Like all the vaccines do far, they will likely reduce your risk of catching it and reduce your symptoms and risk of hospitalisation or death. None have eliminated the chance to catch it or get symptoms.
That’s not to say they don’t work. That’s how they work. They make your immune system better at dealing with them. Each new variant and time increases your risk again.
If it’s very effective for this strain, it might be like 90% effective at not getting it. But there are more strains that will have less effect. As others are saying, symptoms should be more mild if you do get it.
You’ll come in contact with it probably. The vaccines help the immune system catch it earlier before its taken hold. That’s why covid is such a hard disease to fight naturally, by the time your immune system sees it it has to ramp up to 1000 to fight it off, and then the worst symptoms are what your immune system is causing. (Fever is just your body trying to make it inhospitable to the virus after all).
Vaccines are an early detector, you already have antibodies so it can say whoa whoa whoa I know what you are, gonna get you out now before you take hold. Some people will have it gone before symptoms start. Others will have some symptoms but a milder version.
I personally had the vaccines and got it and it felt like the worst flu I’d ever had, and the main symptoms lasted about 3 weeks.
honestly, looking at the list of things that were taken- including personal devices and an amazon device used to stay in contact with aging parents- it’s amazing the judge didn’t send the warrant back for being overbroad.
I find it inconceivable that the journalists didn’t know to keep their devices segregated between personal contacts and work contacts- precisely to shield your personal device from these kinds of raids.
it’s also dubious as to what they expect to find on the amazon device… even if it was recording them… that data’s generally not stored on the device itself.
To be fair to the journalist(s), it could be a budgetary issue. It’s a small town, and their 98-year-old mother was living with them.
Was.
The stress of the search killed her.
Meyer also blames the home raid for stressing his 98-year-old mother enough to cause her death on Saturday. Joan Meyer was the newspaper’s co-owner.
Oh… Fun Fact. I’m from KCMO where the Chief served for 24 years. Look up our gun violence rate (maybe you can’t, I tried, and it looks like news agencies just stopped counting due to the frequency - the last one was just on Saturday) and our homicide rate.
To be fair to the journalist(s), it could be a budgetary issue. It’s a small town, and their 98-year-old mother was living with them.
Sure, I suppose I could see that. But… it is difficult to imagine the cops would know they use personal devices for work like that. They almost literally took everything that could hold data, receive communications and maybe nark. if those devices were covered under the warrant (which must specifically state what’s to be seized- new things they want to seize requires a new warrant) then the warrant was probably over-broad and itself subject to scrutiny.
Keep in mind, that they need to enumerate specific items- and specifically where they are to be found. “Any devices found at xyz premises” is much too broad. And they have to show a reason why they believe that it contains evidence of wrong doing.
side note… it’s difficult to imagine that the story on the restaurant owner couldn’t have been obtained without using confidential data. Arrest records and convictions are public. and all it would take is camping out on a public street to prove she was still driving.
it’s amazing the judge didn’t send the warrant back for being overbroad.
When you apply for a search warrant, you're supposed to swear out a probable cause affidavit first, laying out the evidence you have that you need you search this place. The probable cause affidavit goes to the judge, who either approves, denies, or requests more information for the search warrant. Interesting thing is that no one seems to be able to find a copy of affidavit for this search warrant.
Honestly, the whole thing comes off as incredibly punitive: the restaurant owner is pissed because the DUI might sink her chances of getting a very lucrative liquor license. The guy who owns the hotel the restaurant is in, and who can raise the rent once the liquor license goes through, just happens to be the DA's brother. And the paper was investigating the police chief due to several allegations of alleged sexual assault at his old job - and the contact information for the people who made those allegations just happens to be on one of the computers the police chief confiscated in his raid. But I'm sure there's nothing to see here. Kermit sips tea
Nobody who is swayed by the charges against Biden’s son, without seriously being swayed by the charges against Trump Himself, was actually swayed by the charges.
Is their comment editing going on or did you reply to the wrong comment or is my app glitched? The comment you replied to seems to say:
That’s good to hear that even though the vaccine is targeting the last big Omicron variant (XBB.1.5) aka Kraken, that its still effective towards the new Eris variant as its similar enough.
Which obviously doesn’t make sense for your comment (which I assume was meant to be a reply to an anti-vaxxer or something)
Nowhere does it mention owning a house with a garden. Even if you could own or co-own a flat or a terraced house you wouldn’t have a landlord leeching from you every month.
… Besides, not all 8 billion people live in America
news
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.