There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

UraniumBlazer

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

UraniumBlazer ,

Oooo so this is future Florida where women wear Christian Hijabs

UraniumBlazer ,

Nazis are all in on vegetarianism.

This is totally not an attempt to make a bad faith argument against vegetarianism btw.

UraniumBlazer ,

Absolutely correct decision. YouTube is just so incredibly poor. They really need money guys. In fact, we should set up a donations page to support this great organization that totally respects its users and artists while being very strict against spam, dangerous misinformation and state funded propaganda! /s

UraniumBlazer ,

In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.

UraniumBlazer ,

Eating food in cars is just something I find to be SO REPULSIVE.

  • Cars have that plastic-ey smell.
  • Cars make ya motion sick.
  • Food gets EVERYWHERE when u eat it in a car.
  • No matter how hard you clean, those food crumbles stay somewhere in there, which then mix with the plastic-ey car smell.
UraniumBlazer ,

I would rather sit on a rock or something outside rather being in my car.

UraniumBlazer ,

Yeah yeah, I’m just sharing what I like to do lol. Not attacking anyone here

UraniumBlazer ,

I have never experienced any of this. Have you only been in cars that have been made after 2015 or something?

Not rlly. Perhaps I just get motion sick more easily.

Last point is moot because with even the slightest amount of care, food doesn’t drop into the car. Unless you are trying to scarf onion rings while flying down the interstate, I don’t see any of this ever happening.

I have no idea what kind of a millimeter precise mouth u have, but like… Uk, crumbs n stuff get everywhere, sauce may get on ur fingers, some veggies may fall off n stuff like that. I’m not exactly a messy eater too. It’s just… Disgusting… It’s like eating food in bed for instance.

UraniumBlazer ,

Yea, most people (here and on Reddit) argue in bad faith without knowing that they’re arguing in bad faith.

Let’s say u see some statement that u agree/disagree with. The goal should be to reach the truth. Whether you are right or wrong doesn’t really matter. What matters is if u’ve reached the truth. A bad faith argument is when u argue to prove that you r right for reasons other than getting to the truth.

I’ve seen many ppl just write their hypotheses without any further explanations. It’s rlly rlly annoying when these guys r just like, “yeah, but it IS this way” without any evidence, without even any explanations and so on.

Ideally one should exit bad faith arguments, but still… It’s rlly annoying.

UraniumBlazer ,

Exactly. I felt the people here being a lot more hostile too (aside from the nicer instance like the furry instances or Lemmy.blahaj.zone)!

UraniumBlazer ,

All thanks to the CEO union- the government

I took an apple at the cafeteria

It was so bad Ever on and on, I continue circling With nothing but my hate in a carousel of agony 'Til slowly I forget and my heart starts vanishing And suddenly I see that I can’t break free I’m slipping through the cracks of a dark eternity With nothing but my pain and the paralyzing agony To tell me who I am, who I was,...

UraniumBlazer ,

I agree with you. I would like to add though, that coffee in a cafeteria of the Venezuelan kind is quintessential for the existence of the apple species in Uganda due to the very simple laws of motion of quantum mechanics. The theory of everything requires the grand unification of the great countries of Ivory Coast and mechanical dynamics. Modern technologies are built and advanced due to the red bull concentration technique that focuses on driving profits by manufacturing more self driving trains. It’s very simple really. AI will show us how to establish objective philosophical ecologies of the Geonosian kind, where the pains of human existence are equivalent to the bonds between entangled particles in a quantum supercomputer. The future is made up of many possibilities of having ethereal intercourse with Joe Biden.

Your decision of taking an apple at the cafeteria has thus changed the course of human existence.

(This comment was made WITHOUT AI and without any alcohol consumption. The credit goes solely and solely to the not so narcissistic, me).

UraniumBlazer ,

Fun fact: According to the Indian Constitution, India is a “socialist secular Republic”. India had incredibly powerful unions till the 90s. After that, liberalisation happened (which led to significant economic progress). This however, destroyed all socialist institutions that were in place.

It has become so bad, that the wealth inequality is now more than it was under the fucking British Raj.

UraniumBlazer ,

Why is Joe getting access to all his memories and thus realising the Golden Path?

(dune reference)

UraniumBlazer ,

Somebody once told me

The world is gonna wear me

What Do Neural Networks Really Learn? Exploring the Brain of an AI Model (youtu.be)

Neural networks have become increasingly impressive in recent years, but there’s a big catch: we don’t really know what they are doing. We give them data and ways to get feedback, and somehow, they learn all kinds of tasks. It would be really useful, especially for safety purposes, to understand what they have learned and...

UraniumBlazer OP ,

American politicians then: “The solution to a bad man with a gun is a good man who can shoot really sticky stuff really far without getting tired”.

UraniumBlazer ,

Yes we can!

Wait, that one’s taken too? Uggh

UraniumBlazer ,

Just like the Lord intended!

The Lord being me. You’re welcome.

/s

UraniumBlazer ,

Ahem akshually, this photo was taken a few hundred million years ago. Then, the continents didn’t look like they do now. So ahem no, you need to go to school. Uhuhuhuhehehehe.

/s

I have no idea how many brain cells I lost writing that lmao

UraniumBlazer , (edited )

If only… Shoutout to all zoophiles who miss that dino pussy. I feel ur painnnnnn /s

UraniumBlazer OP ,

I can’t see any more efficient ways of getting people from place A to B faster. Hypersonic speeds can’t be achieved on the earth’s surface due to its atmosphere. Therefore, I see only two ways to go about it:

  1. Spaceships that exit and reenter earth’s atmosphere.
  2. Hypersonic trains in a vacuum chamber, I.e., a Hyperloop .

I did compare this above. Like… Wouldn’t Hyperloops be safer and a lot more efficient than spaceships? Basically, the trains vs flights debate of the future.

UraniumBlazer OP ,
  • Expensive
  • Noise pollution
  • Incredibly unsafe

Basically, the future’s version of cars.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Hyperloops are an engineering problem, not a physical one. The same goes with nuclear fusion. Theoretically, nuclear fusion can be done on Earth. However, engineering such a system has taken more than half a century now (n we still don’t have a nuclear fusion reactor yet).

UraniumBlazer OP ,

I mean… Why build HSR if u just have normal rail? It might get u from place A to B faster by an hour or so… What difference would that make?

Turns out it would make quite a lot of difference, right? Faster human transportation in history has always been a good thing.

As for the price, the assumption is that nuclear fusion and lunar mining are mature tech. That would certainly lower the price a lot, no?

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Naah it’s just a fun thought experiment lmao. Don’t care about Mr. Douchebag.

As for the elevated rail thing- we would have to demolish A LOT of on ground infrastructure for that, no? Elevated makes sense for metros n stuff because of smaller turning radii. But for an absolutely straight tube? Ehhh.

Also, we need to factor in vertical turning radii as well, no? Elevation changes r quite drastic on the earth’s surface. Building elevated means building crazy tall pillars and stuff (which also have to be earthquake resistant). Also, we would definitely need to build a lot of tunnels either ways (through hills, mountains, or simple plains whose elevation changes r too steep for our hypersonic vehicle)

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Lmao n what if u ram into a building by mistake while scrolling whatever brainrot social media platform we’ll have by then? Don’t u think we’ve had enough of such occurrences already?

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Ahh so what the metaverse was supposed to be? I think I do see this being more probable than the underground continent spanning Hyperloop network lol.

Maybe full body suits that produce output sensed by all 5 senses? Hmmm, that’s a lot more probable I suppose (and I think would look a lot more dystopian too lol)

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Dayum, I like your wisdom SatansMagottyCumFart! Here’s a song to immortalize your saying!

suno.com/…/e5b4f8b8-2efc-434c-a9fd-b0692ba4d52f(Your saying is the chorus lmao)

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Deal!

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Sure, I think I agree with the AR/VR point. We won’t really need such fast travel when this exists.

As for the physics problem, I didn’t see you mentioning any unsolvable ones. As for the energy required and the resulting pollution, we have nuclear fusion (that’s the premise). We r even mining resources from the moon for this.

This might be an economical problem with AR/VR competing. But a physics problem? Naah

UraniumBlazer OP ,

We already build spaceships that have to experience temperature differentials much much greater than what a hyper loop would have to experience. A Hyperloop would just be an inverted extension of this. Again, an engineering problem - not a physical one.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Expensive TODAY. But when we have nuclear fusion and lunar resources? Not really, no?

This would essentially be a trains vs planes debate of the future. Hypersonic planes or mach speed maglev trains in a vacuum?

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Eh we’re talking about the future. We might have nuclear fusion engines for all we know. But sure, planes could run on hydrogen in theory. Sooo making them green in a hundred years? Sounds kinda possible, no?

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Sure, u won’t need to mine the moon to do this. But resources would be incredibly cheap WHEN we start mining the moon.

I disagree with the energy part though. I’m pretty sure we would need A LOT of energy to dig continent spanning tunnels. How many drills would we run out of? How much energy would be required to recycle these drills?

The point is, the resources required for Hyperloop construction would be cheaper when we uk… Increase their supply (by nuclear fusion or lunar mining). It would thus be kinda economical then, no?

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Agreed. The Concorde wasn’t sustainable.

In my premise, energy is abundant. Resources are abundant.

Also, my comment about speed being good was more from a civilisational perspective. Going from running to horses to rail to the plane (for long distances of course) had incredible advantages for humans. My point was that the Hyperloop would be a natural extension to this whenever the resources and necessary tech become available.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

I don’t think AR/VR will play a big role, I was talking about the acceptance and incorporation of digital systems in our every day lives.

I mean… AR/VR is a step forward in audio/visual IO systems. You technically don’t NEED an HD monitor and a good camera to have a video call. But it definitely makes things easier, no? AR/VR right now sucks. Although it doesn’t mean that it has to suck 100 years in the future.

Plus there’s already plenty of resources online that go into great detail about all the things that are totally impossible.

None of them talking about the physical impossibility of it. All issues of the hyperloop are economical ones. My premise removes these issues.

as you even start to contemplate this you run into huge issues.

Them being economical issues. NOT physical ones.

They still need fuel, they still produce nuclear waste

Sourcing fuel is incredibly easy if we have a mature nuclear fusion energy supply ecosystem. Most likely, nuclear fuel would be deuterium and tritium. Sourcing deuterium is very very easy. For tritium, you would just need breeding blankets at reactor walls. I don’t see how this tech won’t be mature a 100-150 years from now. As for nuclear waste, the fusion processes produce negligible waste. It’s the breeding blankets that could be the source of waste. They too won’t produce waste that would have to sit for more than a 100 years without being recycled/repurposed/disposed off.

the unwarranted fear people have towards nuclear fission

The politics around this is changing slowly. I don’t think it would be that many decades before people start liking nuclear fission again.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

The hyperloop is a dumb project today. Think about it this way: U live in Siberia in the 1600s. U just discovered oil (and also processes to refine it). You most likely would make heating oil from it to keep you warm. But then if I told you that you could also use 1000 times the amount you use in a month to go to America in just a few hours, you would probably call me a dumbass. Would you be right then? Yes. Would you be right now? No.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Don’t parrot what idiots like Musk say.

Aren’t you parroting what others say too though? You haven’t provided a single PHYSICAL problem. You are just telling me, “it doesn’t work that way”, without giving a single thesis statement.

And if people tell you there’s huge physics issues, think about that instead of waving it away and say “it’s just engineering”.

I have. I’m not saying that we will have anti gravity spaceships. The physics for anti-gravity simply doesn’t exist. I am talking about a vacuum tube. That is the biggest holdup. We have already built small vacuum chambers. The physics is there. HOW is this a PHYSICAL problem?

Give me one single reason as to why the laws of physics prevent hyperloops.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

I’m sorry you feel that way. I think I explained my position very clearly whenever I disagreed with you.

I did “look into stuff” as you asked. Perhaps I didn’t look into the resources that you were talking about. Maybe you should’ve linked those sources in your post instead of saying “go look it up”.

I do listen to what other people have to say. That doesn’t mean I have to agree with it always, no? Whenever I disagree, I always explain my underlying motivation.

I really cannot see how I was arguing in bad faith anywhere above.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

I’m not rlly that aware of how boring works, so I’ll take ur word for it there I suppose.

Any moon mining is going to be expensive because it’s the moon. That kind of travel is going to be expensive.

For this tho, u don’t have to “travel” anywhere. U just build a one time installation on the moon, which would be expensive. Once it’s built, u just launch stuff from the moon using a railgun like system with enough velocity to deorbit it, use the earth’s atmosphere to slow down enough that the material doesn’t vaporize on a crash landing in a designated location. This would most likely be how we would get our material in the future.

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Whose cost would be energy and light wear and tear on the railgun. Which won’t be much at all.

(I thought by “travel”, u meant having to use spaceships to transport material which would be significantly more expensive).

UraniumBlazer OP ,

Which would be incredibly cheap even in 2024 (compared to the amount of resources being transported).

How dense would the atmosphere need to be to result in a cataclysmic chain reaction during a nuclear explosion?

Famously, Oppenheimer and co worked out how close a nuclear bomb test would be to causing a chain reaction of nitrogen fusion in the atmosphere. They made a lot of worst-case-scenario assumptions and still came to the conclusion that no, a nuclear bomb test wouldn’t scour the surface of the world....

UraniumBlazer ,

It would turn scary if the atmosphere would become as dense as the core of a star. Then too, a lot of stuff depends on the type of star we’re talking about. Are we talking about some wimpy red dwarf core density? Yeah, we’ll fuse the hydrogen in the atmosphere/on the surface all right. U wanna fuse nitrogen? Oof. U’r gonna need a much bigger star than that.

So basically, to become scary, ur atmosphere would have to be a lot more dense than what it would be if it was fkin solid (like if the gases were literally solid). It wouldn’t thus be an atmosphere.

So don’t worry. Have fun blowing up ur nukes!

UraniumBlazer ,

Thin Blue line fellas being hypocrites again smh /s

UraniumBlazer ,

Awww look at Mr cutie patootie here UwU

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •