There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

timesofisrael.com

ShroOmeric , to world in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

That’s what Nazis would say.

bamboo , to worldnews in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

Wasn’t the ruling more or less “try to kill fewer people”? I guess it’s antisemitic to not let Israel kill as many people as they want to for any reason.

PowerCrazy , to worldnews in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

Accuse your enemies of that which you are guilty, it’s not just Nazi Propaganda, it’s Israel’s M.O.

lntl , to nottheonion in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

Slammed!

2xsaiko , to worldnews in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures
@2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

They were silent during the Holocaust and today they continue the hypocrisy and take it another step further,” he says.

The ICJ in its current iteration was founded in 1945.

They really just say anything to try to disparage anyone who calls them out, huh

yetAnotherUser ,

He’s not wrong though.

But wait… wasn’t he silent during the Holocaust as well? Oh no… Ben Gvir is antisemitic :(

roastedDeflator , to world in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

Not the Onion material

dlatch , to world in Ben Gvir slams ICJ as antisemitic, says Israel should ignore ruling on provisional measures

Israelis doing whatever they can to make the word “antisemitic” lose all of its value.

agitatedpotato ,

At this point I can’t take it at face value unless I know who’s saying it. At least in this case I know it’s coming from a genocidal waste of human life.

Brokkr ,

It already has lost its meaning. Semites are anyone who speak or spoke a semetic language. Arabic and Hebrew are both semetic languages. Palestinians and Israelis are both semites.

yetAnotherUser ,

Yes, but the term antisemetic was coined by - well - antisemetic Germans who wanted a more scientifc term for “Jew hate” explicitly.

It doesn’t matter that Arabs are semetic, the history of the term solely refers to hating Jews.

ShroOmeric ,

Well sorry for you, the rest of the world DOES care about the meaning of words.

yetAnotherUser ,

???

You know, you’re right. It doesn’t matter how words are used, only the etymology matters.

That’s why it’s ok to refer to black people as negros. After all, “negro” is the Spanish word for “black”, so “negros” just means “blacks”. And the n-word is just an English version of negro after all.

ShroOmeric ,

That was exceptionally dumb.

yetAnotherUser ,

What I am saying is:

The meaning of words is defined by how they’re used. Antisemitic has never been used to refer to anything but hating Jews akin to how the n-word has been used as an insult instead of a neutral descriptor.

You cannot use the n-word as a neutral descriptor, nor can you use the term antisemitism to describe hatred of non-Jewish ethnicities.

ShroOmeric ,

You just said that words are described by how people use them.

So I’ll use that word like any other the way I prefer, and by doing that I’ll shape its meaning.

See why it sounded dumb now?

DmMacniel , to worldnews in Israel says WHO ‘colluding’ with Hamas by ignoring ‘terrorist use’ of Gaza hospitals

When you’re against them, then you are Hamas!

givesomefucks ,

Nah, they crossed that line decades ago…

Now if you don’t offer them unconditional support, you’re Hamas.

And even if you do but you get killed anyways, believe it or not, still Hamas.

Moxible ,

You say that sarcastically, but former president George W. Bush stated it clearly “either you’re with the US, or you’re with the terrorists”

queermunist , to worldnews in Israel says WHO ‘colluding’ with Hamas by ignoring ‘terrorist use’ of Gaza hospitals
@queermunist@lemmy.ml avatar

WHO? Hamas. Doctors Without Boarders? Hamas. The UN Human Rights Council? Hamas. The Hague? Hamas.

Unhinged cringe country. The fact that their population actually believes this shit is astonishing.

SkyNTP ,

Propaganda and cultural isolationism is a hell of a drug. I blame their leaders, and victimhood dialed all the way up. Everyday Israelis are victims themselves of manipulation.

snek ,
@snek@lemmy.world avatar
Tremble , to worldnews in Hamas bigwig rejects 2-state solution, says Oct. 7 ‘revived dream to free Palestine’

Headline is way off. I assume this is propaganda

SloppyPuppy OP , to worldnews in Hamas bigwig rejects 2-state solution, says Oct. 7 ‘revived dream to free Palestine’

“He further claimed that while Hamas has agreed to a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders in a bid to “establish common ground” [ … ] it will not relinquish its ambition to liberate the entirety of historic “Palestine,” including the territory of the State of Israel.”

Yeah this is how they are going to finally get a state for Palestinians….

MarcoPOLO ,

I mean I too would not be happy about a two-state solution with a “state” that’s releasing snuff films of my people.

white_shotgun Bot , to world in Hamas rejects Israel’s offer of two-month pause in Gaza fighting — Egyptian official

Netanyahoo is a deadset fucken yahoo like if you have yahoo in your name well that just about says it all

Eldritch ,

I dunno. I quite like Yahoo Serious. I still watch Young Einstein now and again. Where else are you going to watch someone defuse an atomic beer keg with a steam punk electric guitar.

Doorbook , to world in Hamas rejects Israel’s offer of two-month pause in Gaza fighting — Egyptian official

So Israel gave these stupid terms that anyone with a brain cell would refuse, and the 4 Zainoist here will claim “Hamas doesn’t care about Palestinians life, look they refused a peace deal”

Son_of_dad ,

When did Hamas suddenly become the good guys anyways? Both leaderships need to go, but acting like Hamas aren’t a bunch of self interested fucks is just silly

Doorbook ,

Putting 2 million people in impossible living conditions with restricted water electricity in gaza while continuing to build settlement and giving any jew and Israeli passport to live there while building multiple checkpoint to make it impossible for people in west bank to have freedom of movement and expect no resistance movement to come out is just a stupid statement coming from freedom loving people. While they may not be the best, thinking a peaceful resistance would work ( west bank) is stupid at best.

kaffiene ,

Nobody thinks they’re the good guys. I think most people think Hamas are an understandable and inevitable consequence of an ntolerable situation

roastedDeflator , to world in Hamas rejects Israel’s offer of two-month pause in Gaza fighting — Egyptian official

Some context that would not be included in times of israel would be the following:

Israel rejects Hamas hostage release deal, lays out own Gaza truce terms

The proposal comes following Netanyahu's rejection of a Hamas offer that sought an end to the war in return for the release of the remaining hostages.

The Israeli government has offered a new proposal to Hamas that would see a two-month ceasefire in return for the release of Israeli hostages, after rebuffing a Hamas offer.

It is also unknown if any of the over 6,000 Palestinians that have been detained by the Israeli military since 7 October from the occupied West Bank will be included in the deal.

Some 250 hostages were taken during Hamas' attack on Israel on 7 October, with 130 being released during a one-week ceasefire in November.

Families of the Israeli hostages have ramped up calls for their release, with protests occurring outside Netanyahu's house and inside the Israeli Knesset on Sunday.

UN agencies have repeatedly called for a ceasefire for an increase in humanitarian aid into Gaza, as UNRWA reports that 570,000 people face catastrophic hunger in the enclave.

DeadHorseX OP ,
@DeadHorseX@lemmy.world avatar

I’m not really sure what that adds.

When you declare war, as Hamas did on October 7th, you don’t get to set the terms of your own surrender.

roastedDeflator ,

I’m not really sure what that adds.

As mentioned above it adds context. Context to the claims of the main Israeli news outlet.

And please, do not talk as if this started last October, cause it's definitely not the case.

Madison420 ,

Way to ignore history, short sighted interpretation is what got us here and I’m fact keeps us here.

Maggoty ,

When you declare war as Israel did in 2006, you don’t get to set the terms of your own surrender.

kaffiene ,

Because the events of the world since '48 didn’t occur. Nice to know that history started a handful of weeks ago

photonic_sorcerer , to world in Hamas rejects Israel’s offer of two-month pause in Gaza fighting — Egyptian official
@photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Whatever happened to “completely destroying Hamas”? Now they’re offering them to leave?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines