Sure, but I suspect it's like that for thematic reasons. That people move up and down the economic ladder due to factors beyond their control. And the characters must move up to show that they don't change their values just because their conditions improve.
Also a parallel to real life, poking fun that the people at the top of the tower think they're 'better' and disrespect those below them despite the placement being arbitrary (and likely a place they've been before or will likely be in the future, though that's more true in the movie as you've said).
I agree, the film works much better with the system of random placement and the themes go much deeper than simply “people at the top are egotistical ass holes”. I feel like the point was more about finding humanity amongst a self perpetuating system of greed and gluttony.
I didn’t think I would ever agree with a goose. But these states rights MFs are always either trying to push something racist, anti-lgbt or something along those lines.
Ratios and amount are the most important thing in healthy eating. For reference, vegetables should be more than half your food intake, the rest split between whole-grain carbs and protein (either meat or plant based) in order to be healthy. And we need to pay attention to how much total food we eat too since our monkey brains that evolved under extreme food scarcity don’t do a good job of moderating nutrient input.
lemmyshitpost
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.