This is the one that gets me. If I’m doom scrolling a community and accidentally comment on a 3yr old post, it shouldn’t get catapulted into hot. Hot should be filtering out anything older than 2 days
Ah, the YouTube experience. Jeez, you guys are still talking about this? Wait, no, no you’re not.
Reddit was getting pretty bad about surfacing ancient threads there, for a while. I thought they were back on their bullshit about Gamestop but no, three year old thread.
Considering I’ve enjoyed some of the “old” videos the algorithm sometimes sends my way, I’m not always disappointed when I find one I hadn’t seen before.
A lot of people seem to just be reacting to this without reading and understand. Granted, Forbs does not go sufficiently in depth to the findings to make this easy.
From what I’ve read on this, the underlying study here has valuable information that we can all use, understand, and digest.
Does your role require a lot of colaberation? You may need to ensure you have something better than email and phones to replace your ability to talk to someone who would have otherwise sat next to you.
Do you have a lot of junior employees? You will likely need to spend more effort on ensuring they get the quality training they need.
Like… Sure. A CEO could easily read the title of this article and decide to just bring everyone back to the office without thinking critically. But that doesn’t mean we should do the opposite we should be arming ourselves with this information so we can know how to counter our boss’s arguments to ensure we can get what we want.
Experiencing the other side of this having just built a new instance. As the communities get closer to 50 subscribers, all I can think is “post, post, post”
lemmyshitpost
Newest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.