ikr? nothing like giving complete control to the judge who’s already so aggravated by your nonsense that he’s been leveling fines against the attorneys. just the best, most beautiful strategy.
Bad strategy. Even if he got off with a $2 fine, he’d call it an “injustice”. He’s gonna go off the rails no matter what, so might as well nail him to the wall.
He’s interfering with an election, and it's a disgrace.
This statement is so dementedly ironic that I think it may have damaged the time-space continuum.
This statement is so dementedly ironic that I think it may have damaged the time-space continuum.
Why do people continue to be surprised or appalled at whatever Trump has to say? We already know his game. Tomorrow he’ll say that Biden personally slapped him at the oval office while declaring that he got away with stealing the election. He of course slapped him back. It was the best slap.
You may as well sit down and listen to the rants of the neighborhood crazy homeless person in the 7-eleven corner.
By the time I get to the end of an article about him, nothing he says or does surprises me. Then I’m sick of hearing about him for a while, and avoid stories about him. In the meantime, I get used to normal people again and partially “reset”. Then I’ll come across another article that’s really more of the same, but it seems a bit different. Wash, rinse, repeat.
It’s unsatisfying and irrational, but it’s also the best explanation I have.
As soon as I see “Donald Trump said…” somewhere, or if I hear his voice in the news, I mentally check out and replace my capacity to process language with sounds of a tuba playing the Macarena.
The one good thing about this trial is that America is realizing how chronically inadequate its laws are for expecting people in political office (or campaigning for) to behave within the law. Everyone is human and bound to abuse and the law should set clear boundaries to prevent that abuse.
Just end the sentance with poor. It doesn’t matter if you are white, if you end up in the system and have no money you will be fucked.
It’s part of the reason republican voters are such morons, they think the system will just hurt the “right people”, when in actuality it fucks every non rich person.
From healthcare to education to prison, you will be fucked if you are poor.
i'll bet he had a Christmas card where the little kiddies are holding high powered weapons, sending out their holiday message of black powder love and lead kisses.. i find that particular display to be especially heinous..
people like this will destroy everyone around them for their own vanity..
Well when you put it that way, guillotine’ing a few billionaires once a year would probably save everyone a ton of money and significantly improve workforce moral.
There are about 3,000 billionaires on Earth. More people died on 9/11 than there are “winners” who manipulate our species, world governments, and our entire civilization to their detriment for short term private profit.
Our common enemy oppressing humanity doesn’t have enough numbers to fill a tenth of a football stadium. Just saying…
Jokes aside, they aren’t the biggest hurdle, their army of deluded true believer, self-hating, “love me senpai” peasants are.
That’s what made the “lie flat” (or “lie down?”) movement in china a few years ago so compelling. To disarm the global elites is the simplest thing in the world: ignore them. Do nothing.
I thought about it and I don’t want that happening to the CEO of where I work. I want him to go into early retirement and I don’t know step on a Lego once in a while. Not even every month just like once a year. That would be justice in my mind.
tbh even the monsters are victims of their class position - being a billionaire warps a person into a horrible creature that is deserving of pity as much as they are deserving of a good French haircut
Don’t most states have Romeo and Juliet laws that specifically say a 19 year old wanting to date a 15 year old is acceptable? Maybe it’s only a 3 year gap or something. IANAL.
AFAIK if the relationship started BEFORE one of them turned 17? or 18? then they are protected. So a 16 y/o dating a 14 y/o would be protected if they are still together when they are 18 and 16. Something like that.
Before anyone asks there was a scene in the Mark Wahlberg transformer movie where a kid had the law lamentated in a card in his wallet so he could pull it out and explain to Mark that he is legally allowed to fuck his underage daughter… so I had to look up wtf that was about.
news
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.