There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

Alice-Hughes586 , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US
@Alice-Hughes586@gehirneimer.de avatar

Yes,I have received an email on ホットメールログイン too.

the_q , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US

🏴‍☠️

Assman , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US
@Assman@sh.itjust.works avatar

If we can’t use my MIL’s account I will pirate the shows instead

ISometimesAdmin , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US
@ISometimesAdmin@the.coolest.zone avatar

Damn, Steamboat Willie going into public domain really has Disney tightening the purse strings /s

MisterD ,

They’re going to need that money to settle the lawsuit from Gina Carano funded by Elon Musk.

TheGrandNagus , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US

I’m not surprised. It went really well for Netflix.

Everybody said they’d cancel Netflix over it, even that it would be a mistake that would kill Netflix, but when it came down to it, most continued paying/bought a plan and Netflix became more profitable.

Hyperreality ,

Great news to be honest. I hope disney sees a similar spike in profits so they can make more great shows for me to pirate.

ExcursionInversion ,
@ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world avatar

Ay someone gets it. Everyone can win

NoIWontPickaName ,

Ironically I dropped Netflix for the Hulu Disney package because of password sharing and I was the one paying.

Dasnap ,
@Dasnap@lemmy.world avatar

The people who said they’d cancel probably did, they were just the minority.

BraveSirZaphod ,
@BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social avatar

Everybody said they’d cancel Netflix over it

What's probably more likely is that the "everybody" that you heard from was an incredibly unrepresentative sample of people from a bubble of nerdy tech enthusiasts.

Silentiea ,

And those people, like me, probably did cancel.

I am still surprised more people didn’t cancel since everyone I know who uses streaming services shares them, and most are splitting the cost.

fruitycoder ,

Yep. I cancelled but all of my family on my account got their own

webhead ,
@webhead@lemmy.world avatar

I cancelled. It’s just that I’m a small minority of people. The number that cancelled was apparently less than the people who signed up for their own account. Oh well. Netflix wasn’t that good anymore anyway. I barely used that app. Disney Plus however I’m not going to cancel. That one is worth it to me.

ModernRisk , to technology in Disney+ has started cracking down on password sharing in the US
@ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Was no surprise that other platforms would follow Netflix with not allowing sharing passwords.

What does surprise me is that people actually pay their own subscription for these platforms. Netflix had a win in profit/revenue. I’m surprised that these people did not go for the Piracy method even though, they complain about:

  • Price increases
  • Not allowed to share password/ account
  • Content not available on said platform and having to go to others platforms
  • Cancellation of shows after one or two seasons
AProfessional ,

There are millions of people who can afford $140/yr. They just don’t complain on forums.

nvvp ,

$140 a year, sure. That’s just Netflix or Disney Plus though. If you want all of the services these days you’re up to $140 a month.

Alexstarfire ,

While I’ve cut back because of the abundance of services, the always increasing prices, and the cutting of content, I still don’t get this comparison. Most people don’t get all the services the same way most people didn’t get every cable package available. I’ve never had more than 5 at once and 1 was because it was included with my internet service and another because it was included in my Prime subscription. I really only ever consciously had 3 services and I’m down to two now because fuck Netflix.

kemsat ,

That’s what we used to pay for cable/satellite TV before we switched to Netflix+YouTube a few years ago.

d3Xt3r , (edited )

What does surprise me is that people actually pay their own subscription for these platforms. Netflix had a win in profit/revenue. I’m surprised that these people did not go for the Piracy method even though, they complain about:

Most people don’t like change. Maybe they have a habit of switching on Netflix daily during dinner or something. There’s also a big “Netflix” button on their remotes and their TV’s homescreen, which serves as a constant reminder. They probably even have the app on their phones. All of this leads to mental conditioning and addiction, it’s now a part of their daily lives. Humans are a creature of habit, and it’s hard to break out of a routine ingrained over several years.

Piracy could be a option for some people, but it’s still either too technical, or not as convenient, for the average Joe. Sure, there are even websites you could simply go to without installing any app, but most people won’t bother with that - they just want to hit a single button on their remote/TV and watch something, without needing to go to some website, a website which may eventually stop working.

You’ll find that most people would prefer to take the path of least resistance, even if it means paying (more) money. Don’t forget that even pirates may sometimes pay money to make things easier - eg usenet/seedbox/debrid users - and that’s simply because they too would prefer to take the path of least resistance, even if it means being in the ironic situation of paying to watch pirated content. So it’s not too hard to imagine why normal people would just prefer to cough up the extra cash for Netflix and continue with their lives, routines unchanged.

the_post_of_tom_joad ,

My mother in law is like this. She has cable and she’ll never, never get rid of it. She’ll just browse for huge chuncks of time thru the long, long list of channels (including shipping, music, spanish, and many of which aren’t even available or are pay per view). The act of browsing the crappy ui itself is soothing to her (fucking maddening to me but w\e).

I think she has fond memories of watching cable news and such as a family when she was a child. It’s the only thing that makes sense because she’s alwayscomplaining about the price but refuses to cut the cord. Nothing other than rose- colored glasses could account for her behavior that i can fathom.

Dasnap , (edited )
@Dasnap@lemmy.world avatar

Most people don’t even know how piracy works unless it gets as mainstream as Napster did. You tell them about torrenting, -arr programs, debrid services, and they’ll have no clue what you’re talking about.

Alexstarfire ,

I pirate with torrents and the rest still goes over my head.

Z3k3 ,

Of it were up to me I’d drop it in a heart beat. I’m outvoted by kids grandkids and wife who watch random things throughout the day.

I barely watch TV these days and would happily hooky the odd things I do want to see

Evkob ,
@Evkob@lemmy.ca avatar

I totally get that the couple of bucks a month is worth saving any headache from doing tech support for family members.

However, if you want to try switching them to pirated sources, Stremio + Torrentio add-on and a Real-Debrid sub (which is paid but much cheaper than a streaming service) is great for giving you a Netflix-like interface for pirated content. It’s easy enough that I coached my dad on how to set it up via text.

Z3k3 ,

Cool ill give em a look

Smokeydope ,
@Smokeydope@lemmy.world avatar

Also good piracy requires understanding torrenting and navagating the 7 seas with a vpn. And know what a good/bad torrent looks like.

My parents LOVE to tell all their friends and family how I can magically get any tv show or movie for them through the computer 5$ a month without all that subscription crap which gets everyones hopes up and I have to gently let them down that it requires a bit more computer knowhow than a regular non-tech person ]possesses.

If you think you can properly educate people on safely torrenting be my guest but for most people who have neither the time or desire to learn computer nerd stuff instead they choose the simple and convinent option of just coughing up dollars

mintiefresh , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

No need. Sundar is bad enough as is.

Resonosity , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Internet Archive is essential now. I used to use Google Cached for when IA failed. All researchers are now losing that resiliency.

BananaTrifleViolin , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Enshitification strikes again. Cached doesn’t make money and maybe reduces adclicks so it’s gone. This benefits Google but not users in any way whatsoever.

linearchaos ,
@linearchaos@lemmy.world avatar

I kind of wonder if they’re just training machine models with it all so they don’t have to store the content. That would give us a pretty good reason why their search results became inadequate over the period of a month or two.

kameecoding , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

didn’t that happen like years ago? or maybe because I am using Firefox, but I haven’t seen the button for the cached website for a while now

Psythik ,

It’s still there; just buried in a menu now.

ZambiblasianOgre , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Absolute cunts

ad_on_is , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature
@ad_on_is@lemmy.world avatar

Has Elon secretly bought Google too?

laurelraven ,

Nah, they’ve been pulling crap like this for at least a decade now, nothing new here

Psythik ,

Yup, removing useful features is kind of Google’s thing.

I still mourn the death of the Menu button in Android.

Swarfega , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

I stopped using Google late last year and it’s pretty eye opening how much freer I feel now. Previously, any searches I made would follow me around. Make a one time search for something I’d see that being advertised later on. As a result I started searching more using private browsing. I’d often forget though and end up being tracked.

Ultimately switching to Firefox and DuckDuckGo I no longer have to do private searches. No more being followed around the internet.

Also I’m not convinced private browsing works. For example I still use it for YouTube but I noticed despite YouTube not knowing who I am, the videos on the home page include some that are very related to my usual videos. I guess they are using IP’s to still deliver relatable videos.

DNU ,

Yt doesn’t know who you are, but it knows damn well who was last logging in from that PC/IP.

aidan ,

Same useragent and window size too.

Zink ,

Private browsing keeps your computer from remembering things about what you did. It cannot keep other people’s computers from remembering everything about interacting with you.

Swarfega ,

Indeed.

gunslingerfry , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Google is the king of giving bullshit reasons to hide their true intent.

nossaquesapao ,

Just like that safetynet thing. They will write long pages about it, but won’t admit they want to make custom android roms unusable for the average user.

grayman ,

My guess is ads don’t work in cached pages.

DigitalFrank ,

This is the real reason. Google is an ad company, not a search engine.

Astronautical , to technology in Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

Finally, an excuse to use the Wayback Machine for all of my searches!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines