I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that’s what fuels the hope.
Even small chances are chances. It’s that simple ;)
When did I say there weren’t any winners? I said people think there’s a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause.
I… Heh. 🥰 To seriously answer your question I guess early childhood socialization? Being naughty and then getting scolded and forced to fix it and learn my lesson was fun. And now that desire to be a brat has taken on new meaning.
I guess being forced to take my desires less seriously in the urgency or the anger of the situation can provide a bit of risk, danger, or shock. The idea that I can do my best and they will still be pissed regardless and treat me differently because of it is so much fun. And then, its kinky so there’s aftercare where the attitude drops and I’m given love.
This bookTells you how to handle this, along with everything else you need to know to rebuild all systems in society from scratch should there be some sort of time machine based accident. It’s a good read!
There’s also [The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Our World from Scratch](!wiki The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Our World from Scratch) by Lewis Dartnel. Great book
lemmyshitpost
Hot
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.