<p>In a new study published in <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295117"><em>PLOS One</em></a>, researchers found a subtle yet significant relationship between changes in individual levels of depressive symptoms and subsequent weight gain. Conducted on over 2,000 participants, this study provides evidence that even minor deviations from one’s typical depressive symptoms can influence body weight, particularly among those with higher body mass index (BMI).</p>
<p>For years, scientists have known that there’s a complex, two-way street between mental health and weight. People who struggle with their weight often face mental health challenges, and vice versa. However, this relationship has remained somewhat of a mystery, with most studies offering only cross-sectional snapshots of how mental health relates to weight at specific points in time.</p>
<p>The need for a clearer understanding of this interaction, especially how mental health changes within an individual affect their weight over time, has been a significant gap in research. This understanding is crucial, as it could help in developing strategies to prevent weight gain, particularly in the context of mental health.</p>
<p>“We were interested in this topic because obesity – and helping people to maintain a healthy weight – remain critical public health challenges. Currently, two-thirds of adults in England are living with overweight or obesity,” explained study author <a href="https://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/people/julia-mueller/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Julia Mueller</a> from the MRC Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge.</p>
<p>“Overweight and obesity increase the risk for numerous health problems, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancers. Research has suggested a connection between weight and mental health – with each potentially influencing the other – but the relationship is complex and remains poorly understood, particularly in relation to how changes in an individual’s mental health influence their bodyweight over time. A better understanding of the relationship between mental wellbeing and weight changes can help us understand how we can provide more effective psychological support for people trying to lose weight.”</p>
<p>For their study, the researchers used data from a segment of the Fenland Study, a comprehensive health study of over 12,000 people in the United Kingdom. The Fenland COVID-19 study, a sub-study conducted during the pandemic, provided a unique opportunity to investigate these changes due to the expected higher fluctuations in weight and mental health during this period.</p>
<p>A total of 2,133 participants, aged 44 to 70 years, were included in the analysis. They provided data on their mental health and weight via a mobile app over 6-9 months. Mental health was assessed using three validated questionnaires: the Patient Health Questionnaire for depressive symptoms, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire for anxiety symptoms, and the Perceived Stress Scale for perceived stress. Body weight was the primary outcome, with participants reporting their weight monthly.</p>
<p>The researchers found no significant association between within-individual variations in anxiety symptoms or stress and subsequent body weight. However, a notable connection was observed with depressive symptoms. The data showed that when individuals experienced a rise in depressive symptoms from their usual level, it was associated with a slight increase in body weight in the following month.</p>
<p>“We found that even small changes in symptoms of depression are predictive of increases in weight, regardless of whether people meet definitions for ‘clinical depression’ or not,” Mueller told PsyPost.</p>
<p>This effect was primarily observed in participants with higher body mass indexes. This suggests that those who are already overweight or obese might be more susceptible to weight changes in response to mood alterations.</p><div class="addrop-wrap" data-id="64749"><p style="text-align: center;">
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-9585941727679583" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<!-- In-Article Ad 1 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display: inline-block; width: 300px; height: 250px;" data-ad-client="ca-pub-9585941727679583" data-ad-slot="5494213682"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script></p></div>
<p>“We found that increases in symptoms of depression are associated with a subsequent increase in body weight when measured one month later,” Mueller explained. “This effect was only observed in those individuals with overweight (defined as BMI 25-29.9kg/m2) or with obesity (BMI of over 30kg/m2). The effect was not seen in those individuals with a BMI below 25kg/m2. Overall, our findings suggest that individuals with overweight or obesity are more vulnerable to weight gain in response to feeling more depressed.”</p>
<p>The researchers discovered that each unit increase in a person’s typical depressive symptoms score was associated with a weight gain of 45 grams in the following month. For instance, if an individual’s score for depressive symptoms increased from five to 10, signifying a shift from mild to moderate depressive symptoms, this change would correspond to an average weight gain of about 225 grams (0.225 kg). While this amount might appear minor, it can accumulate significantly over time.</p>
<p>“Although the weight gain was relatively small, even small weight changes occurring over short periods of time can lead to larger weight changes in the long-term, particularly among those with overweight and obesity,” Mueller told PsyPost. “People with a high BMI are already at greater risk from other health conditions, so this could potentially lead to a further deterioration in their health. Monitoring and addressing depressive in individuals with overweight or obesity symptoms (even if criteria for clinical diagnoses of depression are not met) could help prevent further weight gain and be beneficial to both their mental and physical health.”</p>
<p>A further surprising revelation was the lack of a reciprocal relationship. The study found no evidence to suggest that changes in body weight could predict future changes in mental health. This finding challenges the often-held belief that the relationship between mental health and body weight is always bidirectional.</p>
<p>“Apps on our phones make it possible for people to answer short questions at home more frequently and over extended periods of time, which provides much more information about their wellbeing,” added senior author Kirsten Rennie. “This technology could help us understand how changes in mental health influence behaviour among people with overweight or obesity and offer ways to develop timely interventions when needed.”</p>
<p>However, the study’s insights come with certain limitations. The reliance on self-reported weight measurements could introduce some bias, as individuals might over- or under-report their weight. Moreover, the study’s observational nature means that while it can highlight correlations, it cannot firmly establish causation.</p>
<p>“This study is an exploratory, observational study, so we can’t draw firm conclusions about whether changes in symptoms of depression cause weight changes,” Mueller said. “Future research could more closely examine how changes in mental wellbeing influence behaviours like diet and physical activity.”</p>
<p>The study, “<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295117" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The relationship of within-individual and between-1 individual variation in mental health with bodyweight: An exploratory longitudinal study</a>“, was authored by Julia Mueller, Amy L. Ahern, Rebecca A. Jones, Stephen J. Sharp, Alan Davies, Arabella Zuckerman, Benjamin I. Perry, Golam M. Khandaker, Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe, Nick J. Wareham, and Kirsten L. Rennie.</p>
<div class="addrop-wrap" data-id="163146"><script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-9585941727679583"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script></div></p>
.
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Open Mastodon instance for all mental health workers: https://mastodon.clinicians-exchange.org
.
NYU Information for Practice puts out 400-500 good quality health-related research posts per week but its too much for many people, so that bot is limited to just subscribers. You can read it or subscribe at @PsychResearchBot
.
Since 1991 The National Psychologist has focused on keeping practicing psychologists current with news, information and items of interest. Check them out for more free articles, resources, and subscription information: https://www.nationalpsychologist.com
.
EMAIL DAILY DIGEST OF RSS FEEDS -- SUBSCRIBE: http://subscribe-article-digests.clinicians-exchange.org
.
READ ONLINE: http://read-the-rss-mega-archive.clinicians-exchange.org
It's primitive... but it works... mostly...
. #psychology#counseling#socialwork#psychotherapy@psychotherapist@psychotherapists@psychology@socialpsych@socialwork@psychiatry#mentalhealth#psychiatry#healthcare#depression#psychotherapist
How did redditors treat him? I was subscribed to the sub and I have no idea who db0 is. I recently learned that db0 owns the lemmy.dbzer0.com instance but I don’t know anything beyond that.
The app? There are many, many clients for Lemmy. Thunder is able to handle multiple versions and multiple accounts on multiple instances. This is a client API implementation limitation of whatever client you are using. Not Lemmy itself.
As for the federation issues, they are being worked out. Each major version has improved the internal server logic, improving the reliability of the inter-instance communication. But the changes have also come with kinks, that have had to be worked out with each sub-version update, before the team bites off on the next big improvement.
v19 introduced changes to how the federation queue works, and these are currently causing higher resource usage than before. Because of this, some instances seem to be falling behind on syncing federated content.
It really feels like !sub should be the default but I get the issue. Different instances. But you’d feel like it would just default to whatever instance you’re already on lol.
The joys of being cradled by tech monoliths then going back to the stone age.
You’re telling me I have to type in the entire address!?!?!
What if Meta’s hidden objective behind the Threads-to-Mastodon initiative is a play on app.net? And, what if threads.net is a measured step towards what could be the greatest pivot in all of tech?
Tldr: The answer is actually to outcompete them. People will use the app/website that brings them more value.
They already have the ability to subscribe to a thread and get notifications for new posts, quote posts, and an optional algorithm that recommends you stuff based on your likes. Things mastodon does not have will be coming fast to Threads. When they decide to come for Lemmy they will have features they see people begging too.
If its way easier and more useful to find information on Threads and their version of Lemmy people will start using it more and more. If AskDocs, AskHistorians, LegalAdvice and other useful subs popped up on a Meta version of Lemmy I would use a Lemmy instance that federated with it because its valuable information I want access to.
Just like twitter and instagram are basically required right now for 3D artists to find jobs, we will be required to use Facebook’s version of twitter, reddit, and instagram if they get the huge user base that twitter and reddit are pushing away, tiktok might lose from a ban, and they already have from instagram.
I hate facebook/meta but if its the best place to find information and work i will use it just like i currently begrudgingly use instagram for finding work.
We need to realize that evangelizing like Stallman is NOT how we grow the open web and FOSS. it’s by making killer apps/hardware like the Steam Deck did so well. People don’t use tech for the philosophy behind it, they use it as a tool to complete their task or improve their day. At the end of the day the best tool wins, not the most ethically made tool.
Currently the best thing we could do is get Lemmy to work better with mastodon and vice versa. Thats done by allowing Lemmy accounts to follow Lemmy and Mastodon accounts and by improving the UX for a Lemmy post to be made with mastodon so people post to a community like they would use a hashtag
‘Front page of the internet’: how social media’s biggest user protest rocked Reddit::A mass user protest six months ago over technical tweaks had big downstream effects, and now the ‘front page of the internet’ is changed for ever
Well that’s the issue. Reddit as a tool/service is fine. The only thing that I have an issue with is the api / third party app stuff and their leadership. Subs like Homelab , league , etc are ones I used heavily and they still function the same more or less. I just lurk more and use Reddit in browser with an extension that helps.
Lemmy and the various instances and apps are cool, but the lack of content(or content creators rather) is what makes it a little depressing. Outside of memes and discussions like this, it doesn’t replace Reddit because the user base is like 10+ years behind. I can show up and find posts from days ago which just leads me to keep using Reddit and rss for new content
I miss some of the communities I used on reddit that are still either quiet or very quiet over here, but I also recognise that unless I ramp up my participation in them, I haven’t really got grounds to feel negative about that. Besides, using social media less is a plus to me.
I love there’s no ads, tracking and ‘suggestions’ - in short, no algorithm. The apps are (mostly) open source and the community are appreciative of that.
I used to get news from reddit and can get it here too, there’s no difference in quality or quantity. Politically, I appreciate the de-emphasis on hateful content and it helps I’m on an instance where the Admin is on top of their game in that respect. It is noticeably more left-wing on here but since I am too I guess that’s not an issue for me. It’s certainly way better than Reddit in that respect where I’d stumble across fairly extreme right-wing opinions in (supposedly) non political subs every day.
People seem, by and large, much calmer and more reasonable here and less inclined to attack en masse. I’ve noticed a distinct improvement in my overall mental health but I think that might have more to do with not being on reddit than being on here.
Lemmy is what we make it. For those of us who came over in the Summer, Lemmy/KBin is less than 6 months old. Let’s not paint it into being one thing or another just yet.
Tesla drivers had highest accident rate, BMW drivers highest DUI rate, study finds::Tesla drivers had 24 accidents per 1,000 drivers during the period from mid-November 2022 to mid-November 2023, according to a study by Lending Tree.
Voyager is basically a verbatim UX clone of Apollo.
And, if you really want to avoid dupes, it’s best to browse “local” or your subscribed communities. And don’t sub to similar communities on multiple instances. Then you’re going to see dupes.
I moved from Lemmy.ml because I liked the name of Lemmy.world and it ran a newer Lemmy version which meant I could make communities. I moved from Lemmy.world because they defederated from piracy communities they didn’t even host (but for some reason still kept the small piracy community they DID host) From thelemmy.club...
Some instances are running on better servers than others, have staff that fix issues quicker and attend to updates sooner.
For example, .world is still on v18 while the rest of the threadiverse has mostly moved on to v19.
Some instances defederate certain other instances, so in some cases you might end up finding that a community you subbed to gets disappeared by the admins of your instance (lemmy.ml did this to ani.social a while back). Whether there are valid reasons goes case by case, sopuli.xyz for example blocks instances that are for porn, and I like it that way.
Though outward federation is a bit borked on there atm, so I’m using my alts…
But really, it doesn’t matter that much. If the grass looks greener, you can hop over the fence and see for yourself, and then hop right back if it turns out it wasn’t.
Over-moderation will kill Lemmy instances. One of the reasons Reddit became as big as it did is due to very light-touch moderation verging on “absolute freedom of speech”. It was refreshing and ‘alternative’ compared to the increasing sanitisation of the Internet.
That’s the sub not the website, over moderation is a feature of some subs, just like lemmy instances. Just like reddit, if you don’t like it create your own, unlike reddit you can set an overall tone to your instance.
Military Psychology News Robot
.
TRIGGER WARNING: This robot may occasionally display disturbing content as it shows articles around the topic "military psychology news".
.
The year’s highlights included the Warfighter Brain Health Initiative,
critical advancements in traumatic brain injury research, and a new b
2023 Year in Review: Defense Health Agency Dedicated to Warfighter Brain
Health
Department of Defense's Warfighter Brain Health Initiative Leading the
Way Forward
The DOD made significant strides in monitoring service members,
instituting injury prevention safety measures, and providinginnovative
traumatic brain injury treatments.
The Military Health System is an integrated system of readiness and
health that includes health care delivery, the TRICARE health plan,
medical education and training, public health, private sector
partnerships, and combat medicine. We want to engage with you about your
health and readiness. Please follow us on social media!
I used to think that there would be 1, main ‘Fediverse’ with all of the ‘big instances’ connected to each other. The recent Threads debacle has shown me otherwise....
Unless you want content and more people to interact with.
Like, people keep saying “oh yeah you can jump instances” as if that wasn’t possible on Reddit. You could go to different subs or make your own. But what good were most of them? As long as there’s a “default”, a main “hub”, people will go there, and that’s where everything will be happening. The alternatives and smaller instances will be starved out.
Centralization is not about the software, it’s about the people. Users centralize where others are. So when the big hubs are allowing threads to poison the well, it’s poisoning the thing most people want to drink from, and the thing new visitors will be most likely to drink from.
Threads represents something that a lot of people came to the fetiverse to escape. If threads wants to join, fine, but I believe it is in the best interest of all of us if there is a large alternative “cluster” that is separate from it rather than being tied up with it.
A separate galaxy in the fediverse, that says in big red neon lights, “Get your corporate bullshit away from us. This is our space, for people, not for you to make money.” And if we let them in immediately, it becomes increasingly difficult for that galaxy to retain that identity.
And I’ll just gently point out that once Threads joins, separating from it will not be easy because you will have Threads users here actively pushing back on the separation.
The very nature of the fediverse makes fragmentation part of it. Since it’s not centralized, control is distributed to the different instance admins. It’s only natural that people with different opinions will want to split from each other, and that’s without taking into account the levels of toxicity allowed by different moderators.
Is an instance allowing racists to thrive in there? Of course it will be blocked by leftists, since banning is a concept that no longer applies.
Let me repeat for clarity: You CANNOT ban someone from the fediverse, you can ONLY defederate from them.
And don’t tell me it’s that much different from reddit, I’ve seen political subs denying access to people simply based on what other subreddits they’re subscribed to.
Would you rather have a single hierarchical “network” where an asshole dictator decides who is and who isn’t allowed to post? Of course not, otherwise you wouldn’t be here.
Federation implies defederating instances you’re not comfortable with.
And that’s perfectly fine, because safety comes first.
My freedom of association necessarily implies that I’m free NOT to associate with people I don’t like, and my insurance admin should be able to make sure I’m free from harassment by those same people.
Want to solve this issue? Solve human nature first.
I keep on forgetting that “threads” (in lowercase) is frequently being used to refer to “Threads” the Facebook thing, and not separate sub-communities within the Fediverse.
Was getting all confused as to why Fediverse instances were internally blocking each other.
Y’all all need to learn capitalization, yo. Helps reduce confusion by turning certain things into the proper nouns that they actually are.
I think the chances for the fediverse having this are generally lower. I saw a rough estimate that puts our bubble at 1.5 million. By comparison, reddit is 500 million and YouTube is 2.5bn.
Yes, we are a bunch of nerds in that 1.5m number but we also value human input and generally seem to only use practical bots - and some people don’t even like those. We also have the bot account option, which should inspire more trust, though we have to trust that people actually use it.
Compared to reddit or YouTube, which I’ve personally seen as testing grounds for rolling out bot accounts. Whole subs dedicated to it. It’s not that it doesn’t, can’t, or won’t happen here, I know we have a number of repost bots from various instances - I’m moreso just saying that I think being so small helps. When the dead Internet arrives, the fediverse will have been one of the last bastions of human interaction on the Internet.
Except for mastodon. I see a lot of bots there compared to lemmy/Kbin
Yeah, I think this is a big part of it. The Star Trek sub’s total abandonment of Reddit and conversion to a standalone Lemmy instance during the Blackout was a big deal and a big driver of traffic in those days and beyond.
Star Trek is big in the Threadiverse for the same reason that Earth is big in the Federation. They were a massive force in the early days.
There's a common false dichotomy about #Threads: cut them off, or leave it to user choice.I can't speak to other software, but Mastodon offers a third option: limiting Threads. This can be done for all users of a server....
I don’t think Lemmy does either…? It pushes updates to subs that at least someone on the receiving instance subscribes to (at least that’s how it worked last time I checked). That’s why there are scripts going around for new instances to automatically follow a bunch of popular subs to populate the All feed.
I think Mastodon works in the same way with users, where it sends updates for accounts that someone on the receiving end follows. So if nobody follows you from Threads it wouldn’t send any of your posts there.
Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse....
Interesting. But lemmy is not built to be a personal instance, more of a group thingy (I understand the complexity of it, and I like it, but there are things that will be hard to deal with computer-science complexity wise if one instance gets too big. That’s why I’m not just on board against meta/threads.net, but totally against it). In a nutshell Lemmy will thrive being lots and lots and lots of small servers with sub 100k users (probably 10k is a nice number? Or 35 because you like that rare thing).
Yeah, I was on that sub as well, occasionally. I respect Bardfinn, the lead mod of AHS, but they used to tell me that accounts were restored on appeal if moderators retaliated by reporting users for “abusing the report button,” but my appeal was never accepted, and it was a clear instance of mod retaliation. I finally shared that experience when I was on my way out of the site for good.
It’s frustrating how many non-joiners are completely turned off by the part where you hunt for an instance to join. They act like it’s super confusing and scary (when in fact it’s ‘super easy, barely an inconvenience’).
Meanwhile these same people will scour the internet looking for a recipe or bootleg movie or whatever.
It’s really frustrating when you remember what a huge PITA it is to get your account going on reddit. Sure, the first part is easy enough, it’s just registering on the site. But then you find you can’t do jack shit because you don’t have enough karma and every sub you visit has 10,000 arbitrary byzantine rules to deal with because the mods got picked on in high school.
Lemmy is actually EASIER than reddit. But here we are.
Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation
Since what content users might want to see is quite unlikely to match which servers the admins tolerate, choosing instance on the Fediverse can be quite complicated, which is inconvenient and off-putting for new users.
For this reason, and simply that the Fediverse is stronger united, I believe defederation should ideally be reserved for illegal content and extreme cases. If Fediverse platforms would allow instances to simply block the rest for users by default, the user experience would be the same, unless they decide otherwise.
I’m a retired Unix admin. It was my job from the early '90s until the mid '10s. I’ve kept somewhat current ever since by running various machines at home. So far I’ve managed to avoid using Docker at home even though I have a decent understanding of how it works - I stopped being a sysadmin in the mid '10s, I still worked...
Yeah, it also has the effect that when starting up say a new postgres or web server is one simple command, a few seconds and a few mb of disk and ram, you do it more for smaller stuff.
Instead of setting up one nginx for multiple sites you run one nginx per site and have the settings for that as part of the site repository. Or when a service needs a DB, just start a new one just for that. And if that file analyzer ran in it’s own image instead of being part of the web service, you could scale that separately… oh, and it needs a redis instance and a rabbitmq server, that’s two more containers, that serves just that web service. And so on…
Things that were a huge hassle before, like separate mini vm’s for each sub-service, and unique sub-services for each service doesn’t just become practical but easy. You can define all the services and their relations in one file and docker will recreate the whole stack with all services with one command.
And then it also gets super easy to start more than one of them, for example for testing or if you have a different client. … which is how you easily reach a hundred instances running.
So instead of a service you have a service blueprint, which can be used in service stack blueprints, which allows you to set up complex systems relatively easily. With a granularity that would traditionally be insanity for anything other than huge, serious big-company deployments.
I just realized /c/piracy is the most subscribed community in the lemmyverse! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
lemmyverse.net/communities?order=subscribers
Can one take advantage of lower subscription fees when residing abroad?
For instance, YouTube Premium charges 12€ in my home country. However, where I’m staying now they would charge less than 3€....
Are you not annoyed by Lemmy's constant glitches?
On the instance I’m using, my comments and posts have disappeared. It is ok?...
This is the year, guys. (i.imgur.com)
Copy, Acquire, Kill— How Meta could pull off the most extraordinary pivot in tech history (www.fromjason.xyz)
What if Meta’s hidden objective behind the Threads-to-Mastodon initiative is a play on app.net? And, what if threads.net is a measured step towards what could be the greatest pivot in all of tech?
‘Front page of the internet’: how social media’s biggest user protest rocked Reddit (www.theguardian.com)
‘Front page of the internet’: how social media’s biggest user protest rocked Reddit::A mass user protest six months ago over technical tweaks had big downstream effects, and now the ‘front page of the internet’ is changed for ever
How have you personally found the Lemmy community compared to its competition and other social media?
Tesla drivers had highest accident rate, BMW drivers highest DUI rate, study finds (www.cnbc.com)
Tesla drivers had highest accident rate, BMW drivers highest DUI rate, study finds::Tesla drivers had 24 accidents per 1,000 drivers during the period from mid-November 2022 to mid-November 2023, according to a study by Lending Tree.
I might move again. (Or not) (lemy.lol)
I moved from Lemmy.ml because I liked the name of Lemmy.world and it ran a newer Lemmy version which meant I could make communities. I moved from Lemmy.world because they defederated from piracy communities they didn’t even host (but for some reason still kept the small piracy community they DID host) From thelemmy.club...
The Fediverse is working just as intended.
I used to think that there would be 1, main ‘Fediverse’ with all of the ‘big instances’ connected to each other. The recent Threads debacle has shown me otherwise....
The fediverse in a nutshell (futurology.today)
41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!! (tech.lgbt)
Facebook Is Being Overrun With Stolen, AI-Generated Images That People Think Are Real (www.404media.co)
Dear Lemmy, **why** Star Trek??
Every single large server in this federation has at least one Star Trek community. There is even an entire server dedicated to Star Trek....
Need a last minute gift this year? From the makers of Happy Fun Ball, it's Pongo! (www.youtube.com)
cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/9692419...
Erik Moeller on Mastodon: There's a common false dichotomy about Threads [...] (nerdica.net) en-gb
There's a common false dichotomy about #Threads: cut them off, or leave it to user choice.I can't speak to other software, but Mastodon offers a third option: limiting Threads. This can be done for all users of a server....
Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net. (mstdn.social)
Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse....
Current state of Reddit (poptalk.scrubbles.tech)
My friend sent me this, the current state of Reddit. (I left during the app issue and haven’t looked back)
How to Kill a Decentralised Network (such as the Fediverse) (ploum.net)
Should I move to Docker?
I’m a retired Unix admin. It was my job from the early '90s until the mid '10s. I’ve kept somewhat current ever since by running various machines at home. So far I’ve managed to avoid using Docker at home even though I have a decent understanding of how it works - I stopped being a sysadmin in the mid '10s, I still worked...