There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

UnderpantsWeevil ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

“Eat my ass!”

“Don’t mind if I do.”

bluestribute ,

I’ve always wanted Antiviral to be real!

Zetta ,

Haha I’ve been saying for fucking years that boutique lab growing meat outlets will pop up selling exotic animal meats and celebrity human meat. We are getting close to that future

HonkTonkWoman ,

“I’ll take a burger, mediums rare, & let’s do a 50/50 blend of Ground Chuck & Beyoncé on Sourdough.”

Revan343 ,

Ground Chuck

Palahniuk or Norris?

Noodle07 ,

Republican meat is ewwh

Revan343 ,

Palahniuk it is then

HonkTonkWoman ,

Woolery. Dry aged, of course.

fellowmortal ,

Its not the ‘eat the rich’ that I was hoping for… Might be the one we deserve.

Persen ,

Eat the rich (onlyfans celebrities).

Good_morning ,

What are the chances this doesn’t result in a rise of (traditional) cannibalism? High profile cannibalism case where they tasted a sample of a celebrity and went for the real deal.

JovialMicrobial ,

I bet I taste delicious!

This is ethical despite it walking the line of taboo. It hurts no one, and if the tissue sample can be extracted at home without causing damage to the donor I see no issue with it.

BarbecueCowboy ,

It’s unethical because it’s gross and I personally don’t like it.

DragonTypeWyvern ,

This guy understands the root of ethics

Schadrach ,

I mean it worked for gay sex!

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

Anyone who doesn’t like gay sex hasn’t tried it.

BarbecueCowboy ,

It’s ethical relativism y’all!

jaemo ,

Shades of Wendy meat from Rudy Rucker’s “Ware” tetralogy

Pulptastic ,

Incoming: nonconsensual meat grown from samples illicitly taken against someone’s will.

curiousaur ,

Imagine the network of Taylor Swift DNA trading.

And you know someone is going to fuck it.

towamo7603 ,

I think these are the plots to at least two Cronenberg family films.

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

What are the ethics of fucking a steak made from a non-consenting Taylor Swift’s tissue sample?

Jax ,

Unethical??

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

I’d agree that taking the sample is unethical, but if you’re growing the steak from a sample someone else got or fucking it the ethical lines get really blurry.

Jax ,

Idk, I don’t think they’re that blurry if we compare them to similar “conundrums” in other unethical circumstances.

Like, would you think the same of someone owning child porn? They don’t distribute it, they don’t film the children themselves, they just own the recordings. The law says they’re a criminal, but it seems like a similar ethical conundrum - no? (To be clear, I think eating meat sourced from someone who did not consent is wrong. I hope that says enough about how I feel about CP.)

How about owning the schematics for a ghost gun? You haven’t printed it, you haven’t distributed the schematic - you just own the schematic (and, for the purpose of the example, a 3d printer capable of printing the parts needed).

Seems like the answer is “it’s unethical”. Gonna need a third party to weigh in.

SatansMaggotyCumFart ,

The closest thing to this exact situation would be the HeLa immortal cell line and that situation is fuzzy as fuck.

terry_jerry ,

So I think it’s more like if u got a papermache piñata from some one that just so happened to be made of child porn and then u fucked that… Yeah seems unethical to me

Zip2 ,

What if you have cancer and don’t know it, and just accidentally happen to grow a tumour for dinner?

InFerNo ,

It’s not a tumah!

crusty ,

How do you know the cancer won’t make it tastier?

yamanii ,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

By what technicality this isn’t cannibalism?

aphlamingphoenix ,

I would call it auto-cannibalism. I think it is a form of cannibalism.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •