There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Firefox Browser Blocks Anti-Censorship Add-Ons at Russia’s Request

Mozilla, the maker of the popular web browser Firefox, said it received government demands to block add-ons that circumvent censorship.

The Mozilla Foundation, the entity behind the web browser Firefox, is blocking various censorship circumvention add-ons for its browser, including ones specifically to help those in Russia bypass state censorship. The add-ons were blocked at the request of Russia’s federal censorship agency, Roskomnadzor — the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media — according to a statement by Mozilla to The Intercept.

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information.”

Stanislav Shakirov, the chief technical officer of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian open internet group, said he hoped it was a rash decision by Mozilla that will be more carefully examined.

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information, and its policy was somewhat different,” Shakirov said. “And due to these values, it should not be so simple to comply with state censors and fulfill the requirements of laws that have little to do with common sense.”

Developers of digital tools designed to get around censorship began noticing recently that their Firefox add-ons were no longer available in Russia.

On June 8, the developer of Censor Tracker, an add-on for bypassing internet censorship restrictions in Russia and other former Soviet countries, made a post on the Mozilla Foundation’s discussion forums saying that their extension was unavailable to users in Russia.

The developer of another add-on, Runet Censorship Bypass, which is specifically designed to bypass Roskomnadzor censorship, posted in the thread that their extension was also blocked. The developer said they did not receive any notification from Mozilla regarding the block.

Two VPN add-ons, Planet VPN and FastProxy — the latter explicitly designed for Russian users to bypass Russian censorship — are also blocked. VPNs, or virtual private networks, are designed to obscure internet users’ locations by routing users’ traffic through servers in other countries.

The Intercept verified that all four add-ons are blocked in Russia. If the webpage for the add-on is accessed from a Russian IP address, the Mozilla add-on page displays a message: “The page you tried to access is not available in your region.” If the add-on is accessed with an IP address outside of Russia, the add-on page loads successfully.

Supervision of Communications

Roskomnadzor is responsible for “control and supervision in telecommunications, information technology, and mass communications,” according to the Russia’s federal censorship agency’s English-language page.

In March, the New York Times reported that Roskomnadzor was increasing its operations to restrict access to censorship circumvention technologies such as VPNs. In 2018, there were multiple user reports that Roskomnadzor had blocked access to the entire Firefox Add-on Store.

According to Mozilla’s Pledge for a Healthy Internet, the Mozilla Foundation is “committed to an internet that includes all the peoples of the earth — where a person’s demographic characteristics do not determine their online access, opportunities, or quality of experience.” Mozilla’s second principle in their manifesto says, “The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.”

The Mozilla Foundation, which in tandem with its for-profit arm Mozilla Corporation releases Firefox, also operates its own VPN service, Mozilla VPN. However, it is only available in 33 countries, a list that doesn’t include Russia.

The same four censorship circumvention add-ons also appear to be available for other web browsers without being blocked by the browsers’ web stores. Censor Tracker, for instance, remains available for the Google Chrome web browser, and the Chrome Web Store page for the add-on works from Russian IP addresses. The same holds for Runet Censorship Bypass, VPN Planet, and FastProxy.

“In general, it’s hard to recall anyone else who has done something similar lately,” said Shakirov, the Russian open internet advocate. “For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”

preasket ,

Better than Firefox being blocked in Russia. Addons can be added from files anyway.

sugar_in_your_tea ,

And they can be renamed, so the authorities will need to play whack-a-mole.

Nioxic ,

im not TOO surprised.

they’re a non-profit company after all. they’re not political activists etc.

that said, it hardly matters, because its open source.

dukethorion ,
@dukethorion@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe if all tech companies told Russia and China to fuck off, they’d all get banned in those two countries, further isolating their citizenry, in hope that those citizens would eventually get fed up and say enough is enough, through whatever means necessary.

I’m sure plenty of Russians and Chinese put up with their governments, but are they willing to become North Koreas?

MehBlah ,

Not likely from what I’ve read the majority of russians don’t have flushing toilets. So the internet is probably a few notches down on the whole basic needs thing.

iAvicenna ,
@iAvicenna@lemmy.world avatar

welp time to browser hop soon

Ultraviolet ,

Unfortunately there are no other options. Literally everything else is Chromium based and ruined by Manifest v3.

Ibaudia ,
@Ibaudia@lemmy.world avatar

They can either lose the Russian market entirely or capitulate to this demand, I think it’s pretty obvious what they’re going to choose. Mozilla may be an NPO but it still needs revenue to survive.

ikidd ,
@ikidd@lemmy.world avatar

Besides, it’s open source. Anyone can pull it down and compile it without the fuckery, or download a binary from another source, or use a package manager that presumably would have a normal version for that distro.

Ibaudia ,
@Ibaudia@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, and you can install extensions even if they’re not on Mozilla’s addon store.

Omniraptor ,

afaik they can’t do any business with Russian customers since March 2022 because of the sanctions

uis ,

Wait, they complied to Roscomnadzor? This is so stupid. It’s literal Big Brother.

Долбоёбы.

uis ,

“In general, it’s hard to recall anyone else who has done something similar lately,” said Shakirov, the Russian open internet advocate. “For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”

Wait. Are they first to comply?

Renegade , (edited )

So is this what Mozilla meant when they announced a privacy push back in February

fortune.com/…/mozilla-firefox-ceo-laura-chambers-…

cheddar ,
@cheddar@programming.dev avatar

I see a lot of gentle replies. I wonder if they would have looked the same if the browser in question was Google Chrome. The issue is that you can’t win this game. They ask you one thing, then another, then another, until you either fully comply or stop cooperating, and they block you anyway. That’s a reputational hit for the company and its product, whose only competitive advantage was its reputation.

nadram ,
@nadram@lemmy.world avatar

Well said and a good reminder to keep our loyalties / fanboyisms in check

fruitycoder ,

Mozilla fanboy here, this feels like an absolute diversion from the mission. They should have at least notified the community and devs some how, delayed the best they could, and then ban them to prevent being censored too. They better fight it or at empower someone that can (both technical circumvention attempts and legal rectification).

RedAggroBest ,

It’s a handful of addons (open source, available to be added via files) rather than the whole browser that are now available in Russia. Seems better to cut loss there and remain available as long as a workaround exists I’d think?

Kroxx ,

I think this is the big takeaway for me as a Firefox user. I switched the over from chrome about a year ago and I’ve been enjoying/promoting Firefox since.

I’m not saying that I will stop doing that but we should definitely not be blind or unwilling to criticize Firefox just because we are big fans of the service.

Konstant ,

I mean, I’m not ditching Firefox over this.

fin ,

We’ll keep using Firefox until they finally realize it’s a bad practice to trust a company.

kuneho ,
@kuneho@lemmy.world avatar

Are these only “just” pulled from the online catalog, or the browser itself blocks installation too from file?

If the prior, I don’t really like this action, but my browser won’t change because of it (for now?) and also Mozilla and Firefox served me well in the past almost 20 years since I use it, I trust these guys.

If the latter… that could be a different story.

Skullgrid ,
@Skullgrid@lemmy.world avatar

Are these only “just” pulled from the online catalog, or the browser itself blocks installation too from file?

The Intercept verified that all four add-ons are blocked in Russia. If the webpage for the add-on is accessed from a Russian IP address, the Mozilla add-on page displays a message: “The page you tried to access is not available in your region.” If the add-on is accessed with an IP address outside of Russia, the add-on page loads successfully.

kuneho ,
@kuneho@lemmy.world avatar

ah okay, thanks, I missed this one.

Allero ,

So what they’re essentially said is that they’re gonna follow the rules for now to not be insta-banned, but will consider how to act next given the time they have received.

Which is why it’s important to tell Mozilla it really is a bad choice to follow Russian censors.

kawa ,
@kawa@reddeet.com avatar

What the actual fuck Mozilla

Aux ,

Their choice is to either block access to a set of add-ons from Russia or to get their whole infrastructure blocked by Roskomnadzor.

cley_faye ,

Officially, the world is taking the second option in general.

Aux ,

When did that ever happen? GitHub cooperates with Roskomnadzor, Apple cooperates with Roskomnadzor, Google cooperates with Roskomnadzor.

uis ,

Don’t remember GH cooperating with rkn, but others did it for money. And still do.

Aux ,

Well, time to refresh your memory - en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_GitHub scroll down to the section about Russia.

uis ,

Huh. Lol.

johannesvanderwhales ,

Every piece of software that’s available in Russia or China has to comply with their laws. Their laws are fucked up. This is also very easy to circumvent.

FiniteBanjo , (edited )

Yeh they enshitified starting quite some time ago, and with only sub-3% market share lmao.

If you like GECKO based browsers like firefox then try out Waterfox or others.

Allero ,

I think it’s important to support the original Mozilla since they are the engine developers and need resources to make all other gecko-based browsers possible.

Currently though, it might make sense to make a switch, at least for now.

Psych ,

Chrome ? Is that you ? Never thought my complete views on chrome would change in an instant .

douglasg14b ,
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world avatar

Imagine being to wishy washy that you can’t even read the article before doing a 180 on your principles.

Psych ,

I did read it and from what I can tell google isn’t bending over like mozzila . I didn’t sell my soul to Mozilla so I don’t have to find a way to justify their Evert shitty behavior like you . I liked them and supported them because they had a vision that aligned with mine and Chrome’s was shitty, but now that they have turned shitty I have no issue calling them out for it unlike fangirls like you .

WallEx ,

The thing is, you dont have to sell your soul to Mozilla, with Google on the other hand …

Psych ,

Well I don’t use any Google apps and don’t have a google account but credit where credit is due .

0Xero0 ,
@0Xero0@lemmy.world avatar

Dammit, Firefox! You was the chosen one! It was said that you would destroy the anti-privacy, not join them! You were to bring security to the internet, not leave it in neo-naZi’s propaganda.

FiniteBanjo ,

They were never really the chosen ones, just the most well known GECKO browser.

rottingleaf ,

It was clear what has happened since XULRunner and alternative Gecko browsers became unwanted.

Like now WebKit is sometimes the basis for alternative browsers for people who need something patient and usable. Or QtWebEngine, but that’s Chromium.

Before they did this, Gecko was the one to be picked the most for such usage.

299792458ms ,

That is really pathetic…

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines