoriously difficult to pull off. You see one take, but the crew has done about 17 takes of the same scene. Even with chefs on hand, they can’t bloat the actors up with food. Hence why in most dinner scenes, there’s a lot of cutting and mocked chewing but little goes in their mouth.

Sprokes ,

It is not that difficult as other directors do it well. I see that in Japanese shows. It is OK if actors pretend to eat or drink when it is believable. In many episodes of Seinfeld we see the actors drinking coffee but we can clearly see that they weren’t taking a sip.

TheOubliette , in The British be like

A single hand pie filled with brown sits in the center, slowly crumbling to bits

ssj2marx , in Those who know...

the engine’s running and the wheels are attached, these extra bolts probably aren’t important.

HuntressHimbo , in The British be like

Hopefully they will have more variety in more respectful presentation through a voluntary exchange with other museums. That would be the dream at least

Lynx , in It's like the Bacon game, but funnier
@Lynx@jlai.lu avatar

With great power comes great responsibility, you piece of shit.

synae , in Napoleon Dynamite is 20 years old now.
@synae@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

I don’t care for this movie, even though pretty much everyone else I know loves it

Gosh pit, though, is hilarious

moncharleskey ,

I’m with you on both counts.

LordSinguloth , in Communist Filth/Capitalist Filth

Ah, but one contains millions and the other only hundreds of thousands.

Pull the lever?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines