…she swallowed the horse to catch the cow, she swallowed the cow to catch the goat, she swallowed the goat to catch the dog, she swallowed the dog to catch the cat, she swallowed the cat to catch the bird, she swallowed the bird to catch the spider (that wriggled and jiggled and tickled inside her), she swallowed the spider to catch the fly. I don’t know why she swallowed the fly. Perhaps she’ll die. 🤷🏻♂️
I know that this isn’t the point but I absolutely can’t stand the word “juice” to describe meat drippings.
Juice is from a fruit! When I see juice to describe meat drippings, all I can think of is someone squeezing a big steak and squeezing all the “juice” out.
Anyway, commit message is on point. Add a small pinch of flour to thicken the “juice” and you’ll have gravy.
From Middle English jus, juis, from Old French jus, jous, from Latin jūs (“broth, soup, sauce”), from Proto-Indo-European *yúHs, from *yewH- (“to mix (of meal preparation)”).
Sounds like the right word to me.
You sound like one of those people who take issue with non-dairy milks being called milks too.
This is why I always write my methods from bottom to top. This way I’ve always got a return statement and I use my variables before they are even declared.
That’s true, in fact I’ve started doing that myself. Same with methods, instead of going and writing the method and then coming back to use it, I’ll write the invocation first.
programmer_humor
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.