Article is a little light on facts. The author should have looked into whether or not the other tenant was actually a squatter or not. We only know at this point she is an alleged squatter from a tenants statement. Why not check with the landlord to get the facts? Why not check with the other tenant to ask if she is a squatter?
But let’s assume she actually is a squatter for sake of argument. I mean it’s a weird thing to allege.
I dislike the gop. I dislike squatters. I dislike trespassers.
Person a trespassed into the one side of the house in order to throw a spider.
Person b is a squatter. (Again we don’t have info from the landlord (lazy reporting)).
Everyone sucks in this article including the author of the article.
She had a tarantula with her, pre-meditated. Throwing a Tarantula can kill it, animal abuse. In my view she’s automatically the asshole who planned this regardless of transgression or tenant.
Dislike a squatter all you want. You’re not part of their due process, and you may not throw a tarantula at them. So, it’s irrelevant.
I would also point out that if this happened it probably would not make the news here… Except for that the aggressor is a political candidate. That’s what makes it interesting, that this batshit MFer actually thinks the people deserve her. The squatter is not trying to represent you.
Considering the person she accused of being a squatter is an attorney and the person making the accusations is currently sitting in jail, I’m going to assume her story is b/s. The article stated that the attorney’s lease was up but that doesn’t mean she has to move out. I lived in places for years after my lease expired as a “month to month” tenant.
The reason the one is in jail is because of assault and battery… Or is it assault? Always get that part mixed up. Either way she’s in jail because of that. Still doesn’t show if the “squatter” part is bs. Both can be true. The one is an asshole for throwing a tarantula and the other could be a squatter. We don’t know about the Squatting because of the lack of information.
I’ll stick with my original statement, lazy reporting
I’m saying this woman is crazy and has zero credibility so there’s no reason to believe anything she says. The woman she attacked is an attorney so I’m assuming she wouldn’t be illegally squatting in someone’s home and jeopardizing her whole career.
According to the FBI crime has been on a steady decline since the late eighties. The Freakonomics guys credited things like higher incarceration and legalized abortion. Another factor others came up with is the removal of lead from gasoline. It happened not only in the US but other countries also. Apparently airborne lead isn’t so healthy for young developing brains and the drop in crime began when people born at the time of the ban were reaching their adult years
*privileged children who’s parents invested a hundred thousand dollars into their crazy computer software startup. None of them were nearly self made. They sell you a story of long cold nights in the warehouse floor but it’s all a facade. They don’t tell you about the investments their parents gave them. They hide how his father sold undocumented stolen emeralds abroad for a living. Do you know what Elon did in college? The dude rented a 10 bedroom mansion using the emerald money and hosted huge parties at it. Rich scum of the earth should just die. All of them criminals. That’s how impossible it is to generate any meaningful wealth in this wasteland. They resort to criminal tactics. From the president all the way down to genius spacecraft builders. Do you know wtf would happen if I was to somehow host 500 person college parties? The fucking swat team would raid that shit in no time and I’d be charged with all kinds of crazy crimes. But the son of the stolen emeralds trader gets away with it perfectly.
This is clearly a dark road to go down and a terrible idea for the country. I personally couldn’t be anymore against this.
That said should there not be stricter rules on titles on a news subreddit? A lot of the titles I’ve seen recently are clearly prejudiced or undescriptive.
I think it’s important we maintain a high level of accuracy on news subreddits to limit the spread of misinformation.
My bad, I didn’t realise that that was the article title. I’m surprised that Vox chose to go with that title but obviously that’s got nothing to do with this post or the community rules.
Great job, Democrats. He’s was VP for 8 years while Obama was president. Didn’t do it then. And now you do this at the end of Biden’s 4 years and he’s dropping in polls to Felon Donny. Sure, we’ll forget all about the workers’ rights being trampled and the genocide in Gaza.
Yeah, and you’re going to vote for the douche, unless you want the orange turd to change your country in an autocratic dictatorship.
You might want to read into how politics works. Biden condens Israel and promptly will lose the next election because Israel has quite the influence in the Jewish population. He loses the election, trump will win andy dear DAMunzy, if you think Palestinians have it bad now, wait until orange dictator comes to power. I believe his words were along the lines of “total eradication”.
Biden has done a large number of great things, which I never hear people talk about. I do hear talks about situations where there is no good outcome,.damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
What would you have done? Condemn Israel, take away all their money? That would totally not backfire about 6 months from now… Carefully mention to Israel to behave? I’ve seen Biden do that, for all the good it did… So do whstz exactly?
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.