There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

gofsckyourself

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

gofsckyourself ,

Cunt Fuck
Crowded Florist
Crammed Fart
Cool Flow
Colostomy Fist

gofsckyourself ,

It only breaks down under industrial environments. It’s not as “biodegradable” as claimed. I use PETG because I can recycle it with normal plastics recycling.

gofsckyourself , (edited )

FYI - the owner of this site, gamingonlinux, was a mod on the !linux_gaming community until they were caught abusing their moderator powers. Then they deleted their account and complained on mastodon that it’s stupid design that mod logs are public.

Instead, here’s the direct link to the bundle:

fanatical.com/…/build-your-own-play-on-the-go-bun…

And the bundlefest:

www.fanatical.com/en/bundlefest

gofsckyourself ,

Just slap the “Linux” onto any post and immediately get more upvotes on Lemmy.

gofsckyourself ,
gofsckyourself ,

I just always do a really quick reverse image search before I share things so I can share the best quality version as well as be able to point to the original artist. Usually only takes a minute at most.

gofsckyourself ,

The open-source software from WordPress.org is great for blogs. It becomes the worst when you try it make it do more than that. Even worse is WordPress.com which is very different and uses a very locked-down and restricted proprietary version of the WordPress software. They charge $25/mo for the tier that lets you add custom CSS.

Additionally, Automattic gets a free pass of violating the WordPress terms of use for the WordPress name and logo to intentionally trick people into thinking the paid platform at WordPress.com is the same as the free and open-source software from WordPress.org. They get to leverage the non-profit’s name and likeness and gets preferential treatment to funnel business to their for-profit company.

gofsckyourself ,

Completely separate entities besides the owner being the same.

gofsckyourself ,

Matt Mullenweg effectively is the ‘owner’ of both, yes. Though the term ‘owner’ isn’t necessarily precise, it effectively conveys the idea.

gofsckyourself ,

FYI - the owner of this site, gamingonlinux, was a mod on the !linux_gaming community until they were caught abusing their moderator powers. Then they deleted their account and complained on mastodon that it’s stupid design that mod logs are public.

gofsckyourself ,

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3ed4e565-5730-4518-88f5-d62b5587d490.png

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b69806f1-4ced-4e8c-a9dd-3f1e8d8979e9.png

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/53d0e77c-6d5b-48c2-91ed-c0286684b1e8.png

Deleted comment:
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d95d6921-cfc7-4415-8597-89cacb2b4570.png

I called them out for not following their own community rules:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

and they deleted their account.

gofsckyourself ,

Mod abuse is mod abuse, regardless of the level. They clearly felt embarrassed for needlessly being mean and getting caught for it after trying to hide the fact.

Then they tried to excuse it on their mastodon.

If they’re willing to go through all that for something so minor, they would absolutely be willing to do the same to hide worse behavior.

gofsckyourself ,

Pointing something out is not inherently being a dick. It did not warrant the response, particularly a response that clearly breaks the rules of the community they were trusted with the responsibility to manage.

gofsckyourself , (edited )

“Annoying” is subjective, and there is no rule against being perceived as being “annoying” in the community rules.

The only rule is to be respectful, which they did not follow at all, then tried to hide it.

Response to edit: yes, it was edited after it was brought up. The modlog is public, there’s no need for me to try to hide anything like they tried to do. If you’re going to try to give me shit for that, why do they get a free pass?

gofsckyourself ,

I agree that the main interaction was mild, but if they were willing to go this far to try to hide this, then that shows how low the bar is for them to try to manipulate things to their favor and liking with the trust that was given them as a moderator.

gofsckyourself ,

Are you Liam in disguise or something? Why are you trying to make up shit like I’m “stalking” posts mentioning their site? I’m a user of Lemmy just the same as anyone else and when I see posts that bring up this toxic person’s site, I can easily help inform people of their gross manipulative behavior.

gofsckyourself ,

Yes, their comment was extremely annoying, both in tone (whining) and content (TL;DR: “pls spoonfeed me basic reading comprehension”). If the guy simply removed the comment, or issued an official warning, it would be 100% warranted.

It’s your right to have an opinion on whether or not you think I was annoying. However, the rest of that is just wrong and needlessly rude. My comment was only to point out how many different ways the title could be interpreted without being explicit in what happened. There is no need to be so rude with your wild assumption. I just found the title to be mildly frustrating due to being vague because of the missing word, and I thought I would express that. Does that warrant moderation action? No. It breaks no rules and there was no intent to be disrespectful, nor is there any real tangible proof of any disrespectful intent.

gofsckyourself ,

I’ve provided plenty of evidence, and there is more to be found if you feel like you need it. Do you really expect me to provide an exhausting dissertation on every single detail of the situation? I provided just enough to back up my claims. If you feel you need more, that’s on you and it’s available for you to find. That does not warrant your baseless accusations.

gofsckyourself ,

Seems like the the whining on mastadon about transparency was more because this guy is following them around harrassing them via public modlog screenshots

Baseless accusation. Got any proof?

gofsckyourself ,

No snark was intended, but I can see why people could interpret it poorly. I won’t claim to be perfect at communicating over Lemmy comments.

gofsckyourself ,

So, because I copied my messages from before explaining the situation in an attempt to educate people about the toxic behavior of the website owner? Should I have wrote a whole new comment instead? Should I just keep quiet and let toxic people not reap the consequences of their actions?

Okay, bud.

gofsckyourself ,

Lol your argument is that the mod abuse is somehow okay because it wasn’t against someone else?

Why should any amount of mod abuse be okay, forgotten, or ‘let go’?

You’ve spent way too much time arguing a shitty position that really has no effect on you. Then you say I need to ’ let it go’?

The irony is too sad to be funny. I feel sorry for you.

gofsckyourself ,

Then based on that logic you’re harassing me. You can’t even follow your own logic.

gofsckyourself ,

I don’t agree with you, but you can think all you want about how annoying or pointless my comment was. That is no excuse for their response, then they doubled down and tried to hide it by abusing their moderator powers. That’s the only part of this that matters.

gofsckyourself ,

So, the facts are somehow not facts because of the source they came from?

You’re insane.

gofsckyourself ,

The facts are presented as neutral because they exist and are neutral.

The moderator deleted messages to hide their negative response, including messages that broke no rules citing a non-existent rule for the reason. They found out that the mod logs are public after they were called out for misusing their moderator powers by deleting messages that broke no rules. Then immediately deleted their account and complained about it on mastodon, very clearly stating that their issue was that mod logs are public.

If you think that those facts somehow change because of the context, then that’s on you. You’re just flat wrong.

Also it’s “bury the lede” 🙂

gofsckyourself ,

Your argument is “they only committed a little bit of mod abuse. You need to let it go!”

gofsckyourself ,

Me: occasionally brings up information for people to be aware of whenever I happen to see the website linked.

You: constantly tries to berate me with terrible logic and even admits to harassment.

Yep. Totally the same.

gofsckyourself ,

Conveniently leaving out quite a bit of important information there to twist the narrative.

Why are you so adamant on trying to attack me throughout this thread? Do you really not have anything better to do? Get a life.

gofsckyourself ,

Don’t bother.

gofsckyourself ,

What you are doing is pathetic

gofsckyourself ,

Bye kiddo

gofsckyourself ,

It has nothing to do with “being hurt”. They showed the kind of scummy person they are.

They showed that if they were willing to go this far to try to hide this, then that shows how low the bar is for them to try to manipulate things to their favor and liking with the trust that was given them as a moderator.

I don’t like the idea of that kind of person reaping the benefits of their site being linked to on the platform they tried to manipulate.

I don’t like the idea of people not facing the consequences of these kinds of actions.

I think people should know who this person is, since they showed their true self and then tried to hide it.

gofsckyourself ,

I made no claims about my comment being perfect. I meant no disrespect or anything, even though I didn’t articulate myself perfectly to display that. Making a comment about an article’s title does not break any rules.

But none of that is the point here. Moderators are held at the very least the same standard as anyone else. As a moderator, they handled such a mild situation very poorly and lashed out, which is already evidence of being unfit to be a moderator. After being downvoted a handful of times they deleted their comment. Then later deleted my comments to even further hide it. My comments broke no rules. Someone else asked what happened and I responded with an answer of the situation, and they deleted that comment as well. They were absolutely abusing their admin to hide their embarrassment.

gofsckyourself ,

They’re making babies and one of them looked at me

gofsckyourself ,

Yeah, that’s weird. It’s pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.

gofsckyourself ,

Obviously it doesn’t matter, but my brain was stuck on the title for a while because you make a decision, not “take” a decision.

gofsckyourself ,

That’s not a real McChicken, though. That’s an advertisement model of one. The one pictured in OP’s image is not a faked model.

If the fake model one counts, then compare it to this:
https://s7d1.scene7.com/is/image/mcdonaldsstage/DC_202302_4314-999_McChicken_1564x1564:product-header-mobile?wid=1500&hei=1500&dpr=off

How is Lemmy better than Reddit?

I am a reddit refugee. Keep seeing that this is supposed to be somehow better than Reddit. As far as I can tell, it follows a similar format, less restrictive on posts being removed I suppose. But It looks like people still get down vote brigaded on some communities. So I’m curious, how it’s better?

gofsckyourself ,

but there’s less hivemind.

The hive mind here is far stronger.

  • anti-anything microsoft
  • anti-anything google
  • unwarranted “just install Linux” everywhere
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines