There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

startrek

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

superb , in Rant: Star Trek writers really need to be more careful about what living scientists they choose to reference.
@superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Which Star Trek mentioned Elon Musk

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@lemmy.world avatar

The same one which named a character Paul Stamets

OlinOfTheHillPeople , in Rant: Star Trek writers really need to be more careful about what living scientists they choose to reference.
Maven , in Rant: Star Trek writers really need to be more careful about what living scientists they choose to reference.

To be honest, I think the Elon reference worked because it was Lorca saying it. A terrible person idolizes a terrible person. Aged really well tbh

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@lemmy.world avatar

Tilly also mentions having attended Musk Junior High

Maven ,

That also could potentially be justified by the fact that the US still has places named after Confederate generals though it’s harder to lock down as any sort of positive thing.

CosmicCleric , in Rant: Star Trek writers really need to be more careful about what living scientists they choose to reference.
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Anyway, my opinion is firmly that if they’re going to make references, it needs to be about people who are already dead, whose negatives are known, and who can’t come back and fuck your reference up by becoming a horrible person as your life goes on.

Definitely. You save yourself a lot of trouble if you wait until they’re dead before you praise them, politics wise.

Because these living people keep revealing how Un-Star-Trek they are, imho.

Nothing breaks immersion more than something that is very un-Star Trek like being shown in Star Trek.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

teft , in Rant: Star Trek writers really need to be more careful about what living scientists they choose to reference.
@teft@lemmy.world avatar
RootBeerGuy ,
@RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de avatar
Dasus ,
@Dasus@lemmy.world avatar

You rang?

Eeyore_Syndrome ,
@Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works avatar

My brain auto corrected the “Fungi” straight to Ferengi.

Shyfer , in [Industry] Sony and Apollo send letter expressing interest in $26 billion Paramount buyout as company mulls Skydance bid

Oh cool. More movie company consolidation -_-… Great…

MelodiousFunk , in [Industry] Sony and Apollo send letter expressing interest in $26 billion Paramount buyout as company mulls Skydance bid

Til all are one -_-

RootBeerGuy , in "Whistlespeak" — Star Trek: Discovery Episode Discussion
@RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I still like the season, but some of the writing is just so weird.

Like having Tilly instead of Michael finish the race. I know its a throwback to when they practised running in the first season, but its a physical test and Michael is surely in better shape than Tilly. It would have been so easy to get around that by just making Michael drink the water because she can’t take it anymore.

And finally we see why the doc keeps talking about his abuela every second scene he is in this season. She is now a hologram. I am guessing this is setting something up, new tech that reads your mind and makes a convincing hologram of someone you know. Surely that won’t be abused.

FlyingSquid , in [Industry] Sony and Apollo send letter expressing interest in $26 billion Paramount buyout as company mulls Skydance bid
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

I’m thinking this is bad for Star Trek no matter what, because the first thing these entertainment companies do when they buy each other is cut budgets and cut projects.

negativenull OP ,
@negativenull@lemmy.world avatar

Agreed. There’s already too much consolidation in the TV/Movie content industry.

glimse ,

Wow how rude, that doesn’t sound like Sony at all! They’re a good company with a preference for quality media over profits…always!

Worf ,

I’d be really curious to see how Trek is seen in bigwig offices. Do they see potential worth investing in, or do they see it as a dead franchise?

FlyingSquid , in Jonathan Frakes on WGN News
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Science Fiction is not Frakes’ “genre”

Strange thing to claim. The vast majority of movies and TV he has directed has been sci-fi or fantasy.

HubertManne , in Jonathan Frakes on WGN News

man I have this on every day and this is the part I end up missing.

Buddahriffic , in [TNG] What did you think of the Dixon Hill stuff?

(Response is more about holodeck centric episodes in general).

I liked how Data would go all in on the roles he played. And Picard’s frustration at frequently getting called away from his fun time.

I didn’t like the Moriarty takes over the Enterprise ones, you’d figure they’d sandbox the holodeck environment and specifically set it up to prevent situations like that. Maybe even make them incapable of seeing through the 4th wall in fantasy/entertainment programs (though I can see the usefulness of being able to do that for engineering exploration and might have just talked myself into not hating that as much because I had forgotten about the practical uses of the holodeck).

I’ve also always found the focus on holodeck scenarios relevant to the 20th and 21st centuries culture made it harder to suspend disbelief. I don’t think our current entertainment is the peak that everyone would come back to all the time. Like you’d figure LaForge would have done the whole “help build and troubleshoot the first warp drive” on the holodeck before doing it for real in First Contact. Like I get why they focus on things we know rather than having to make up more lore, but they made up a lot of lore each time they visited a new planet.

JWBananas , in [TNG] What did you think of the Dixon Hill stuff?
@JWBananas@lemmy.world avatar

It was still infinitely better than Captain Proton

ArtieShaw ,

Well thanks for reminding me that Captain Proton existed. /s

I disliked all of the mid-century nostalgia episodes. Not that I dislike mid-century nostalgia, but I thought they were poorly done.

theYode , in [TNG] What did you think of the Dixon Hill stuff?
@theYode@lemmy.world avatar

I was fine with them. They weren’t my favorite episodes, but as @zero_spelled_with_an_ecks mentions, it offers a different facet of the character. The idea of the stern, “stuffy” Picard indulging in 1940s American noir roleplay is amusing to me. It’s one of those things that’d come up in one of those awful “two truths and a lie” icebreaker activities.

StillPaisleyCat , in [TNG] What did you think of the Dixon Hill stuff?
@StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website avatar

I never understood the love they got.

Just another example of indulging Patrick Stewart’s desire to play a character other than the one he was cast as.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines