Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music::Audio created using Google DeepMind’s AI Lyria model will be watermarked with SynthID to let people identify its AI-generated origins after the fact.
That’s actually an accurate description of what is happening: an audio file turned into a 2d image with the x axis being time, the y axis being frequency and color being amplitude.
If someone says that their intent is to look for X inside of Y, I highly doubt that announcing that you did indeed find X inside of Y would be a security risk.". If it was that sensitive, why even announce that they are looking for anything inside of anything?
They’ve already announced intent and described the purpose. The enemy will 100% know what was found, the only reason for obscurity is to keep a failure from going public,as not saying anything at all is only marginally worse than what they did.
If a server costs X and the amount of free users is Y and VIP is Z then you’d need to create an equilibrium where you can make more money to sustain the infrastructure and have enough in case it goes belly up.
Aka: If 10k users are free, and the income from VIP or ads is Z then you have to limit the capabilities of the free users to sustain the platform which in turn can stay (to some anount) free because the VIPs pay for it.
Means: Limit API calls.
I think the problem is the idea of subscription services themselves which has caused companies to become adversaries to the customers rather than partners.
When you pay a one-time fee for an item or service, it’s in that business’s interest to make you feel valued as a customer, to bring you good so that you are likely to pay one-time fees again in the future.
With a recurring fee model, it’s in the business’s interest to make you use their service less while still paying, because if you use it too much they lose money, and if they price it according to how the power users use it then it won’t be a competitive deal.
Example: when you get flights costing $200 per domestic trip, the airline wants to make you feel not terrible for choosing them. But if instead of that you paid $1000 a month to fly domestically “as often as you want”, they will degrade the experience so that you wouldn’t even want to fly more than 5 times per month, like duct tape you to your seat if they were allowed to, or put restrictions like “only to these cities” or “only on our 3am flights” or “only on trips less than x days or longer than y days”.
No matter the industry, the whole premise of the RR model is to trick you into pretending you still have whatever original value of service, while screwing you in every possible way just short of the point that causes you to cancel. That makes them the most money.
I used to pirate because I was a broke kid. Now I have money (not as much as Rossman and no money for these subscriptions) but I too need to find value when I give this money I earned to someone who makes a thing. As Rossman said, if you’re tinkering to get the thing you paid for, at that point you might as well tinker and not pay for it.
P.S.: Rossman is aware his whole shtick is “angry man yells at cloud while sometimes petting cat”. I get many people don’t like it. Don’t watch it then. Odysee is just Rossman’s spare platform in case YouTube doesn’t like him anymore for whatever reason. Yes it’s full of loonies (and you can call Rossman one too if you want) but just don’t give them your attention.
Amazon is blocking promotions of employees who don’t comply with its return-to-office policy, leaked documents show::Amazon has updated its promotions policy to enforce its office attendance policy.
One day you’re hopefully going to learn that just because a company can do x or y does not mean that they should or that it is in their best interests to do so.
There’s supposedly a variety of different spectroscopy methods but what drives the choice of one method over another? If elements drive the colors, how do you parse out individual elements from a compound?...
Not all methods can pick up on all materials, and some methods are easier to use or faster or more accurate or you can so multiple things at once or probes something else than just what the material is.
For instance, EDX is a method where you hit the sample with an electron beam from a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and measure emitting x-rays. You can probe lots of elements with this, but not the very lightest of elements (skipping couple at the beginning of the periodic chart, don’t remember which). It is very accurate in terms of spectra and because it is an electron beam it has very high physical resolution. However, you need to use pretty high energies which can destroy or modify the sample when doing the scans. Also, you need an electron microscope with the capability, it is common to skip it and use the money for improving the electron microscope in other means. And then you need to put your sample in a high vacuum, which might be a problem. It is not exactly fast and SEMs are used a lot so the tool might be booked a lot, just a practical issue but a very real one. Also SEM costs hundreds of thousands of euros or millions. Nor cheap.
XRD is a method where you blast your sample with x-rays ans look at how they diffract from it. You can use it to probe which materials your sample is made of but you also get information about its crystal structure and things like distance between two atomic layers (very accurately). Issues are for instance that you might need to grind your sample into dust basically to do the measurement (it only probes the very surface of the sample). And it is not a high resolution method in the physical dimensions, you can tell what the entire sample is made of but not really what is this specific spot made of.
Then methods like Raman and infrared spectroscopy use lasers to excite molecules on the sample and then look at what the sample spews out. They both can be used to know what materials the sample is made of (at the laser spot), but not everything is “Raman active” or “infrared active”. Like I mentioned, they probe molecules and not necessarily individual atoms. Essentially they look at how molecules vibrate and rotate and how the electron cloud around the atoms stretch and move when being hit by lasers. EDX might tell you a material is made of carbon 12, but how is it arranged? Amorphous carbon (no crystal structure)? Buckyballs (small clusters of couple tens of carbon atoms in a ball)? Carbon nanotubes (sheet of carbon rolled into a tube)? Graphene (2D sheet of carbon aroms)? Raman and/or IR spectroscopy can tell you that. Now to be fair, EDX can also differentiate between those (or the electron microscope can as a whole) but it will have though time telling how well the atoms are arranged (missing atoms, doping, extra atoms etc).
Of course you can just take white light (usually maybe 300-1000nm or so), shine the sample with it and look at the spectra. Either transmissed light (light that goes through) or reflected. Then you can run into issues like, well most stuff doesn’t let white light through that easily for transmission, and not all samples reflect that well. Here you have looooots of different wavelengths so just making that wide frequency band well is difficult, hence it is usually limited to around the visible spectrum, and this also is a problem in spectral resolution (tends to be lower). And all frequencies interact with the sample a bit differently, so here afaik you don’t really get any more info that literally what the sample reflects / passes through. So no crystal structure or anything fancy.
if elements drive the colors, how do you parse out individual elements from a compound?
You might not be able to. What you might see is how many percent of X and Y and Z you have and from this you could determine what type of a compound you have. You would probably start to look at phase diagrams of those elements and from there you might be able to determine what compound you have.
Then you could also run into issues with spectral resolution and non-idealistic measurement conditions. For instance you might see a peak of spectra at some wavelength, but the peak is not a single line, it probably looks like Gaussian curve or Lorentzian. Now you can have multiple peaks very close by but because of the resolution of the system isn’t high enough to see them as individual peaks, you would see one big peak. To get around this you probably need to do some math and try to fit multiple peaks into your measurement data and see what peaks make up the big boi peak.
Is there a consistent pattern to how the emission lines relate to what the element looks like before going through the prism?
Pretty much yes. The theoretical peaks are what they are but your measurement data is noisy (like previous example). Your electrons are not at the same energy. You get secondary electrons that can mess up things. Your laser isn’t at one frequency and might change a bit from measurement to measurement. If you need accurate results you might need to make some calibration steps. Like, measure something you know is 99.999% copper, then adjust the setup so that it identifies it correctly. For lasers you should measure the frequency and adjust the results based on that. You might also need to measure like spectrum of a xenon lamp that has very well known, strong peaks, and adjust according to that.
Is there a resource that shows examples of emission lines along with the visible color?
There are lots of books on spectroscopy of different materials that work as reference. NIST also has a database www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-spectra-database but I have not used it myself. But usually the tool itself has a database that you just query from and it tells you.
Sorry about the confusion. It’s not sarcasm. I’m just sick and tired of people blocking my PR because of an argument about wether the function should be called X or Y or Z or D
I have a Samsung Galaxy J3 (2018) smartphone which currently has the stock Samsung Android OS installed on it. I wanted to install an Android “distro” that doesn’t spy on me, like Graphene OS, but I couldn’t find a ROM for it. Since I would probably need to compile AOSP from source code anyways, I though, why not install...
As others are saying, that’s not really an option unless you’re really dedicated. IF it has an unlockable bootloader you could technically get to compiling and tinkering to get everything built, but in order to get a phone all set you’d need to get the right drivers and do a whole lot of tinkering (like full time job levels of building and tinkering) kind of deal to get it built. Phone’s aren’t so plug and play like computers.
If you there’s no rom support and/or a permanently locked bootloader but you want an OS without x y and z you can always try to fire up ADB bridge and disable stuff. You could also accomplish the same by rooting, though it’s a bit of a security risk (though not as overblown as some people say IMO).
The criticism was your integrity, not your alleged race.
Great google translate bro.
If you have to pull out a “trust me bro” instead of present facts of the matter that can be verified via search engines, you’ve already failed at the purpose of the discussion. I noted specialty along with direct information that can be directly corroborated with online reputable sources.
You backed your words up with ‘trust me bro’.
Tell me who, in that conversation, would you more likely listen to, the person who provided a detailed overview and perspective along with their noted background or the person who just says ‘i know everything about the middle east because I’m x race born in y town’?
You’ve only said I’m wrong without any substance to back that or presentations of understanding or experience, especially since you flopped entirely on the history aspect (especially if you are arabic, then you’d know the background of the USA is light in comparison). Either you’re too emotionally involved in the information you’ve been shown IRL or, as I suspect, you’re pushing an agenda rather than an opinion.
The rule — announced late last month by the National Labor Relations Board –- sets new standards for determining when two companies should be considered “joint employers” under the National Labor Relations Act....
Joint employer rules have never been that complicated. You want to know what makes them complicated, is that a Supreme Court judge can read regulations and say… oh well it says here that X is defined by Y, so we went back and found a case in 1930 that said that Y can be this, so that is the definition we are going to go by, and our ruling will set president for all future legal cases. Regulations don’t mean shit when the Supreme Court can interpret them however they like.
Tesla will sue you for $50,000 if you try to resell your Cybertruck in the first year::Tesla may agree to buy the truck back at the original price minus “$0.25/mile driven” and any damages and repairs.
That’s how Musk names everything. He loves the letter X, he named the Tesla models “S”, “3”, “X”, and “Y”, the Cybertruck, his five most recent children including “Techno Mechanicus”… He’s absolutely unfit to be in charge of anything.
They absolutely design cars with some pedestrian safety in mind. That’s why hood ornaments went away and bumpers moved away from solid steel.
I don’t remember the exact numbers, but they have a metric along the lines of “X% of pedestrians survive impacts up to Y speed” that they need to meet.
The problem is, this is still decietful. If this is an issue then the correct move would be to make every item on the menu 18% more expensive as a base. Because now, they still get to say “oh well our prices are still low come eat here and get “X item” for “Y price” but that’s not true anymore because of the service charge. It’s just a way to keep menu items lower in price but increase the price at the end.
People just HAVE to keep changing established terms to feel special, I guess. For example, I’ve noticed people used to say “X got that Win!”, then it changed to “Y fr earned that W”, and today I saw someone say “Z deserved that dub”.
Oh that’s cool, I ran across the same website while making a comment to another user here.
I’m not super sure how reliable they should be considered to be honest. Looking at Mediabiadfactcheck.com they state that they are mostly factual in reporting but points to their lack of transparency on funding and strongly loaded emotional wording that may be misleading.
Based on the rest of the review it seems that they are really good about being very specific in their statements to avoid inaccuracies. Looking through this article and a few of their other articles they mostly focus on local accounts (X person said this, they live in Gaza) or third party references (Y on Twitter said this based on an article by Z at the BBC).
Another representation of this style of reporting would be this example:
Headline: “The Election Was Stolen!”
Body: New information has come out about an investigation into the legitimacy of the 2020 election. SOUTHERN boy on Twitter shows a video of FBI officials going into the election offices to perform an investigation. SOUTHERN boy also recently posted a potential connection between the investigation and the Trump 2020 election, but it hasn’t been picked up by the mainstream media.
We also spoke to Melissa Simpson in Mississippi and she says she and all her neighbors believe the election was stolen.
Since 2020 Trump has been telling everyone that, “The Election Was Stolen!” Does SOUTHERN boys information show the proof to Trump’s claim?
End example
Technically nothing I posted is false, I’m not making any claims myself, but anyone reading this would know the subtext to my article.
I just listened to this AI generated audiobook and if it didn’t say it was AI, I’d have thought it was human-made. It has different voices, dramatization, sound effects… The last I’d heard about this tech was a post saying Stephen Fry’s voice was stolen and replicated by AI. But since then, nothing, even though it’s...
AI can't tamper with physical evidence. It can't fake financial records or witness testimony. Many kinds of audio and visual recordings will still have sufficient authentication and chain of custody to be worthwhile.
The main kind of evidence that these AI generators makes untenable are the ones where someone just shows up and says "look at this video of X confessing to Y that I happen to have," which was never a particularly good sort of evidence to base a court case on to begin with.
Even if that’s true, what are you going to do about it?
Say you do a whole lot of research, and conclude that loosening regulations x, y, and z will not impact safety in any measurable way, and will substantially reduce costs. Even detractors with scientific credentials agree this research is solid. Best case scenario, here.
NIMBYs will still kill it. What you just did is hand them a way to say “they are cutting corners using unproven methods to let their investors line their pockets at the expense of the lives of their workers and everyone who lives around it”.
They may be wrong, but their arguments in front of a government body can still be persuasive. They don’t have to be right, just vaguely plausible to people who aren’t experts. That will be enough to kill it.
You can’t beat NIMBYs by having the best argument. You need to plan around them. Don’t hand them a weapon before the fight begins.
I always laugh when someone says “the American media isn’t reporting on X Y or Z!” Because invariably it takes me 30 seconds to find that they in fact have reported on it.
Nobody here old enough to remember rules 30&31 of the Internet lol?
For the first systement, yes, there are a lot of women on the Internet nowadays. But there also are a lot of men pretending to be women, and a lot of creepy men, so I’m guessing a lot of women just don’t mention it or pretend not to be one just to get some peace.
It all boils down to stereotypes, IMHO. Every time you’re making such statements as “all X are Y” when talking about groups of people based on one criterion, you’re stereotyping. Such broad generalizations are rarely useful outside humoristic tropes, and even then…
Pricing is almost yh same in US$ all over the world if you consider buying in relative bulk (60$/sack of rice of 100pounds = PREMIUM RICE. 35$/SACK is normal.
60-120 GRAMS PER DAY = 44 kg per YEAR = 1 sack of 35$ (or $60 if you feel fancy)
That leaves 363 days x 20$ to pay for beans, veggies, some protein and A TV, MOTORBIKE AND BRICKS & CEMENTS & REBAR.
If you give 20$/day to every FAMILY (not even person) in the world, all of them will have a DECENT CHANCE ON A DECENT LIVE including some luxury.
But we/YOU/ prefer to give them $2 a day but (y)ourselves 20$/hour and our overlords 20.000$/second.
YOU HAVE NO POINT NO PROOF NO EXPERIENCE NO ARGUMENT. JUST STOP REPLYING OR I’LL GO INTO MUCH MORE DETAIL
I can’t help with the middle days but I have a trick for Friday. Look for something the entire week that can be pushed, for a semi valid reason, to Friday afternoon/evening. Preferably something that’s easy but takes a lot of waiting. That way when someone tries to drop some shit on you last minute you can say " sorry boss I’m already scheduled for x or y priority task, it’ll have to wait until Monday " it doesn’t always work, especially if your boss is a fucking Slave Driver. But it has saved me a few times.
Right now I have a ticket scheduled for around 3:30 that should keep me “busy” until 5.
Google employees typically work more than eight hours a day: Internal memo::Employees said they were eager to share the HR representative’s response with their relatives.
I will say when I was younger and started in tech I stuck around the office until 9pm every day, then I’d get beers with my coworkers. I was learning so much more than I ever did in school, and doing projects that were really fun, and I made a ton of money for myself and the company (I did not get paid near what I was worth though).
Now, after many many years, the jobs aren’t challenging anymore, and the interesting work has been split up and blocked by organizational bureaucracy (you can’t do that because it would need a team of X to build, Y to deploy, Z to support, all when the job could be a 150 line Python script with 15 mins a week maintenance).
I’ve tried startups and they’re fun, the last one my shares got diluted vastly cutting my pay, and I have friends who got acquired for less than their options cost them, taking a loss. It’s not so fun working overtime for the VCs to snatch your tickets right from your hand.
Now I’m back at a big corp again, where I spend my time optimizing tiny levers in a vast machine to make a few more bucks here and saving a few there, organizing it all by multiplying 12 columns of a spreadsheet and putting in bullshit targets.
Nowadays I wish I could work 9 to noon for how much mental energy I have.
New EV owner here. We charge at home so I don’t need to use them, but stores nearby have chargers. I tried them to see how they work. They are often broken....
As a tesla owner for several years, I find this hard to believe. 15 minutes at a 250 kw charger doesn’t even get you 50%.
I can go buy a surgery robot but that doesn’t mean I know how to use it. Just because you own a Tesla doesn’t mean you know how to road trip it effectively, or have one that can do what I literally just did. For example, an early Model S or X can only charge at 120KW no matter what charger you plug it into, ergo no, it can’t do this. But any long range or performance model 3 or Y certainly can.
Part of the reason there’s so many stops (which I prefer and so do my wife and daughter, for that matter), is that if you keep the battery’s charge level between 10 and 50% from hop to hop, you end up spending much less time at chargers in general because you’re always charging at peak or very close to it. Sitting at a charger waiting for that last 10% at like 75kw from 70% - 80% is MUCH slower than hopping on down the road and charging at near peak at the next charger.
It works, I know for a fact it works, and I brought the receipts! Here’s a few examples from my trip:
Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music (www.theverge.com)
Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music::Audio created using Google DeepMind’s AI Lyria model will be watermarked with SynthID to let people identify its AI-generated origins after the fact.
US will not share intel on Hamas and Al Shifa hospital -White House (www.reuters.com)
Exciting news! The free API you were using is no more free! (feddit.it)
Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription...
[Louis Rossmann] Piracy is COMPLETELY justified: Louis tries NetFlix and remembers why (odysee.com)
Amazon is blocking promotions of employees who don't comply with its return-to-office policy, leaked documents show (www.businessinsider.com)
Amazon is blocking promotions of employees who don’t comply with its return-to-office policy, leaked documents show::Amazon has updated its promotions policy to enforce its office attendance policy.
Can someone give me a semi-layperson explanation of emission spectra?
There’s supposedly a variety of different spectroscopy methods but what drives the choice of one method over another? If elements drive the colors, how do you parse out individual elements from a compound?...
Merge then review (programming.dev)
Move fast and break things....
Eat garbage (lemmy.world)
Should I install Linux on my smartphone?
I have a Samsung Galaxy J3 (2018) smartphone which currently has the stock Samsung Android OS installed on it. I wanted to install an Android “distro” that doesn’t spy on me, like Graphene OS, but I couldn’t find a ROM for it. Since I would probably need to compile AOSP from source code anyways, I though, why not install...
Hamas terrorists fire anti-tank missile at IDF troops from Gaza hospital entrance (www.ynetnews.com)
New 'joint employer' rule could make it easier for millions to unionize - if it survives challenges (apnews.com)
The rule — announced late last month by the National Labor Relations Board –- sets new standards for determining when two companies should be considered “joint employers” under the National Labor Relations Act....
Tesla will sue you for $50,000 if you try to resell your Cybertruck in the first year (www.businessinsider.com)
Tesla will sue you for $50,000 if you try to resell your Cybertruck in the first year::Tesla may agree to buy the truck back at the original price minus “$0.25/mile driven” and any damages and repairs.
Restaurant Bill (lemmy.world)
Every Job person now (telegra.ph)
"Shoot at everything": How Israeli pilots killed their own civilians (electronicintifada.net)
Why isn't everyone talking about AI generated audiobooks?
I just listened to this AI generated audiobook and if it didn’t say it was AI, I’d have thought it was human-made. It has different voices, dramatization, sound effects… The last I’d heard about this tech was a post saying Stephen Fry’s voice was stolen and replicated by AI. But since then, nothing, even though it’s...
apple users in a nutshell (sh.itjust.works)
First planned small nuclear reactor plant in the US has been canceled (arstechnica.com)
First planned small nuclear reactor plant in the US has been canceled::NuScale and its primary partner give up on its first installation.
Eric Adams: FBI seize NYC mayor's phones in fundraising investigation (www.bbc.com)
Why is that on the internet, people assume you're a male from America, but if you're a vegan on the internet, people assume you're female?
I'm not asking to be rich. (lemmy.world)
Every Time (media.mas.to)
Google employees typically work more than eight hours a day: Internal memo (www.cnbc.com)
Google employees typically work more than eight hours a day: Internal memo::Employees said they were eager to share the HR representative’s response with their relatives.
How reliable are EV chargers?
New EV owner here. We charge at home so I don’t need to use them, but stores nearby have chargers. I tried them to see how they work. They are often broken....