There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Delusion6903 ,

The pharmacy is not where the people that stock the front of the store work. They are very busy trying to fill hundreds of prescriptions and deal with doctors, patients and insurance companies.

Don’t ask them where to find the cosmetics that are on sale. We don’t even know. We are not a service desk.

Dearth ,

A thicker, wider bicycle seat is going to be more uncomfortable on longer rides than a thinner, narrower bicycle seat.

Buddahriffic ,

What if it doesn’t have the bit that goes between your legs?

I bought a seat like that because I understand that the normal bike seats put pressure on that area in a way that can lead to impotence. I haven’t tried the seat yet because I’m lazy, so I don’t know how comfortable it is. Though even if it isn’t comfortable, it’s a trade-off.

Dearth ,

It’s a very small percentage of the population that is affected by bike seats without center channels. It may help you, it probably won’t harm you.

A slight warning there is some concern that the cut out collapses as the saddle ages, causing the padding to pinch your anatomy rather than support it. The less pressing on your saddle the less of a concern this is.

The best place to have padding while riding your bike is against your anatomy. Wear a chamois if you’re planning on riding longer distances. You can get them as either the classic spandex or as a pair of padded briefs you wear under some shorts.

The most important part to bike saddle fitting is thus:

  1. A saddle designed to support the width of your sit bones
  2. A saddle designed for the posture you ride your bike with (a euro style city bike needs a much different saddle than a keirin race bike)
Michal ,

I think seat type depends on riding posture. Wide seat is suitable for a city bike, where you seat upright.

Dearth ,

There’s a limit to how wide your seat should be. Too wide and the seat is unable to support your sit bones and will interfere with your pedaling

absentbird ,
@absentbird@lemm.ee avatar

There are different screen sizes. Your monitor isn’t the standard universal size of every other monitor, some are larger and some are smaller. Your phone isn’t the same width and height as every other phone. The website will look different on different devices.

yogthos ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar

Most people don’t understand the real cost of software development, because the price of apps creates skewed expectations. In practice, software companies employ a business model that amortizes costs over time, making the true investment less obvious to users. The apparent simplicity of well-designed apps can also mislead users about the complexity involved. So, if somebody sees an app that costs a dollar they might assume that the cost of developing the app might be a few hundred dollars, while in practices it can be hundreds of thousands.

igni5s ,
@igni5s@lemmy.world avatar

Actors don’t “act”

90% of an actor’s work is preparation (memorization is just a tiny part of this- a big part of it is studying the scenes and figuring out the character’s realizations and decisions)

By the time you’re performing, you shouldn’t have to think about the scene or dialogue at all, but just connect with your scene partner and let them guide you through it. Acting isn’t about you. You’re not important, it’s about the moment that’s in between you and the people you’re performing with.

Michal ,

“acting without acting”

igni5s ,
@igni5s@lemmy.world avatar

indeed

ehxor ,

Ambulance’s should be used for emergencies

philpo ,

Currently working on one. Shifts nearly over. Am a CritCare certified provider.

Didn’t see a single remotely sick patient today even though we ran calls back to back for most of the day.

eestileib ,

I’ve been one of those calls. Woke up with chest pain and pain in my left upper arm. Called 911.

Diagnosis was heartburn+slept wrong.

philpo ,

Nah, that’s seriously sick. Would absolutely be a warranted call for me.

ehxor ,

Yeah that’s reasonable. A reasonable person could see how that could look like something life threatening until examined by a health care provider.

Knee pain you’ve had for a month? Had a panic attack yesterday? Pain because you just had surgery and don’t want to take your pain medications? This is more what I’m talking about

philpo ,

Todays results:

  • Diarrhea for a week. Didn’t think he needs to see a GP but today he felt it does not get better and he needs to see someone now.
  • Diarrhea and didn’t feel good. Yeah. That’s it.
  • Had a fall three days ago. Now the elbow hurts. Does not want to go to the GP/ED,but now the daughter has arrived and basically forced the patient.
  • Fall. Zero injuries. But the nursing home wanted to get
  • Another fall yesterday. Zero pain when not moving, minimal pain in slight bruise.

To be fair we had a massive multi vehicle (5 cars) accident as the last call (5min before the end of our shift) that required helicopter backup and everything (severe brain, spine, thorax and abdo trauma). But still…

captainlezbian ,

The speed of the conveyor belt does not impact the cycle time. No you cannot fucking slow down the conveyor belt to make it so you can work slower. You can’t speed it up to make people work faster. The speed of the fucking conveyor belt determines how long the things stay on the fucking conveyor belt. If it’s too slow things just stack up on it

Sorry, fucking line workers, managers, and executives in a factory…

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Okay I hear you, but have we tried speeding up the conveyor belt?

captainlezbian ,

sighs and speeds it up sure whatever vp,

thegreatgarbo ,

If you could speed the conveyor belt up, that would be greeeeat.

AngryCommieKender ,

Just stick a speed module into the workers. That should help. May increase their power consumption though

Sizzler ,

Expected Factorio.

Buddahriffic ,

An analogy to thinking faster conveyers means faster production is thinking faster speed limits on the highways leads to higher reproduction rates (or faster graduation or whatever).

One thing it will affect is how long a part takes to go from initial production to release. But there’s a trade-off with how many products are “in fight” at once.

norimee , (edited )

Medicine is not an exact science. Every human body is different and will react different to treatment or show different symptoms.

That your doctor couldn’t diagnose you right away or a treatment is not working for you as wanted (or as it did for your neighbor) has most often nothing to do with the competence of the medical personel but with the fact, that your body is not a massproduced machine but 100% unique a änd individual biological mass.

smb ,

that is only partly true, health system (here) also proposes to make false diagnoses for making money while the really needed treatment is underpayed or not payed at all or - in some cases - not payed at all if some facts change “after” the diagnosis so that the involved doctors spent time and money while afterwards not beeing payed at all. doctors doing false diagnoses (here) are mainly following the systems suggestion to skip real treatment but instead abuse patients.

norimee ,

That is a pretty big accusation you are putting on health care professionals.

Of course the cost often is a deciding factor on what treatment is possible. I’ve seen this in european hospitals as well, that we couldn’t run certain diagnostics or give certain medications because they were too expensive and would mean the hospital spends more than it gets for the patient.

But what you are saying is that doctors and in consequence nurses, medical technicians and all kind of medical staff are all in on a conspiracy to MISDIAGNOSE ON PURPOUS (!!) causing bodily harm (again on purpous) to their patients in order to get payed by insurance?

Please provide reliable sources and proof for this accusation of significant criminal activity that is apparently the norm in your (“here” means the US I assume?) Health care system.

I understand that your health care system is wack. But the fish stinks from the head and that’s usually not the medical staff providing your care, which you are accusing of serious crimes here.

smb ,

i did say that health care professionals follow suggestions which is 100% true for the suggestions they get from (known health damaging) pharma corporations. and these suggestions are mainly for profit. maybe let me note the opioid crisis here, that did not even touch my country directly (that is until this becomes officially maybe), but assumingly yours. if you don’t know what happened there and who followed who’s suggestions, maybe start reading. same happens in other countries too and for the same purposes.

a fact that is official here (as in there was a need for a law that currently helps) is that you get different diagnoses from different doctors and NEED to go to at least two different ones to have a chance for a correct diagnose. it took me >30 years to find a doctor that also tells me what is maybe less probable but also maybe a correct diagnose. the others just ignored all facts that were noncomplient to their diagnose and either were silent about it or incapable of also assuming other things with slightly similar symptomes.

the system is that prone to do wrong diagnoses while not paying for real treatment that some patients and doctors silently agree to do some extra things that are paid better to finance the things that are not paid in one go as a compromise to circumvent the harmful system. this is not public as in news, but when you go to a doctor that you know and need something that is not paid and offer something else at the same time that actually gets paid like a scan for something that could be important for symptoms you might have, chances are very good to get better real help than when strictly following the laws without such offers. i’ve talked about this with a doctor where i was not patient and i observed this once from little distanze.

i did not say that healthcare professionals intentionally harm for profit but follow guidelines made for profit-only that cause harm.

also maybe ‘interesting’ to read: …bmj.com/…/time-to-assume-that-health-research-is…

i tend to say that some shamans with true intention to help might often be better than a socalled healthcare system that truely is based on profit-only directors. while healthcare professionals depend on intentionally wrong informations (see opioid crisis) from profit-only corporations, their actions effects can highy contradict what their true intentions are. but for patiens really the outcome is what counts.

so even if someone says that treatment from healthcare professionals harms the patient this does not at all include evil intent from that professional.

Halosheep ,

I feel like you’d have a better conspiracy statement if you at least spelled paid correctly.

smb ,

sorry for making you feel less convinced by a misspelled word.

xilona ,

And now I am thinking how the mrna “vaccines” must have worked for every person or else…

Buddahriffic ,

The mRNA itself would behave the same from person to person. The immune response and specific cells that get “infected” can vary.

The immune system works to produce cells that can produce antibodies that bind well to the antigen, the specific part that they bind to can be different from person to person. The immune system tries to avoid antibodies that also bind to other things, but it’s not perfect.

If the injection ends up getting into a vein, then the mRNA could infect heart cells, which then later get killed by killer T cells and can affect heart function in the short term. Or potentially, they could end up anywhere in the body before entering a cell.

But, the same applies to the actual virus, only to a higher degree.

When you have a live virus infection, the immune system has the full virus to target with antibodies, so the variance will be higher compared to people only getting a subset of the virus, and has more chances to overlap with things we don’t want our immune system targeting.

And a real viral infection generates copies of the virus to spread to other cells instead of just producing proteins that the immune system will target. It’s like getting another vaccine shot every time the period it takes to produce more virus copies passes, from the moment you get infected until your immune system manages to get the upper hand (though distributed very differently).

It makes sense to be wary of new things you’re advised to put into your body, but it’s also important to frame them correctly. It’s not just risk of vaccine going wrong vs no vaccine means no risk. It’s risk of vaccine going wrong plus risk of infection breaking through times risk of vaccinated infection going wrong vs risk of getting infected times risk of unvaccinated infection going wrong.

ssm ,
@ssm@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

Software doesn’t age, it doesn’t make sense for your computer to become slower as it becomes older. (some) Software just becomes more shitty and bloated with every release, which is what you’re experiencing.

captain_aggravated ,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

I think there’s room for an exception here: operating systems or other software that handles a large number of files could bog down with use as the number and size of files grow with time.

todd_bonzalez ,

If the operating system slows down because you have a lot of files, you’re running some weird operating system I’ve never heard of.

xilona , (edited )

Try Linux! Fast and reliable!

WhyJiffie ,

Doesn’t help with the bloated web and local webapps, though. Also, you’ll need to choose from a set of desktop environments that were made with lower resource usage in mind. Also don’t forget that while linux is often faster, a slow drive is still a slow drive and it can help only so much if you keep your OS and heavyweight software on a HDD.

janus2 ,
@janus2@lemmy.zip avatar

Radioactive contamination: things don’t transfer the property of radioactivity to everything they touch and/or irradiate. If that were the case, the entire Earth universe would have become radioactive gray goo long, long ago.

When radiation workers talk about “contamination,” we mean radioactive compounds have physically transferred from one object onto/into another. For example, tools becoming contaminated with radioactive metal dust from equipment they touch, or clothing absorbing radioactive iodine gas from the air.

There is a form of radiation called neutron radiation that does make some formerly stable things (mainly metals) radioactive. This isn’t something you’re likely to encounter unless you’re a specific type of radiation worker, however.

This is mainly gear-grindy to me because the reason we don’t have gamma-sterilized produce in the US is completely unfounded fear that gamma irradiation “contaminates” everything it touches. So we could be having lovely fresh strawberries and peppers that last weeks longer than they usually do, but no, we can’t because rAdIaTiOn ScArY 🙄

niktemadur ,

Physics/nuclear literacy in the general public around the world is lower than bad, even many scientists from other fields seem to be genuinely uninformed or misinformed, then posting wrong and often alarming interpretations in social media, which laymen give weight to because “it’s coming from a scientist”, never mind that their expertise may be in areas of biology or astronomy, nothing to do with the subject they are posting about. And they themselves might have gotten their bad info/interpretation from other figures in academia.

Croquette ,

Now that you mention it, it does make sense but I never t thought that you could sterilize food with radioactivity.

StuffYouFear ,

It is called cold pasteurization, seen some things labeled as such before.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_pasteurization

That will inturn lead to, en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_irradiation

overcast5348 ,

What about contamination in disaster sites like Chernobyl or Fukushima? Is that also mainly radioactive substances that we’re spread around the area by air/water making the whole place dangerous to live or are other previously-non-radioactive objects radioactive now?

janus2 ,
@janus2@lemmy.zip avatar

The former, unless those disasters also included neutron radiation (admittedly I don’t know much about either disaster)

dgmib ,

Yea basically the main contamination issue is that radioactive substances were spread around. Contamination of the surrounding area isn’t the only issue we have to deal with, nor is it the most serious, but it is generally is the most costly remediate.

The contamination problem is caused by radioactive matter spewed into the air and settling on the trees, buildings, ground etc… in the surrounding area.

The main remediation strategy is to remove everything in the surrounding area including the top ~3 ft or so of soil of the and haul it off to an underground landfill to slowly decay for at least a few hundred years safely separated from humans.

wolfpack86 ,

I was about to go hold up, but neutrons … And then you covered it.

nobleshift ,
@nobleshift@lemmy.world avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • darkpanda ,
    Sylvartas ,

    Nothing about game development is “easy”

    Valmond ,

    The 0.01 alpha fun to build test version is :-D

    Sylvartas ,

    Yeah, the carefree mood of preproduction is definitely the best part

    EnderMB ,

    I remember my university orientation so vividly, because I was sat next to several people that were taking the “Game Development” degree. They spent the entire orientation talking about what consoles they brought with them.

    Two weeks later, they were all gone. The course was arguably harder than my CS course, based on some of the required classes they had to take. I think the dropout rate over the full degree was ~90%. CS was high, sure, but barely anyone actually graduated with the Game Development degree.

    Game dev is hard, and I’m yet to meet a game dev that didn’t bemoan how utterly ruthless it was.

    mriormro ,
    @mriormro@lemmy.world avatar

    I do not literally build buildings. I design them, I document them for construction, I collaborate with other people who do actually build the buildings to make sure everything’s on the level.

    ColeSloth ,

    It’s at least mostly going away nowadays, but…pulling a fire alarm will not make your school fire sprinklers go off. Getting one sprinkler to go off is just that. One sprinkler. None of the rest will go off.

    Also, fires in a building are never a spot here, a spot there, over there a spot, and just randomly burning patches all over the place. It just grows out and up from its origin point, for the most part. It doesn’t magically plant little patches all over the place. It’s also often times so smoky and so thick with smoke that you quite literally couldn’t see a big portion of fire if it were ten feet in front of you. You feel the heat and maybe see a faint bit of orange glow. Sometimes you don’t even get to see that.

    0_0j ,
    @0_0j@lemmy.world avatar

    Learned something today. Thank you

    LuycYQ2uUiTjR3yLri ,

    Does this affect any fire evacuation procedures? For example, would it be likely that the nearest exit stairwell happens to be the source of the fire? If so, how would that change the plan?

    CanadaPlus ,

    Not OP, but that’s why fire codes specify multiple escape routes - for example, a window on a bedroom.

    richieadler ,

    That current “AI” is not turning into Skynet any time soon.

    hperrin ,

    It might turn into dumb skynet though. Like a version of skynet that does malicious things, but not because it’s trying to hurt people, just because it’s really stupid and we put it in charge of things.

    trolololol ,

    Oh like politicians and CEOs? Can we try replacing them with AI?

    fruitycoder ,

    Boards are certainly looking at this. They certainty won’t align with the workers, consumers, or publics interest.

    richieadler ,

    Yeah, the McKittrick effect (remember Wargames?)

    CanadaPlus , (edited )

    We can’t even get them to not be racist under light adversarial conditions. Billions of dollars have probably been spent on that problem to no avail.

    LLMs like ChatGPT have kind of just turned the problem of getting knowledge into a computer, into the problem of getting it back out in a controlled way. It’s still hard and failure-prone but now nobody knows how it works inside.

    Wirlocke ,

    I’ve begun to think of LLMs as compression algorithms for patterns. It can take an existing pattern and apply it on unusual subjects. Like take the pattern of a limerick and apply it to the patterns of Danny Devito, that’s the upper limit of their creativity. So rather than storing information, it stores these patterns making it seem more dynamic.

    The way I see it, human creativity is the combination of patterns but in a chaotic non-analytic way. We make leaps of logic that without precise knowledge of our brains can’t be exactly replicated. Meanwhile LLM’s just do the basic combination of patterns that result in the most generic realization of any idea.

    However the well dries up as soon as we stop training them. They’ll store the basics of any field but fail to replicate new developments or conclusions until trained.

    xilona ,

    However the well dries up as soon as we stop training them. They’ll store the basics of any field but fail to replicate new developments or conclusions until trained.

    Exactly this is the reason we should prevent any further data collection by these bastards…

    Don’t feed the beast!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines