There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

They tried

EDIT: I didn’t realize the anger this would bring out of people. It was supposed to be a funny meme based on recent real-life situations I’ve encountered, not an attack on the EU.

I appreciate the effort of the EU cookie laws. The practice of them just doesn’t live up to the theory of the law. Shady companies are always going to find a way to be shady.

Pons_Aelius ,

Cool. One less website to visit. Not like there is a shortage.

Scubus ,

I love when the trash takes itself out

glad_cat ,

So far I’ve only seen small US newspaper who did this. Is anyone angry about this?

Oddbin ,

There’s a medical website that appears in top searches (forget the name) that does it too but yeah, mostly seems to be news websites but not the big ones. In most cases Unlock Origin or the like can hide the panel they throw up to choose if you really need the info or archive or 12ft ladder can get you the info.

Pigeon ,

deleted_by_author

    •
    Oddbin ,

    That’s the one!

    I love how my description of basically “it’s a website in searches” was enough for someone to figure it out 😄

    lemann ,

    I dns blocked them after constantly clicking on the first result and it being their site. The “please enable cookies” wall started to get old fast

    ChlorineAddict ,

    If only there was a way to store state of that decision…

    MDFL OP ,

    I just happened to run into a few recently. Just venting some frustration.

    BuddyTheBeefalo ,

    www.tagesspiegel.de has no option to disable cookies without a subscription from contentpass. I think it’s contentpass’s business model.

    Pigeon ,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    newIdentity ,

    They’re still widely used for some (illegal) reason

    Carighan ,
    @Carighan@lemmy.world avatar

    Because they rest safe in the knowledge that you rarely if ever get taken to court for it. There are millions of web pages, it needs people to take action to do something about it, and just clicking “Yes all of them” to access the content you were just trying to get to is a far better solution in most situations than hiring a lawyer and investing a few years of legal proceedings, nevermind the money.

    relevants ,

    There is an organization called nyob (I think) pushing back against that and going through the courts to have more sites penalized for their violations. The process is slow, but I see more and more pages adopting the required “reject all” so there seems to be some pressure on them.

    AnUnusualRelic ,
    @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world avatar

    Those pages can just fuck off. There are many more pages.

    Of course that’s just my opinion.

    purplemonkeymad ,

    IIRC the EU also ruled that burying the rejection options under additional links counts as a violation. Hence why Google now has a Reject button next to the accept button. Most sites still do that.

    crunchpaste ,
    @crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Do you know if there is a EU-wide place to report such behavior?

    The biggest privately owned TV channel in my country not only does that, but actually just redirects you to a pdf file if you want to “manage cookies”. And it’s not like I can submit a complaint on a national level, as the ruling party’s website uses google analytics without a cookie notice at all.

    purplemonkeymad ,

    I think you report to your nation’s Data Protection Centre, each member has their own that takes the reports. If I was still in the EU I would have put more time into finding out how reports work.

    Knusper ,

    Yeah, either of the nation or your nation may have data protection officers for individual states/regions.

    Honytawk ,

    dataprivacymanager.net/list-of-eu-data-protection…

    Here you can find the GDPR authority per EU country.

    mojo ,

    Most sites definitely don’t do this

    Pigeon ,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    mojo ,

    Yeah this is very common, I don’t know why other people on here are gaslighting like it doesn’t happen. It’s this way for major sites like YouTube/Twitter/Twitch/etc too. Hell even embedding a YouTube video on a site is violating GDPR. It’s a good idea, but needs a version 2.0 patch to fix some exploits.

    Zacryon ,

    There is also a name for these kind of psychological tricks and pressure. It’s called nudging.

    I found a small report on this by the EU Commission’s science and knowledge service. publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/…/JRC127856_01.pdf

    There are surely even better resources.

    Pigeon ,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    sunbeam60 ,

    I mean almost all websites fall foul of that. You often have to bury deep and end up with a palette of complicated choices and acceptances of individual tracking companies. It’s a bloody mess. The EU should just have mandated “do not track” adherence. There’s already a standard; just enforce it.

    _number8_ ,

    why are the EU the only people that bother to actually govern in a modern and helpful way

    Steeve ,

    But what are they going to do about it?

    “Here’s a fine, if you don’t pay it your site can no longer operate in the EU”

    “… ok”

    Knusper ,

    The EU is an important market for many websites, so yeah, that is usually what happens.

    Steeve ,

    We’re specifically discussing websites that refuse to load in the EU anyways as per the post

    Knusper ,

    I understood the post as those webpages only refusing to load, if the user declines Cookies. So, they do still want to benefit off of those EU users, who click “Accept”.

    Steeve ,

    Ah, I think I misunderstood then.

    GreenMario ,

    Then half the web violates it or there is One Pixel button that closes the damn popup.

    Sysosmaster ,

    even worse offenders are the ones with tick boxes for “Legitimate Interest”, since legitimate interest is another grounds for processing (just ads freely given consent is one), the fact you got a “tick” box for it makes it NOT legitimate interest within the confines of the GDPR.

    it also doesn’t matter what technology you use whether its cookies / urls / images / local storage / spy satellites. its solely about how you use the data…

    ecamitor ,

    They found a way around: accept all cookies or pay 2€/months. And it was decied legal by GDPR authorities

    koper ,

    Some national authorities allow it, most don’t. The final word will be from the CJEU or the EDPB.

    Zacryon ,

    The what or what?

    HorriblePerson ,
    @HorriblePerson@feddit.nl avatar

    The EU supreme court or the EU data protection agency, roughly.

    koper ,

    GDPR enforcement is left to the member states. The EDPB isn’t an agency, its more like all the national data protection authorities in a trench coat.

    wisplike_sustainer ,

    Like I care. I’ve got a plugin that automatically accepts all cookies, and another one that deletes cookies when I leave the page.

    SSUPII ,

    By accepting everything, you are also sending most of the time extra data to third parties. What you are doing is ill-advised if you care about privacy.

    mojo ,

    Not really. If you’re using an adblocker, it’s the best option. It’s the path of least resistance, and tracking is blocked regardless if it’s tracked it not. No server will see if you pressed accept or decline. That’s why this addon exists.

    Honytawk ,

    Just because your browser doesn’t show ads doesn’t mean you don’t get profiled.

    mojo ,

    Yes it does. Open up your adblocker to see the tracker domains blocked.

    dan1101 ,

    How does that work though? The cookies are presumably based on things like your IP and browser metrics, which a site gets from your browser. If your browser throws away the cookies then on your next visit you aren’t volunteering that you’ve been there before. But the site can still likely figure it out, but without the cookies it isn’t as certain. With well-constructed cookies they can be almost 100% sure you’re the same visitor.

    towerful ,

    Cookie consent is actually supposed to be about all data tracking.
    There are quite a few analytics that do fingerprinting “because it’s not a cookie, it’s not covered by Cookie Consent”. But it is still covered.
    Some of them respect the fact that declining cookies is about declining tracking.

    So, if you consent to all cookies, you are also consenting to any fingerprinting that doesn’t rely on cookies. So deleting cookies wouldn’t remove that fingerprinting data.

    dan1101 ,

    Gotcha, responsible site owners should not be tracking you if you decline cookies.

    DerpyPlayz18 ,

    Wait doesn’t it automatically deny them?

    filcuk ,

    The above is wrong, the add on attempts to hide the prompt. It doesn’t accept nor reject it.

    wisplike_sustainer ,

    I Still don’t care about cookies? From its description:

    In most cases, the add-on just blocks or hides cookie related pop-ups. When it’s needed for the website to work properly, it will automatically accept the cookie policy for you (sometimes it will accept all and sometimes only necessary cookie categories, depending on what’s easier to do).

    So, yeah, doesn’t accept everything, but might accept some.

    Knusper ,

    The “I still don’t care about Cookies” extension does not, no.

    This extension can do that: addons.mozilla.org/firefox/…/consent-o-matic/

    However, since many webpages have illegally made it so refusing consent is more difficult than giving ‘consent’, that extension is significantly more complex and in my experience doesn’t work as reliably, unfortunately.

    brb ,

    Is there any extension for android that can do that?

    Knusper ,

    Well, you can install both of these add-ons via this workaround: blog.mozilla.org/…/expanded-extension-support-in-…
    (I have used both. Both work. Although, again, I’d rather recommend I Still Don’t Care About Cookies + Cookie Auto-Delete.)

    However, Mozilla plans to make much more extensions available for Android soon, so you might see these regularly available before the end of the year. This is what we know for now: blog.mozilla.org/…/prepare-your-firefox-desktop-e…

    Honytawk ,

    Yeah, sometimes websites have so many hidden checkboxes, that consent-o-matic has a rough time going through all of them. Takes like 10-20 seconds to disable them all at computerized speed.

    Imagine doing it by hand, lol.

    Honytawk ,

    Better to use consent-o-matic, which blocks all possible cookies instead of accepting them.

    The websites still work perfectly anyway, it only preserves your privacy.

    drkt ,

    Oh boo I can’t visit American propaganda websites what a loss to my European life style

    MDFL OP ,

    I have run into this recently on several non-US, non-news sites. Your comment is propaganda.

    Kichae ,

    propaganda

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    BruceTwarzen ,

    It's a synonym for socialism and it means everything that i don't like

    MDFL OP , (edited )

    I absolutely do. Spreading the idea that news sites are all propaganda and the only entities involved in this kind of practice is, in itself, propaganda.

    explodicle ,

    I think they were referring only to American news websites.

    MDFL OP ,

    You’re right. I wasn’t clear in my comment. Saying all US-news sites are propaganda is propaganda. I’m not sure how that changes anything.

    mojo ,

    It’s a lost cause, the EU circlejerk is too strong, as clearly everything is a utopia over there with nothing wrong.

    GDPR is a good idea, but still very flawed in practice which they really don’t like to admit anything wrong for some reason.

    explodicle ,

    Bruh he was just being unclear

    smollittlefrog ,

    claiming the GDPR is good =/= claiming the GDPR is flawless

    mojo ,

    Yeah, and?

    smollittlefrog ,

    They didn’t say that either. Where do you get this idea from that they’re talking about (all) US news sites?

    They said “American propaganda websites”. That may include some news sites. It may also not include some news sites.

    The most you could infer from their statement is that only American propaganda websites violate the GDPR.

    Of course websites exist that violate the GDPR and are not American propaganda websites.

    But the vast majority of websites commiting severe violations of the GDPR that an average European encounters will be American propaganda websites.

    (Believe it or not, Europeans don’t often visit websites written in Russian or Chinese.)

    Kalkaline ,
    @Kalkaline@programming.dev avatar

    It means “something bad that I disagree with”, synonymous with communism, socialism, democrats, and Nazis, at least that’s what Infowars tells me.

    Pandoras_Can_Opener , (edited )
    @Pandoras_Can_Opener@mander.xyz avatar

    Infowars tells you Nazis are something you disagree with? Haven’t heard from them in a while. Would have thought they’d quietly drop the Nazis are evil thing.

    SloganLessons ,
    @SloganLessons@kbin.social avatar

    Yeah being unable to open… checks notes local news websites from the US has been a real deal breaker

    kubica ,
    @kubica@kbin.social avatar

    Sometimes its relieving when you go to do something and you find out that you have already finished, lol.

    amio ,

    Frankly I wish I could fit more US politics into my life, so it's been hard, I tells ya.

    explodicle ,

    Then you’ve picked the right place my friend!

    MDFL OP ,

    I have run into this recently on several non-US, non-news sites. I have actually never run into it on US local news sites, so I don’t know what you’re on about.

    SloganLessons ,
    @SloganLessons@kbin.social avatar

    Yeah it’s a tragedy

    christophski ,

    In my experience it seems to be medical websites and recipe websites

    sederx ,

    That’s literally the point though…

    ozymandias117 ,

    No? If a website refuses to load because you refused tracking cookies, it’s still illegal under GDPR

    CookieJarObserver ,
    @CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works avatar

    I don’t give a shit about cookies my browser just cleans after me and next time i open it everything is like new.

    hdnsmbt ,

    That’s fine. People who don’t care about cookies will accept them anyway and those who do care about cookies will know not to visit that site anymore.

    Hazzia ,

    Be me, american, using a VPN Visit some fucking webber site to read an article Cookie agreement pops up Has a decline all option pog.png Hit “reject all” New popup appears Says “We’ve detected that you’re in the EU. Due to EU regulations, we cannot display this webpage with the ‘reject cookies’ setting selected. Please accept all cookies to continue” Dafuq

    MDFL OP ,

    Not at all my experience, but ok.

    Honytawk ,

    Clear sign that the only reason that website exist is to extract your privacy for profit.

    Just move on to the billion other websites that don’t try to violate you.

    BurnedDonutHole ,

    Any website that does that I just close the tab.

    twistypencil ,

    You should travel to Europe sometime and try to use the web

    Honytawk ,

    Yeah, it is great here.

    Either the website is great and doesn’t ask anything.

    Or it asks for cookie consent, which you can decline in 1 click.

    Or it pulls one of those “break the website” tricks which will get them sued sooner or later.

    Or they block access to EU members, at which point you know they only exist to extract your data anyway.

    twistypencil ,

    I think it would be a worthwhile research project to find out how many users just click through these, accepting what the website wants you to accept by default. It effectively operates like a EULA for every single website, which produces overall fatigue and lack of care. When you’ve visited 20 sites in one day, you just start being irritated by having to constantly make a decision before you can view any content, and just mash whatever button you need to proceed.

    Faresh ,

    I also live in Europe and almost all websites display a dialog that asks you to choose cookie preferences. However, it seems that some few websites, mostly german (spiegel.de, gutefrage) that give you the opetion to browse with ads and cookies or pay. I do not use those websites and I imagine it is not legal.

    genoxidedev1 ,
    @genoxidedev1@kbin.social avatar

    That's gotta be quite some website you visited, if it didn't load at all without cookies. As someone from Germany, who mostly rejects every sites cookies, except for the essential ones most of the time, but sometimes outright rejects all cookies, I've never encountered a website that refused to load upon doing that.

    Not defending any webpages that do do that, just contributing my personal experience.

    Also: this for chrome or this for fiefrerfx

    SanityFM ,

    Consent-o-matic is magnificent.

    SlopppyEngineer ,

    One extension to automatically accept, one extension to automatically delete everything after the tab is closed.

    MDFL OP ,

    It’s rare to see (probably since someone pointed out it doesn’t conform to GDPR standards), but I ran into a batch of them in short order recently, so it’s been on my mind.

    BuddyTheBeefalo ,

    www.oekotest.de

    www.pcwelt.de

    www.saechsische.de

    www.wetter.com

    All don’t offer cookie rejection.

    genoxidedev1 ,
    @genoxidedev1@kbin.social avatar

    Makes sense, I don't use any of them, at all. I'm pretty sure there's a place where you can report such webpages for doing that though, though I don't know where at the moment.

    Edit: possibly this one

    BuddyTheBeefalo ,

    Netzpolitik.de checked Germany’s top 100 sites. Not many offer a single click rejection of cookies. Many of them only offer a paid ‘pure abo’ to disable tracking.

    datawrapper.dwcdn.net/9GFZM/8/ (German)

    gamey ,
    @gamey@feddit.rocks avatar

    Yea, we have the same issue in Austria but technically that’s illegal behaviour and you should be able to report it somewhere!

    AceFuzzLord ,

    Don’t know if it’s me or what, but I clicked on the first link and when it opened in my mobile browser, everything started shaking vertically like the page was suffering an earthquake. I’ll definitely have to look into that because I’ve never seen it happen before on any website like it.

    PopularUsername ,

    I’ve seen Italian sites that will put up a pay wall if you refuse the cookies.

    Pandoras_Can_Opener ,
    @Pandoras_Can_Opener@mander.xyz avatar

    Also from Germany. Some american news and media sites do that.

    ErwinLottemann ,

    some other just block access from the eu completely. (not a news site, but applebee’s does this)

    triplenadir ,
    @triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml avatar

    www.healthline.com - has a two-click “disable all”, but if you choose it you get a static site with 10 of their articles anon.healthline.com

    CanadaPlus ,

    I exit in the EU a lot. Same, they mostly work fine with no cookies. It’s much more common to see one that just doesn’t let EU residents in.

    Cold_Brew_Enema ,

    The second that popup about cookies shows up I immediately backout and not use the site.

    MDFL OP ,

    That’s like every site. How do you use the internet at all?

    RegularGoose ,

    It’s becoming a lot easier to use the internet a lot less. It’s been turned into such a user-hostile space so domineered by corporations and fascists that most of the internet doesn’t really hold much of an appeal anymore, at least for me.

    If the internet died tomorrow and didn’t come back, I’d be annoyed about not being able to use it to order food, manage my bank account, or watch shows/movies, but the world would likely be an overall better place once logistics re-adapted to not having it.

    The internet was cool for the first 10-15 years, but it’s been a rapidly worsening cesspit for a long time. Nothing the internet can offer us is worth also tolerating it as a tool for inescapable government and corporate surveillance, and as the most effective imagineable breeding ground for fascism and disinformation.

    The internet makes our lives worse in so many more ways than it imporves them, and people are too fucking addicted to it to give a shit.

    Honytawk ,

    If you really don’t want to bother, you can use the consent-o-matic addon for Firefox that automatically declines every cookie possible.

    Scoopta ,
    @Scoopta@programming.dev avatar

    I refuse to go to sites that do this, I also refuse to go to sites that block adblock…and specially the sites that detect and block private browsing, that one shouldn’t even be a thing

    Zikeji ,
    @Zikeji@programming.dev avatar

    Sites that block adblock - I have network based filtering I’m not going to take the time to specifically figure out what ad providers you’re using (which is probably that same as everyone else) just to unblock your shitty site.

    Scoopta ,
    @Scoopta@programming.dev avatar

    LOL, I also use DNS based filtering soooo I feel your pain.

    WaLLy3K ,
    @WaLLy3K@infosec.pub avatar

    Hilariously, I find the Pi-hole feature “disable for 5 seconds” often works because it’ll be down for long enough to load the page but not the ads.

    PersnickityPenguin ,

    Reminds me, I need a pihole

    Scoopta ,
    @Scoopta@programming.dev avatar

    I don’t use pihole…didn’t know that was a thing…still don’t plan on using pihole but that’s cool

    ozymandias117 ,

    The fun part is that websites that do this are illegal in the EU

    They need to start flexing that 4% revenue / year fines

    peter ,
    @peter@feddit.uk avatar

    I hope one day they just start fining everyone doing it all at once

    corsicanguppy ,

    And i hope they start using that sizing thing at airports to keep people from carrying on their massive samsonite tuba-sized suitcases and jamming them into the entirety of the overhead storage.

    But we can’t always get what we want.

    ignotum ,

    I don’t use adblock, and yet i keep getting “disable adblock to view this” messages, fuck this shit

    Fissionami ,
    @Fissionami@lemmy.ml avatar

    Probably Adguard or Pihole? (Some network level blocking?)

    ignotum ,

    I did have adguard set up, but i disabled it thinking it could help with this issue, which it sadly didn’t

    Trainguyrom ,

    Most browsers block some ads by default as well as some other privacy protections nowadays. I’m guessing whatever sites you’re hitting have advertisers so scummy they’re blocked by default

    ignotum ,

    Might be, might be

    I’m using Firefox and might’ve set a couple of the privacy settings “too high”, haven’t checked those in forever

    hairyballs ,

    Why the fuck would they prevent private browsing? I use that a lot to be sure the session is closed correctly.

    Scoopta ,
    @Scoopta@programming.dev avatar

    There’s lots of newspaper sites in the US, that do this. They’ll be like “wanna use private browsing, make an account, or go visit from normal browsing.” Idk why they do it but they do. Apparently there are discrepancies in the way browsers handle persistent storage features between private and non-private browsing that allow for detection

    sukhmel ,

    I’d guess they just want to keep track of what you read and how many articles. You still can wipe that information from your browser but private browsing makes it more convenient so they ban it

    KillerTofu ,

    12ft.io

    I use this to deal with paywalled articles.

    Scoopta ,
    @Scoopta@programming.dev avatar

    This comment needs more upvotes…I did not know this was a thing and I’ll try to remember it next time I hit a wall

    KillerTofu ,

    Bigger walls, bigger ladders!!!

    Honytawk ,

    Cause they can’t track your browser history that way.

    SnipingNinja ,

    Your meme is funny, but people genuinely use these arguments to be against sensible EU laws, hence the response I imagine.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •