The majority 3d screenings must’ve been specifically for opening weekend. I guess they thought people watching it on opening weekend are more likely to pay extra for the 3d showings if it was the only option.
That might have been the case where you live. Here there are always more 2d screenings than 3d (including on opening night), since people here think think of 3d as more of a gimmick and usually not worth the extra price
This whole “every two years” new justice thing is really bothering me. Did he say that or is the journalist taking liberties?
I wonder because that timing will fly straight out the window the minute someone retires early or dies. Does the next Justice get a shorter term? A longer one? Does the seat go empty for a time? Do we end up having cycles of presidencies that get to appoint 3 or 4 justices in one term?
Bah- this will keep me up tonight, I just know it.
Not sure what the solution would be that is proposed by the legal experts but it seems to me that we already have a system for dealing with that for the office of the president in the form of vice presidents etc taking over if they die. Not that you should have to have an entire chain of people ready to take over for every SC justice but rather, if one dies or retires or whatever before their 18 years is up then a replacement can be appointed to finish the remainder of their term.
Every 2 years the longest-standing justice would be replaced, if they have served at least 18 years. Since there are nine justices this means each will get an 18 year term exactly. Any early exits would just mean you skip the next cycle. That’s how I’d imagine it anyway.
I imagine it will be the seat itself is reappointed on a fixed schedule, that would function most similarly to the Presidency or Congress. The replacement be more or less an “acting” Justice to finish the term.
I saw someone mentioned that if something happened and a seat was vacated early, one of the justices whose term had expired could be brought in to serve in that seat until it is filled with a new person at the next scheduled time. But that seems to mean that some other justice(s) more senior than the one who vacated might wind up serving more than the normal 18 years as they wouldn’t be replaced until the next cycle.
As far as a president getting to appoint 3 justices in one term, we just had that with trump. IMO there really should be more than just 9 seats. A common suggestion is 13, one for each District.
I think you’re thinking of users’ ages not posters’ age. They don’t verify the age of people watching videos and they are publicly against that. I don’t know how they feel about validating the age of people in videos.
They realized it would get their asses handed to them a while back. They at least supposedly have some sort of verification system now and they’ve cut out a lot of videos because of their new verification requirements.
That is a separate issue. The Age verification law is for viewers. PornHub doesn’t want to store, or be responsible for, your Driver’s License info.
I happen to side with PornHub on this one. It’s a privacy issue, and the age verification is just an initial step in the direction of censorship.
Now verifying identity/ages of the performers, supporting the fight against sex trafficking and the predation of minors, that is worth putting restrictions on PornHub.
Answer: we’re in late stage climate change, we need drastic and unpopular actions to address the cause at this point… and if Trump wins extreme weather patterns may just be a permanent norm.
I’ve a very political continuous person - volunteer with democratic groups, do poll observing, research local Arizona ballot measures on the local news sites and ballotipedia, etc…
I have not once seen any of these “informational pamphlets” out in the wild. Others said that they get them mailed to them, but I’ve never gotten one. I’ve seen sample ballots - but those don’t have for/against arguments, just the text of the measures. They can call them “sanctified holy pre-people to be saved from the baby meat-grider” and it wouldn’t really mater if no one ever reads it.
If you’re in these comments saying Bitcoin is a waste of energy resources, come prepared with the amount of energy traditional finance uses. How many banks have big empty buildings in downtown that keep their lights on all night? Security trucks to transport cash, etc.
What the Fediverse has done for social media, Bitcoin does for money.
BTC can use the same amount of energy it does now and process every transaction that tradfi does. Aka it’s more efficient than the legacy system it will replace
PoW is necessary to financially disincentivize attacks on the network.
Programmable money can achieve everything a bank does and more. Imagine automations that have their own wallets and can pay people (or other bots) to do things.
Attacking a PoW system costs more than a bad actor would receive in reward for attacking the system.
There’s good book I can recommend that you might enjoy as a programmer if you want to learn more about this: Mastering Bitcoin by Andreas Antonopolis. He is a Greek CS nerd who got into it during the Greek financial crisis and explains this all very well.
It’s strange to me to be a professional programmer and have no interest in highly secure programmable money and distributed systems for consensus, but you do you. I am not here to change your mind.
Yes, we obviously have different definition of security, as you imagine at being ‘outside the traditional banks’, not ‘guaranteed to be at your disposal and accepted by the rest of the world’.
Bitcoin is just one crypto, which is still being developed, and if you think CrowdStrike is an argument against thousands of banks versus one git repo, I have a bridge to sell to you.
It gets really exhausting talking to people with minimum technical knowledge at best about this stuff. 51% attacks have been done in the past, acting like it’s not possible is just plain stupid.
PoW is a huge energy black hole with nothing to show for it.
Bitcoin by itself has done very little for the general public, its biggest achievement was spawning other coins, which was the idea from the start. BTC should have died a decade ago.
Crypto is and should remain a niche past time for some techical folk, once big money goes in, it will kill the retail (non-business) users. Big players will make (or already made) PoW and PoS irrelevant for basic users. At least stop them from killing the planet.
Minimum technical knowledge indeed. Just not in the direction you are saying.
Bitcoin is not a repo. It’s a protocol, like TCP / UDP. You are probably thinking of the Bitcoin core client. It can be written in Node or Python if you want.
I’ve read the whitepaper, all the source code for Core, and built lightning mainnet applications.
Re: 51% attacks, yes they have happened, but as I noted above, the expense of running them is more than the gains. Because of PoW.
Re: real-world applications: Africa and other unbanked areas use BTC regularly. Citizens of countries with high inflation too.
Re: destroying the planet: many of the successful Bitcoin miners run on excess energy that would otherwise be wasted. Nuclear / hydro plants have excess energy as they generally online large portions at a time, more than is needed for a specific time. You can think of Bitcoin mining as bringing forward the ROI on a new power plant before it reaches capacity.
Protocols are maintained by someone, too. How many nodes use that core implementation?
And if you are aware of development, you then know CVEs right? So you must understand while not having global economy rely on a singular protocol with majority nodes using a core implementation is not a good idea? And don’t you dare compare it to TCP again, or I will not take you seriously any longer.
51% - just use the cloud computing for a little while, it’s not as expensive as buying an entire country worth of ASICs, that you have no use for afterwards. Back to big players - imagine if Google decided to go all in on crypto? Wonder what would have happened.
People use it - sure, people use all kinds of shit, might as well use any other currency, what makes bitcoin special there?
Planet - just no. It’s inefficient, and provides very little advantage over existing solutions, with huge drawbacks. We should use the hardware and resources on power storage, not made up markets. Folding@home would make 10000x more sense than this bullshit.
So fuck off with this apologistic bullcrap. There are better solutions for every issue at hand, where bitcoin poses no advantage, and alternatives provide some value to this world. Bitcoin robs us of huge amounts of power all over the world, and that stupid fad has been replaced by even worse energy sinkhole - AI - that other techbros will defend with similar arguments, while the results never meet the expectations. “But just one more planet, bro, and we will change the world, bro.” Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
Also, fucking relational databases do way more than blockchain ever will. And distributed ledgers even less so.
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.