every single report by a user matters more as they’re sent to every federated instance
For example:
As a user of instance ‘a’ if you don’t like your moderators’ actions/inactions, now you can easily jump to instance ‘b’ which still provides you access to the previous communities that you were subbed to
due to this interconnected complex system, instance admins and moderators are more likely to take reports seriously and attempt to provide their users with the most reasonable services and logic
all of which means that bot accounts are highly scrutinized than regular users
sorry for the long explanation but I hope this helps you understand how and why🤗
Summary: The article from EL PAÍS discusses a study predicting a significant decline in the global population by 2100. Here’s a summary:
Global Population Decline: The study, published in The Lancet by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, forecasts that by 2050, 155 out of 204 countries will have fertility rates too low to maintain their populations. By 2100, this will rise to 97% of countries.
Fertility Rate Drop: The fertility rate is plummeting worldwide. For instance, Spain’s fertility rate decreased from 2.47 children per woman in 1950 to 1.26 in 2021, with projections of 1.23 in 2050 and 1.11 in 2100. This trend is mirrored globally, with France, Germany, and the European average also experiencing declines.
Economic and Social Impact: The study urges governments to prepare for the economic, health, environmental, and geopolitical challenges posed by an aging and shrinking population.
Regional Differences: While rich countries already face very low fertility rates, low-income regions start from higher rates. Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, will see a significant increase in its share of global births, from 18% in 2021 to 35% in 2100.
Migration as a Temporary Solution: The authors suggest that international migration could temporarily address demographic imbalances, but as fertility decline is a universal phenomenon, it’s not a long-term solution.
The article highlights the need for strategic planning to address the impending demographic shifts and their associated challenges¹.
<p>In the face of an aging global population and the consequent rise in dementia cases, a recent study published in the journal <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.02.009"><em>Neurobiology of Aging</em></a> offers hope in understanding and potentially mitigating cognitive decline. The research reveals that individuals with high levels of openness – a personality trait characterized by imagination, curiosity, and a wide range of interests – tend to have a stronger cognitive reserve.</p>
<p>This cognitive reserve can protect against the negative impacts of brain pathology, including conditions like Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia. The study suggests promoting openness across the adult lifespan as a means to bolster this protective reserve.</p>
<p>The concept of cognitive reserve has emerged as a crucial area of study within neuroscience and psychology. It describes the brain’s resilience to neuropathological damage, explaining why some individuals maintain cognitive function despite significant brain aging or disease. With dementia predicted to almost triple globally within the next 30 years, understanding and enhancing cognitive reserve could be key to addressing this looming public health crisis.</p>
<p>“We know that some people are less susceptible to age-related pathological changes in the brain and therefore perform better on cognitive tasks than expected given their brain status. These individuals are said to have higher cognitive reserve,” explained study authors Annabell Coors (a postdoctoral researcher) and Yaakov Stern (the Florence Irving Professor of Neuropsychology), who are both affiliated with the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.</p>
<p>“It is important to better understand what makes them different and what we can learn from them to help us age healthier. And we can also use this knowledge to identify individuals who are at increased risk of cognitive decline in the presence of brain pathology, and then develop interventions specifically targeted to them. We assumed that personality influences leisure behavior and may therefore be related to the level of cognitive reserve.”</p>
<p>The study included 399 individuals ranging in age from 19 to 80 years, with a slight majority being female. This wide age range allowed the researchers to examine the effects of personality traits across the adult lifespan. Each participant underwent a series of cognitive assessments designed to measure performance across four domains: fluid reasoning, vocabulary, memory, and perceptual speed.</p>
<p>To assess personality, the study used the 50-item Big Five Inventory. This assessment tool is widely recognized for its reliability in measuring the five major dimensions of personality: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.</p>
<p>In parallel with these cognitive and personality assessments, the study incorporated advanced neuroimaging techniques to evaluate the participants’ brain health. This involved using MRI scans to measure cortical thickness and volume in specific regions of the brain associated with cognitive function.</p>
<p>The researchers observed a positive association between higher levels of openness and enhanced cognitive reserve. Openness was found to be beneficial across several cognitive domains, including fluid reasoning, vocabulary, and perceptual speed. Specifically, individuals with higher openness demonstrated better cognitive performance in these areas, even after controlling for the physical condition of their brains. This suggests that the trait of openness contributes to an individual’s ability to maintain cognitive functions despite the presence of brain pathologies, such as those seen in Alzheimer’s disease.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the protective effect of openness was particularly notable in the domain of perceptual speed. The study found that for individuals with high levels of openness, the status of their brain health was almost unrelated to changes in perceptual speed over time. In contrast, individuals with lower openness exhibited a more pronounced decline in this cognitive domain as their brain health deteriorated.</p>
<p>“The key message is that it is beneficial to be and remain open to experiences, as high openness helps counteract the negative effects of age-related brain pathology on cognition,” Coors and Stern told PsyPost.</p>
<p>While the protective effect of high openness was evident, the study did not find similar protective associations for other personality traits such as conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, or neuroticism. This specificity suggests that the mechanisms through which openness influences cognitive reserve may be unique and distinct from those of other personality traits.</p>
<p>“We expected high neuroticism (low emotional stability) to be detrimental and to underlie lower cognitive reserve, but we found no association between neuroticism and cognitive reserve,” Coors and Stern said. “We believe that some previous studies found this association because their study samples included individuals who already had or were about to develop Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease may be a common underlying cause of both high neuroticism and low cognitive reserve, without high neuroticism and low cognitive reserve being directly related.”</p>
<p>The personality assessment focused on broad traits without delving into the subtleties of personality subfacets, which could offer more detailed insights into the relationship between personality and cognitive reserve. In addition, the study’s cross-sectional design limits the ability to infer causality between personality traits and cognitive outcomes.</p>
<p>“It would have been interesting to gain more detailed insights into which sub facets of openness are particularly relevant to cognitive reserve,” Coors and Stern explained. “However, we assessed each personality trait only with 10 items, which does not allow for a more detailed examination of the sub facets.”</p>
<p>By demonstrating that high openness is associated with a stronger cognitive reserve, the study suggests that interventions aimed at enhancing openness could play a role in preventing cognitive decline. This could be particularly beneficial for individuals at higher risk of dementia, offering a non-pharmacological approach to maintaining cognitive health.</p>
<p>“One of our major goals is to better understand how cognitive reserve is implemented in the brain, i.e., how brain organization differs between individuals with high and low cognitive reserve,” the researchers added.</p>
<p>“A person’s personality is not set in stone, and major life changes, such as marriage, divorce, or unemployment, have been found to be related to personality changes (e.g. Bühler et al., 2023, European Journal of Personality). Further, it has been found that openness often decreases in older age, which might be due to changes in the environment, such as retirement or less exposure to new and challenging contexts (e.g. Bleidorn et al., 2022, Psychological Bulletin). One strategy to prevent a decline in openness may be to engage in volunteer work or training in new skills and competencies (Mühlig-Versen et al., 2012, Psychology and Aging).”</p>
<p>The study, “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0197458024000368" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Personality traits and cognitive reserve—High openness benefits cognition in the presence of age-related brain changes</a>,” was authored by Annabell Coors, Seonjoo Lee, Christian Habeck, and Yaakov Stern.</p>
This is why you don’t sign up with the biggest possible instances, eventually they will become the biggest possible bottleneck in a network. Anything dot world admins do will affect all of their users, that shouldn’t be surprising 🤷
As for dbzer0, this might affect users in the short term but eventually people will figure out how to access the sub from more friendly instances.
Content loads just as fast on small subs as on large subs. Not so for instances. I think centralization is inevitable unless federated data transfer gets faster.
Pornhub has disabled its site in Texas to object to a state law that requires the company to verify the age of users to prevent minors from accessing the site....
I do wonder how this kind of thing will mesh with sites that arent for porn but do allow posting of it. Like reddit or for that manner any lemmy instance federated with one of the instances with nsfw subs
Not really. If you’ve been on Reddit for more than a decade you really could see a cultural shift. Lemmy feels smaller and more filterable. If you curate your subscriptions and exclude more extreme Instances it’s quite all right.
Whenever I read Reddit outside of my niche subs it just feels almost distopian, is become a very weird place.
With the advent of the m3, m2’s and m1’s still in inventory can be a steal, particularly 'Air macs which can be sub-1k easy. My mbp m2pro 16g was 1500. I’m not impressed by real-life macos performance tho, a lot of it is impressive in parts (blender rendering for instance) but everyday life is just the same… Yes, the same hanging Color Wheel Of Doom.
I hope your 5k investment isn’t having sound playback hiccups because dropbox is trying to log in and refresh in the background. I am actually furious with the 10% of the time I have to use macos on this machine.
What are some of your favorite communities that feature topics like literature, science, ecology, aerospace, technology, politics, history, arts, culture, theory, and debate?...
In my own experience I found that .world communities are usually the ones to stay away from. Most of the comments devolve into petty bickering and go off topic quickly. It was a great improvement when I made a new sub list of topics from other instances. They arent as active, but the quality of discussions is higher and respectful.
A six-week audit by the Federal Aviation Administration of Boeing’s production of the 737 MAX jet found dozens of problems throughout the manufacturing process at the plane maker and one of its key suppliers, according to a slide presentation reviewed by The New York Times....
This article makes clear how Mr. Barnett called on Boeing on numerous dangerous practices, which Boeing fully denied. But it seems the FAA was able to confirm at least some of Mr. Barnett’s testimony.
Here follow some notable parts:
He later told the BBC that workers had failed to follow procedures intended to track components through the factory, allowing defective components to go missing.
He said in some cases, sub-standard parts had even been removed from scrap bins and fitted to planes that were being built to prevent delays on the production line.
He also claimed that tests on emergency oxygen systems due to be fitted to the 787 showed a failure rate of 25%, meaning that one in four could fail to deploy in a real-life emergency.
Mr Barnett said he had alerted managers to his concerns, but no action had been taken.
Boeing denied his assertions. However, a 2017 review by the US regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), did uphold some of Mr Barnett’s concerns.
It established that the location of at least 53 “non-conforming” parts in the factory was unknown, and that they were considered lost. Boeing was ordered to take remedial action.
I wonder what the results were for the remedial actions imposed on Boeing in 2017. Were they able to account for the lost parts, particularly in light of Mr. Barnett’s claims of garbage parts being used from the garbage bins?
Sounds like a particular corporation is being scummy.
His death comes at a time when production standards at both Boeing and its key supplier Spirit Aerosystems are under intense scrutiny.
Gosh, this is convenient for Boeing and Spirit. Very, very convenient.
And it’s clear the FAA is pissed:
A preliminary report from the US National Transportation Safety Board suggested that four key bolts, designed to hold the door securely in place, were not fitted.
Last week, the FAA said a six-week audit of the company had found “multiple instances where the company allegedly failed to comply with manufacturing quality control requirements”.
Returning to the top of the article, we see the use of quotes around “self-inflicted”:
Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett’s passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.
It said the 62-year-old had died from a “self-inflicted” wound on 9 March and police were investigating.
Yeah, the quotes look very appropriate to me.
Rest in Power, Mr. Barnett. I’m truly sorry for you and your family.
Which is why I am talking about a new option, which does not yet exist but I am saying that I wish that it did.
Likewise, two previous options that went from not-existing to now-existing-and-are-extremely-helpful are the ability to block an entire instance rather than each community and each user on that instance separately, and the ability to set your language preferences and have most (or at least some?) even if not all communities dedicated entirely to a different language not show up.
Likewise, if you could specifically target - either in the positive sense of subscribing to or in the negative sense of blocking - communities that match certain pre-defined keywords that communities could choose to use to identify themselves, like “hockey” or more generally “sports”, or to use another example “vegetarian cooking” or more generally “cooking”, then later if tens or even hundreds of additional communities were to be spun up within that same category, you could remain subscribed to or block them ALL, if you so chose, without having to make that determination for each and every single one, individually, and then repeat that process every time a new one appears. This could be modified by making a stronger choice of an individual community override the weaker choice of a mere category - e.g. if I like hockey but hate a particular team (fuck those guys in particular) or whatever.
Since these types of communities (as “sports” or “cooking” or “which app used to connect to Lemmy” etc.) rarely correlate with instance, this has nothing to do with a Local feed. Rather it is like the other two aforementioned examples in that, depending on implementation, possibly being able to affect your Subscription (adding subs to categories of communities) and All (minus categories of things you would prefer to not see) feeds. The latter is where it is most helpful b/c if you were looking for new things to subscribe to, but you will NEVER in your life ever subscribe to e.g. sports or cooking, then it saves you a great deal of time & effort from having to make those determinations on a per-post or per-community basis. Especially when they can be quite popular to other people, and thus ranked highly when sorted by Top or also Hot b/c of the interactivity with them, but when your preferences diverge from the mainstream. It helps make the whole place much more “welcoming” then, when automation more or less mindlessly takes care of such things that otherwise would require individual curation effort to achieve.
“Default behavior” can be an entirely separate matter, or it could be related but I am saying that it does not have to be. The way I am thinking of it, this would all be optional, just like blocking or subscribing to a community is now. Eventually some app could even offer a wizard to guide users through selecting those keywords that they might want, but that is getting too far ahead of ourselves here.
A couple things. From my experience with Lemmy, you can subscribe to communities you want to see, the same way you could subscribe to subreddits. There’s a subscribed feed, a local feed, and an all feed.
The way Reddit handled this is that there was a default set of subreddits that everyone would get. Things like /r/pics … Whether you were browsing as a guest or as a user, by default, you could see that sub. I believe there was an option for “all” but nobody used it AFAIK. So you started with a small default (whatever Reddit thought you should see), and went from there. I’m sure, in more recent times on Reddit, it will also show you things that the algorithm wants you to see, either because Reddit is being paid to show it to you, or because it’s adjacent to your currently subscribed subreddits.
Lemmy isn’t substantially different when it comes to the subscribed feed, with one big exception: you don’t really start with anything. So the subscribed feed is pretty bare, but the local feed is full of anything on the same instance as you are, and the all feed is everything that’s local or has been brought in by federation. There may be some limits on this, for example, to NSFW stuff, but I’m not certain and it’s likely up to the discretion of each Lemmy instance admin to make those choices.
The difference is in an exclusionary mindset vs an inclusionary mindset. Reddit follows an exclusionary mindset, eg. We’re only going to show you what you say you want and exclude all others. Lemmy is more inclusionary, where you will see everything unless you say otherwise.
The same functionality exists here, like it did on Reddit, to only see what you’re subscribed to, but you have to go and find what you want, subscribe, and then stick to your subscribed feed.
I’ve personally spent a lot of time on the /c/all feed specifically to find what communities I want to subscribe to so eventually, I can just stick to the subscribed feed. I’m not too the point where I think the subscribed feed has quite enough communities to keep me engaged, but I’m getting there.
The option exists and you don’t need to block entire communities to get there, but you can use block for it if you want. There’s nothing wrong with either methodology.
It’s an instance that automatically reposts every post made in certain Reddit subs.
I don’t like it, and blocked the entire instance because I don’t like the whole automatic repost thing, especially when the OP probably won’t even see any responses
I hope this is the right place for this post because from my 2-day experience in lemmy.world I see signs of a dystopic online community in which it is not permitted to express anti-zionist opinions. If you think this post would fit better in another forum, would you point it out to me? Unless automod gets to me first?...
Case #1 - looks like the moderator of that community doesn’t think the headline fits the sub. I don’t get any particular sense that the reason for removal was in any way political.
Case #2 - as the moderator explained, the auto moderator on Lemmy is basically still in beta stage and is still very much a work in progress.
In both cases, it seems you got a fair explanation as to what happened to your posts. I think it’s a bit premature to start making accusations of some kind of political conspiracy about this instance in general.
I’d like to start doing a better job of tracking the changes I made to my homelab environment. Hardware, software, network, etc. I’m just not sure what path I want to take and was hoping to get some recommendations. So far the thoughts I have are:...
Lemmy is more work to get on and then find an apk to use. There needs to just be a simple and clear instruction set to get people over. Like a link to an instance they can easily join and here’s a good app to use. Sort by /all and top from last 24 hours.
Right now there are waaaay less users, so content is low compared to reddit, and you can’t just create your own sub at the drop of a hat.
Hexbear is more sane than it seems but their loudest voices are… Quite loud. Generally because of the tools they had that other instances don’t and just come off as annoying to anyone outside of the community.
The problem with judging where the Chapo diaspora ended up is that while Hexbear started from the sub ban it has become a fairly different community and there’s also quite a lot of shared users between Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad, and Hexbear, and then there’s the fact that the exit of the radical left from Reddit was about more than Chapo alone.
Any given sub is only hosted on one instance, although moderators can be on other instances. I don’t know how moderation changes propagate across other instances. I hope someone else will explain that.
<p>New research sheds light on the psychosexual and psychosocial effects of polygamous marriages. This study, published in <a href="https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-023-02830-1"><em>BMC Women’s Health</em></a>, provides a comprehensive analysis of how polygamous relationships impact women’s sexual function and psychological well-being, revealing significant differences when compared to their counterparts in monogamous marriages.</p>
<p>Polygamy, particularly polygyny, where a man has multiple wives, is a marital practice found in various cultures worldwide, with notable prevalence in sub-Saharan African countries. However, the psychosexual and psychosocial dimensions of polygamous marriages, especially in comparison with monogamous unions, have received scant attention in medical and psychological research. This study aims to fill that gap by examining these aspects among Somali women, contributing to a deeper understanding of the implications of polygamous marriages.</p>
<p>The researchers conducted a cross-sectional study involving 607 women who visited the gynecology clinic of Mogadishu’s Somali Turkey Training and Research Hospital. These participants were selected based on specific criteria, ensuring a focus on sexually active women without major health or psychological issues that could confound the study’s findings.</p>
<p>The study found that 28.3% of the women were in polygamous marriages, a figure that places Somalia among the countries with the highest prevalence of polygamy in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of these polygamous arrangements consisted of two wives, followed by three and four wives, highlighting a common marital structure within Somali society.</p>
<p>The research revealed significant differences in psychosexual and psychosocial outcomes between women in monogamous and polygamous marriages. Women in polygamous relationships exhibited lower scores on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), indicating decreased sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, and satisfaction levels compared to their monogamous counterparts. This suggests that the dynamics and complexities inherent in polygamous marriages, such as altered roles and expectations, may adversely affect women’s sexual health.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study found that women in polygamous marriages scored higher on the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), reflecting greater psychological distress, including increased levels of anxiety and depression. This aligns with previous research indicating that polygamous marriages can be associated with lower self-esteem and higher mental health challenges for women.</p>
<p>Notably, first wives in polygamous unions showed the highest levels of anxiety and depression, which could be attributed to the “first-wife syndrome,” reflecting the emotional and psychological impact of sharing a husband with other wives.</p>
<p>The study also explored socio-demographic factors, revealing that lower education levels among women and higher income levels among husbands were associated with a higher likelihood of being in a polygamous marriage. This indicates that socio-economic factors play a crucial role in the prevalence and nature of polygamous relationships in Somalia.</p>
<p>“Our findings suggest that women in polygamous marriages experience considerably higher psychosexual and psychosocial adverse effects as compared with their monogamous counterparts,” the researchers concluded. “This study also shows that, in underdeveloped countries like Somalia, illiterateness of women constitutes one of the major contributors to polygamous marriages.”</p>
<p>However, the study is not without its limitations. Its findings, derived from a single-center study, may not fully represent the broader Somali population or those in other regions with similar marital practices. Despite these constraints, the research offers invaluable insights into the psychosexual and psychosocial challenges facing women in polygamous marriages, pointing to the need for broader, more inclusive studies to better understand and address these issues.</p>
<p>The study, “<a href="https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-023-02830-1">The psychosexual and psychosocial impacts of polygamous marriages: a cross-sectional study among Somali women</a>,” was authored by Adil Barut and Samira Ahmed Mohamud.</p>
Good on you for asking instead of just assuming these are of earth-shaking importance and infinite hilarity to everyone on the planet.
I'm sure there are politics, political "humor" subs where this fits right in. Several, in fact, on several instances. I would check my blocklist but it is a dozen pages long at this point, and not searchable. You're on World, so have a look at https://lemmy.world/communities
A lot of Redditors hate the Reddit IPO | Reddit warned us that its users were a risk factor, and boy do they sound excited about shorting its stock.::Reddit seems like a likely candidate for a meme stock. But the actual reaction suggests that r/WallStreetBets isn’t going to send the stock to the moon.
Also, for some hobbies/interests, there really isn’t another space. For instance, if you’re into tactical gear, there’s really not another community like r/tacticalgear. Lemmy has the promise of being free from Reddit’s admin and moderator madness, but doesn’t have the user base and neither do any other sites.
TwoXChromosomes has the same problem, though of course it has a much wider appeal. The moderators there protested the API changes and the gradual decline of Reddit in general, but they face two bad choices, and I genuinely don’t know the right answer:
Keep serving as a large and visible space for women within the confines of Reddit’s sinking ship
Abandon Reddit (ship) and let Reddit powermods run a space that they may be uniquely unqualified to operate. those same powermods/admins don’t care about doing the right thing in every other sub they control, so why would they ensure that women are protected from, say, tracking their visits to Planned Parenthood and selling that data to “advertisers” or hostile governments.
We need Reddit to truly self-destruct to ensure an Exodus, and right now it’s crumbling but not broken yet. It’s honestly sort of a mirror to society in general. We’re in the Crumbles, and every day we inch closer to the final straw that breaks the camel’s back.
reddit users discuss its enshittification [SafeReddit mirror] (safereddit.com)
Sad...
Humanity will shrink in the future: 97% of countries will experience negative growth by 2100 (english.elpais.com)
Lemmy.world seems to have banned the largest piracy community on Lemmy. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:...
Pre-IPO Reddit lets ads be dressed up as promoted user posts (www.theregister.com)
Well, look at that. Ads disguised as posts.
Pornhub disables website in Texas after AG sues for not verifying users’ ages (thehill.com)
Pornhub has disabled its site in Texas to object to a state law that requires the company to verify the age of users to prevent minors from accessing the site....
‘Deluded’ Hamas made a ‘catastrophic miscalculation’, say Palestinian analysts (www.thejc.com)
Fanless linux laptop
I’m looking for an Apple MacBook Air M2 alternative that could run Linux....
(Serious) What are your favorite high quality Lemmy communities?
What are some of your favorite communities that feature topics like literature, science, ecology, aerospace, technology, politics, history, arts, culture, theory, and debate?...
New details revealed from FAA audit of Boeing’s 737 MAX production. Dozens of issues found (www.seattletimes.com)
A six-week audit by the Federal Aviation Administration of Boeing’s production of the 737 MAX jet found dozens of problems throughout the manufacturing process at the plane maker and one of its key suppliers, according to a slide presentation reviewed by The New York Times....
India moves to implement controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims (www.cnn.com)
Boeing whistleblower found dead in US (www.bbc.com)
Now all these f*ing zoomers are telling me that I'm out of touch!? (lemmy.tf)
I don’t know what everyone means when they use ‘rule’ in the title and at this point I’m too afraid to ask. Please enlighten me.
What's your favorite community on Lemmy that has no equivalent elsewhere?
Am I in lemmy.world or in lemmy.zionistworld? (lemmy.world)
I hope this is the right place for this post because from my 2-day experience in lemmy.world I see signs of a dystopic online community in which it is not permitted to express anti-zionist opinions. If you think this post would fit better in another forum, would you point it out to me? Unless automod gets to me first?...
Change tracking ideas
I’d like to start doing a better job of tracking the changes I made to my homelab environment. Hardware, software, network, etc. I’m just not sure what path I want to take and was hoping to get some recommendations. So far the thoughts I have are:...
Lemmy Active Users looking good (discuss.tchncs.de)
Source: fedidb.org/software/lemmy
HOLY HELL! (sh.itjust.works)
(source)
What does Lemmy do better than Reddit?
Just found this space, I’m trying to play around with this platform. Can anyone help to explain?
Where can I post funny things that a US politician said?
These are the items in question:...
A lot of Redditors hate the Reddit IPO | Reddit warned us that its users were a risk factor, and boy do they sound excited about shorting its stock. (www.theverge.com)
A lot of Redditors hate the Reddit IPO | Reddit warned us that its users were a risk factor, and boy do they sound excited about shorting its stock.::Reddit seems like a likely candidate for a meme stock. But the actual reaction suggests that r/WallStreetBets isn’t going to send the stock to the moon.