There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

zcd , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Google well on their way on their uber-dick speedrun

Clbull , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

This is the search engine equivalent of aiming a carbine at your feet and shooting yourself with a .50 cal round.

Cached pages were something I found myself using quite a bit and them going may be the push needed for me to use an alternative search engine.

avidamoeba , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

Sounds like someone’s after storage savings.

HarkMahlberg ,
@HarkMahlberg@kbin.social avatar

All those racks of hard drives are taking up the space they need for racks of Nvidia GPU's.

avidamoeba ,
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

They use their own TPUs instead of NVIDIA AFAIK but yeah.

_haha_oh_wow_ , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works avatar

The enshittification will continue until quarterly reports improve.

Just kidding, it will continue regardless.

Gormadt ,
@Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

If anything it will keep accelerating the worse quarterly results are as they try to solve their way out of problems they made while still keeping the problems

Chee_Koala ,

Hahahaha, GOTTEM!

db2 , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

I haven’t seen that available for literally years. I thought they killed it long ago.

Google sucks.

originalucifer ,
@originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com avatar

they hid it under a little 'more' menu awhile back. i kinda saw this coming

db2 ,

Maybe I was one of the test subjects then because it wasn’t there at all, menu or otherwise. 🤷

ConstipatedWatson , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

I tried using it three days ago and had to resort to the Wayback Machine instead. Thanks Google!

Aatube ,
@Aatube@kbin.social avatar

archive.today

shininghero , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

No, there are still use cases for it. I usually use it to retrieve web pages from sites that get incorrectly blocked by the firewall at work.

NoRodent , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@NoRodent@lemmy.world avatar

Well that really sucks because it was often the only way to actually find the content on the page that the Google results “promised”. For numerous reasons - sometimes the content simply changes, gets deleted or is made inaccessible because of geo-fencing or the site is straight up broken and so on.

Yes, there’s archive.org but believe it or not, not everything is there.

OpenStars ,
@OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

Or locked behind 100 pages of unnecessarily paginated content. Seriously, one of the best features that a webpage has over a physical printed page is the ability to search it for what you were looking for… smh:-(.

ARk ,

We must archive all the things

eating3645 ,

I will archive you!

Appoxo ,
@Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I would love to archive the comment on archive.org but it seems like a bit of a spammy way to do that…

EdibleFriend ,
@EdibleFriend@lemmy.world avatar

Donna Noble has left the library. Donna Noble has been saved.

pastaPersona , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

In a shocking turn of events, google decided once again to make their namesake service worse for everyone.

Legitimately baffling, keeping this feature doesn’t really seem like it would impact anyone except those that use it, while removing it not only impacts those people that already use it, but those who would potentially have reason to in the future.

Cannot think of a single benefit to removing a feature like this.

OpenStars ,
@OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

It is only baffling if you still think that Google’s aim is to help people. At one point they were trying to gain market share and so that was true. It is not anymore.

_number8_ ,

ostensibly it takes a lot of space to cache that much data, but seeing as they own youtube this should be nothing in comparison

Emerald ,

i would guess they have it cached still anyways.

nicetriangle , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

They really have just given up on being a good search engine at this point huh?

lauha ,

They are an Ad company, and using cached page doesn’t bring ad money to their clients

kratoz29 ,

Make sense, it seems that they have been having lots of meetings regarding how to maximize its revenue

Juvyn00b ,

They’ll reintroduce the feature with their own ads embedded.

lemmyvore ,

They may not have a choice in the matter. AI-generated pages are set to completely destroy the noise to signal ratio on the web.

Google’s business has two aspects, collecting user data and serving ads. If Search stops being relevant people will stop using it, which impacts both aspects negatively.

Kid_Thunder , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

It has barely existed for years anyway. Anyone can remove the Google caching from their website and most major websites and many small ones do.

Now I just have an archive.org extension to do the se thing basically.

key ,

Ya I’m just surprised to hear the feature still exists. I remember the option to view cached page disappearing from every search result I would try to use it on years ago.

Buelldozer , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@Buelldozer@lemmy.today avatar

JFC…at this point I may as well stand up a self hosted search engine.

Aatube ,
@Aatube@kbin.social avatar

Is this really such an essential feature when archive.today exists?

Buelldozer ,
@Buelldozer@lemmy.today avatar

Not really but I’m disgusted with the continual downgrading of Google Search and it’s hyper-focus on increasing profitability at the cost of user experience and data privacy.

I was already toying with searXNG anyway, so it’s not a big leap.

DocMcStuffin ,
@DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world avatar

A few months back Ruud stood up a copy: searxng.world

I’ve been using it, and it tends to be as good as or better than google’s search. There’s only been a handful of instances where I’ve explicitly used google’s.

Buelldozer , (edited )
@Buelldozer@lemmy.today avatar

Thanks, I’ll give it a try. I’ve been using searx.work to play with the tech and I’m almost satisfied enough to stand up my own instance.

Edit; I removed my dumb-assery around default search engines.

Endorkend , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@Endorkend@kbin.social avatar

Cached pages haven't worked on many sites for several years already.

And for specific types of sites, it 100% still is needed and a great tool.

zkfcfbzr , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Was it even still around? I can think of a few times in the past few months where I’ve tried to find the cached link to a google result and failed. Most recently just two days ago, when a site I wanted to use was down for maintenance.

originalucifer , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com avatar

there are half a dozen still very good reasons to keep this feature and one not to: lost ad revenue

assholes

Neato ,
@Neato@ttrpg.network avatar

I can’t imagine there was even that much lost revenue. Cached pages are good for seeing basic content in that page but you can’t click through links or interact with the page in any way. Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

NoRodent ,
@NoRodent@lemmy.world avatar

Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

I doubt that as well. There are much better ways to deal with ads. I always only used it when the content on the page didn’t exist anymore or couldn’t be accessed for whatever reason.

But I suspected this was coming, they’ve been hiding this feature deeper and deeper in the last few years.

Catoblepas ,

I honestly thought it was already gone.

db2 ,

but you can’t click through links or interact with the page in any way

Most of the time that’s exactly what I want. I hate hunting through 473 pages of stupid bullshit in some janky forum to try to find the needle in that haystack.

bjorney ,

I feel like 99% of its usage was to avoid ads/paywalls/geo/account restrictions on news and social media sites

PapaStevesy ,

You can’t lose what you never had. It’s desired ad revenue they’re after.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines