I signed into my JMP.chat account via XMPP on Pidgin. I can make calls and texts just fine.
Edit: Pidgin (installed from Trisquel repos) can be used for texting, but as of right now, calling seems to be bugged. I’m currently using Dino (installed from Trisquel repos), both calling/texting work fine on there.
I also have a lot of other libraries and programs that I have developed and published with GPLv3 license, so I also want to integrate them with the new program. Since I don’t want to reinvent the wheel for things I have already done. And I’ll probably want to integrate this software on things I might make in the future.
may I ask why? Different hardware is designed for different tasks, and using even a Linux phone will beat out most laptops for energy efficiency to make the same call using the same apps
PS: I do have a PinePhone and PinePhone Pro, used both with a USB-C adapter to have screen, mouse and keyboard and was a quite convenient solution but I understand that some of the firmware limitations might go against your goal. I hope they’ll be fully open if they do a newer model.
I have “mained” a Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme running Pop!_OS for over two years now. I run a company and interact with clients all the time, so I’m not just browsing PornHub all day. My Thinkpad has not let me down yet.
I have a Mac for my music production and graphic design hobbies, but only because I own software for it that only supports Mac or Windows. That said, I rarely use it since Bitwig and Renoise run on Linux. I’ll only boot the Mac if I need some plug-in or Abelton. All that’s happened is that I have slowly started to gravitate towards DAW-less production.
I imagine you’re aware but GPL doesn’t directly prevent corps from using your code (just often done because their code is often propriety). They can use it legally as part of their own GPL licensed code or when they are offering software as a service (they don’t distribute the binary, it’s running on their server). In that case where your code could be running on a server then the AGPL would be preferable if giving software freedom to their users is part of your goals.
I’m fine as long as it is used in other GPL projects. I just don’t want them to take this, use it on some proprietary code and make money/mine data and other things and not contribute to upstream or open source in general.
I hadn’t thought about the network usages, I though GPL covered it. So, is AGPL everything GPL has plus software service from network? If yes, then I will use that license. EDIT: Saw that AGPLv3 is indeed GPLv3 + the network thing.
Furthermore you can mix GPL and AGPL licensed code, each part retaining their license. So you can include someone’s GPL code in a new AGPL project (or vice versa). It’s stated in the GPLv3 license under “Use with the GNU Affero General Public License”.
Yeah, but my program does not have such things in the code. And if you add it, GPL will make it so that they have to share to code, so people will be able to tell if they try it, right?
@JoMiran
>I am afraid to open the box up though. Those dust bunnies must be huge.
Yeah probably, but it's necessary to remove them if you want your machine to stay in good conditions for the next years, even more important when it's running 24/7.
I know, that’s why I’m opening it and why it is going to the basement. It’s basically a concrete bunker at a constant 50°f with no windows and just a filtered radon extraction unit. There are cans sitting there since the COVID lockdown that still have no dust on them. The closet it is in now has carpet. Enough said.
EDIT: It was shockingly clean. Some dust and cobwebs, but very little.
I want to publish it under Open Source Licenses like GPL (not MIT) so other corps can’t take this to use on their product,
Sooo, that’s not what the GPL does - or any other Open Source license really. OpenSource is about the freedom of the user, including the freedom to profit from the software (see RedHat, Ubuntu, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, etc. all making money off Linux).
You’ll want to research your licenses a bit more to see what fits your purpose if your goal includes “not for commercial use”.
I don’t mind them making money off of it, as long as they contribute to the open source community by improving it, contributing upstream, or using it in other systems and keeping those open source as well. I want other people to benefit from the effort I made and published, and if someone wants to improve it, I want others to benefit from there too.
I don’t want the case like insulin in US, where the first invention is free because they wanted everyone to benefit from it. But now it’s super expensive because of the incremental advances other corps did that are patented. And the free version is no longer viable to use without those incremental improvements.
The GPL doesn’t say they need to contribute. It just says they need to publish the source if they make changes. The GPLv3 requires them to allow you to run modified versions
I have moved on to LMDE for everything other than my laptop, but I don’t feel like rebuilding the thing. I just blew out the dust and in a few minutes it will be back up and running in the basement.
I am pretty sure the kernel is up to date, but I am not 100% sure since I haven’t checked that the process didn’t fail at some point. This is a tertiary backup system, super low priority, hosting movies, music, and VeraCrypt drives internally behind multiple layers of network security and isolated in the DMZ where I keep stuff I want isolated from my network, like SmartTVs, IOT crap, and gaming consoles. But since I am working on it now, I will double check.
EDIT: 6.9.3, which is a little behind, but I’m ok with that.
Pop_OS was updated regularly. The kernel version changed to the latest one once it booted up in the new location. It was probably live on 6.0.9 before the move since that was the last one I recorded.
It was 6.9.3 once I booted after the move. I assume it had been updated but waiting for a reboot to use the new kernel. Until I rebooted, it was probably still running on the 6.0.9 image.
If uptime and having the latest kernel ever becomes something I care about for this server, I might switch to Ubuntu Pro. It is free for personal use and it includes kernel livepatching. I can’t imagine why I would need it for this use case though.
linux
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.