Dayum, 9 years ago i started with mint and distro hopped a bit then daily drived arch for many years, and now I’m back to lmde6, so you ain’t gotta call me out like that
Pacstall is AUR for Ubuntu (so UUR?) based distributions. It is certainly less complete than AUR, but still it might be useful depending on your needs.
I’d rather trust an Ubuntu community repo than the snap store. At least, for pacstall, the community is able to review the package.
Since the snap store is the default store on Ubuntu , there is more chance that he will be targeted by malicious software than a community repo than has to be manually installed.
I stay away from AUR because it is completely unsandboxed and unmonitored.
To be fair, I don’t believe flathub is constantly monitored, but at least it is (somewhat) sandboxed, if I set everything up in flatseal.
I have recently replaced my final .tar.gz app (git-credential-manager) with the builtin github extension of codium, and removed my final two ostree overlay with flatpak sdk extensions.
I mean, there are two options: You either don’t have the technical knowledge or time to install it yourself and thus you’d are fucked, or you don’t have the technical knowledge to read through the AUR and make sure it is safe and you could be fucked.
Or, a third option for the gurus: You build it yourself, but then you might aswell read through AUR and save yourself time.
Ideally you would install app directly from the app developer, who you are trusting by using their app; or your distros maintainer, who you are trusting by using their OS.
The use of AUR and/or unverified flathub app adds an additional person to trust, that is the person packaging these apps. flathub is slightly better as the app is sandboxed, so the damage they can cause is confined.
Unfortunately, AFAIK, there is no store for sandboxed command line apps, this is one of the reason I like to minimize my command line usage. So that I don’t need app that isn’t packaged by my distro maintainer (like oh-my-zsh) to improve my cli experience.
I’ve used Mint and, honestly, I don’t like it. The default applications are kind of annoying to deal with, I find KDE and GNOME far superior. Themes are very limited. I just don’t see why you’d want to use Cinnamon.
Right out of the box it functions enough like Windows that even my wife swapped with barely a hiccup
Yes, other distros can be great and all that jazz, but Mint makes a strong first toe dip for those who are less confident in tech
Shit, I’m confident and I actually preferred my mint install over the other couple of distros I tried partly because it came mostly pre done and only my server gets my IT time these days
Tried out fedora and it was really good, but mint just felt a little bit more right to me
Which sucks cuz I fuckin own a fedora like a massive nerd and wanted to make that joke as often as possible. I mean I grow mint too but big fucking whoop it’s a dollar to get a plant and near impossible to kill
Tried out fedora and it was really good, but mint just felt a little bit more right to me
Oh I definitely like the idea of Mint, but for gaming I need a distro that keeps itself up to date more often, especially when it comes to graphics drivers and Proton, etc.
Which sucks cuz I fuckin own a fedora like a massive nerd and wanted to make that joke as often as possible. I mean I grow mint too but big fucking whoop it’s a dollar to get a plant and nest impossible to kill
Could you explain the highlighted bolted part for me? Is that a typo, or some kind of gardening term?
No I get they are being tongue and cheek, I just don’t literally understand the meaning of using the word ‘nest’ and ‘impossible to kill’ together in a sentence.
idk man, i just like me a good non derivative distro. Debian, arch, nix, gentoo, whatever as long as it has less hands it’s being passed through im happy.
for me that’s just a script that auto installs the software i need at minimum to be productive. Gimme an X server, i3wm, and some applications to compliment it and i’ll be one very happy user.
Arch is great if you want to customize your system, but I wouldn't say it really needs "maintaining" beyond just updating more frequently. (which you don't even really need to do very often, you just have the option to get newer versions of software.)
I don’t even update my Arch setup that often. Most of my stuff lives in flatpaks. I just want updated software and rolling release, which Arch is the best for that.
Yeah I agree with the sentiment, use whatever is good for you, but I feel like most advanced linux users are not using Mint. They typically come to the realization that everything is either Debian, Arch, or build it yourself so they use one of those.
I’m running Debian 12 for while now and it works great. Gossip says you need to get everything from flatpak because the packages are so outdated, but that’s bullshit.
Definition of standing on the shoulders of giants. Even from the start when it offered the codecs Ubuntu didn’t mint has been there. Same for arch want something specified but don’t want to start at a lfs or Gentoo it has your back all you have to do is read up on the bits you want. I think it’s amazing that for me the best distros are still community ones.