There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

lemmy.world

EleventhHour , to lemmyshitpost in Sometimes what a person needs is just...
@EleventhHour@lemmy.world avatar

c/2me2irl

odium , to lemmyshitpost in Sometimes what a person needs is just...

It’s real!

can , to android in Rich Communications notification keeps popping up?

Which SMS app?

Trex202 OP ,

I use Textra

MrSoup , to technology in Adguard's ad-block filters repo had been blocked "due to a violation of GitHub's terms of service" (now reinstated)

Another reason not to use GitHub.

jelloeater85 , to lemmyshitpost in Sometimes what a person needs is just...
@jelloeater85@lemmy.world avatar

Straw Hat gang rise up!

SturgiesYrFase , to cat in Acceptance
@SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml avatar

Looks soooo much like my cat!

cranakis , to cat in Acceptance

Also: “pet me.”

Balthazar , to cat in Acceptance

The cat is not accepting you. He is manipulating you in order to dominate you.

Zorque ,

That’s how cats show affection.

Balthazar ,

Wow, they’ve already gotten you…

recursive_recursion ,
@recursive_recursion@programming.dev avatar

the game was rigged from the start meow :3

Revan343 ,

If that’s getting me, they can have me

toofpic , to lemmyshitpost in Sometimes what a person needs is just...

Is this about circumcision reversal?

StephenTallentyre , to cat in He has such big paws

Beautiful.

kittykittycatboys , to cat in He has such big paws
@kittykittycatboys@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

big ol’ peets

Severalkittens OP ,

Perfect for knockin stuff off my table

auzy , to lemmyshitpost in America's Smartest Man Finds Something Interesting

It’s funny how I’ve tried to bring some of that most blokey guys I have come across on mountaineering and such, and the vast majority weasal out of it

And the biggest badasses I know always drive the most basic cars lol

UnderpantsWeevil OP ,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

If you’re an actual car guy, you’re probably driving some absolute piece of shit that you’ve been continuously breathing life into for the last ten years.

The folks with the real high end luxury stuff just end up leaving their vehicles in the shop for half the year.

ruk_n_rul , to science_memes in Some light comedy

I see what you did there

Alexstarfire ,

I argue that you do not, in fact, see what is going on there.

MsPenguinette ,

Guys, please stop making observations, people are trying to work

someacnt_ ,

Thanks, I dunno how but this let me see the joke

ByteJunk ,
@ByteJunk@lemmy.world avatar

The joke was probably there all along.

StephenTallentyre , to cat in Acceptance

You mean you’ve accepted that the cat is in charge and not the other way around, right? Because yeah, that is what usually happens.

Rekorse , to meanwhileongrad in Average tankie calling for the genocide of the working class for being the wrong ethnicity

What was wrong with their comparison to a previous occupying force? Occupy does not mean at war or invade. Nazis could be civilians of course.

PugJesus OP , (edited )

“Al-Awsa flood was a fully legitimate and legal attack against an occupying force”

Citing the attacks on October 7th, which targeted civilians, as legitimate and legal against an ‘occupying force’.

“Innocent civilians are not an occupying force”

Giving the opportunity, here, to dispute that they were innocent civilians - by specifying innocent civilians not being an occupying force, they are necessarily narrowing the scope of the discussion to civilians in the context of the October 7th attacks and whether they were legitimate.

“When they’re the people who’ve stolen your homes and land, they are”

That innocent civilians were targeted is not disputed. Instead, it is asserted that as the civilians were “the people who’ve stolen your homes and land”, they are in some way legitimate targets. What other reasonable interpretation is left in context?

Rekorse ,

Well they didnt avoid military personnel, they grabbed whoever they could. Its a bit different too when you consider all Israelis serve in their military by default.

How about this, you tell me what they should have done instead? Continued on as they were? Are you aware the IDF was killing a palestinian child per week all through 2023 l, PRIOR to October 7th?

savethechildren.net/…/2023-marks-deadliest-year-r…

I’m not saying its right to hurt people, I’m saying there is only so much a community can take before things like this happen, and now its being used as an excuse to further kill and steal land, which is wrong.

Or how about foreign countries lobbying our government? Bad right? If russia had a PAC and was donating money to get laws passed that are favorable to Russia, we would rightly protest across the nation.

We allow the exact same thing for Israel and protesting that fact is now illegal in America. How’s that for moral consistency?

PugJesus OP ,

Well they didnt avoid military personnel, they grabbed whoever they could.

Oh, they didn’t avoid military personnel when killing civilians, if they had avoided military personnel when killing civilians, like all the truly great terrorists do, THEN it would be condemnable.

Its a bit different too when you consider all Israelis serve in their military by default.

Jesus fucking Christ. I ask you to take a step back and re-examine this statement and its implications.

How about this, you tell me what they should have done instead? Continued on as they were?

You do realize that a massive attack on an occupying power does not actually have to target civilians, right?

Are you aware the IDF was killing a palestinian child per week all through 2023, PRIOR to October 7th?

Yes, I am well-aware. I’ve condemned the situation in Palestine as a genocide many, many times before October 7th.

I’m not saying its right to hurt people, I’m saying there is only so much a community can take before things like this happen,

Before… what? Before a mafia pseudostate triggers an intensified period of war with the occupying power which looks damn well like it might result in a serious incident of genocide far in excess of previous attempts, by launching an attack by paramilitary forces on the ground (as opposed to rockets or bombs) that targeted civilians, because they want to puff themselves up to hold onto power?

and now its being used as an excuse to further kill and steal land, which is wrong.

Agreed,

Or how about foreign countries lobbying our government? Bad right? If russia had a PAC and was donating money to get laws passed that are favorable to Russia, we would rightly protest across the nation.

Yep. AIPAC’s influence is awful, and should be strongly opposed, especially considering how deeply they’ve woven themselves into the current party system. Not really sure what that has to do with Hamas targeting civilians, though.

We allow the exact same thing for Israel and protesting that fact is now illegal in America. How’s that for moral consistency?

Don’t be silly.

Rekorse ,

I think its hypocritical everyone seems understanding of the Palestinians but wants to shout at them they are doing it wrong. They were already facing cultural genocide, it was already awful before the 7th.

Unless you lived in Gaza at the time I dont think westerners should be sitting here virtue signaling.

Americans do understand the occupier vs occupied you’d think considering their history with Britain, or Americas history with the “third world” but suddenly this one doesnt count.

The people being abused had been lashing out in every way they could before with no response. Its absurd to sit here and say the one thing they did that caused global outrage against Israel for their treatment of Palestinians was the wrong thing to do.

I would never hurt anyone, but im not Palestinian nor do I live under those conditions. If I did, I’d likely have a different perspective.

PugJesus OP ,

I think its hypocritical everyone seems understanding of the Palestinians but wants to shout at them they are doing it wrong.

If you think targeting civilians in ethnic cleansing isn’t doing it wrong because you prefer their side of the conflict, we have nothing to talk about. Your position is no different than the excuses given by the Zionists.

Rekorse ,

I’m just not being a hyprocrit who says they agree with the Palestinians but knows better than them how to help their people.

This wasn’t the first attempt at a solution, this is nearly 80 years of events leading up to something.

The crowd of people who are using this as an opportunity to hang their perfect morals in front of the general public are cowards.

PugJesus OP ,

This wasn’t the first attempt at a solution, this is nearly 80 years of events leading up to something.

Except it’s not. It’s not ‘leading up to something’ like this was some bold, grand strike that’s never been tried before. This has been tried numerous times before, and the reaction from Israel is always the same. This isn’t 80 years of events leading up to something - this is an 80 year pattern whose only change is that Israel seems ready to right and truly finish their genocide attempt in Gaza - or make significant ‘progress’ in doing so.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines