There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

m13 ,

People should keep submitting fake reports, and make them somewhat plausible. Just so they don’t get instantly discarded and can actually tie up more resources by actually getting investigated.

xantoxis ,

But like, how would they even investigate them? That’s the part I don’t understand. Whoever was peeing in there, they’re gone by the time the cops show up. It doesn’t take that long to pee.

androogee ,

Republicans show up and taste the toilet seat. They claim they can tell the difference.

CosmicTurtle0 ,

I love/hate how I can’t tell anymore if comments like this is sarcasm or real.

Censored ,

It’s real. They can taste the difference.

ReveredOxygen ,
@ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works avatar

For starters, showing up and finding out that the alleged suspect doesn’t exist

explodicle ,

It’s probably for coworkers, regular customers… people who keep going to the same restroom.

Grandwolf319 ,

Camera footage?

crab ,

Can we submit on a website? I can submit a million per day

Skydancer ,

Here you go, but it appears to be down at the moment.

Nikki ,
@Nikki@lemmy.world avatar

good

Aurenkin ,

This is something an LLM is actually very useful for. It can make it sound both legitimate, be verbose and generate many submissions with little human effort.

brbposting ,

The employment of a large language model, such as the one utilized in this scenario, can prove to be remarkably advantageous. It possesses the remarkable capacity to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that convey an aura of authenticity, while adhering to the principle of verbosity. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial quantity of content with a minimal investment of human resources and effort.

Engaging the services of an advanced language model represents a highly valuable asset in this particular context. Such models exhibit the remarkable ability to reformulate the given input in a manner that not only maintains an air of legitimacy but also embraces the principle of verbosity. This capability enables the effortless generation of numerous unique submissions, thereby optimizing the utilization of human resources.

The utilization of a large-scale language model in this scenario can be deemed a highly effective and efficient approach. These sophisticated systems possess the remarkable aptitude to transform the provided text into multiple submissions that uphold a sense of legitimacy and authenticity, while simultaneously adhering to the principles of verbose and detailed expression. This approach allows for the generation of a substantial volume of content with a minimal investment of human effort and involvement.

Aurenkin ,

Thank you for the support, fellow human.

brbposting ,

<reciprocal affirmation>

mPony ,

you sneaky pete :)

afraid_of_zombies ,

This one is an evil genius

brbposting ,

LLMs are useless! Why is Apple integrating ChatGPT?!

“Why do you hate trans people?”

Viking_Hippie ,

“But do you condemn Hamas?”

Diplomjodler3 ,

There’s a transgender Hamas activist in my bathroom!

Viking_Hippie ,

Lucky!

Corkyskog ,

Now I just have this image of someone taking a dump in an Applebee’s restroom and the stall next to them just starts shouting “Free Palestine” out of nowhere.

Viking_Hippie ,

It’s the only way real ones shit at Applebee’s.

danc4498 ,

Worth noting, Russia agrees very much and is flooding social media in a very similar way. The LLM makes it more effective now than in 2016

Beaver ,
@Beaver@lemmy.ca avatar

Music to my ear and I wonder how much it costed them to comb through all of that.

BlameThePeacock ,

Fun fact, costed is a word but has a slightly different meaning than the way you have used it.

Costed means to get the details on the cost of something complex. Like “I costed the three projects and the last one is cheapest”

You tried to use it as the past tense of cost, but the past tense of cost is also just cost.

TheBigBrother ,

I love free English classes…

hoshikarakitaridia ,
@hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world avatar

Free education? Hell yeah brother!

SpermHowitzer ,

Learning is great, especially when it costed nothing!

Sabata11792 ,

I like OPs version better and chose to evolve the language that way.

addie ,
@addie@feddit.uk avatar

Yeah; as a native and fairly well-educated speaker, I’m fucked if I can form the past participles of some of our verbs

If I swim across a river, is it now the swimmed river? Swum river? Swam river?

If I sneak into a room, have I sneaked? Snuck? Both sound wrong.

Didn’t find anything ambiguous about ‘costed’, it works for me.

mPony ,

so if I understand correctly, the past participle of drag is… cabaret?

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

Snuck

palordrolap ,

Would some variant of "snauk(t)" or "snaught" work for you? Your brain might be expecting ablaut in the style of "teach" / "taught" or "catch" / "caught" rather than that of "sing" / "sung".

How do you feel about "(p)reached"? "Snaked"?

A fun fact about "caught" is that it's a relative neologism. It uh, caught on after people decided they didn't like "catched" for whatever reason. (I guess it has something to do with tangibility / concreteness. Most other -atch words are used for objects.)

Censored ,

If you swim across a river, it is now a river you’ve swum. If you sneak into a room, you have snuck in.

Those are correct but they look and sound wrong.

RogueBanana ,

I prefer cost, not sure why but it just feels more natural and easier for me to say. But I am not a native speaker if it means anything.

Hugh_Jeggs ,

If only a very small handful of people make the same mistake, it doesn’t evolve the language, it’s just a mistake, plain and simple.

I know you’re just trying to make yourself feel a wee bit morally superior by saying that, but it’s the complete opposite of how language evolution works

Sabata11792 ,

It’s not a mistake if I can understand the message.

Hugh_Jeggs ,

It’s still a mistake, no matter whether yo cn undrstnd th sntnce

Default_Defect ,
@Default_Defect@midwest.social avatar

People have varying degrees of ability to understand outside of what they know, what is “good enough” for you might be incomprehensible to someone else.

escalate8315 ,

Fun fact, ‘cost’ is a regular verb in Canadian English. Infering from the lemmy.ca instance, the comment op might be a Canadian, which means the usage of ‘costed’ is correct.

Source: grammarist.com/usage/costed/

BlameThePeacock ,

I am Canadian, and I was taught Cost as past tense in school and university. I’ve never seen it written Costed for past tense in any government publication either.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •