I was on reddit since 2014. Got perma banned a few months ago. Essentially I argued with the nazi mods and they booted me. Whitepeople Twitter is a cesspool of an echo chamber. I took the perma ban happily and permanently switched to lemmy, much happier here. Fuck reddit and the nazi mods just leave and don’t look back
My understanding is that there is also a Democratic element to his business model which also works as a form of engagement from his fans who give him their money.
To combine a bunch of explanations I’ve seen in the comments here:
A bourgeois philanthropist game show producer who dabbles in poverty porn.
That said, I do occasionally burn time watching some of his videos, however some of the content (especially the more recent game show ones which feel a bit like toying with people) rub me the wrong way.
I have no idea if his philanthropy efforts are genuine or not - he’s barely visible in those videos (he has another individual hosting those videos) although I do appreciate the efforts they appear to go to when assisting communities desperately in need, and careful implementation of solutions that are sustainable, and can actually be maintained and fixed with local knowledge.
I’ve seen way too many “gimmicky” charity contributions by other organizations that become worthless as soon as they break because nobody fixes them, as well as other solutions that seemingly make sense from a western cultural lens but aren’t really understood by the local people… worst one being a “merry-go-round” water pump mechanism where senior locals are forced to “play” just to pump water for survival. It was originally intended as a kids toy, but they of course don’t have any attachment to such a foreign device, thus don’t use it.
Edit: I didn’t see the hit piece / exposé that was made about him until now
From what I know about him, he is a genuine person, and his projects are done to help people if possible.
I know that many influencers profit off of suffering/kindness in a scummy way, but I believe that MrBeast is one of the few that actually try to do it ethically.
I feel the same way. The only videos I watch are the ones on the philanthropy channel and the ones where the core is giving away money or stuff (e.g. cars) to random people (or people in need).
Though, I also question the sustainability of (some of) the philanthropy actions. Don’t get me wrong, giving water and light to people in the middle of nowhere is nice, but when they become dependent and they can’t fix it when it breaks, they could be screwed big time.
The like five minutes I “researched” the “main” guy of the philanthropy channel (Derrick? Taran?) I came to the conclusion that he seems genuinely dedicated to trying helping people.
The goal of any military is to build and maintain a technological edge over potential adversaries. Because of that, a lot of basic research happens in and around military organizations.
You mentioned the internet as one such technology and it’s a great example. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) started a project to build a communications network which would be resilient in the event of a nuclear war. Their work created ARPANet. And for a long time, it was really just intended as a US DoD thing and no one really considered its potential uses for the civilian world. It wasn’t until it was opened up to the civilian sector that its potential to change the world was recognized.
Many other technologies follow this trajectory. There is a need in the military and research is done to fulfill that need. If that research is successful, new technology can be created and may eventually move into the civilian market and be very useful. Though, as part of that technology transfer there is always pushback from the military that opening up that technology may reduce or eliminate the technological edge the military holds over potential adversaries.
An example of this would be the Global Positioning System (GPS). GPS was supposed to be a way for the military to be more accurate in the stuff it blew up. When they began opening GPS up for civilian use, there was the worry that adversaries would use GPS against US forces. And so, part of the initial opening up involved intentional inaccuracy in the GPS signal for civilian use. Over time, this has been removed; however, the US DoD does maintain the ability to introduce inaccuracies if considered tactically necessary.
you’d think some five or 6 star general would go “Yeah nah we don’t need this shit, waste of tax money just stick with what works”
So, this actually does happen. In 2013, the US Army famously said tanks, but no more tanks. And Congress overrode that request. At the same time, just “sticking with what works” is a tough thing to know ahead of time. Prior to WWII, air power was considered more of a niche thing. Useful for reconnaissance and not much else. And then the Luftwaffe adopted dive bomb tactics and started wrecking shit from the air. By the end of WWII aircraft had reworked a lot of military doctrine. For example, WWII navies were built around battleships. And then the Japanese rather definitively proved what air craft carriers were capable of (see: Pearl Harbor). Navies are now built around air craft carriers and battleships are largely museum pieces. But, this only happens when militaries are willing and funded to try new things out. Not everything works and that means a lot of money expended on failed projects. But, sometimes it pays off and a military is able to create or extend a technological edge.
So, why does the the bleeding edge tech seem to always come out of the military? It’s because they often have the reasons and resources to do the research. As much as it sucks, the world is still a dangerous place. And so, militaries the world over will always be looking to push the boundaries on technology. And they will also be the first recipients of said technology and will guard it jealously to prevent losing the technological edge it gives them. Yes, the world would be far better off, if humanity was not hanging from a cross of iron. But, thanks to assholes like Putin, here we hang.
Fucking Stanton and Warby Parker advertised $45 for 2 pairs… But you can only actually get that price if you don’t actually need lenses. These two (and probably all others advertising similar prices) are just fucking scams.
They’re 27"×40" posters in a limited print run and on good quality paper stock. Plus, the artist promises he’ll ship as many different prints as you want at the same $10 rate. Sounds like a fair deal to me.
The Daily Zeitgeist - a daily rundown of the news and pop culture Behind the Bastards 16th Minute (of Fame) - reviewing internet main characters and adding context to what is generally known about them Factually - Adam Conover interviews experts The Dollop - two comedians tell stories from history Bad Hasbara - two anti-Zionist Jews discuss Israeli propaganda, usually with a guest Pod Yourself [x] - episode by episode recap of tv shows. First the Sopranos (pod yourself a gun) then The Wire (pod yourself the wire) and upcoming is Mad Men. Search Engine Some More News - news deep dives and weekly current events.
kbin.life
Hot