I do not recognize this artwork and the style is a little different but this definitely has Roy Lichtenstein vibes, some more of his stuff here: www.wikiart.org/en/roy-lichtenstein/all-works#
KFC in particular uses commercial pressure cookers, or at least they originally did I haven’t worked there since before they were called KFC. Those things are dangerous, and if you didn’t appear to have a decent amount of spatial awareness, I wouldn’t hire you at my store, cause an accident with one of those pressure cookers could end in an explosion.
Things might have changed since the 90s, however I worked at multiple KFCs and the intelligence level of the people they hired to run these things was pretty damn low. In fact, at one store most of the cooks were stoned every single shift. Nobody got seriously hurt.
I mean… Getting stoned is arguably better than my experience with fine dining where almost everyone was either stoned and drunk, or on meth… Except for dishie. That dude had EVERYTHING available. He was kinda like Dopey from The 7 Dwarves. Always had an arm out and a leg up to try new drugs. I will admit that dishie was always a reliable source for LSD and X, so there is that going for the madlad.
There’s a lot of us. Extreme shyness and such. Doesn’t matter how cute and handsome you are, if you’re too chickenshit to go talk to the girl smiling at you from across the bar. It’s also difficult to know if she’s really into you, she could just be Canadian. :D And then you have all the incels whom I really don’t understand. But they have a whole subreddit, if you wanna go take a dip in the cesspool.
This is why I love the number 7. It’s the first real prime number. All the others are “first”…1?2?3?5? No, those aren’t prime numbers, they’re “first” in a long line of not-prime numbers.
Then you get to 7. Is 27943 divisible by 7? If you take away 3 is it? If you add 4 is?
I have no clue, give me 10 minutes or a calculator is the only answer
Take the last digit of the number, double it and subtract it from the rest. If that new number is divisible by 7, the original one is as well. For your example:
2794 - 6 = 2788
I know 2800 is divisible by seven, so 2788 is not. Thus 27943 is not divisible by 7.
Quick maff shows that neither subtracting 3 or adding 4 will make the original number divisible by 7. Adding 1 or subtracting 6 will tho.
There is a mathematical algorithm that proves this works in all cases. However this rule is not actually all that impressive as it appears at first glance! The number of operations (comparisons/subtractions/multiplications) you need to do is equivalent to just long-dividing the number by 7.
Consider: each operation of the rule removes one digit from the end. But you could just as easily apply the rule like “If the first digit is >=7, subtract 7 from it. Else, subtract the biggest multiple of 7 that will fit from the first two digits.” To skip multiplying, you can use the following jump table: if the first digit is 6, subtract 54 from the first 2 digits, if 5 subtract 49, if 4: 35, if 3: 28, if 2: 14, if 1: 07. That will also remove one digit from the front! But now you are just doing long division.
I can handle being the weird dude that takes super loud shits in public bathrooms. That’ll just make people leave me alone.
I can’t handle making my girlfriend feel like shit every time we’re intimate. That would be debilitating to our relationship.
I don’t mind a bit of construction work. Wouldn’t be hard to tear down the drywall in the bathroom and pack the stud walls with Rockwool soundproofing insulation. And also swap the door out for a double-thickness solid core sound-deadening door with a sealing sweep. That’s like a couple weekend’s worth of work max.
Also she is an absolute saint and would probably be fine dealing with it to stay with me.
lemmyshitpost
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.