By declaring the Mpox outbreak as a public health emergency, it’s hoped research, funding, and the introduction of other international public health measures will be accelerated.
That part rings true, depending on the group it seems.
This is obviously anecdotal. Your experience may vary, and if so, I’d like to here it.
My wife is an immigrant, as are all her friends. Filipinos are very well integrated here. They have good jobs, run successful businesses, speak perfect English, all that. Hispanics on the other hand…
She supervises a cleaning crew of Mexicans and Hondurans at a hotel. They’ve been here for years and none of them speak a lick of English, she says they flat refuse to learn. She brought a good friend kayaking with us, fun Honduran guy that walked two months to get to America. I admire that! We could hardly communicate, but my wife speaks Spanish/English pidgin well enough.
When we got home I was telling her how much I like the guy but I was surprised he couldn’t use the most basic words. I was really surprised when I found out he’s been here for five years. FFS, he won’t even say “yes”, doesn’t know the word for “year”, super simple stuff.
Another anecdote; Dated a Jamaican women from south Florida back in the day. We were talking about the Hispanics down there and discussing why they won’t learn English. She stated there was no reason for them to do so. They have entire communities where no one speaks English, nor needs to. I argued that English would give them a significant leg up in America. She argued that they were quite successful and happy without it. That was a new viewpoint for me.
Living in Chicagoland was a mixed bag from my experience. Seemed most Hispanics spoke enough English to get by, and in any case, they seemed more integrated into America than they do down here in Florida. Went in a check cashing place and the cashier was snotty because I didn’t speak Spanish, but that was an edge case I think. My best friend up there was a Mexican guy who was all about getting his kids educated. LOL, miss that guy terribly. He talked like Yogi Bear. :)
One of the reasons why Latin American immigrants don’t learn English is that a) it’s not a requirement (I think it should be, require learning English, history, culture , etc) and b) especially in the southern eastern states, historically it was Mexican and Spanish was the main language and a huge part of the population still speaks Spanish, it’s easy to love there without speaking English.
Honestly, I love that my wife is a childless cat lady. It makes everything cheaper and easier. My life is better because I don't have kids, and I'm happy that we made that choice together as rational adults and that we were able to agree that this is the best path for us.
Anyone who chooses to have kids based on their values and circumstances is totally cool, whatever, as long as the kids aren't being abused or neglected, of course. That's your option and I respect it - someone has to have 'em.
But if you don't think people are capable of making the choice not to have kids and that it makes them sociopaths to not have kids, I'm pretty sure you're just an authoritarian who either hates women or has a breeding fetish. Maybe both.
Considering the sheer strain on the body pregnancy and birth have, I feel like being a mysoginist would automatically qualify one for a breeding fetish
Have you looked at the cost of day care? And diapers? Or just having a place to live with the extra necessary bedrooms? Pre pandemic I read some article that (as I vaguely remember) estimated it costs at least $100k to raise a child to 18 in the US. I imagine it’s closer to $150k or more by now. Probably way more.
a) some states are pure vote by mail. b) if you have the option of voting at home, that exact same abuser can make you exercise it.
I used to oppose VBM because of this. Now I see it as a trade off since there are also benefits that can outweigh the problems. But a person with their eyes open should not pretend that the problems don’t exist.
Which states? I am not aware of any that are solely vote by mail.
If you wanted to, it would be easy to screw up your ballot request. Throw it out when you get it, mess up the form, forget to sign, offer to take it to the post office and never mail it… Then it’s “oh no it never came, let’s just go vote in person”.
Yes, that is California. In the exact same paragraph, other states are listed which don’t offer the option. Oregon was the one that came to my mind immediately.
The issue is, having an option to do something the right way is not all that helpful. If there is an option to do it the wrong way, attackers (using “attacker” in the sense of computer security) will do what they can to make you use that option, so they can exploit it. Therefore, security systems should make doing the wrong thing impossible, rather than merely making the right thing possible.
Here’s one of the sources cited by that Wikipedia article:
Mostly-Mail Elections (aka Vote-by-Mail, All-Mail or Vote-at-Home Elections) What Are Mostly-Mail Elections? In mostly-mail elections, all registered voters are sent a ballot through the mail. The voter marks the ballot, puts it in a secrecy sleeve or envelope if required, places it in a separate mailing envelope, signs an affidavit on the exterior of the mailing envelope or otherwise provides verification of their identify and then returns the ballot via mail or by dropping it off at an approved return location.
Ballots are mailed out well ahead of Election Day, and thus voters have an “election period,” not just a single day, to vote. Mostly-mail elections can be thought of as absentee voting for everyone. This system is also referred to as “vote-by-mail” or all-mail ballot elections. While “mostly-mail elections” means that every registered voter receives a ballot by mail, this does not preclude in-person voting opportunities on or before Election Day. For example, even though all registered voters in Colorado are mailed a ballot, voters can choose instead to cast a ballot at an in-person vote center during the early voting period or on Election Day.
According to this, “All mail elections” are not different from “mostly mail” elections, and doesn’t preclude the use of in person voting.
Also
systems should make doing the wrong thing impossible
Please no, imo that’s an incredibly fucked line of reasoning
According to this, “All mail elections” are not different from “mostly mail” elections, and doesn’t preclude the use of in person voting.
You can’t vote in person in Oregon. There are no voting booths in the state. It is ALL done by mail, the way I heard it.
“Casting a ballot at a polling place” is not “voting in person”. I sometimes cast my own ballots (California) at polling places. That is, fill in the ballot at home, and drop it off at the polling station instead of mailing it. Voting in person means there is a physical voting booth that you enter, close the curtain, and THEN make your voting choices, in an environment where no one else can see them. Poll workers are supposed to make sure that nobody goes into the booth with you, with some exceptions for disabled people (there are similar exceptions for absentee voting in non-VBM states). It’s against the law to photograph your filled-in ballot inside the booth, though in the phone camera era that has become near impossible to enforce.
Please no, imo that’s an incredibly fucked line of reasoning
It is what you have to do in a secure system. Voting (like retail loss prevention) is of course a security vs convenience trade-off, so you might choose to allow the insecure approach at least some of the time. Again, a person with their eyes open has to be aware of all the issues and reach an informed conclusion. See:
Yeah, ok, that sucks. Oregon should still try to make actual polling locations available for people who need (or want) it.
I still don’t think that that’s a reason to abandon vote by mail altogether. The accessibility of it reduces the impact of other voting problems we have in the us overall.
I’m still going to push back hard on the idea that the system has to be 100% perfect. So long as humans are involved, that simply isn’t possible.
I’m not currently proposing abandoning VBM, I’m just saying people shouldn’t ignore the issue. A secret ballot is supposed to be one of the foundations of democracy and VBM doesn’t provide it the way a voting booth does. These days though, I would be scared of voting booths (at least where there are long lines) because of COVID. COVID is what kicked California over to near-universal VBM in 2019, after all.
People have studied and analyzed this stuff for centuries and it’s very easy to overlook things or make false assumptions if you just examine the immediate situation, without awareness of its long history. I’m not any kind of expert, but as a security nerd, I’ve seen the topic come up in that context.
Just going to preface this by saying that I absolutely do support vote by mail, it’s objectively a good thing
However, there’s a problem that should be considered in that it can create opportunities for coerced voting either within a household, or by requiring someone to send a photo of their form.
Where should a just and equal society draw the line, though? A person's partner can also use Life360 (or another app) to monitor their whereabouts and prohibit them from getting a job so they can't save up money to escape - does that mean we shouldn't have phones or that tracking apps should be restricted?
In a country like the US, where voting lines can literally be 8 hours long and employers don't have to pay you while you take time during the day to vote, can you guys afford to limit mail-in voting due to extremely specific scenarios in which abuse may occur?
It appears (from my position as someone who has not been in an abusive relationship) like we could more comprehensively tackle this issue with legislation that covers more situations that are directly coercive in nature (like your mail-in ballot being tampered with, regardless of your consent).
At the same time, I am a bit of an idiot, so I do genuinely want to read your perspective about how you think things should be. I am almost certainly not considering every avenue here, given that I lack first-hand experience with abusive relationships and have only really heard stories from friends and family (some of whom do have first- or second-hand experience).
does that mean we shouldn’t have phones or that tracking apps should be restricted?
It is not my intent to equate “x has problem y” with “x should not exist” very good systems can and do get abused and misused.
There’s a reason I started my comment with
Mail-in voting is objectively a good thing
All I’m saying is that maybe there should be a way for people to go back and override their votes (which admittedly could probably also be abused in some situations), or better yet, just better social safety nets to help people get out of those situations. I’m not suggesting I have all of the answers, just acknowledging that the person at the top of the thread raises a valid, if possibly overstated, concern.
See the discussion? VBM means you fill in your ballot at home, while your husband potentially watches. As opposed to voting with a secret ballot in a voting booth with the curtain closed.
BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
> Wikipedia about this source
The GOP ticket is led by a sexual predator who a jury found “‘raped’ [journalist E. Jean Carroll
Meanwhile, the Democratic ticket is led by a woman who chose “Freedom” by Beyoncé as her campaign song
Okay, but what about women’s rights to health care? Do they have legislative priorities? Which one of these candidates is willing to stack the court or assign reproductive rights lawyers to the DOJ? Any forthcoming executive actions? Policies? Anything?
Was it really that hard to read the whole sentence?
and has dispensed with the mealy-mouthed language about abortion rights to declare she stands for “the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body.”
declare she stands for “the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body.”
Okay, so what does this means as actual policy? Is she appointing the head of NARAL her AG or is she just going to put a bumper sticker on Air Force One?
I just don’t understand why people keep believing this man is going to pay his debts. This is the same guy that declares bankruptcy like it’s a sign of honor.
news
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.