I no longer use Twitter, so I’m not sure whether this is a possibility now, but it was at one point.
Was the link itself a forwarding link through a potentially spammy/tracking service, even though the end link is a legitimate NPR page? I do not know if Twitter shows the resulting link at the end of a redirect chain in that widget or just what is posted.
I’m also unsure if NPR has any sort of advertising that could be using shady forwarding from the page that Twitter may be seeing in the link. Advertising networks incorporating shady shit on regular pages happens a lot since they don’t actually verify every ad.
Now, I doubt either of those are the case, but they’re possibilities to verify first before jumping on a bandwagon. Twitter is such dogshit now that I doubt they’re doing more than the basic anymore, almost definitely not actually following links and redirects to check for even basic safety stuff like that since Elon took over.
Every link posted to twitter is followed to the end of any redirect chains that may be present and then the end result is shortened IIRC (take this with several grains of salt as this is just what I’ve heard previously and it may be incorrect or may have become incorrect)
I guess it’s possible, and it looks like NPR changed the word “tiktok” to “video” in the URL, but I don’t think Xitter deserves the benefit of the doubt here. NPR is a pretty solid media organization overall, with standards that they mostly adhere to, and no paywall. They’re unlikely to be using any technical shenanigans, and critically there has already been a history.
The last time they said things Musk didn’t like, he decided that they should be lumped in with the likes of RT as a state-run propaganda arm, even though the government share of funding is indirect and limited, and they’ve got decades of history of solid reporting from an American center to center-left perspective, and even that is more meeting their audience where they are with story selection and tone, rather than shading facts of the stories they do tell.
Quite the opposite actually, otherwise lemmy will just devolve into another echo chamber, just like Twitter has, and most social media sites. The down votes I got simply for bringing up points that might happen to not fit the hive mind mentality are just as common here obviously, even when expressing up front that I don’t actually believe those points.
Amazing how fragile some people are, so filled with hatred over a billionaire that lives rent free in their head and doesn’t even think about them at all that they downvote a discussion simply because it might bring up valid points they hadn’t considered in their knee jerk reaction.
I don’t like how this article hyperbolizes the amount of booing. Compare the moments of booing to the very end with the mix of cheers/jeers where that sounds like the entire audience giving a reaction.
Yes it’s important that jorkin depeanus vance got booed but misrepresenting the level of heckling from the crowd isn’t journalism that respects its readers.
Gateway Church draws an estimated 100,000 people to its weekend services and has more than 560 employees at nine locations in Texas, and two others in Missouri and Wyoming, according to the church.
Imagine how much money they’re raking in.
Religion should be private. Better yet, wake up from that long-con and give it up altogether.
With numbers like that it sounds more like a cult with tax exemptions. And why do they have so employees, shouldn’t people be happy to do “the work of God” for free as volunteers?
If you do a single thing of value for a MEGAchurch, fucking bill them out the nose. That’s not a religion it’s GOOP with a significantly more exploitative and evil business model.
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.