There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Windows 3.1 saves the day during CrowdStrike outage — Southwest Airlines scrapes by with archaic OS

Windows 3.1, launched in 1992, is likely not getting any updates. So, when CrowdStrike pushed the faulty update to all its customers, Southwest wasn’t affected (because it didn’t receive an update to begin with).

Aside from Windows 3.1, Southwest also uses Windows 95 for its staff scheduling system.

One X user suggested that the company switch to Windows XP—it’s also no longer updated, and it can run Windows 3.1 applications via compatibility mode.

aeronmelon ,

That’s why Southwest is so cheap. They never sprang for the Win95 site license.

muntedcrocodile ,
@muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee avatar

Anyone using linux also wasnt effected.

Rai ,

I don’t get the downvotes other than we were affected fixing windows machines all day…

muntedcrocodile ,
@muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee avatar

I think its probably windows users who have heard us go on about linux and now would prefer to suffer the consequences than admit they where wrong.

Rai ,

I agree, and it’s still balderdash hahaha

rock_hand ,

Because it’s obvious to the community. It didn’t affect a Linux or windows patch in this instance. It doesn’t mean it couldn’t have.

I’m not some windows fanboy or whatever the term is these days. It just seems the op is pointing out the obvious.

wreckedcarzz ,
@wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world avatar

It’s a news article of a tweet that was originally a joke on a year-old article which says some were still on 3.1.

That’s harder extrapolation than my grade-school essay assignments.

BossDj ,

I couldn’t find any sources either. In 2022, they had issues that were attributed to aging technology and reluctance to go digital on their processes, but nothing to suggest Windows 3.1

The was a quote from a union rep that said their programs “looked like they were designed on Windows 95”.

CaptDust ,

deleted_by_author

    •
    BossDj ,

    Not my point at all

    Aatube OP ,

    The tweet is from the founder of Android Authority and APKMirror, so while it's indeed filmsy sourcing, the credibility hasn't completely vanished.

    MossyFeathers ,

    Once upon a time I couldn’t understand why companies and governments still used ancient computer systems running DOS, Win3.1, or 9x, or computers like C64s. “Upgrade! Your new systems will be far more powerful and efficient; and that means they’re better!” -teenage me at some point, probably.

    However, as I’ve gotten older I’ve realized that it’s because “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. While Southwest may spend more money than necessary on maintenance due to the ancient systems needing now-specialized skills, those systems are also time-proven to be as functional and dependable as they need them to be. Ironically, they might actually be more secure than most modern systems due to a combination of decades of specialized security/stability patches they’ve probably had and simple security-through-obsolescence.

    Edit: misremembered the phrase, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

    PriorityMotif ,
    @PriorityMotif@lemmy.world avatar

    It becomes an issue when hardware is involved. I’ve seen industrial machines with 386 based touchscreens. Things as simple as a PS2 keyboard start getting hard to find and downtime costs a lot.

    iAmTheTot ,

    While Southwest may spend more money than necessary on maintenance due to the ancient systems needing now-specialized skills, those systems are also time-proven to be as functional and dependable as they need them to be.

    So they spend more on maintenance, but the system is also dependable? That seems contradictory.

    MossyFeathers ,

    Not really. A machine that only breaks down every 10 years but is expensive to repair could be considered dependable and expensive to maintain. Similarly, a machine that has expensive parts which rarely fail within their expected lifespan could be considered dependable and expensive to maintain.

    Edit: you’re also ignoring the cost of finding and hiring people who know how to maintain the systems. The systems themselves could be dependable, but the skills required to maintain them are expensive.

    XiozTzu ,

    Now that this is known the hackers will come.

    gazby ,

    They’re infamous for it, and it’s bitten them in the ass before.

    forbes.com/…/can-southwest-airlines-fix-its-syste…

    TheDemonBuer ,
    @TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world avatar

    Auto mechanics were also not affected, since they’ve been using the same computers since the Carter administration.

    pastermil ,

    Gotta rock that cold war era rig.

    Gingernate ,

    Haha that’s not true. My computer was down, I am a diesel tech

    PriorityMotif ,
    @PriorityMotif@lemmy.world avatar

    I figured CDK was still down

    themeatbridge ,

    The Amish also were not affected.

    aeronmelon ,

    Amish, to the computerized world: “Think you’re really righteous? Think you’re pure of heart? Well, I know I’m a million times as humble as thou art!”

    Tolookah ,

    This explains some things

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •