Warframe is a good one. After 4000 hours I got burnt out of some of the things it does poorly and haven’t played in a year, but overall it’s fun with crazy new content on a regular basis for free.
Terraria has far more depth than I ever expected, and way more than that added since I last played. This game can sustain a player for ages.
I would say Satisfactory but I did actually get tired of it for a while. Itching to go back with the 1.0 release though. I love it but the two above have better longevity.
Dwarf Fortress and No Man’s Sky. I wanted to say Satisfactory instead, but felt it might be too close to Dwarf Fortress in nature and that would make it hard to want to play either game if I was burned out from one of them.
I came to say Dwarf Fortress. I could gush about it for a long time. It’s a very special game. This was the only game that came to mind for this question. Especially knowing that the brothers are only about half way done with all of the features they want to add to the game. And I’m not exaggerating here. They’re on version 50 and the consider version 100 to be feature complete.
Baldur’s Gate 3, and um… Warthunder. Maybe Elite Dangerous instead of Warthunder. But why can’t I play the $650 worth of other games that I bought and barely played?
Dead Cells and Beat Saber. I don’t know that I’ll ever tire of dead cells, and beat saber my husband and I love to play together, trading off after three songs like we used with DDR when we were kids
Both sides were in a big grump with the other, leading to angry blog posts, spurious DMCAs, crowdfunded legal defences, and eventual amicable settlement due to intervention by bees.
steam
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.